|
User talk:Seicer/Archive 14
Happy New Year!
Hi Seicer, sorry to bother you with this again, but will you look at this if you get a chance. He's back again, and edit warring to implement the same material as usual. Landon1980 (talk) 01:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
The Used PageHi, you seem to have helped me since I joined here. There is a user 'Landon1980' that keeps removing information from the used page. If I revert it, they change it back. All this information is properly sourced and accurate and I try telling them that but they do not listen. What could we do about this because I think that they are vandalizing the page by not allowing updated information on it. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Remote peace (talk • contribs) 06:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC) What would Wikipedians be if not pedantic?In reading your proposed principle, I can't tell whether you really mean deprecated (deplore) where you have used depreciated (belittle, devalue)[1]. This changes the meaning to the proposal somewhat so I wanted to ask. A thousand apologies for the OTT pedantry. Ronnotel (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Deletion review for Threshold (online game)An editor has asked for a deletion review of Threshold (online game). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Theblog (talk) 03:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC) fsCan you please explain how my actions are forum shopping as you claim on my talk page. I do not understand why asking two editors a question on their talk pages fits the bill. Thank you. --Theblog (talk) 05:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC) RequestHello Seicer - I am writing to ask if the Karan Johar article can be reduced to semi-protection as there are some typos which need to be corrected. Also, it seems like bad form for the page to be locked for three months when there is a clean up tag on one of the sections. If this is the area under contention, perhaps you could move it to the talk page to sort out? If you can't undo the lock, could I ask you to clean up the page a little bit? Thanks -Classicfilms (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Please replace the article "Ira W. JayneThe deletion reason was stated "No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion" Did you read it? This man pioneered the Friend of the Court, developed the boarding home plan replacing orphanages, organized the Children Aid Society. Additionally his involvement as national Vice President of the NAACP and the American Bar Association Chairman and vice President of the National Lawyers Guild. Seems all of this makes him worthy! Plus the page has been there for over a year! Please replace the article "Ira W. Jayne - I have spent hours researching this information! Thank you, Tony Slosar (toneron2) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toneron2 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
ThresholdACME drama rating I'm starting to get a bit of a concern that the Threshold thing is gonna be a new ED (i.e. constantly arriving at DRV every other month with the same arguments over and over again). As much as I'd hate to say this, I think that a can of worms has just opened. -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 23:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm very troubled by one aspect of your close on this, actually - you seemed to dismiss the presence of the CGM reference as unverified. I am troubled by the suggestion that print references have a higher bar to clear - it seems to worsen the problem we have of excessive reliance on online sources. Phil Sandifer (talk) 17:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
SarplaninacHello Seicer, this is IllyrianDescendant. I wanted to talk to you about the Sarplaninac article, there some edits I would like to do in that article, for example the place of origin its not Yugoslavia, we both know that Yugoslavia doesn't exist.So please if you could help me with this please again... Sincerely Yours User:Illyriandescendant 6:55 PM, 09 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Seicer, I really hate to bother you with this again and I know you have to be getting tired of dealing with this. However, he is already back again, and is pretty much making the exact same edits in the exact same section with the exact same horrible grammar. Do I need to request a checkuser or is this something you can act on? Cheers, Landon1980 (talk) 04:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Anon "evading" blockAn anon appears to be User:Sven70, whom you blocked. The personal system of orthography matches, the location of the IP matches Sven70's claimed location, and so forth. He's decided that appealing the block is demeaning, so he's just going to edit anonymously. I don't honestly know whether we should care one way or the other, but I thought I'd let you know that he's back. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC) FT2 discussionACME drama rating In the process of subpaging, I think a comment of yours was lost. Majorly talk 22:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi I notice you marked the titled AfD as "delete" and closed it, however you only deleted the List of nominees for the Academy Award for Best Actress (by film title) page, with no action being taken on the other 4 list also pages. I don't have that much experience at AfD, but was just wondering if some action should have also been made towards them, as currently they have deletion listings on their pages which link to the now closed AfD. Regards, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
The sorted lists are now at: List_of_nominees_for_the_Academy_Award_for_Best_Actress_(by_actress) These would need to have the (by actor) etc removed from the title as per the AfD. I'll see if I can move these into the main articles, but I'll ask on the talk pages first and go through AfD again. By my reckoning (with the one deleted already), that only leaves the following for deletion: BTW I've seen you around cleaning stuff and you really do a great job as admin, I figure you hear that a lot but another one doesn't hurt. :) Phil153 (talk) 14:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
disruptivenessUm... Seicer, I don't find myself disruptive, just unexperienced and I would really appreciate you drop it to just let me carry on a normal (Wiki)life. Thanks. Kalajan€₣ 21:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the deletes on the two lists for FraternitiesThank you for the deletes, I was attempting to split a category into three other categories and for two of the three, when I copied from my notepad to create the articles, I forgot to put Category: in front.Naraht (talk) 15:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC) I'll try to dig one upThe problem with web only sources is of course you need something to be posted to the web before you can source it. But yes, I'm sure ;).--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 20:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Also, Calling someone names (Arrogant) is a quick way to lose your Admin status.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 20:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
My Life Would Suck Without YouIts true, without you my life would suck! Anyway to the topic in hand. While I disagree with the deletion in general of this article, I know your protection is necessary to enforce the procedures in place. However, once this single charts, it will become notable, as per <insert various places previously quoted here>, I would hope you would remove protection on that day, to allow people that have been working on the article to finally add the information they have (currently on somebody's user page). I'm not one of those editors, I have no interest in the article to be honest, I'm just an outsider looking in! jenuk1985 (talk) 00:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Mediation RequestHello, On behalf of the concerned parties in the mediation case of The Man Who Would Be Queen. I know that none of you have to accept our case. I felt that asking all of you would be the best first approach. If you have any interest in mediating for us, or not, please indicate this on the talk page of the mediation case. If you are outright interested, want to mediate this case, and need no other convincing then please indicate that as well and we can get the ball rolling. If not we will not bother you anymore. Thankyou. --Hfarmer (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Since you commented earlier, could you give some feedback on the current discussion about a topic ban of User:Levine2112? Tim Vickers (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC) ThanksI was childish. You gave me a very good opportunity to look back on myself. I made up my mind to have a conversation with Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs). I don't spare my efforts to realize mutual understanding with Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs).--Bukubku (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Blah?Blah?. This needs to be addressed, there's nothing "blah" about it. Dreadstar † 01:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
RE: epic lulzSo, Dreadstar deleted the sockpuppet investigation that he tried to bully me into filing. It was later restored by another admin. Should I be concerned about this? Cheers, Skinwalker (talk) 11:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Given you contributed alot early on to ghost, you may have an opirion on some proposed merges etc. Scroll down from Talk:Ghost#Merger_proposal. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC) ArbCom on date linksI saw that you'd issued an indef block to User:Date delinker. I just wondered whether the block should be logged at the case page, as another admin appears to have done for that user's primary account? Mlaffs (talk) 03:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC) TaggingOn User:Ringkjøbing, the account is not blocked, so I think a variable needs to be altered in the tag to make it reflect the block log status. MBisanz talk 18:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
User:Reqluce block / talk page editing lockI know he's been fairly offensive on and off, but I don't see that the degree of stuff he's done requires a talk page lock. Yes, he could leave some more edits which are offensive there, or more offensive edit summaries, but it's also the only convenient venue to try to talk him into being more civil in the future. Would you object to undoing the talk page edit portion of the block? Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Disruption at GaGaACME drama rating As the person given the waring, you have no power, I will give you a warning, I have always given good faith, when someele for example YOU, bad faith is given. You have no right nor the power to give a warning, If you want to block me, then block me. But you dont have any evidence, so I wont. I hope you understand. kind regards. Assume good faith and give good faith you will get it in return.
What goes around, comes around. Dance-pop (talk) 01:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC) This is some of the worst adims I ever delt with. You say that I stared blind reverts, I give a edit summary, that justified it. I have contacted two abbrituors to sort this mess out. Seicer you are one of the worst adims, you take things out of context and do not look at both sides of the story. I hope that other third party adims see this, because I am concerend about the safety of other adims. I will be watching carefully, to see if you contiue with your eratic behavior. I hope you learn from this, I am dissapointed at you for your poor work as an adim. You wrongfully blocked me edit wrrings is to be repoted at 3RR violations and vandilism at ongoing vandlism( by the way I did nothing wrong). You ethic and morals on wikipedia should be questioned. I am digusted at you as a follow admin and your ignorance and arrogance. From the person you blocked wrongfully. Dance-pop (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Would you please reply, to your message. I guess you wouldnt sine your a "bad" admin. I am still keeping an eye on you.Dance-pop (talk) 04:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC) A certain IPSince your in on this whole Lady GaGa mess, you might want to keep an eye on this IP. I'll give you 3 guesses as to whom it belongs to. — R2 13:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the unblockThanks for the unblock.From the history I have gathered, YellowMonkey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) seems to be block happy(trigger happy type) and blocks user on minor issue as was the case with this usuer (talk) and other.Should I refer him ?User:Yousaf465 This user is requesting an unblock. Seems legit. Figured I'd just shoot it your way. I'm going to bed, so if you want to unblock her go ahead, I'll be offline. Protonk (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC) User: dance-popOk. I try to talk to people on their talk page for help. Thay ALL have ignored it. Therefore how can I, I must mass revert. I have other users to stop before it turns it an edit war but repectively ignore. How can I do anything when I am being ignored EVERY TIME. I am frustrted at users who do not look at both sides of the story. Im sorry if you feel my edit sums. are threatning, but its your opinion and I only do it because users dont listen eg-charmed. Dont bring up the past, my recent deits on your page has being ignored, and the only reason for that is because you know I have being wrongly blocked. I have tryed to dispute content but again I am ignored. Do you see were i am going...please do not ignore this edit. Dance-pop (talk) 04:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC) Two ipsSame user is using two Ip and again and again reverting edits 24.28.83.178 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 70.112.77.127 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) User:Yousaf465
Dance-popHi seicer. I think you are the one who installed a block against User-Dance-pop. I think nothing has changed by the block, still the abuse and the threats continue along with the edit war. Just now i pinged him giving reasons for why some info can't be in a particular article, but alas, again started the threats. Could you please take a look in this again? "Legolas" (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm trolled :(Take a look at this. What to do when you are trolled? :-( "Legolas" (talk) 06:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Thanks for semiprotectionThanks for protecting the sst article.User:Yousaf465 You are on WP:ANIHello, Seicer. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Yousaf465 on an Anti-India Propoganda. Thank you. -- Tinu Cherian - 05:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Sorry for any inconvenience causedI'm regretful for any inconvenience caused due to my actions.Sorry for that.User:Yousaf465 Smile! A NobodyMy talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing! The above-linked Arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published. ScienceApologist is banned from editing any article relating to fringe science topics, broadly construed, for a period of six months. ScienceApologist is free to edit the talk pages of such articles. Pcarbonn is admonished for needlessly stoking the fires of disputes in the area of fringe science, and is encouraged to direct his efforts elsewhere. All editors in the disputed area are warned that further disruptive editing in the disputed area will be viewed dimly by the Committee, and may lead to further sanctions being imposed. Editors in the disputed area are encouraged to seek to engage in formal mediation to help establish consensus when coverage of fringe science in an article or group of articles is under dispute. While mediation is not binding, editors are further encouraged to abide by the results of mediation (and other dispute resolution). For the Arbitration Committee, Gazimoff 00:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC) Hey, I restored this. I don't see how it's reasonably speedyable as nonsense. Friday (talk) 15:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC) QuestionJust wondering - was that ANI comment directed at me? I started to respond to it, but then I wasn't sure... Tan | 39 17:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
User:Ukufwakfgr blockArgh. I edited at almost the same time you did, offering to give User:Ukufwakfgr one more chance to become a valued contributor. Now I'm not sure if I should unblock because I offered to, or decline because of your review.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/MZMcBride/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/MZMcBride/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tiptoety talk 02:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC) I appreciate the thought, but I prefer that my user and talk pages remain unprotected. It won't help much in this specific case anyway, since this guy's socks were mostly created in 2007 from what I've seen. --Onorem♠Dil 12:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC) Mediation committee question that needs to be addressedYour input regarding a question for the mediation committee is requested. Please see Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation#Would_this_case_be_accepted.3F. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC) Hmm...Ukufwakfgr was unblocked based on a willingness for him to edit in good faith on other articles besides the ones on which he was being contentious. I'd note that he has gone 10 days without any contribs whatsoever on any articles, and I wonder if his plan is to wait out a few months and then come back ot the aforementioned contentious articles. MSJapan (talk) 21:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC) If you're in the mood for more abuse...Seems in the 3RR range, and is now he's citing some blog to prove the Obama's birth certificate was a forgery. Guettarda (talk) 05:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC) I don't support the inclusion of inaccuracies or demogoguery, but this article on Drudge is not the kind of publicity that is good for Wikipedia. Public opinion should not be that biographical articles are treated differently for different people, but the same for all. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 12:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Take carePlease don't use Science Apologist's talk page to have long and involved discussions with users that are not SA. This has caused problems in the past. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
KlienWell done. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Borderline is even a stretch. Calling the guy an idiot in passing...don't we have more egregious attacks and BLP issues to worry about? Grsz11 18:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
|
