User talk:Seb az86556/archive29

Navajo Nation

Navajo population information was submitted to the B.I.A.. This data was submitted on January 18th 2010, by: Navajo Nation Community Development & Navajo Nation (CHID)[phone] or [phone] & Navajo Nation Transportation Department. [phone], You may also contact Denise Copeland "Principal Archaeologist" - Navajo Nation - Shiprock Agency [phone] or Richard Begay, Jr. "Community Service Coordinator" - Navajo Nation - Indian Wells Chapter [phone]

Current on Landbase: 168,996 Tribe Wide: 270,000+ Thank you, Razster (talk · contribs) 03:36, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; however, the article is about the Navajo Nation, not the Navajo people. So the number would have to be the number of people living on the territory, regardless of ethnicity — do these updated figures exist somewhere? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 01:02, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ajanta Caves

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Saw your major cleanup on this article. Loved it! Good luck for rewriting it so as to avoid those copy-paste tags. Waiting to read the new version. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 21:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hah. I'm afraid that wasn't my point. I just found the page in that category and gave it a go. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 21:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then why not do it? Once deleted no one will edit it. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

copyright-violations must be removed; it's difficult enough to find them, by the way. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 22:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

& they can be removed by editing the articles too. & that should be the 1st & best option as it retains the information that way. What say? Wanna work on it? Instead of just being an inspector around why not ACTUALLY work? Be the change you wish to see in the world. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 06:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your tone just killed this conversation. Bye. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 10:46, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

File:1 eurocent mt.gif

Hi Seb. You can go ahead and have File:1 eurocent mt.gif deleted. I uploaded it a while ago before I really understood the guidelines. Thanks for notifying me. --Brandon5485 02:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

How did I abuse warning or blocking templates? BrandonTR (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You know. Or how many warnings did you leave on the page indicated? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 14:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign character warning boxes

Hello - I just wanted to let you know that your top icon idea seems to be efficient and maybe it is time to get consensus for its adoption. I've seen an upsurge in the addition of those warning boxes recently and thought about adding your idea to discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) but I felt you should do it, since you are the original submitter. Regards Tachfin (talk) 14:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, go for it, good idea. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 14:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC) Actually, I did. thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 15:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicosia

Hi. I'm trying to make sense of what has been going on today at Nicosia.

What, specifically, do you see as the problem with this change by MariaPetridou (talk · contribs)? I tried comparing the two versions of the page, and although I do see differences in imagery, it's not clear to me why one version would be preferred over the other. Is there a Greek/Turkish POV issue here that I'm missing? Sorry if I'm being dense here.

Also, are you saying that MariaPetridou appears to be a sock of Giorgoos (talk · contribs)? Richwales (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

a) there has been a discussion on the talkpage regarding the infobox-picture, and this is the current consensus-version (a collage that was specifically made for this article) b) Giorgoos and his socks have been replacing said collage with a different pictures (in most cases some skyline) over the past months without ever commenting @ talk or elsewhere. All this has me guess it could be Giorgoos, but I'm not sure. In any event, there's a talkpage, an Maria can use it. Cheers. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 00:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Richwales (talk) 00:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colld you reveret instead?

Doing the revert is quite boring task. Can you please keep doing this instead ? 99.90.197.87 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:04, 10 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Insanity. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 04:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Someone just said to me "you know, I really like that we're involved in an organization where Seb feels free to say that a block by an Arb is wrong." I think he's quite right. Even though I don't agree with your opinion, I respect it, and I think you've put forward some good points. Thanks for keeping me honest. Risker (talk) 07:13, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome... and I go by "Seb". Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 07:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments to other editors

Hi Seb. Just dropping you a note to ask you to keep your comments to other editors civil.[1] We are all colleagues here, so we should treat each other with the same respect that we would use with our colleagues in real life. Thanks. Kaldari (talk) 21:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the lecture. since you missed the context, it's completely misguided. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 22:38, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read the entire discussion. Just because the context is a discussion about offending people, doesn't mean that the civility policy doesn't apply. I only brought it to your attention because someone at Wikipedia Talk:Civility was complaining that you were being uncivil. Regardless, I consider the matter resolved. Kaldari (talk) 01:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So do I. (and maybe next time you could give me the link right away. I now understand why you send me the message, I just don't watchlist every possible page here) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 01:45, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you inserted image in Serer people?

Hi, Why have you inserted this image [2] in the Serer people article when it is evident that Halaqah is playing games?

You have just reverted my edit instead of telling him to stop the games he is playing on Serer articles. In so doing, you have helped him, stopped him from reaching 3 reverts. Please remove the image that you have inserted in the Serer article. This is exactly what Halaqah has been doing who really does not care about this article unlike some of us who have been working on it for a long time and trying to develop it. If you've read the discussions you would have found that him and I have been having problems for the past few months and he is only doing this for kicks even after my comments on the talk page. He does not care about Serer articles and merely doing this to get back at me and destroy my work. Please remove it. Thank you. Tamsier (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Yeah, I didn't mean to re-insert the image. Sorry. I was just standardizing the layout (Infobox first). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 14:38, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with the image? Use the talk page to discuss if there is a problem it is used in other Serer articles.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read what I wrote ^ ? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 15:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No actually I didnt see what you wrote, as it relates to the image which is used for the Serer article? Serer article where Tamsier editsSo it is best to clarify that particular issue (I mean beyond Tamsier incessant conspiracy theories and 4ever editing editors.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Thank you much, Seb. Drmies (talk) 04:00, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

np Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 04:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the section on my talk page (about flying into namespace) to see what we're dealing with. Drmies (talk) 04:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahéhee’

Seb, Thanks for the info about the TV show. Unfortunately I didn't catch your message until today. Maybe I can catch a rerun though! --ಠ_ಠ node.ue ಠ_ಠ (talk) 08:19, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IP at U2 and Bon Jovi

I have made a report here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#IP hopper:Edit warring and refusal to cite edits, but no action as of yet. Anyway you could help out? Heiro 09:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oops, just noticed your post at 3rr noticeboard, replied there, nevermind this I guess. Heiro 09:15, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tracking

Hi, thanks for comment, can I ask you where you get this information from? I don't know if you are capable to read the source code, but it's absolutely clear that tool doesn't track anyone, it was described in the technical specification as well. Best! Petrb (talk) 08:50, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Signs of life

Finally people are discussing Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people)#New proposal for "Articles on peoples (ethnicities and tribes)". Do you have any thoughts on the matter? -Uyvsdi (talk) 20:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

You're on the right track. As long as that "tribal" business is kept at bay.Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^> haneʼ 23:16, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Western Sahara again

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Flag of Western Sahara". Thank you. --Nightw 07:50, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]