User talk:Seb az86556/archive16

Plants

Hi, I made these articles: Oxytropis lambertii, Dalea candida, Zinnia grandiflora, and Aquilegia elegantula. Cheers, IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 18:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Chris Deschene

Hello! Your submission of Chris Deschene at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rlevse • Talk • 13:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added some to this and it's still about 80 char short. — Rlevse • Talk • 13:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

q

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

HEY DUDE! WHY NOT MAKE IT EASIER FOR USERS TO CONTACT YOU? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric0889 (talk • contribs)

Obviously, you did manage to contact me. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh? What if I disagree with you? Would you be the one vandalizing articles then? Does your word out weight others? 66.62.115.141 5:19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric0889 (talk • contribs)

Let me check what you are referring to... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see, you're the one who thinks atheism is a religion, Canada is an autocracy and English is the most prevalent language in the Americas. If you would like to keep believing that, you are free to do so, but it doesn't belong here; you could try getting consensus for these assertions. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? In many arguments atheism is a religion. It can be argued to be a type of dogma that believes in the idea of nothingness on the basis of no scientific evidence. Sounds like a religion. Canada can be argued to be leading to an autocracy type of state with the massive disarmament of the people, kind of like what Hitler did to the Jewish people. The English assertion was a typo, I meant the world. India and china are teaching there kids English as we speak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric0889 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, take it to the relevant talkpages, don't make it a private discussion with me; when you do so, however, I would advise you not to let Adolf and the Jews walk around, esp not when talking about Canada of all places. It won't win you many friends. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why take it public? It is between me and you. I just want to know your reasoning for condemning a person's edits as vandalizing. My argument is sound. I didn't do it out of spite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric0889 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I said "next time." This conversation is over. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Erm...

Georg Hans Madelung was verifiably a member of the Nazi party, as you would have seen when you read the article.--Shirt58 (talk) 02:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

list needs separate refs for each name. wikipedia is not a source. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The source is not the article, the source is the one cited in the article.--Shirt58 (talk) 02:19, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Same thing. I'm sure every source is cited somewhere. It needs to be in the list. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, agree. A ref in each article plus a ref in the list would be the best outcome. Lets see how Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nazi Party members goes, hey? I still stand by my assertion about Madelung, tho.--Shirt58 (talk) 15:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Warner

Please answer me on the Talk page of that article ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.143.250.221 (talk) 13:35, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yasir Afifi

I don't know what is the speed US legislation, but while wating for the verdict, I create Yasir Afifi on Big Brother tactic. The article can be redirect to "Afifi vs. the United States of America 2020" at later stage. Read also about Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_School_District. If US can do this to his own citizent, what's more to people like me, non-US citizent. I have no doubt that in their eyes, I'm just a sub-human. Bee cool, stay cool. Yosri (talk) 10:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chris Deschene

The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Demographics of North Cyprus

Please share your ideas about:[[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nestera (talk • contribs) 18:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic cleansing

Please see Talk:Ethnic cleansing#18 October 2010. -- PBS (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not read the conversation on my talk page?

Please remove the deletion marks... my page is a work in progress. Ctk986 (talk) 08:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did, I disagree; thus, we have an AfD. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Seb az86556's Day!

Seb az86556 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
so I've officially declared today as Seb az86556's Day!
For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian,
enjoy being the star of the day, Seb az86556!

Signed, Neutralhomer

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pff... thanks :)... any specific reason? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I outlined, for everyone, a section about their award in the section What'd I Do to Deserve This? on the archive page. You are quite welcome and keep up the great work! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IP's talk page

Really what's the point? My remark did have the desired effect though. He's upset at me now rather than Ged UK. Theresa Knott | Hasten to trek 13:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 82.152.216.15 (talk) 15:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let you know

It just keeps going. :/ SilverserenC 19:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ah dear... thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nicosia sockpuppetry

I made a case here; Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giorgoos. I welcome your involvement. Outback the koala (talk) 19:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of the articles about the names of Allah

What gives? Wikipedia allready has a main page regarding the 99 Names of Allah. The listed translations are very simple and limited English translations, which do not give the comprehensive meanings of these names, nor their origins from the arabic language. Each name has a wealth of information associated with it which should be on Wikipedia for those who wish to research the 99 names of Allah further. IslamForWiki (talk) 21:23, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a) At least two of them are copyvios. You can't simply take it from... wherever you got it. b) This is original research if you don't cite sources; suggest you work on them in youjr sandbox c) Most of the links given in the list are to a dab-page which explains the word, not solely in reference to God.

Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]