User talk:Seb az86556/archive13

Edition of the section "Turks and the Ottoman Empire"

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hello Seb az86556! I've added my comments about this section in this discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Turkey#.22showing_both_sides.22 Please consider changing it, because the current edition of the article is not universally accepted. --EthemD (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Seb az86556! I'm been waiting for a while now, I hope you've been reading my contribution to the discussion about the Turkey article. The current version to which you have reverted the past article is biased and completely unacceptable. It has been in this state for the past days now, and I am wondering why you would keep it in that state. -EthemD (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You are fast today!

The K2 and Mount Everest edits.... within a minute! You beat me by just a few seconds, so tip'o the hat to you! Keep up the good work. Qwrk (talk) 09:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thaaaaank youp -- I'm not fast, I'm bored :P Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Two thumbs up! Qwrk (talk) 09:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kudos from me too :-) Anna Lincoln 09:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Anna. Haven't seen you around in a while :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I pop in and out these days. Hopefully I'll devote more time after summer. Anna Lincoln 09:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your contribution on this article, it is a neutral and objective article; just info. Maybe you could add more info in order to improve this article? M.D.A (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:COI Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for an explanation

You haven't given me any explicit answer yet. If this goes on I'll have to ask another administrator... I really don't understand the reason behind your actions. :S peace -EthemD (talk) 16:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an administrator for English wikipedia. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please have a look at talk of the article. We had a very long discussion about the origins of the instrument. The thing is that the instrument is popular with almost all the people of the Middle East and Caucasus, and there's no way to determine who invented it unless we have a time machine to travel back to the times when it was invented. And http://www.worldmusicalinstruments.com/ is not an academic source. Please join the discussion at talk to help us build a consensus. As for complains by the sock of the banned user, I will ask for semiprotection of the article, to stop edit warring by the banned user. Thank you for your contribution to the article. Regards, Grandmaster 06:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The anon posting at WP:ANI is apparently this banned user: [1] The "quack" comment was made by the admin who banned him. His talk is full of warnings by the admins to stop edit warring, please see User talk:Armoboy323. Grandmaster 07:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. makes sense. I have no opinion about the instrument as such (I learned something new yesterday, didn't even know it existed :P) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 19:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's OK. Thanks for trying to help. Grandmaster 20:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I RUN THIS SHOW

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


go fuck yourself

I see. Thanks, I'll be watching more closely now. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


AND WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO YOU CHILD? —Preceding unsigned comment added by I Run This Show (talkcontribs) 20:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, maybe have you blocked or something... we'll see... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Talkback

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at Katherine Daisy Anderson's talk page.
Message added 15:31, 12 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at I-20's talk page.
Message added 17:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pony express mail! I-20the highway 17:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

watchlist-question (+202?)

Please tell me what does this stands for (+202) ,It is written in my Watchlist . --Saudahmed66 (talk) 12:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It tells you how many characters/letter where added to a page. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 19:55, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You know that Users can remove whatever they want from their Talk pages, right? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 23:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do know that. This needs to stay for a while, so that huggle and other stuff detects recent vandalism warnings. I won't restore it again, but this guy doesn't seem to get it. (he's blocked now) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 23:05, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bubba hotep blocked him.  :) Everard Proudfoot (talk) 23:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation

I hereby award this barnstar for changing 10 (to 3 d.p.) to 10,000 930913 (Congratulate/Complaints) 02:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That really annoyed me when I saw it, glad you changed it to how it should be 930913 (Congratulate/Complaints) 02:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at A930913's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arizona land of the Klan?

you got rid of my neo-nazi reference as well? Dude, I liked that addition. Well you are a decent guy so I wont revert war it, guess we can hash it out on the talk page of the article. Peace Travis in travisland (talk) 04:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We sure can. g'ahead :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh BTW thank for the link on the Navajo newspaper. I had a feeling that there would be one, I know I have seen them for amish and jewish people in NY. Travis in travisland (talk) 04:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

are you a JEW?

are you a JEW? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.100.174.159 (talk) 02:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no. (aval im ata rotze ledaber ivrit iti, ze beseder. :)...) Cheers!Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:29, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Seb, we could start a non-Jewish Jewish cabal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmies (talkcontribs)
Sure, I can make myself a shirt and be the undercover agent: "This Goy knows Hebrew" Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry. Misfire.

I'm putting it back now. HalfShadow 02:53, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey

Hi there,

I think you have made a mistake there. All I did was undo some edits by a banned user (the 88.251 IP, which is a sock of the dreadful User:Shuppiluliuma. If you note, the IP had made a number of POV edits which I undid (I kept those that were OK), especially to the lead and history section. If you would be so kind as to revert back to my version, I would be much obliged. Thanks, Athenean (talk) 02:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you like. Your version has a cite-error in it. Couldn't figure it out. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:07, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, ok. I was just about to fix the cite error when you reverted me :) Anyway, too tired now, will look into it tomorrow. Thanks. Athenean (talk) 06:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Saw that you reverted, so I fixed it. Thanks a lot for keeping an eye out by the way, that article really needs it. Be especially watchful for the 88.251, it belongs to a particularly disruptive banned user. Athenean (talk) 06:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! Your submission of Article at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nsk92 (talk) 18:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silly little cunt

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


You're gonna get it, good and proper!

Thanks for catching my attention. Keep going. :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 23:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then... I'm gonna pound you to a pulp you little bitch
Fine. You're heading for a block then. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 23:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.189.13.134 (talk) 23:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks. :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 23:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK for Radmilla Cody

RlevseTalk 18:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]