User talk:ScottyBerg/Archives/2010/August

This is an archive of past discussions with User:ScottyBerg. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Voluntary CC article restriction

Please consider signing the CC restriction, as explained here. Cla68 (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

FBI seal

I've made a compromise proposal at User talk:Jimbo Wales#Compromise proposal - I'd be interested to know what you think. -- ChrisO (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Good compromise. Thanks, ScottyBerg (talk) 17:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Attention and participation

As you might know, The Signpost has been reporting on the Climate change case for the past several weeks. One of the drafting arbitrators is clearly unhappy with my reporting, and a couple of other users share a similar view. However, some users disagree (and on at least one occasion, one case participant disagreed with the objection raised (see this). Each user is obviously going to have their own opinion, but irrespective of the outcome, I think actual participants in the case (who are involved in the dispute or may be affected) should add their input. Therefore, I think your attention and participation is invited here. Ncmvocalist (talk) 09:29, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I was away for a few days and I'm catching up on my reading. I don't quite grasp the issue here. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:49, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, there.

This wasn't vandalism; please be more careful. Thanks! - Donald Duck (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, it was a boneheaded error (I thought it was a article and not talk page edit). I'll definitely be more light on the trigger. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Also, I fixed your unsigned template. The IP address is the one who commented, not me. - Donald Duck (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Definitely not my day. ScottyBerg (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Trust me, I've had my own problems. - Donald Duck (talk) 17:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Arbcom

Saw your comments on the opaqueness (opacity?) of Arbcom at WMC's page. You might be interested in this. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 14:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I actually saw that a while back. I thought that you were overstating the case. You weren't. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/Proposed decision

Apologies, but I've been trying to get people to remove their !votes and of course, with people in different time zones, this is happening very slowly and meanwhile others, like you, are following suit not realising that this isn't appropriate. I've been removing completely anything that is just a !vote, and rewording anything that is actually a comment. Dougweller (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)