|
User talk:Schazjmd/Archive 2Thank you for Sunnyvale!Thank you for your comments and references on Toddst1's talk page! My ApologiesYou recently edited Sir Ralph Halpern's Wikipedia page. Destructive editing is certainly incorrect, however, his son is a wretched human being and also happens to be my best friend's boyfriend. I won't be settling personal issues on Wikipedia again because I understand the effects of destructive editing, but I also will not regret my actions. Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:58B:8300:66F0:8958:D5FE:D41A:3FF9 (talk • contribs) November 15, 2020 (UTC) USA! USA!OMG you're probably American too! Now I am nationally disgraced as well as time/efficiency-shamed! When you are next in London please let me salvage my pride with (1) a visit to the wood in question and (2) beer (yes, just not that cold) or tea or whatever! Sheesh. I will have to fly the Union Jack at half-mast tonight – or I would if I had one! :) Cheers DBaK (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
WP:CEN is now open!To all interested parties: Now that it has a proper shortcut, the current events noticeboard has now officially opened for discussion! WP:CEN came about as an idea I explored through a request for comment that closed last March. Recent research has re-opened the debate on Wikipedia's role in a changing faster-paced internet. Questions of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:Recentism are still floating around. That being said, there are still plenty of articles to write and hopefully this noticeboard can positively contribute to that critical process. Thank you for your participation in the RFC, and I hope to see you at WP:CEN soon! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:10, 29 June 2019 (UTC) India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan discretionary sanctions This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Thanks!Thank you for reminding me to put my user info first. Cheers! Azvdo.art
Apollo in Real Time, Apollo 13Hey Schazjmd, thank you very much for your quick Apollo in Real Time article. I am one of the team members who was involved in the Apollo 13 project. In that section of the article you state that "The Apollo 13 site went live in April 2020", which is certainly supported by the source you cited. But the site actually went live a month earlier. In keeping with the guidelines of "No original research", you should of course not just take my word for it. But if you do more digging you might be able to find a factual source that corrects this. Feel free to contact me if you're having trouble finding anything. Thanks! Ke6jjj (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Alice Merton likes baking browniesStrictly as a point of curiosity, based on this edit, do you (like me) watch Twitter for people bragging about vandalizing Wikipedia? Maybe there should be a {Template:User} for such sly stalkers so we can add a box to our user page! NedFausa (talk) 18:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
GreetingsThought I’d say hi since were are discussing. Always nice to meet a fellow armed forces veteran. I was over with my star ranker once to your space operations centre in Colorado, back in the past, and with him for a few exchange talks (but must admit, outside of when I was on deployment in Baghdad, didn’t have much contact with the US armed forces - expect maybe for seeing them do things on screens at Joint Operations). As you can expect, what with my star ranker being a Service Chief, I’ve had a few posting where all I did was minutes, papers, etc. I can only say what is my knowledge, I can’t comment on other armed forces quirks, as it is outside my wheelhouse - but that is our service writing standard and how it is used domestically. Did you ever get over to Australia during your time? Apparently very popular posting so I understand it is very competitive - I did meet some nice Marines out at the Embassy once, they were loving it here. Kangaresearch (talk) 16:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Inadvertent pingsSorry if you got a ping that I mentioned you, seems to be a glitch in the method I used to archive conversations from my talk page (which I won't be using again). Schazjmd (talk) 16:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC) Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC) Bass IPThat IP is clearly closely connected to Bass somehow.Seven Pandas (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
How Dense are you?It’s a Twitter account linking to a video by an established institution where the author herself is speaking. Change it back or I’ll have your moderator trinket. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abattoir666 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
How to update education?I don't have a citation for a awarded degree. I included a citation to the Annual. What are we supposed to use?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthman68 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Any talk page watchers?If so, I'd really appreciate experienced editors weighing in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Haglund (real estate) because to me it seems such a gray area in notability and I really don't know what the right call is on it. Schazjmd (talk) 17:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC) Thanks for your reply to my dilemma that "You can't add or fix pings"Schazjmd, thanks for the info about pinging. The documentation is "Template:Reply to,", of course; if I were to write the documentation, that is exactly what I would have called it probably, maybe. A "(talk page watcher)", Ha Ha! I like to watch too, but mostly I am not sure where would be a good place to look. I guess I could have replied to you by doing a notification to you from a post on Doug's page. I will try that. I will take you up on the offer to ask you questions. About my Talk page, it is a mess. Until recently I didn't know I had anywhere else to save things on Wikipedia. So everything I needed to save for reference and such I put there and it grew and it grew. Yes, archiving sounds like a good thing to do, I'll check with you late on that. But first I need to get up to speed on "replying to" methodology. Thank you very much. Osomite hablemos 20:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC) Late apologiesHello Schazjmd, I just wanted to issue an apology for previous edits I made that were unsourced many months back. While the issue is over, I still wanted to issue a formal apology as I continue my quest to productive edits. Happy editing!Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 05:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Select editsTo be honest Schazjmd, it seems like wikipedia only requires changes to be backed up with a citation to a reliable source when the person or group is of a certain political view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aqwert777 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
My cheer wiki Suggestion.Did you read my cheer wiki talk? I was wondering if we could have ever possibly do what I asked? MerlinLionHeart (talk) 10:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
I replied again on the “Cheerleading” article Talk page but I don’t know if it was published. So when ever you get the chance please check it out. MerlinLionHeart (talk) 05:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
ImageCan you delete this [1]? I uploaded the wrong image. Zoe1013 (talk) 19:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
(adding a @Zoe1013: just in case you're not watching the page) Schazjmd (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC) UTC)
The second image is from the source. [3] Can I take the image from the source? Is that copyright violation to use the library book cover or the source? Zoe1013 (talk) 19:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Reduce size of imageHow do you reduce the size of image? This edit says I need to reduce the size of image. You can’t make image smaller. So I have asked for the image to be deleted because the image can’t be reduced. Zoe1013 (talk) 21:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Authentication for RICO EditsWe spent five years researching Paul Rico and the surrounding controversies. We researched the transcripts of congressional hearings, other testimony, and conducted hundreds of interviews of witnesses. Joe Wolfinger and I are both retired special agents of the FBI and licensed attorneys and have independent sources for every fact. If it will help, we can include many additional footnotes for each fact (independent of our book). The page that exists is very poorly sourced and completely unreliable (e.g., some purported "FBI mugshot?" Not possible since Rico was never arrested or charged by the FBI. Other sources include "Reader's Digest," etc.). We are not experts in Wikipedia and are interested only in getting this information corrected. We are open to any suggestions you might have.Chriskerresq (talk) 19:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Haglund Foundation Twitter accountHi there, Although the Haglund Foundation's Twitter account does not bear a verified checkmark from Twitter, it is linked from the footer of the Haglund Foundation's official home page, which is already included as an external link in Carl Haglund (real estate). I think it's reasonable to conclude that it is the official account of the foundation. Per WP:BLPSPS, is it justified to include information sourced to the foundation's Twitter account? White 720 (talk) 22:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Abdala Bucaram Jr.I disagree with the removal of my edit. It simply stated that there was an order for his detention and that he was being investigated. Your reason for deleting stated he had been detained but no charges filed. I never said any charges had been filed.skmply that he was being investigated which is completely true and verifiable. Could you also please support the claim that he was detained? He fled the country under suspicious circumstances, while travel was prohibited, before he could be detained. TruthDoesMatter2020 (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Theories entryNice work with the Cynical Theories entry. I see that someone drafted an entry for Helen Pluckrose, which was not deleted but parked on account her lack of "notability." I don't quite agree--there are lots of authors with only one big book to their credit who yet have a wiki entry. At the same time, it wasn't as well written a job as yours here. You did a nice job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigetastic (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
ten year society inviteInvitation to join the Ten Year Society Dear Ex, I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. You may already be aware of this and have declined to participate, but, if not, here's an invitation. Best regards, Nigetastic (talk) 16:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
ThanksOk, I understood... Greetings.--Tenan (talk) 16:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Oops, my bad!Thanks for moving those sandboxes to my userspace. The Irate Communist (talk) 21:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I saw that you put a tag on this page. I apologize for my tardy editing. I've now altered the content quite extensively. Could you please check to see whether it's up to code now? I wouldn't want to unilaterally remove the tag. Thanks in advance. O.ominirabluejack (talk) 23:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Okay, thanks Schazjmd... I'll try again. O.ominirabluejack (talk) 23:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Health psychology and clarityThank you for working on the issue roiling the health psychology entry by freezing the page and later prompting me to lay out the different, relevant quotations from the assorted publications. Rounding up the quotations took a little time. But doing so provided clarity. Iss246 (talk) 02:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Meetei Puya(Meitei Puya Lailik)
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Meetei Puya(Meitei Puya Lailik). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Puya (Meitei texts). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Puya (Meitei texts). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page. If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. noq (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
HelpI had difficulties because I'm new help me please 👀Gremista.32 (talk) 23:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Articleshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleanor_of_Castile https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt_(Roman_province) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiberius Help me please ? --👀Gremista.32 (talk) 00:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Yes 👀Gremista.32 (talk) 00:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
I use Portuguese Wikipedia to search for references 👀Gremista.32 (talk) 22:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks 👀Gremista.32 (talk) 22:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC) QuotesHi Schazjmd, love the quotes that head your talk page. I need to make a note of them somewhere. Happy St Crispin's Day, MSgt. Acad Ronin (talk) 11:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
"Meetei Puya(Meitei Puya Lailik)" listed at Redirects for discussion
Sir, you were there on the subject[[4]]. I have tried it to improve with recent edits[[5]]. kindly see and comment.Thanks and Best regardsRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Harry Loucks was one of the key figures in Rolling Wood's development. Loucks (along with his father) were major realtors and developers on Long Island during this time, and did work in places like Brookville New York, Syosset, New York, and Roslyn Estates, New York. I have added this information to the article. Please keep in mind that this article is very new. It was started roughly 24 hours ago (as of the time I am posting this). I am expanding it and will continue to do so. LINYperson615 (talk) 21:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
SchazjmdI did, and I just added more information. Another thing about this subdivision is that the original 14 homes were all of unique designs (mentioned in source 1). Additionally (and I am about to add this in), the Guggenheims were very prominent landowners on this part of Long Island during this time period. They made their fortune through mining, and Edmond was a relative of Solomon R. Guggenheim (as in the museum); please see the Guggenheim family article for more information on the family. LINYperson615 (talk) 21:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
User:Magical1031aHi Schazjmd, if I did anything inappropriate, please let me know. I just thought that removing the redirect was the best way to handle it. They also copied the article's talk page content to their talk page so I deleted that as well. S0091 (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Daveburstein (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC) Thanks for accepting I made an honest mistake on the Jemisin picture. I think livelier pictures would be better, but that's not the community decision. I've since heard from Nora she likes the old picture, even if it doesn't do her justice.
TNS famous folksThe HTTP link you gave, even though it has "public" in the name, is not actually publicly accessible. Can you find any way to provide a link that *is* accessible? Finney1234 (talk) 18:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
ITN recognition for Ben Bova On 1 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ben Bova, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Dumelow (talk) 07:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC) Hello, I'm new to wikipedia and I'm not really certain on how to use all features. However, this user is going around on Twelver Shia Imams and stating that they are a certain denomination with a heavily one-sided view with a single citation from medium.com and I am trying to revert the pages back to a neutral viewpoint. They keep trying to engage in a edit war with me and I was hoping you'd be able to investigate this to allow me to revert the pages back to a neutral standing point with the edits that I am doing to his changes, thank you. Butene (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Sununu setting NH record in 2020It's not a claim, it's a fact. If a ref is needed, I'll get one. Thanks. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 22:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
About titles, honorifics and appeal to popularityHello and greetings, This is just for your kind info. Since previously you have participated in an inconclusive RfC discussion at this RfC in year going by, and since some related aspects are under discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Titles, honorifics and appeal to popularity may be you want to join in to share your inputs or opinions. Thanks and regards Bookku (talk) 05:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello once again, I went through your and other replies up till now and added following mid discussion synopses / review as my reply there. May be we won't agree but it might help better in understanding each other's point of views better.
RE: dead linksHello there! I saw your post on my talk page. While the link was technically saved in the wayback machine, when I clicked on it, it was just an archive of the 404 page. I'm unsure if that was an error on my end or not, but I wanted to let you know that I really try to make sure dead links haven't been archived anywhere else. Sorry about the confusion --Vaporwaveboyfriend (talk) 21:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
ClarificationI'll take a look to see if the quotes can be trimmed and I expect that will be very doable. I've got to get on the road and I don't know if I'll be able to get back to a computer today, but thanks for the input. Activist (talk) 21:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Activist (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Tom Theo KlemesrudYou recently deleted my contribution for this page in the writings section, saying the text of this court filing was not reliable. The filed declaration came from attorney Richard Horning and it is ok to contact and verify with him. https://www.reedsmith.com/en/professionals/h/horning-richard-allan Also Shari Steele at EFF can verify it. The case and file was on the EFF server, but was accidently destroyed. https://www.eff.org/about/staff/shari-steele Seen here on BBC-2 ... //youtu.be/b6KM27TUsvM?t=367 The declaration is also on Pacer of course. The case is published. Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communications Services, Inc , No. 95-20091 RHW, 1995 Comp. Ind. L. Rptr. 20214, 20292, 20357, 20380, 20435 (N.D.Cal. 1995), 907 F.Supp. 1361 (N.D.Ca. 1995) 71.29.113.108 (talk) 02:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 71.29.113.108 (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
You have new messages You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. 00:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC) Wiki of Functions followupHi there, I'm a researcher for the Wikilambda project. Last month we held a naming contest and I'm following up with those who voted to see if you might be willing to provide some feedback to help guide the project. This would be a 45 minute conversation about your past experience with other Wikimedia projects and thoughts about the future of this new initiative. I'm hoping to gather a wide range of perspectives so I'd be interested in your opinion regardless of whether you plan to have further involvement. As a way of saying thanks, the research team is offering a $35 gift card (in your local currency) for participation. We could chat by phone or through a website for audio conferencing. If you're interested just pick a time slot from this calendar link: Hope to hear from you soon! // jeff (design researcher) (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC) You've got mailIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 08:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC) 2011 Bach DivorceWhat do you need for proof of Richard’s divorce from Sabryna in 2011? The dissolution is in the Washington, Kings County online docket search, but how do I cite this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk) 00:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
In his book about his crash and recovery, Illusions 2, he writes that Sabryna is his ex wife at the time of the crash. He also wrote on his website, richardbach.com, now offline, that he was single and looking for a new mate both before and after the crash. One of the 2010 filings was finalized in 2011, I know this personally, but I don’t understand the court docket lingo well enough to know which one. He remarried Sabryna in December 2014, but then filed for divorce in 2015, after meeting me, I am his fourth wife. That divorce was withdrawn, but he filed again in 2018, and that one was finalized November 2020. Richard and I married right after that. I have those divorce papers, but obviously don’t wish to make them public. I think a good faith edit for the 2011 divorce should be allowed. You can confirm in his book that he was divorced at the time of the crash. I have backups of his website, I could personally send you an entry clearly indicating he is single if that helps you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
If you go here and search for Sabryna Bach, you will see their December 2014 marriage license, their second marriage: https://www.sanjuanco.com/171/Recorded-Document-Search And if you look at the quit claim deed from this month at the top, you can see Sabryna is once again a “former spouse.” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk) 02:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC) Turns out you can easily find our marriage license this way as well, but I do not wish to go public with our marriage at this time.... Anyway, he is definitely not married to Sabryna any longer, and seeing her listed as his current wife is bothersome to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC) September 29, 2014 is one entry where Richard explicitly states on his website that he is single and seeking a mate. But, he talks about this a lot starting with his entries prior to the crash. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk) 02:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
I am looking at the book, at best, he says, “ There by the bed was the woman I knew, she was my wife? No.” And, “ She’s my wife, I thought. Can’t remember her name. Not my wife.” Richard wants to correct this, is there something he can do to provide proof he is divorced from her? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk) 17:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
I have the final certificate of dissolution from the state of Washington, it cites the 10-3-05920-6 court file number as the finalized divorce case, it was finalized on April 1, 2011. There is nothing in that docket that indicates the divorce was not completed, in fact it clearly indicates it was completed (final facts and findings means completion). There was the confusion in that they had two divorce filings in the courts at the same time, and so one must have been nullified. But the official dissolution certificate says the 10-3-05920-6 is the finalized one. There was no trial, the parties agreed to a separation agreement, so no trial needed. I will cite that court docket as my reference. I can scan and upload the dissolution certificate, if you could give me some pointers as to how to do so. Thanks for all your help with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk • contribs)
I am adding in my marriage to Richard. I put the reference in the body this time. Let me know if you have a problem with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk • contribs)
No, we didn’t. That’s okay, I am pretty on the fence about being public about the marriage, so I am okay to keep it off the page. Maybe someday later, when we have something with less personal information on it. Thanks, Schazjmd! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.205.64 (talk • contribs)
DYK for Chicago circulation wars On 22 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chicago circulation wars, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that about 27 men and newsboys were killed in the Chicago circulation wars in the early 1900s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chicago circulation wars. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chicago circulation wars), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Expedite RequestI wrote an article for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Weirsky It needs to be approved urgently so I can seek good article status. I cannot seek good article status until it gets approved. I may be wrong but I need to seek good article status before seeking featured article status. Either way it needs to be expedited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) Compel EditorsI need to compel editors to work on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Weirsky and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mikhail_Lebedev_(neuroscientist). I am having difficulty getting editors to participate without a formal command from Wikipedia. Can you please order a list of world renowned editors to help these pages so that they can be superb by the end of the weekend? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) BLP Policies and SourcesI've created a Wikipedia:Third_opinion#Active_disagreements request on poorly sourced content in Talk:Anima_Anandkumar that you were active in editing in December as well. In case you'd like to weigh in. BR, Tunkki-1970 (talk) 15:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Just a compliment on the quotes on your pageI love the selection of quotes on your page! Also, thanks for your help. StarTigerJLN (talk) 02:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
ThanksI'm proud of our discussion/collaboration and the consensus edit it produced -- it's better than the version I initially suggested. I hope we meet again on here. Gershonmk (talk) 06:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Providing feedback/edits on new article draftHello Schazjmd, I hope this message finds you well. I have been working on a new article about Bay Area illustrator/artist Bill Russell; Draft:Bill Russell (illustrator). The article is currently pending approval, but I would really like some experienced feedback from someone like yourself as to what I could do to make the page better. If you have time to do this and this is in your wheelhouse, I would greatly appreciate it! Thank you. --Flewisss (talk) 23:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Scott J. ShapiroHello Does it have to be controversial in order to appear in a wikipedia page? I would think not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiedits1900 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Effects of War: CapitalismI have brought up the topic of removing effects of war from the capitalism page for the reasons listed in my edit. The section as is and even the topic heading itself appear to be fairly nonsensical to the topic of explaining capitalism. I would implore you to go over the section with your own eyes. It has some interesting facts, without citation, though it does not appear to offer relative information. Maybe I am reading it wrong though. TauGuys (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Daniel VettoriThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi pal! Daniel in Islam/Arabic is Daniyal دانيال Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok dear ☹ Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Well, Daniel in Arabic is also Danial Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Adam in Arabic is Adam Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
ادم Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC) What about Danial. Danial is the Arabic name of Daniel pal Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Ok ☹ Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Adam in Arabic is Adam Sarah in Arabic is Sarah Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Adam in Arabic is Adam Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC) Sarah in Arabic is Sarah Styy4fvtd (talk) 01:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ya beat me to it!I rejected those pending edits on the Meriwether Lewis page, but you beat me to the punch on the user's Talk page. Thanks for keeping an eye on things—and for being the faster typist! Cheers! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 22:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Request for interviewHello there! My name is AVardhana (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC), and I recently joined The Wikipedia Library team to help with design work. I noticed you've been very generous with your input to our team so I thought I would reach out! I'm writing to invite you to participate in an interview study that I'm currently conducting. This would involve us meeting via Google meets where I will ask you a few questions and then have you test a prototype with me. For the interview, I'd be recording your screen as well as audio. The purpose of the study is to get a better understanding of who is using The Wikipedia Library for the purposes of making the right improvements! If you're interested, please email me at avardhana@wikimedia.org, and I'll send a copy of the privacy statement to you. If you have any questions, I am happy to answer them. Thank you, Aishwarya Mangolia677That user has targeted me and all of my edit’s in a malicious way. Going as far as to delete vital information from said articles he is going after, all pertaining to myself. He is not trying to help. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 21:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
I respect your standpoint on the matter. I just have to disagree, I didn’t realize you were talking about my entire time on Wikipedia. The other user who brought attention to one of my edit’s is the very same who asked Magnolia677 why he deleted the table. I have learned from the first user and listened to his constructive criticism. I said his argument was null and void because he was embellishing by over 50 years how far the said table went back. But besides that, thank you for your help & I will take everything you said and learn from it. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 22:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Much ThanksThanks for your help on my addition!
Elvisisalive95 (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
SyrupIdk how saying that Aunt Jemima is delicious is disruptive. Annonymous224 (talk) 18:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
about the incorrect infothe reason i reverted the info was because they deleted 1,000+ bytes without any reason. I am trying to get people to understand they have to explain the reason for why they do things.Thedefender35 17:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok i understand i will work on paying attention to the content i am reverting — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedefender35 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC) I do not think there are any trainers that are in my timezone D: Thedefender35 17:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC) for the warningsso for the warning when the article part comes up do I just put the name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedefender35 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC) My editsface palm* I’m not trying to cause any issues but why should I assume they are in good faith if they didn’t assume my Politics of MA edit was in good faith? I would like an explanation to that before we move on. Thank you--Chutyo (talk) 00:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Since you joined on to this issue after my edits on the Massachusetts page (not the talk pages), then I assume you wouldn’t know about the broader issue on the two Massachusetts pages. I apologize for any “vandalism” and I agree that the talk page “vandalism” should have been reverted, but you are incorrectly asserting that that was the only problem in this ongoing issue between you, me, and some other members. Have a good night. --Chutyo (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC) Thanks for correcting that on the Sophie Labelle pageI must have not seen that the page (trans woman) was linked in the next sentence. Oops. Anyway, I'm in the process of creating a page for Assigned Male, which I'm pretty sure has all sorts of sources about it. --Historyday01 (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Choked by grapesHard to find someone who can state with certainty that the confusion stems from that. It was stated without references in the article before I edited it, and when I looked for a reference I realized that it was a confusion. The reason became clear to me, but that is as far as I can go.--Jbaranao (talk) 01:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Dr Horrible plotYou're right, I apologise. Nevertheless, I don't think the overall change improved the article so while I retract my edit summary, I stand by my reversion. – PeeJay 14:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC) Peter WoitPeter Woit's family tree is here https://www.geni.com/people/Oskars-Voits/6000000010432516289 His grandfather is indeed the famous Oskars Voits. 70.51.103.62 (talk) 18:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Why are you against his Nazi war criminal grandfather from being mentioned? 70.51.103.62 (talk) 19:06, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
He's trying to avoid being doxed but everyone knows the truth. He says himself that he changed the spelling of his name from Voits to Woit. https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=45 70.51.103.62 (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
He is a coward string theory denying crank. He will never admit to being the grandson of that mass murderer until the clueless journalists call him out. 70.51.103.62 (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC) Thank you for the help. Updates to Eat Just pageHi Schazjmd. Since you previously participated on the Eat Just page when I proposed a rewrite last year, I wanted to see if you an interest in reviewing a few updates I’ve proposed here. Many thanks! Anoyes202 (talk) 20:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Josh fightThanks for nominating this dumb meme event. I didn't do it myself since I knew it would be brigaded by a bunch of new people but it would be good to try again in a few months when their predictions of lasting coverage fail to materialize. Reywas92Talk 02:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
ContributingHi Thank you for your guidance, can you please tell me what else I can do to contribute? Can I create someone's page? or add more information to any existing page according to the links I see on the internet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinerd001234 (talk • contribs)
Anthony Mackie
Survivor QuestionGood day. I'm not sure if this is the correct way to go about this, but I'd like to bring to your attention an anonymous user with the IP address 161.77.38.18 (they can be found in multiple instances on the articles of Survivor seasons adding too much excess detail laced with poor grammar, making the "season summary" sections look like a Fandom page instead of an encyclopedic article). Unless I'm incorrect, summaries in articles like these are good to contain details, but should be kept concise overall since the "episodes" section describes season events in greater detail anyway. This user has repeatedly gone overboard in their endeavors here, and while I wouldn't say it's the most egregious vandalism a Survivor article has seen, the persistent edits by the aforementioned IP don't seem to stop. If I'm overstepping any boundaries, I apologize, but I have to admit that I'm getting annoyed with cleanup at this point. Thanks, and have a good one! 96.231.250.80 (talk) 21:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Virginia HallThank you for your compliment about my work on the Virginia Hall article. I much appreciate your thoughtfulness. Smallchief (talk) 00:47, 24 May 2021 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: David Day (Canadian author) has been accepted Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! – robertsky (talk) 19:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Section headings in date pagesHi, Schazjmd. I noticed that you previously added sections to the date pages (example); thank you. However, please try and keep MOS:DATERANGE in mind when making such edits: where it's just a range of years, the endashes should not be spaced. This is an example of the correct format. Thank you, Sdrqaz (talk) 02:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC) A pie for you!
Thanks for the diligence!
JoleneHi, I thought my edit was useful on Jolene (song) because the Leo Moracchioli cover was notable for being in the heavy metal style (of which I am admittedly a fan). If you search for "Jolene metal cover", on Google or on YouTube, Leo's cover is the top result for metal. So I'd like to appeal the revert.TAPwiki (talk) 18:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
16ConcordeSSCHello, I've had the talk page of 16ConcordeSSC under watch and noticed that you made a reply. There is an ANI thread that may be of interest to you here Blue Riband► 23:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC) |
||||||||||||||||||||
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tigers,_Not_Daughters_book_cover.jpeg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://d17lzgq6gc2tox.cloudfront.net/product/three_d_cover_image/original/9781616208967_3D.png?1585368168){kind=link}
