Hello, Saric, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk01:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen most of those pages already, but thanks for the greeting. — Saric (Talk) 15:34, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
Ooooh, interesting. I'd vote for it (not necessarily for December 25th— there's no reason to antagonize Christians), but somebody seems to have deleted all of the conversation on it. Strange. —Saric (Talk) 02:54, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you are categorized as a Wikipedian by alignment. If you are in to userboxes, there are now infoboxes available using a standard template. See the alignment category page for details.
This is a copied announcement, please reply on My Talk Page or in the category talk if you have any questions. xaosfluxTalk/CVU18:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
While correcting the section marked for copyediting in the WindowBlinds article, I came across this sentence:
For a short time, there was also a scaled-back version called WBLiteFX.
The problem is, it's not clear what WBLiteX is a scaled-back version of. Would you clarify it for me? You made a lot of edits to that article, and you seem pretty knowledgeable about the subject, so whether or not you wrote that particular sentence, I imagine you'd know. —Saric (Talk) 17:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I've talked to the developer (we both work for Stardock and he's confirmed that it was a cut-down version of WindowBlinds. I've made an edit to the article. GreenReaper22:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I have deleted May the Force be with you following your request. I have no opinion as to the appropriateness of the move. I put the redirect there in case it is some time before the move is done, but I think that non-admins can move over top of a page that is only a redirect and has never been other than a redirect. If for whatever reason you can't, just let me know and I'll blow it away. --B (talk) 14:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! It is pretty rad, isn't it? But man, was it hard to get a formula for the center of the Euclidean circle that contains a given hyperbolic line. I should probably add the formula I used to Wikipedia. Figuring out how to pick the right value for the stupid sweep-flag was also surprisingly rough, though I was able to do it after a lot of experimentation. —Saric (Talk) 13:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, because it's a vector image, the arcs are real circular arcs, not rasterized approximations, so they're infinitely fine. Or is it that you want to know how deeply the pattern recurses? Only about six steps; I found that increasing the recursion depth past that doesn't make a visible difference. —Saric (Talk) 13:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
The old list of episode descriptions was copied-and-pasted from elsewhere. Removing it from the page's history involves magic beyond my ken, which we can leave to administrators. If you want to replace it, you could write your own summaries. —Saric (Talk) 03:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
