User talk:Samuell1616/Archive 2


11:33:53, 2 March 2015 review of submission by AkhilShah316


Hello Samuell1616,

Could you tell me specifically the references (reliable sources) that you have declined the submission. I could look at alternate sources to make it more authentic.

AkhilShah316 (talk) 11:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC) AkhilShah316 (talk) 11:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AkhilShah316: Sure, do refer WP:RELIABLE, happy to help once your done...One life to live (talk) 12:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Samuell,

I meant..is it possible to point out specific links in the references that I have put. Will make my job a lot more easier, I fear I may change all links (including links from reliable sources that are currently approved) and I may end up jeapordizing the whole thing.

AkhilShah316 (talk) 06:30, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AkhilShah316: No worries , refer the earlier recommended guidelines and start working - You will have to rework the whole article as currently it looks like a promotional piece trying to feature a lot and missing focus from the main subject of article i.e. Mauj Mobile. References currently are either less reliable or not providing any / much relevant support to the cited information. Press releases and self published sources should be avoided completely. Work on all these and then let me know am always around to help. One life to live (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mistral Solutions - Revised Edit (6)

@Samuell1616: Hi, Further to our last conversation, Wanted to check if you had the time to look into the revised page in detail. About the inactive Nasscom award link, I have removed it. Do let me know if it looks fine now. The link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mistral_Solutions. Looking forward to hearing from you Divyaallen (talk) 10:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Divyaallen: I can still see Winner of Nasscom awards 2007 and the reference link to finalist - its just add confusion and reduce further reliability of the subject either cite reliable reference to verify the subject as winner or just remove it. I noticed you are just stuck with this subject, you are good and should start contributing more on wikipedia. If any help required always around to help. One life to live (talk) 14:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Samuell1616: Thanks a ton Samuel. I am eager to contribute on Wikipedia and will pick up topics as soon as this one is done. I just needed some clarity on the NASSCOM awards 2007 link. I had initially misdirected the reference to the list of shortlisted companies (which is definitely not relevant), but upon your pointing it out, I had recently redirected it to the list of "finalists" for the award. By finalists, NASSCOM means the eight winning companies that were felicitated and recognized for their outstanding contribution to the Indian IT sector in 2007 (which is clearly mentioned in the reference). So I am little confused on how it reduces reliability. Do help me out here. If you still think it is not making sense, I will remove the reference. Thank you in advance. 202.83.16.90 (talk) 04:24, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Samuell1616: Hi Samuel, Just a reminder on this chat. I hope you can help me with this. Divyaallen (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Divyaallen: you may resubmit and some one will review it ... for anything else happy to help anytime. One life to live (talk) 13:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Samuell1616, You have recently rejected https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prateek_Sethi again and I've tried to adhere to the notability of Prateek. He is a leading youth icon in the science edutainment front (and amongst the few ) in India. Pleas...

Dear Samuell1616, you have for the second time rejected an article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prateek_Sethi questioning the notability of the subject. I've added his articles covered from various independent sources including institutes, companies and newspapers. If you'd like me add more I can. The reason we wanted to publish the article is because he is amongst the few indian anchors/designers pushing for science and edutainment in india and is slowly but surely helping kids and teens think beyond textbooks. He is also an upcoming designer/ creative director. Do let me know how we can fix this and with your guidelines get the page published, if at all. Thank you. Udan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.97.247.201 (talk) 14:18, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its always a good practice to post from your registered account. I don’t have any problem with the subject or the article . In the version I reviewed both the article and subject's information can not verified further. The references used in the article are either non reliable or less reliable and not helping much to support the article information. If you improve the article as per WP:NOTABILITY , WP:RELIABLE let me know ‘ll be happy to help further. One life to live (talk) 14:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Samuell1616, Thank you for the advice. Replying from the registered account. I will just figure this soon and resubmit for your inputs and review. Thank you, Udan — Preceding unsigned comment added by AtomicPentz (talk • contribs) 15:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Rosen_(retail_executive)

Hi Samuel - I went ahead and moved this draft into the article space. The subject is notable, and I don't feel the article reads like an advertisement. I'm still open to edit suggestions as I continue adding. Thanks for your help! Mouthwash15 (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 00:22:20, 4 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Peach Lewis


Hi Samuell1616, I'm responding to your rejection of my submission for Christine Kaine (entrepreneur) because you feel the references are inadequate and can't be verified. All references provided have been verified meticulously and are published articles from a long period of time, to reflect that Christine is at the forefront of entrepreneurial thought, change and action and is one of Australia's pioneers of angel investing. I have read through all the guidelines, which I believe the references meet, and I wonder if you could please reconsider your rejection of this article. Or if there are references within the list that you feel are not appropriate, please direct me to them and I will remove them. I do have several other references to add to the list as Christine has just returned from a trip to Antarctica with the Unstoppables. Regards Peach Lewis.

Peach Lewis (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Peach Lewis: Hi , the subject notability was not able to clearly verified from the available references . Online verification / information was not much of a help too. you have added a list of references which are majorly from few regular offline publications / journals . It will be good if you only add few but good relevant references to support the article information. Do refer WP:NOTABILITY , WP:RELIABLE, WP:REFERENCES for better understanding. Happy to help anytime...One life to live (talk) 21:40, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Qimat Rai Gupta) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Qimat Rai Gupta, Samuell1616!

Wikipedia editor WordSeventeen just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this informative article.

To reply, leave a comment on WordSeventeen's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

@WordSeventeen: - Thanks for the note... Cheers !!! One life to live (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abhay Vakil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abhay Vakil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  SAMI  talk 17:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--- Incorrect A7 - CSD declined ----One life to live (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

question about my article

hi there. what exactly are you looking for in my article on benjamin raye? i checke over the notability page for musicians and it looks like he clearly qualifies for several. having a few songs chart nationally...having appeared on a movie...and winning a national award. so is there a problem with my references? please inform. and thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristinamariehopper (talk • contribs) 00:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kristinamariehopper: Hi , you will have to restructure the article and decide whats the main notability factor radio host or musician ? Do refer WP:NPOV , WP:NOTABILITY, WP:NMG, WP:REFERENCES, WP:RELIABLE. The current references used are majorly of no help and some of them are even self published. Simple way to self check is the information should be easily verified by the cited references and it should be reliable and independent. Improve your article considering the suggested guidelines. Happy to help anytime ... One life to live (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

04:58:49, 9 March 2015 review of submission by M.Nishant


M.Nishant (talk) 04:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Samuel, My article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:HDFC_RED was rejected by you for lack of references. I've made sure I supply ideal references regarding the information ive put in the article. Can you please help me a bit and highlight the issues in question? I can work more on the article, but if you can guide me a bit, it'll save me a lot of time. Thanks.

@M.Nishant: Hi, you need to re-look at it considering WP:RS , WP:REF, PR / press releases / self promotion references should be completely avoided. For other concerns in the article do refer WP:NOTE, WP:NOTPROMOTION , WP:CITEKILL. Happy to help always - One life to live (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:21:25, 12 March 2015 review of submission by 178.250.180.3


I don't understand how it hasn't met the rules? I have cited independent sources ie the Ulster Star and the BBC. If you visit the BBC link you will see this club is very much legit.

178.250.180.3 (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel so please resubmit and some one will review it again. One life to live (talk) 15:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


14:28:41, 12 March 2015 review of submission by Oncoexpert


Hi. Thanks for your feedback on my article. Can you help me to understand why it was rejected? I was surprised to see the decision as I used an already published entry on fellow Spanish medical oncologist, Dr Jose Baselga, as a guide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Baselga . I was surprised to see you rejected my article on the grounds that Dr Rosell is not considered 'notable' as both men have done very similar work in the same field at the same time. Therefore, I believe my article on Dr Rosell contains very similar information and he is at least as notable as Dr Baselga.

Regarding the refernces, I was also puzzled as to why the ones I provided were not considered as 'verifiable' since they are all either original publications or links to websites. Again, I used similar sources to the Baselga article and have actually provided far more of them to back up each point.

Look forward to recieving your reply. If you still consider the article is not suitable for publication it would be very helpful to have some more specific pointers as to exactly what more information I could include to prove notability. Also which references are not suitable and what would be acceptable alternatives.

Many thanks


Oncoexpert (talk) 14:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Oncoexpert: Hi, the references are self published / articles / journals / research paper by the subject, I tried finding details about the subject while reviewing but could not found much. Plz refer WP:NOTE , WP:REF , WP:RELIABLE and correct accordingly. Do resubmit once your done it will be reviewed. Happy to help anytime ...One life to live (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]