|
User talk:Samuell1616/Archive 1
Samuell1616, you are invited to the Teahouse
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hradyesh (December 13)
FYI, You had previously Proposed that Umesh Upadhyay be deleted. It was deleted and now restored as a contested prod. -- GB fan 12:17, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Proposed Deletion of Alhassan AndaniHello Samuell1616, I see that you work actively in BLP and I appreciate your efforts in trying to rid WP of articles that violate BLP policies. I believe you mistakenly tagged Alhassan Andani for deletion and stated that it shouldn't be a featured article even though it was never. I would entreat you to conduct Google search to be certain of the notability of an individual before applying such tags. However you are free to maintain still that the tag is appropriate, in that case we would require the opinion of the community. Best Regards.—Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 14:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC) Edits to Vivek BhaskaranHello Samuell1616 The edits done to this article at 13:58, 6 January 2015 are stripping off an important part of facts for which the subject in known in the niche of market research software. The facts presented are directly pasted as they have been presented in a known media site Seattle Times. I do not think it violates any of Wikipedia's guidelines on editing. Although further information to add a bigger perspective about the subject are welcome. Can this change be reverted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unitedopinions (talk • contribs)
You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Request on 08:54:59, 9 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Csma03
I am the author of Draft:CITIC Telecom CPC. I have already rewritten this page many times with reliable sources, I really don't know why it is still be treated as advertisement. I just briefly introduce the company with some background info. I would like to know which part(s) contain problem so that I can focus to revise that part(s), many thanks.
Request on 09:57:47, 13 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Artisan301
Thanks Artisan301 (talk) 09:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Draft:LapaluxHi, I saw your declining the submission of Draft:Lapalux, which I think the subject meets WP:BAND criteria #1. You said: "Improve the article , remove the promotional references, non reliable music reviews etc and add independent references about the subject including the newly launched album."[1] Well, I do not think the references are promotional. Additionally, according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources, websites such as Beats per Minute, Drowned in Sound, The Fader, and Pitchfork Media can be used as reliable sources. Which ones do you think are "the promotional references" and "non reliable music reviews"? 122.26.219.149 (talk) 14:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
19:06:21, 13 February 2015 review of submission by MetaGrrrl
Hi! I've added a clearer statement of notability at the beginning of the article—"Google Reader Founder" in Forbes Magazine's words—and an additional citation (Wired) in which he's being consulted by a major publication as an important "ex-Googler". Also added ABC News coverage of Wetherell's app Avocado. As before, the reason for this article is because Wetherell was already mentioned in half a dozen Wikipedia articles but there was no way to tell that the software developer and the musician were actually the same guy. Thanks! MetaGrrrl (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
09:09:18, 16 February 2015 review of submission by Remsington
Hey there, The article I've written has been rejected because the references don't accurately prove the subject's notability. Would you be able to provide me an example? I'm writing this submission for quite a prominent Australian magician, but he's an older gentleman and many of his sources aren't online. I thought I'd given enough to prove his notability, but I'm a novice with Wikipedia, so any help you can give me would be fantastic. Cheers. Jeremy
Request on 19:02:05, 16 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LailaArcher
Can you please tell me which of the links I have provided do not meet your criteria so I can remove them and have them replaced? Thank you so much, Laila (LailaArcher (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC))
Rockman Industries(Anilmehta9 (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)) Please see my article Rockman Industries - As suggested by you I have edited the content (removed the promotional content and removed the repetitive references.)
14:20:35, 17 February 2015 review of submission by Arjanvangeel
Hi there, thank your for reviewing my Wikipedia article about F.O.D. (band). Since the last review, I've improved upon the article by adding many more (10+) new, objective references from various sources, all discussing and mentioning F.O.D. I also had a talk with the last reviewer, who stated that it's difficult for an underground punk rock band (like F.O.D.) to comply to the 'notability' guideline, but that my article was 'almost there' in getting published. The band I'm writing about is currently one of the biggest, most prominent Belgian punk rock bands. They are playing huge festivals like the 25.000 people fesetival called Groezrock (I've added references for that), they being discussed in interviews and video interviews (I've added links too), and touring Europe (added links for that as well). Can you -please- eleborate on WHAT I have to do to make this article official. I've been working on this for half a year now, and it getting declined all the time is getting frustrating. Especially when there's no comments from the reviewer. I know that these reviews are there to prevent bogus information to be on Wikipedia, but I've been very serious about this article, and putting a lot of effort in it. And this has been the 4th decline in 6+ months. It's disheartening. Thanks for your reply. Arjan van Geel (the Netherlands). Arjanvangeel (talk) 14:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
16:22:35, 17 February 2015 review of submission by Arjanvangeel
08:46:45, 16 February 2015 review of submission by Divyaallen
Divyaallen (talk) 08:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletionThis article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... it is the main disambiguation of the term New Economy movement. Jonpatterns (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Proposed Deletion of Sally FalkowSamuell1616 I have torn out all of the promotional "resume" type stuff and made it bare bone. I aspire to build it up slowly, carefully, and fully inline with the expectations of Wikipedia Chrisabraham (talk) 18:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Samuell1616 this page is not unambiguously promotional, because it is not meant to be. This is the first draft and I had thought I would have a little more time than immediately to kind of work it through. I thought I would have the help and the assistance of the community as opposed to just having delete. I will try to crop down a bunch of stuff in order to make it more compliant. Chrisabraham (talk) 18:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Edits to Premier Boxing ChampionsHello, I have made edits to Premier Boxing Champions wikipedia page to make it less promotional and more encyclopedic. I've added more reference material and cited more sources. Can you advise if I have done this correctly? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davenadkarni (talk • contribs) 20:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Kalika Yap Speed deletionWhile Mrs. Yap exceeds the guidelines for notability, upon further critical analysis, I am going to revise the entry to meet the guidelines of WP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siamsens (talk • contribs) 21:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC) I edited the article. You were right, it needed revisions. LMK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siamsens (talk • contribs) 22:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Jakarta Love StoryHello Samuell1616. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jakarta Love Story, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
18:24:00, 19 February 2015 review of submission by Ben.zitney
Hi Samuell1616, I was wondering if you could point out any specific areas that need reliable sources? My sources included NYTimes.com, PropertyCasualty360.com, and ibamag.com, which are all significant, reliable publications in my opinion. Am I mistaken here? Any specific advice would be much appreciated. Thanks so much! Ben.zitney (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion declined: Dregs of wineI am refusing this speedy deletion because neither of the criteria you specified fits. G5 only applies if someone creates an article if there is a ban saying they can't, or if they use a sock puppet account to create it while their real account is blocked. It does not apply if someone creates an article and later gets blocked for something unrelated, which is exactly what's happened here. If I were to get blocked today for, say, extreme personal attacks, you could not go around to speedy delete articles I created back in 2007. That would be ridiculous. I declined A7 because a colour is not "real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organized event", which I think is pretty self explanatory. Reyk YO! 18:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
18:59:19, 19 February 2015 review of submission by Erikauthor23
Erikauthor23 (talk) 18:59, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Hello Samuell1616 My Name is Erik Shein i spent almost 6 months putting that article together before i submitted for my publisher and studio for the wikipedia, audience and you are telling me i am not notable and my references are not correct that article is about me and i have been a children's book writer for 30 years and make my living and support my family with it so how notable is that? i would like your help with my article because we feel the children's books we write and have published are important for the wikipedia audience to learn about thanks Erik Shein Arkwatch Deletion of Driver SupportI am a little new to the wiki space. I was trying to be intentional in creating the business entry and following other large companies like Dell for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell I just did an edits trying to take out anything that is not just pure factual information. I was hoping to start with a base like this and then grow it over time with facts about the company again similar to dell and other companies. If I am to go about this another way please let me know I would appreciate the guidance and help in making this done the right way. Boothrich (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Boothrich (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Boothrich (talk • contribs) 20:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC) Proposed Deletion of Lorex Technology Inc.Hello, With regards to your proposed deletion of Lorex Technology Inc., I am unclear on the criteria used to establish encyclopaedic value, and further how the content could have been considered to be in violation of the following: (A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events)) Many Wikipedia pages that provide the history of an organization do not demonstrate any more credible indication of the company's importance or the significance of its leadership figures. I can point to other Wikis from related companies that publish facts of far lesser significance to the nature of the company being discussed let alone any kind of innate importance in general. I invite you to examine the links below and provide any excerpt that would nominate these Wikis as being somehow more important or less promotional:
I direct your attention specifically to the GoPro Wiki, which has been marked for its semblance to an advertisement but has not been deleted. I am curious why there is a division in the treatment of content when nothing on the Lorex Technology Inc. page discussed the quality or usefulness of products the company sells. Any objective history of any organization evidenced by official sources such as public press releases and financial assessments and not by promotional content or marketing-driven assessments of the product should qualify as having encyclopaedic value. Since I've finished writing this response, someone has deleted the page. Please advise how I can proceed in getting the Lorex Technology Inc. page back online. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex2230 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Request on 11:31:17, 17 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Pruthv
Pruthv (talk) 11:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
06:37:25, 20 February 2015 review of submission by Sanjoy64
I am not a professional editor, please help me out with the edition of the draft. You had declined the draft stating it used peacock terms, please help me rectify them. HJ000RT (talk) 06:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr.Kutikuppala Surya Rao has been accepted The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! One life to live (talk) 14:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)17:24:18, 20 February 2015 review of submission by Podchomp
Again I am happy to make changes and would just like some more guidance. Your help is greatly appreciated! Disclaimer: I used to work with this company a few years ago. I have recently decided to create articles for companies I have interacted with the past. I found this company to be notable in terms of garnering industry recognition. Podchomp 17:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Om SwamiDear Samuell1616, I request you to please take the article from the Speedy deletion as the article was not written with any promotional intent. Can you please let me know which part of the article sounds promotional so that I can fix it. Your help is greatly appreciated. Srihariom (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Dear Samuell1616, Om Swami is a published author. The general notability guideline requires significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources that are independent. The reliable source is evident by the book authored by Om Swami and published by Harper Element in December 2014. Further, the article contains verifiable statements from multiple independent third party sources covering the subject in various newspapers. The verifiable sources have been cited throughout the article by using the inline citations. A leading newspaper recently ranked the book as No.6 on the best selling non fiction book http://www.financialexpress.com/article/industry/jobs/top-10-fiction-and-non-fiction-6/40247/ amongst other notable authors. I believe that we do have adequate notability and reliable sources to support the article. Regards.Srihariom (talk) 11:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Dear Samuell1616, Can you please review the article now. I have edited most sections of the article and improved it by incorporating the NPOV guidelines. Regards. Srihariom (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Samuell1616, I've just helped cleanup this article. Thank you for your assistance in helping us maintain encyclopedic quality. Please review when you get a moment and hopefully we can remove Speedy Deletion tag now. Cheers223.225.235.211 (talk) 03:45, 22 February 2015 (UTC) A kitten for you! Thank you for , I got an alert you patrolled page I created. Thank you Optrimes (talk) 09:28, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
06:31:51, 23 February 2015 review of submission by Divyaallen
Please take more care with speedy deletion taggingPlease take more care with tagging for speedy deletion and make sure you fully understand the criteria. My impression is that you not. I have removed the tag from Julie Tolentino, for example. The A7 and G11 criteria were not appropriate. The article had multiple references. All it needed was {{Reflist}} added to make them appear. And it made a credible assertion of notability based on them. It is your obligation to check for things like that before tagging. It needs copyediting but was not blatantly promotional. Also, it is inappropriate to tag an article for deletion within an hour of its creation except in only the most blatant an obvious cases. I suggest you work from the back of the NPP queue. You also tagged for the wrong reasons. It was a blatant copyvio. Had it not been, an accredited university would never qualify for deletion under A7. Please re-read the criteria and go back to re-check any other articles you may have erroneously tagged today. Voceditenore (talk) 13:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Request on 15:52:17, 24 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by TomAFT
Hi Samuel1616, I can see that you have rejected the article for the Academy of Financial Trading for publication. I have tries to adhere to the Wikipedia policies by writing in as neutral a fashion as I believe to be possible. I don't really know how to provide a valid description of which services the company provides with less material, and I think it to be almost impossible to provide any additional content without coming across as advertorial. I have also provided valid links from 3rd parties such as CNBC, Yahoo!, MarketWatch, Crunchbase etc. Would it be possible for you to provide me with any further guidelines which might see us succeed in getting this page published? If it is a case where "less is more", please do tell me and I will have no issue in cutting where necessary to help. Thank you. Tom TomAFT (talk) 15:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
@samuell1616 - I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you are asking me to do! I have clicked on the link, but it just brings me to your profile page. Any guidance which you can provide me with in order to get my submission approved would be hugely appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomAFT (talk • contribs) 11:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
@samuell1616 - Sure - thanks for your reply. More and more people are turning to Wikipedia in order to verify the existence of an entity. Wikipedia is, in my opinion, seen by the general public as a trusted, unambiguous, neutral source of information. For those who are looking for information on a company like the Academy of Financial Trading (outside of the company website), I believe that it is of huge importance to be included within Wikipedia - as long as it adheres to the Wikipedia guidelines. Other similar companies like the Online Trading Academy, or Better Trades, or Today Trader, or Trading Advantage have been listed on Wikipedia. How it falls within the WP:Notability guidelines is that it has attracted the notice of reliable sources, unrelated to the company. I am happy to edit the article further if you feel that this would be a requirement to getting approved. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomAFT (talk • contribs) 14:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Request on 18:37:43, 24 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mouthwash15
Mouthwash15 (talk) 18:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Here it is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Andrew_Rosen_(retail_executive) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mouthwash15 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC) You tagged my article on RHCM. My first article. I can not work out how to put it into any category? Could you do this or better still, tell me how to do it? It would fit under Injection moulding or Injection Molding. Thanks..OK, I just entered the entire message in the subject box. Another error. I have mastered linking a word or phrase to a internal or external link. The cite button seems to do nothing?. I tried to put a signature & time stamp on the article but apparently that is just for 'talk' pages. So, I guess I should stamp this? Thanks in advance for any tips or pointers...Best regards.--Altmoney (talk) 23:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
link attachedHi Samuell, I think you are asking me for the link to the page?. I thought you would have that as you tagged it. Anyway, it is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RHCM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Altmoney (talk • contribs) 09:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
CategoryHi Samuell, I added the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RHCM to the category "plastics industry'. The page still reads that it is not linked to any categories? I added references, links etc. Best regards. --88.103.5.5 (talk) 09:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 17:11:55, 25 February 2015 review of submission by ASIrobots
ASIrobots (talk) 17:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Autonomous Solution, Inc. ReviewJust curious what about our page read like a sales pitch? Can you be more specific? Was it a particular section? We feel it was very neutral, and the previous review did not think it read like a sales pitch, they just wanted to see more references, which we added. Thanks, ASIrobots — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASIrobots (talk • contribs) 17:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Recent Review of Draft It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. |
