User talk:Sammi Brie/Archive 17
Speedy deletion nomination of XHPGUA-FM
A tag has been placed on XHPGUA-FM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ammarpad (talk) 09:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
XHTCP-FMNew "Romantica" logo in place; wouldn't it be nice if these companies would update their sites??!! User:Rudy2alan (talk)
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Raymie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Editor of the Week
User:MX submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: {{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 16:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC) DYK for Estadio Universitario Alberto "Chivo" CórdobaOn 26 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Estadio Universitario Alberto "Chivo" Córdoba, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Estadio Universitario Alberto "Chivo" Córdoba incorporates a mural by Leopoldo Flores in the stands on the west side of the stadium? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Estadio Universitario Alberto "Chivo" Córdoba. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Estadio Universitario Alberto "Chivo" Córdoba), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 00:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC) Nomination of The Weather Channel internationally for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Weather Channel internationally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Weather Channel internationally until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC) DYK for Coatzacoalcos Underwater TunnelOn 29 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coatzacoalcos Underwater Tunnel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Coatzacoalcos Underwater Tunnel, which took 13 years to complete, has been described as a "monument to corruption"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coatzacoalcos Underwater Tunnel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Coatzacoalcos Underwater Tunnel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Gatoclass (talk) 12:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Someone removed the logo file for this station, but with no explanation. I found another logo online without the KeBuena; wondered what thoughts you might have?? Is this a format change or just a tweak in the logo, or are both logos usable? If you think the logo which was removed is still valid, would you revert the edit which removed it? User:Rudy2alan (talk)
DYK for Armando Ríos PiterOn 21 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Armando Ríos Piter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Armando Ríos Piter declined his own party's nomination for Governor of Guerrero because it wanted him to sign a pact with the former governor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Armando Ríos Piter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Armando Ríos Piter), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC) Thanks for the review of Template:Did you know nominations/Bhagavad-gita Museum, I concur. I also had an image for ALT1 but the OTRS for permission might take time so I gave it up. --Muhandes (talk) 22:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Is XEHK in Guadalajara or San Miguel? There seems to be some confusion, but the Mexican gov. database says Guadalajara. I changed San Miguel to San Miguel el Alto because it was the only San Miguel I found in Jalisco. User:Rudy2alan(talk)
The Radiorama website shows a logo (page 3 of the Radiorama website) with a format of "1300 Radio Mexicana", but the article branding is shown as "Fiesta Mexicana". I think that you edited the branding last time, so I just wanted to be sure before adding the "Radio Mexicana" logo. Rudy2alan (talk)
Commons deletion requestWondering if you have an opinion on commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Carretera_federal_S30.svg. I'm pretty sure that IP is a Guadalajara-based editor who is indefinitely blocked here and at Commons. –Fredddie™ 23:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:XHFTI-FM La Caliente logo.pngThanks for uploading File:XHFTI-FM La Caliente logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC) Brennen589They're a sock of Martini Lewis X (talk · contribs) for your future reference; I've thus converted your PROD on KQVN Radio to a G5 SPEEDY under those circumstances. Revert and report them on-sight to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martini Lewis X if you see them again. Thanks! Nate • (chatter) 19:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Walden Grove construction.pngThank you for uploading File:Walden Grove construction.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 16:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC) What is a "concession" in Mexican broadcasting?Would this be a license or construction permit? I'm unclear on the terminology. Thanks!Stereorock (talk) 19:14, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Use of CDMXJust wanted to thank you for your check of this on the Mexico City template; I'm seeing it's getting some NYC-type of use, but I'm definitely not sure if it's become ubiquitous (it seems like there's some artificial boosting going on), so I appreciate getting some eyes on that. Nate • (chatter) 04:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC) DYK for Martha Erika Alonso HidalgoOn 16 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martha Erika Alonso Hidalgo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martha Erika Alonso stopped using her husband's last name in public during her campaign for Governor of Puebla? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martha Erika Alonso Hidalgo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Martha Erika Alonso Hidalgo), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC) Someone removed the logo from the XHVQ-FM article; do you think the logo may be out of date. If you think the logo is still good, would you revert the edit which removed it? Same thing happened with XHPI-FM. Thanks! User:Rudy2alan (talk)
DYK nomination of Cuitláhuac García JiménezHello! Your submission of Cuitláhuac García Jiménez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MX (✉ • ✎) 16:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |