|
User talk:Salimfadhley/Archives/2020/September
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate Shemirani (September 1)
Steele and ShemiraniThank you for starting these drafts. I've done some work on Steele. Hope that's OK - feel free to discard whatever isn't useful. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC) PS I am confident more reliable sources will publish about both in the coming weeks and the "lack of significant coverage" objection to Shemirani is likely to become out of date so the draft can be considered again. I'll keep my eye out! Steele's coverage is clearly not inidental, so he should be approved when the draft is ready. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for submitting. Might be worth mentioning this in this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_over_responses_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic#United_Kingdom (which currently doesn't mention the 5G angle people) and this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation_related_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic#5G_mobile_phone_networks BobFromBrockley (talk) 09:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Steele (conspiracy theorist) has been accepted Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Salimfadhley (talk) 09:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Your thread has been archived
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate Shemirani has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Salimfadhley (talk) 19:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)SurnamesSurname pages don't need notability to be shown and are quite common as per the surnames category. I'm referring to Swargiary which I just accepted. SL93 (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Thanks for your comment. The subject has a road named after him. Does't that sound notable to you?
Draft : CitiusTechHi Salimfadhley, Thank you for sharing details with me. Yes I went through both the articles Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) and Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest as suggested by you. [Draft:CitiusTech]] comes under conflict of interest but I don't either work or represent the organization directly. My friend works in the organization and he helped me with relevant information as required. That is how I am connected to this organization. Hence I have disclosed it on my user page about it. I have tried to keep information factual with appropriate references. Request you to kindly check and let me know your recommendation on required edits or if there is any other concern. As this is my first article, I am really looking forward for feedback. Reshmapaul18 (talk) 06:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bike Shed Motorcycle Club has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Salimfadhley (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)ApologiesSorry, @Praxidicae: I misread the situation. Thank you for reverting my talk page comment. It was inappropriate. --Salimfadhley (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC) Conspiracy theoristsI don't think I knew of your work before even though you're not a new editor. It's possible that I've been stating the obvious when thinking so earlier as you invited me to review the Shemirani article. In any case, I think that you're doing good work and I thank you for it. One thing I was surprised about was that unless I missed something you ultimately reviewed and moved articles to mainspace (after some assessment, like mine). While I've done WP:NPP I never was involved at WP:AFC and am not sure if it's common practice. I understand that anyone can do it and that the possible consequence is CSD/AfD where relevant. I'm personally not a great content creator and have mostly cleaned up and improved existing articles. As I believe in collaborative work I never requested the autopatrol right and also decided to submit to AFC a recent article I wrote, then realized that it may take forever for it to be reviewed. As Shemirani made the news and that people were likely to search for her on WP (some obviously did and even vandalised or ranted, your predictions accomplished), it was a good move... I was even more surprised when I saw the pics were really yours from a live event. Congratulations for that, —PaleoNeonate – 19:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
|
