User talk:Salamanderxander

This is Salamanderxander's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: ELONGATE (cryptocurrency) (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ELONGATE (cryptocurrency) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ELONGATE (cryptocurrency), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Salamanderxander! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elongate (cryptocurrency) (August 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:ORG / WP:ORGDEPTH.

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did You Leave A Message On My Page?

I had a message on my talk page about wanting help with the Elongate article but it was not signed. PopCultureSuperHero (talk) 22:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PopCultureSuperHero, I did leave you that message. Apologies for omitting the signature! --Salamanderxander (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To Answer Your Question

Thats cool. Anyhow, when it comes to cryptocurrency they are a dime a dozen. Coinmarketcap lists over 1000 active projects. In this regard any attempt to make an article for a project that has never dipped into the top 100 will be met with scrutiny from the admins. They'll view it as promotional. If you don't have a deep edit history then they'll question whether or not you yourself are associated with the project. Like, what are the motivations for this person to spend the time making a page for an obscure project other than them having some external motivation. I'm not accusing you of this, but hats how the Admins will looks at it.

In regards to me as a crypto contributor, I have not really contributed as of yet. I use to make pages for YouTube influencers while in college, but most got deleted over the last couple years as Admins cracked down on what was relevant. In 2017 having 1m subscribers was notable...in 2021 not so much. I was actually accused by Reddit Admins of being the influencer in question a few times, and what saved me from even having my account banned, was pointing out to the sheer amount of articles I had made. I obviously can't be a dozen people at once.

That would be my suggestion to you. If you truly think this project is notable then begin making pages for other projects, then circle back to this one later. Build your article creation history up -- it really is like a resume. Most projects in the top 100 have pages already made. But there are a fee projects who have dipped in, and then dipped out. These are articles you could easily get approved. Projects like Kava Labs, and Origin Protocol for instance. Best of luck! PopCultureSuperHero (talk) 22:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]