|
User talk:ST47/Archive2ST47's talk page, archive 7
This is an archive of discussions past. Please do not edit this page, and instead visit User talk:ST47 if you want to leave me a comment.
summaryPlease use an edit summary that inspires a bit more confidence than "clean up - bother me at my talk if I mess up". A simple explanation of what you are doing is normally best. Martin 10:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Bot Edit ErrorYour bot recently edited Class 5 telephone switches and incorrectly deleted a closing bracket. I have corrected the error, and (I hope) improved the link anyway. Mmccalpin 18:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
DowneyWould you like to explain to me what 'Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism'. Am I being excused of vandalism if you look at the page Ringwood Town F.C. I have added more information I have in no way added nonsense or done any vandalism to it!
I saw your reply by looking in your archive. The article has been changed, and the contradictory sentence has been removed, with 5 references added, including a historical narrative.Bakaman Bakatalk 21:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC) Your botYour bot is changing the infoboxes for Canadian MPs, changing <b> to ''' which is messing up the boxes. Please see changes for David Christopherson to see what I mean. -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Your bot indiscriminantly removes newlines.You recently edited block cipher modes of operation and then removed some double blank lines. Those double blank lines were put into that page by human editors to make the article more readable and keep tables and maths from getting to cloose to other text. Just as many other bot "drivers" you seem to be indiscriminantly removing blank lines and/or double blank lines without checking what result that has for the page layout and readability. --David Göthberg 08:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Astronomical objects revertPlease do not revert without discussion. Mrwuggs 16:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
STBot edit: Elliot StablerHello. STBot editted the article Elliot Stabler and removed a relevant category. The edit, which I reverted, can be found here. Any explanation would be helpful. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 01:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 16th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
New UserHi, my name is RyGuy. I am a newly registered user to wikipedia. I am looking for people who can help me on my User page (User: RyGuy). I was thinking that you have some pretty good things on your page, so mabye you could help. Just drop by User Talk: RyGuy if you want to help. Thanks! RyGuy 18:22, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the help! It.... um... helped.
RyGuy 16:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Your botI don't know how to say this without being rude, but I am not sure of how useful your bot is. The default AWB edits are nice I guess, but I don't think they really are worth making if they're the only edit being made. It takes up server resources and human resources (bloating people's watchlists) that I don't think are really justified by extremely minor fixes to link formatting or where a stub tag is positioned. Besides, most articles are touched quasi-regularly by AWB as people fix typos, disambiguate links, and so on. Again I hope you don't take this the wrong way, just a hopefully constructive criticism. --W.marsh 02:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
The General fixes AWB has are designed to be minor things that can be done while doing some other task, to make the edits more worthwhile than normal bots. Doing only general fixes is not really going to be worth it. Though some of the general fixes are quite important, simplifying links and similar jobs aren't generally important enough to be done on their own. Martin 09:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC) opinion: wastefulI'd like to register my opinion of this bot, having just encountered it; I find it rather wasteful, and I believe you should seriously re-consider running it. I met it on an extremely minor article that nonetheless I have on my watchlist (no, I'm not going to turn off bot notifications) and it made extremely minor edits. At what cost, and why bother? It removed an underscore and moved a couple of s's. Is there really a need for a bot to change that kind of stuff? It has no impact on the day-to-day use of wikipedia as a resource; and for anyone who's contributing to an article, if there are enough misplaced s's and _'s to make their underpants dance, then they can just go ahead and fix it themselves (using AWB, even) while making their other changes. --Dthatcher 14:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
But it IS hurting people. It's annoying people by changing formatting, often inappropriately, and forcing them to come to you as some sort of self-proclaimed authority on piddly little things. And it's draining Wikipedia server resources by doing things that don't need to be done mechanically. Do I need to repeat the arguments that everyone else on this page have made, too? For christ's sake, at least talk to somebody else about it. Start a forum or something and shut it off til you get some qualified opinions. --Dthatcher 03:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
And do you feel you're following the guidelines that were laid out in letter and spirit? And is the database load really worth editing entries that are (for example) a couple paragraphs long and have 4 stray hyphens and 2 pipes? Is -your- time really worth running a bot for that? Constructive criticism: What if you put in an edit minimum of, say, 6 or 8+, to fix just the most butchered articles? --Dthatcher 22:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Bot edits on MathematicaJust FYI, the STBot messed up a few computer algebra examples, and failed to notice that "Pocket pc" was a redirect to "Pocket PC". Everything is fine now, but you may want to look at the page to see how you could improve the bot, and you may also want to prevent the bot from running again on this page until it is improved. Thanks, Four Dog Night 16:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Source order--templates before catsAs far as I know, stubs and other templates should be placed above categories, not the other way around. 24.19.35.187 01:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC) LaylaWhy did you revert my edits to Layla Williams? Hmrox 15:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
HustleWhy did you revert my edit to Hustle (TV series)? --84.64.51.100 19:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
A very Californian RfA thanks from Luna Santin
Signpost updated for October 23rd.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC) BlocksI'm not sure how the blocking system works. Whenever I try to edit from work (a school) the IP address is blocked. How can I get around this? I requested it be unblocked but still no joy. Ozdaren 00:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Luka (song)You seem to be away on IRC, check Talk:Luka (song) if you have the time, I think the article is not a copyvio after all :) See you! -- lucasbfr talk 01:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC) RfAI answered the questions on RfA (sorry, I forgot). SupaStarGirl 19:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
If I see you violating WP:BITE just once more, I will ask a fellow administrator on ANI to literally block you. This was one of the worst biting incidents in my entire Wikipedia career. PLEASE - reread BITE, CSD, and treat other people's work seriously. You're not doing the project any favors with edits such as those. - crz crztalk 16:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
unblock autoIn regards to [2], please note that you can use {{unblock-auto reviewed}} without a decline reason to do the same thing. Thanks -- Netsnipe ► 05:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 30th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Thanks for unblocking my IP!Happy Halloween! :) --164.107.92.120 21:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC) WP:POST bot requestI'm sorry; I thought I had set that as my default setting. It should be fixed now, but if it happens again, let me know. You might also avoid other AWB users doing this by moving the page to a template in your userspace, and transcluding it that way. Ral315 (talk) 21:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Thank you for supporting my RfA
Wikispecies bot requestHi ST, the bot edits can be summarized on this page: Wikispecies:User:Kempm/Request For Change II. Wikispecies has been using a layered structure for taxonavigation, but it has become to difficult to maintain. Inserting and deleting taxons ran into major problems. We're currently revising all our taxon templates (upto about 10.000), to make a tree flat. So what a bot needs to do is check the taxonavigation section and remove all ':' colons starting at a page. A sample diff: [3]. This is the most important part, that can affect upto 80.000 pages. There could be a further request that looks like this: Check if the Taxonavigation section looks like: ==Taxonavigation==
{{template}}
childtaxon: [[link1]] .... [[link100]]
If it does not fit this standard, a tag should be add, for admins to take actions (Perhaps just placing the page in a category.) So admins can create the template and change the section. --Kempmichel 11:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC) (Wikispecies:User:Kempm) Sorry:Apparently I can't spell, sometimes. —Nightstallion (?) 20:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC) I noticed you are doing a spell check on this. I should be done with my edits in about 2 hours. I would appreciate if you could do this at that time, to catch more errors.thanksDineshkannambadi 21:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC) RFA thanks from Mike
I was fixing the Arnod article dummyI was fixing the last article ... and as far as harper goes, most of what I said was true Plural linksI was looking through Convex function's history and I noticed that STBot had edited the article and replaced [[tangent|tangents]] with [[tangent]]s. I don't think that is something that should be included in general bot cleanup. Personally I prefer wikilinks styled like the former and I change any links like that I find. Wikilinks with text outside of the brackets drive me nuts... it's a matter of personal preference, and I really think that bots should be restricted to changes that have a general consensus. ~MDD4696 18:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 6th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Thank you for your support!
ThanksHi ST47, thanks a lot for your support to my RFA. I see you are a very prolific editor and have already amassed a huge number of edits and running a bot too!! Do let me know if I can be of any help at all. (Sorry I am not good at making templates, and hence this plain looking note..) -- Lost(talk) 10:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Axel Lesser articleI changed your bot remark from East Germany back to the East German. I appreciate your bot's efforts, but it made the first sentence read odd. Thank you for your efforts. Chris 02:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
My RfA:Thank you so very much for voting support in my RfA. However, I have withdrawn due to reasons that a stressed user would withdraw under. I'm sorry I have failed you & your expectations. Thanks, Spawn Man 09:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC) FLV articleIt wasn't a finished edit Since some editors seem to think there should be no external links at all in the article , no matter how useful , I was just doing a quick revert which had the bad side effect of disrupting the wiki links. I was aware of that problem and I was planning to fix it in time Garda40 13:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC) RfA thanks!
EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC) RfA thanks
Erik RegtopHi, please can I ask why you have flagged the article Erik Regtop as a candidate for speedy deletion? Thanks, GiantSnowman Sunday, 2006-11-12 T 16:52 UTC
My failed RfAI deleted the comment that I left here, as I was in a bad mood at the time due to the failure of the RfA and said things that I now regret. I realise this isn't good Wikipedia etiquette, so please accept my apology for that. Walton monarchist89 20:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC) The Vincent Black ShadowCan you give me a chance to finish? Fears in the Water Hackajar 01:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Deletion bot(?) slightly impatientI just got started with writing European mythology and I got your "Marked for speedy deletion" notice. Of course it is a good thing that there are people like you who try to keep Wikipedia a clean place. However I think you should wait until at least a week or so after the creation of a page before you post any of such markers, because this will probably scare new editors.
Thanks for your input!Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider. In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question. A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork"). Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 13:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 13th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC) anon with no sig and who is trying to mess up my talkWhy is my submission flagged! Can you give me a reasonable explanation to why this occurred? JBalton
About useless editsConsidering the message you left me on my talk page, I replay that I won't do it again. Thank you for your polite language. --Meno25 22:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
anonYou just edited my addition to yhe article "Overweight". I will repost it, but don't reedit it. It wasn't experimental, it was intended. I just restored your revert of my 3 edits without the <<episode needed>> tags ... if you look at the difference, I think you will see that they were valid edits. I'll come back Some Other Day and stick {{fact}} templates instead. Fight creeping cruft! —141.156.240.102 (talk|contribs) 01:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
mughal empirehey, yeah....it was not intended vandalism......I did not receive a digital manuscript for the text from my column writer, so I had to do it by hand and shorten it out, sorry about all the edits!! prof Hughes Sherlock HolmesIn this edit [4], you restored a piece of vandalism that had just been removed ! Shome mishtake shurely ? -- Beardo 02:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Homebake editI added Midget to the 1996 Sydney Homebake lineup and it was removed. Why? They did play - right before Something For Kate. What vandalism are you talking about? Here is the edits in question. All I did was remove the stub tags and fix those Categories: (1) The stub tags are not appropriate because the article it too long to be a stub; (2) Category:Presidents of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is for people, not films; (3) Category:History of the Latter Day Saint movement is for actual history, not depictions of history, and (4) Category:Joseph Smith, Jr. is a better category anyways, and it's a sub cat of Category:History of the Latter Day Saint movement anyways. If you disagree with my assessment, that's fine, it's your right, but don't label disagreements about content as vandalism (assume good faith), and defiantly do not give a incorrect Final warning; there are better ways to deal with conflicts than they way you are choosing. -- 12.106.111.10 21:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
This ip address is that of a university hence even though I am not the person who made those edits, I can assure you that they were NOT vandalisms. The person who added them in all likelihood lived there and wished to add the name of a college which he knew existed yet was not listed. 203.197.196.1 01:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC) Check out how many times you warned this guy here - sorry wish I'd seen sooner! Glen 11:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
spammerMy Additions concerning Seth Tinsley on the Lincoln Herndon Page are historically accurate. DO NOT CHANGE THEM unlee you have the evidence / research to do so.
Please quit dinging my edits on the Lincoln-Herndon page. The Tinsley Dry Goods web page is part of the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency. Also, if you have a PHd in History or better ... tell me where from. Otherwise bugoff! George
3RRHave replied on my talk page. Arbitrary username 09:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC) RobotJust occasionally, RobotG (talk · contribs) gets logged out and puts through the odd edit anonymously. Please let it pass. --RobertG ♬ talk 11:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
noob below this lineLook You piece, my edits were valid. You mess up everybody shit, mabye you should stop re-editing peoples things. You gay fuck.
Headline textYou Suck Stop editing my edits. You are a piece of crap and don't know how to use a computer. You fuck.
ASSYou piece of fucking shit, your mother was a frisco dike. You fuck for dollars. Also your dad was a jiggalo. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.165.16.201 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 17 November 2006.
Regarding my "nonsence" on the sandboxHELLO! that is the SANDBOX, i was EXPERIMENTING im angry now!82.44.252.243 19:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
guyAlisonheritage2291 12:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)I am on a no smoking program, but im allergic to the sticky on the back of patches. my legs are red raw and a burning feeling. i was given a barrier cream to put on, but it works for a while and then the symptomes come back. i have tried anti-histamins and they are not working for me.can you give me advice. RfA Thanks
Thanks for your support!
editing of page on "newsletter"Hi, Why did you remove the stuff I added the Newsletter? No offence, but just want to understand the reasons. Stardancer
The edit is marked as STBot, and this bot refers to you. Please check. User:Stardancer
Sorry, it looks like I've confused your edit with the next one from 212.219.118.2. I wonder who this guy is. Sorry about the confusion. Stardancer
HiDo you want to be ma' friend if ya' do tell me
Regarding User: 167.206.78.2This anonymous user is on a multiple I.P Address server. Last time it was blocked, I, a fair wikipedian, could not reverse some vandalism. However, I sign in, and this anonymous user does not. Could you please block just the I.P address, but if someone signs in it will be temporarily unblocked? Thank you, ~Railcgun Signpost updated for November 20th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Welcoming usersHello! I have come across your name several times tonight while reverting vandalism and non-notable articles, here, here, here, here and here. Do you look at an editors' contributions before welcoming them? I suppose that if you welcome very many people then you are bound to come across a few vandals. It is wise to do a quick check of their contributions before issuing the welcome notice, as you may well come across a specific instance where directed advice or a warning would be well-placed. It seems incongruous to welcome someone one minute then have another person warn them about their actions. (aeropagitica) 22:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
VincentHello I am leaving a message here as requested. I started editing the Scott Ritter article because it is very biased. Vincent Farnsworth 20:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Vincent Your RfA... is transcluded incorrectly. You've transcluded your userpage instead. Yikes... riana_dzasta 17:58, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk pageI just need help.Bold textLots of It.Please.Alchemistjikan 19:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Told youSee what I mean.Alchemistjikan 19:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
I readily understand that one might be upset over his encountering strident opposition at his RfA, especially where he thinks such opposition to be without merit or improperly to focus on insignificant edits that tend to present an inaccurate picture of him, and I even understand that one might react viscerally upon his appreciating that his RfA will not succeed, but I think this to be bad form; not only, to be sure, is it less-than-civil, but it also impugns the reasoning skills and good faith of those opposing, none of whom seems to have opposed vengefully. I sincerely hope that such withdrawal was offered in exhaustion and with, as many of your other (quite fine) communications, a humorous undertone; if not, you've served only to bear out that those those who were concerned about your ability to be cordial and other-than-abrupt in your dealings with other editors (amongst which number I tended to count myself) were correct. Joe 19:44, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your support at RFAI wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae'blis 22:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 27th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC) Requesting Your Help to stop vandalThere is a malicious WIKIPEDIA vandal named Rolan Rance, operating under user name RolandR, who has been posting and reposting false and libelous information on a number of Wikipedia pages, including the articles on David Bukay, Steven Plaut, and a few others. He then has requested page protection to prevent other sfrom correcting and repairing his vandalism. Please do something to put a stop to his malicious mischief. Thank you Josef Szamuels
Roland Rance is a malicious liar and vandal. He vandalizes wikipedia pages on Zionists. He simply inserted malicious libelous material on the basis of an unsupported assertion by David Newman, Neve Gordon's crony and sidekick, which Newman inserted in a Tikkun article. Tikkun is not a source anyone would consider authoritative nor serious. The judg ein th ecase in question herself dismissed Newman's statement as baseless. In Newman's Tikkun article, he had no evidence nor factual supports to back up his assertion. It was simply what he thought. Rance has been inserting this in th eweb page as an internet prank. Signpost updated for December 4th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC) CFD removalsGreetings. I noticed that, after your bot removed Category:Fictional heroines from pages, they were not being removed from redirects. I've cleaned (actually in the process of) this cat from redirects, but is there a way to catch these in the future, or is it an intrinsic error of the wiki code? Cheers! -- Huntster T • @ • C 04:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
CfRI replied at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Effecting_a_CfR TonyTheTiger 19:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC) CFD (NZ soccer)Hi - I notice a glitches with your STbot - it seems to have removed categories from articles affected by the proposed change in the names of New Zealand soccer categories (from football to soccer), but not replaced new categories (Chatham Cup is one example). Also for some reason (possibly related and almost certainly piping) Category:New Zealand football clubs seems to be in a completely haphazard order. Grutness...wha? 20:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
24.72.1.39 edit abuse.Hello! I just noticed that 24.72.1.39 again had an interesting run-in with Wikipedia staff and I thought I'd try my best to rectify the situation... 24.72.1.39 is actually a public highschool of some 600 unmonitored, public computers behind a centralized NAT server, meaning vandalism from this range is all but inevitable. Its user page actually contains edits that I made, recommending that it be permanently blocked (complete with weather information) but nobody saw it initially. It should also be apparent on 24.72.1.39's user page how I know this, I go to that school, and thats where I edited the userpage from! Im not sure of the criteria for permanently blocking an address from editing, but I suggest you strongly consider this one. Its a static IP address, as the provider for their internet service is the same I use (a Shaw-based corporation in the local area). - RiceCake anybody created a wiki?Has anyone created a wiki? Reply and please tell the name. thxThanks to whoever replied. im ok. my wiki is perfect. What i mean is, have you ever made a wikipedia page?Mattthecat 19:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC) How is it going?Ddcc 15:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Subst'ing {{wc}} et. alThanks for doing these. It seems some of the uses are {{WC}} rather than {{wc}}. I've also spotted another template in the area that could do with subst'ing (same thing - the whole "template masquerading as article content" thing). I'll dig a little deeper to catch a fuller list that will come back here in the first instance, and back to WP:BOTREQ if you're not up for it. Chris cheese whine 22:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. -- RM 00:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Vandalism? Me?User talk:72.138.173.193 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search You have made an edit that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you do, you may be blocked for disruption. See the blocking policy.Pascal.Tesson 04:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Sports drink, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ST47Talk 19:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC) I have recieved this message on two occaisons and found them to be useless and offensive. Upon trying to edit pages for clarity, as was the case on the Laxatives page, changing "more for ladies" to "feminine" and trying to fix a link on the Sports Drink page (Mountain Dew AMP) I was told I was vandalising these pages. Why is this, and what can I do to stop it? I am not a vandal, and I have made many edits before that, in my view, have helped the Wikipedia project along. Anthalamo Signpost updated for December 11th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Bot flag grantedHi, your bot flag has been granted. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC) High End audio - ATC company removal. can it be put back into the document? i realize i didn't supply proper links, but the info is legit, the company is quite sth among the high end hardware manufacturers. soon i hope to have some time to create a separate entry about ATC. regards - pitdog http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pitdog Assuming good faithDude, when I prove that good faith doesn't exist, and then close by saying "that's in bad faith," then I don't see why I would be required to assume good faith. In the presence of overwhelming evidence, provided by me, destroying such a presumption, it's nonsensical to retain such a presumption. When you rebut a presumption, it disappears. Also, I hope Tuxide wasn't too hard on you. I know he said some mean things and threatened to report your violation, but that's not the way I roll, and I will defend you against his assault. BonniePrinceCharlie 16:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
What Is Your Bot Doing?Looks like you're ripping out a whole bunch of information that ought not be ripped out (e.g., [5]). What is the purpose of the edits? --DanielPenfield 15:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi. You did some work on this article. I'm now proposing a redirect to Pale Ale, similar to the original redirect. American strong ale is a variation on pale ale, and the different variations are best initially discussed in the main article. Later, if enough information grows, we can split it off, but for now it might be best to allow it to grow in a place where attention could be concentrated. SilkTork 21:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Your recent vandalism to User:Colin KeigherPlease do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Colin Keigher. It may be seen as vandalism. ST47Talk 01:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC) Questionable edit by botHello! Altmann was recently edited by your bot to this version. I couldn't figure out why it might have been done, since it didn't make any sense to delete the valid interwiki links. I reverted the edit, but thought you might like to look into it. Best regards, Cmprince 01:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
