User talk:SA 13 Bro/Archive 1

Archive 1Archive 2

Birthday

Tsunesaburō Makiguchi birthday was on 23 July 1871, NOT 6 June, and also Nichiren birthday was on 16 February 1222, NOT 6 April. SA 13 Bro (talk) 04:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Nichiren, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ogress smash! 07:21, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ogress smash! 07:27, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:Nichiren while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. And Talk:Tsunesaburō Makiguchi and Talk:July 23 Ogress smash! 18:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SA 13 Bro, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ogress smash! 22:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry! I have one account "SA 13 Bro" only! I'm from Singapore...SA 13 Bro (talk) 22:40, 23 July 2015‎ (UTC)

@Aki42006 Why you undo away my removed SPI Ivmbox notice at your talk page?... your account is not belong to me. SA 13 Bro (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
@Aki42006 Is this S993 account are belong to you?... If so: Caution! Don't abuse it anymore. SA 13 Bro (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Suggestions

Wikipedia has a strong policy of wp:verifiability. People often wish to verify the accuracy of an article and find out more information on a topic. So, significant edits should wp:cite wp:reliable sources (RS). Please add a citation with your edit. Unsourced may be challenged and/or removed.

Remember to sign your talk page posts with four tildes ~~~~ This is converted to links to your pages and a time stamp. See wp:talk pages for more information.

Please peruse the welcome section (to be added above in a bit). Cheers Ping me with {{u|Jim1138}} and sign "~~~~" or message me on my talk page. 19:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Jim1138 Oh, Thank you very much to you of your acknowledge reference, I'm a new user and I'll observance the policy...SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Disruption

Your edits since your return to editing have been disruptive and tendentious. Your method of communication with other editors on Talk:Tsunesaburō Makiguchi is quite unacceptable and lacks the civility expected in such discussions. You've also added the disputed date to other articles despite knowing that the date is disputed. I've removed your edits to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SA 13 Bro/Archive, once archived SPI reports are not to be modified. If you want to dispute information in an article you need to seek dispute resolution and tone down the hyperbole. Using exclamation points and shouting in caps does not make up for the lack of reliable sources verifying your argument. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Ponyo The account username "Aki42006" is NOT belong to me, the editor account username "Ogress" thought I'm his or her sockmaster...SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

That has no relevance whatsoever to the message I've left you here.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to July 23 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ndash; [[Communist Party of China]] launched the first time of [[National Congress]] in China.<ref>[http://www.chinatoday.com/org/cpc/cpc_1st_congress_standing_polibureau.htm 1st. National Congress

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

BracketBot Ok, thank to you...SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Space Sky - The Heavenly King Of Amaterasu Goddess.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Space Sky - The Heavenly King Of Amaterasu Goddess.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

ImageTaggingBot Oh...I'm sorry. That image I downloaded in six years ago and I didn't knew the copyright information anymore, so I'm now request admin. Yunshui help me to delete the image. Thank to your information, I'm sorry on that. SA 13 Bro (talk) 12:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

FYI

Hello SA. I saw your post here User talk:Materialscientist#Update this pages and I wanted to let you know that "pings" don't work for IPs. Hopefully they will have M's talk page on their watchlist or they will go back there to see your reply. Enjoy the week ahead. MarnetteD|Talk 17:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

MarnetteD Ok, thank to you... SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:55, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
You are most welcome. Cheers MarnetteD|Talk 17:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
5.81.116.226 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) Personal attack did at the talk page. SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

IP 183.90.36.105

Catflap08 And one thing; does you know who go and did the vandalized at Shinzō Abe's article diffs record on 24 June 2015??? There was a unknown person did the vandalizing from my shared IP range in Singapore on that day. SA 13 Bro (talk) 22:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Err nope, having some troubles to understand what you mean ... but no that IP address is not mine. I edit using my user name. --Catflap08 (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
I've quite some worried in future there maybe have some fellow in Singapore will engage an vandalizing at Shinzō Abe‎'s article by using my shared IP range, so I've to prevent it. SA 13 Bro (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

A8v

You were right. The template was wrong, but your fix wasn't quite right, either. It should be good now. Thanks for the heads up.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Moved to User:SA 13 Bro/WikiLove.

183.90.36.138 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) Oh, thank you very much to your appreciating. However, please take note to stay away the Shinzō Abe‎'s article by using shared IP range from 183.90.32.0 to 183.90.39.255, because I'm quite some worried in future there maybe have some fellow in Singapore will engage an vandalizing at that article by using my shared IP range. Wishs all the best career, healthy life and luck to you!... SA 13 Bro (talk) 18:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Bhola Govt. High School

Thank you for patrolling new pages. But I want you to know that I removed the tag you placed on Bhola Govt. High School because WP:A7 explicitly excludes educational institutions. —teb728 t c 22:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I retagged it to WP:A3; I should have thought of that instead of just untagging. A1 would not have been quite right in that the context clear that it is a high school. But A3 is perfect since the content was just a repeat of the title. —teb728 t c 22:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
TEB728 OK, thank you very much to you, I've removed my speedy deletion nomination at the user talk page... SA 13 Bro (talk) 22:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

World War II

I just got the following message from you:

Hello, I'm SA 13 Bro. An edit that you recently made to World War II seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

However, the only edits I made to the World War II page were to put commas and periods inside quotation marks, as is standard English usage (and as was done throughout most of the article; I simply changed a handful that were inconsistent). I do not know why this "seemed to be a test." Matterington (talk) 02:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Comment The helpme template is not required as you are leaving the message to a specific person on their talk page, they will get a notification that a message is waiting. The Helpme template sends a message to several locations alerting several users.McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:03, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
@Matterington You need to contact the administrator Nick-D for making change on that because I'm a patroller if having free time, so I thought is an test edit, I've undid away my change at World War II. Next time you want to make an Spelling, grammatical or Simple formatting corrections; mark on the minor edit. SA 13 Bro (talk) 03:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
@‎Dhtwiki Good provided the WP:MOSLQ guide for Matterington to reference, thanks. SA 13 Bro (talk) 05:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
As the " symbols aren't actually being used to delineate quotes here, I don't think that Matterington's usage was appropriate. The article probably has too many quote marks. Nick-D (talk) 07:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
@Nick-D It doesn't make a difference if they were being used to delineate quotes or not. Whenever quotation marks are used, periods and commas go inside them. Source: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/577/03/ EDITING TO ADD: I just looked at the Wikipedia style guide and I see that its instructions on this question are different from those in the style guides with which I'm familiar as a professional copy editor. So disregard my previous comment. Matterington (talk) 07:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Yuri Lodigin

You recently reverted my revert, which made the usage of 'Lodigin' consistent--it is now 'Lodygyn', even though the title of the article is written 'Lodigin'. I'm not sure why you did that--would you care to explain? Dschslava (talk) 01:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

@Dschslava I reverted this IP 108.51.23.28 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) of 2 edits because he make the incorrect edit of name content about WP:BLP. SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Moved to User:SA 13 Bro/WikiLove.

Moved to User:SA 13 Bro/WikiLove.

@Qwertyxp2000 Oh, thank to you. I via the article and on the way to check the view history diffs record, discovered out and clean up the left down of inappropriate edits. The Mooncake is for Mid-Autumn Festival, not for Chinese New Year. By the way, wishs all the best career, healthy life, luck and happy for reverting the vandalism edits to you!... SA 13 Bro (talk) 12:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Oh well, never mind about the incorrect mooncake thing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 19:42, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Wait a sec, instead, I should've put a dumpling. Someone said to me that the Chinese dumplings represent family gatherings of parents (the pastry) and the children (the filling). That person also said that dumplings are appropriate for Chinese New Year, and not mooncakes. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 20:02, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
@Qwertyxp2000 Hi, thank to you for the gatherings. It doesn't matter to the Chinese dumplings, the cookies is good enough for me!... SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

Moved to User:SA 13 Bro/WikiLove.

Thank you for supporting my RfA

Moved to User:SA 13 Bro/WikiLove.

Nichiren's birthday

Hi. Thanks for your message. I don't know who keeps changing the dates, but it is very clear that Nichiren was born on the 16th day of the second month in 1222. I don't know why someone, who I am assuming is a Nichiren Shoshu devotee, keeps changing it simply since it goes against what their establishment says. If they honestly think that the lunar calendar is the same as the Gregorian calendar, then they need to read up on their information. The SGI dictionary has some information on this, and I would use some other source if I had the references. I don't want this article to be an advertisement for any sect, which is what it is becoming. TK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makalo711 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

@Makalo711 The real person who keeps changing and advertising to error birthday is Minoru Harada not Nichiren Shoshu devotee. But I'm curiously to know that is Daisaku Ikeda also involved the SGI dictionary establishment??? SA 13 Bro (talk) 13:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
@SA 13 Bro I think you are saying that I am either a Soka Gakkai supporter or Soka Gakkai practitioner. For the record I am not, and I take no offense in your criticism of Minoru Harada. It seems like you are against the SG, but I don't believe this discussion should be a sectarian debate. Wikipedia should be above sectarian debate, and bias to make this a genuine academic page. TKMakalo711 (talk) 03:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Makalo711 No, I'm not a anti-Soka Gakkai personage. Because I hear that Nichiren's birthday was on Gregorian 16 February 1222 from majority Soka Gakkai membership, so I'm curiously to know what is going on, thank for discussion. SA 13 Bro (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

te mare

tuh muueto hillllo polla

CIAA MEDIA GROUP

hi regarding the note to CIAA Media Group This name is an DBA under the company IA THE BRAND LLC, where the owner is Isabel Adrian Angello. She is a public person and she needs to be able to change Wiki, when others. For ex her fans edit the page incorrectly.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by CIAA MEDIA GROUP (talk • contribs) 06:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

I tried

I tried to create a separate page for list of Bunk'd episodes but i kept running into problems.I just wanted to prove i could be a good editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJJAK47 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

@DJJAK47 It's ok, use sandbox to experiment on that. SA 13 Bro (talk) 11:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Page

I want to make my Wikipedia page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.88.57.7 (talk) 21:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, take a read at WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIOG policies guidelines if you're Mian Muhammad Latif, thanks. SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

ISASW

Hi, You just sent me a message about an edit I made to the NAIS article. I just wanted to let you know that the only edit I made was correcting the link on the NAIS article to our website. It was listed as www.isas.org, and our website is www.isasw.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ISASW (talk • contribs) 16:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Halil İnalcık

Moved to User:SA 13 Bro/ITN.

Hi

Who are you? Do I know you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.2.180.9 (talk) 01:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, who is this? SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:41, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: SPI

While I appreciate the help, please don't close cases or comment in the "Clerk... comments" section - that's reserved for admins, clerks, and CUs. Of course, feel free to comment in the "other users" section. Thanks, GABgab 00:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry to do that because I patrolled the account before, thanks for the heads up. SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Can you please clarify

I just need a little clarity on why an edit was removed...

How is a formal complaint with the better business bureau considered promotional, advertising, or soapbox when its the truth, and documented. Also the same site is referenced in other sections of the wikipage.

Perhaps we should revisit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Connedin2012 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, thank to your message back, because your edits at Stephen N. Lackey article without provided a WP:RS, and your editing material it seemed like personal opinion pieces to me, see also WP:BLP and WP:COI. If you think I'm making a mistake, then feel free to undo away my revert and Citing sources to re-add it. Hope you to be a constructive (no Vandalism) editor for your contributions to this free encyclopedia, and happy editing! SA 13 Bro (talk) 09:54, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

User:SA13 Bro

Just leaving you an FYI that I noticed User:SA13 Bro was just created, which I blocked for being too similar to your username. If this was an account you created, let me know and I'll unblock it. Just wanted to side on the safe side for your benefit ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

@Oshwah Thanks to you, the account is not belonged to me. SA 13 Bro (talk) 07:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The account probably belonged to User:SGK or User:Royer2356, if not wrong.....SA 13 Bro (talk) 09:06, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Most likely. Either way, it's blocked. Glad I caught it, and thanks for letting me know that it wasn't you :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:10, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. SA 13 Bro (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SA 13 Bro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Bana Alabed

Please remove the speedy deletion request from this article. This twitter account has been reported on since it started in September. Hang googles (talk) 10:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Can you providing a WP:RS about WP:BLP for the article, thanks. SA 13 Bro 10:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))

 Done Thanks to you invited me for the procedure. SA 13 Bro 03:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

You are now a pending changes reviewer and rollbacker

Hi SA 13 Bro! I've see you around Wikipedia quite a lot - it's good to bump into you constantly while I'm patrolling! I went through your recent contributions and thought that you could use the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights, so I went ahead and just gave them to you. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.

You're probably somewhat familiar with these user rights already, but I'll give you a summary, some guidelines, and some useful information for each one so that you can glance through them really quick:

Rollback user right
A tutorial on how to use it located here - do give it a read before using. In a nutshell, here are the "do's and don'ts" when it comes to using rollback:
  • It be used only to revert clear cases of vandalism, trolling, and disruption.
  • Do not use it to revert good faith edits.
  • And seriously (lol)...do not use it to edit war.


Pending changes reviewer user right
A tutorial on how to review pending changes is located here. Special:PendingChanges will give you a list of pending changes that are currently awaiting review. If you need to view a list of all articles that have pending changes protection enabled, visit this page. Before you start using the user right to review pending changes, please give these pages a quick read-through first:

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about these user rights and when they should or should not be used. If you no longer want either of these user rights, let me (or any admin) know and I'll remove them. That's pretty much it... Enjoy, and happy editing! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks to you granted those privileges right to my account, I'm observance those policies guide and patrolling for contributions. Wish you a great happy new year holidays and enjoyable too, Cheers! SA 13 Bro 15:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello SA 13 Bro. Your signature needs a link to your user page, user talk page, and/or contributions. See WP:SIGLINK. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

@JJMC89: The signature characters is too long to fit as a link, while I've removed the wiki markup and bring it back to normal link, thanks for the guide. SA 13 Bro (talk) 16:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, SA 13 Bro!

Happy New Year!

SA 13 Bro,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 23:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

A sincere wish for a happy new year, even though a borrowed template! Donner60 (talk) 23:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Wimpy Kid

Let Derek fix it. Happy New Year, 207.35.33.162 (talk) 01:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your greeting at my talk page, those 21 references (including external links connection of articles) at Diary of a Wimpy Kid (book series) article don't seem appeared any link rot at all, try to kindly read this WP:404 policy guide for the acknowledgement, thanks. SA 13 Bro (talk) 02:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hmmm.

Do you think that User:WIKPEDIA SUCKS and User:WIKPEDIA SUCKS PLEASE STOP are connected? If so, would this be considered sockpuppetry? DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 01:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

@DoABarrelRoll.dev:  Possible, but usually this kind of profane username, admin just take WP:RBI action on that. And also those accounts have no any diffs record, so doesn't need to report at SPI. SA 13 Bro (talk) 01:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Username flag

What is wrong with the name jimbosdayoff? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbosdayoff (talk • contribs) 06:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

@Jimbosdayoff: Your username contain the word Jimbo which may attempting to WP:troll on User:Jimbo Wales, suggest you to change your username for making constructive edits to Wikipedia, and stop your WP:VAND edits as you did at Kim dynasty (North Korea) article. SA 13 Bro (talk) 06:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You clearly are a bot or you do not speak English. Jimbo is a very common nickname for people named James. Day Off is not offensive. My instagram name is jimbosdayoff as well.

My edits made to the Kim Dynasty page were made because the current photo was not representative of the Kim Dynasty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbosdayoff (talk • contribs) 06:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

@Jimbosdayoff: I'm not your robot and if you think your username is meet, up to you. Please read this WP:IUP guide first, before you upload and edits appropriate image to the article. SA 13 Bro (talk) 08:22, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

FlyingKicks‎

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CindyRoleder showed that FlyingKicks and CindyRoleder are the same person. The reasons for thinking this are as follows:

  • FlyingKicks continued CindyRoleder's edit war after the latter was blocked.
  • Even though FlyingKicks did very few edits, it was enough to show that he/she had the same general interests as CindyRoleder.
  • Stylistic similarities in their editing behaviour.
  • The emphatically positive results of analysis with the check user tool.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Do you want admin @EdJohnston: to close the case in shortly? Since the CU results are emphatically positive. SA 13 Bro (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
He might as well. I do not know whether there are other socks, but if someone finds evidence they can file a new report.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2017 (UTC)