|
User talk:RyanGerbil10/Archive 9
Please imagine a different catchy song:
Signpost updated for December 11th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC) User:Berkeley City CollegeOh, totally unfair that you get to do that, and I didn't. I'm filing a complaint against you, if I can find the whine-he-had-more-fun-than-me page. Thanks, it does look like strictly copying from the other page, and I did invite the user to justify it, which they apparently opted not to do. Wikipedia sometimes gets these hard boiled eggs. KP Botany 01:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Needs a cleanupHi! You're in my old neck of the woods. I grew up near Pittsburgh.
Happy First Edit Day!
Thank You!Thank you for your input at my RFA, which successfully closed at 58/2/0. I will think about the 10 questions and answers I had, and I hope that I will use the tools constructively and for the benefit of Wikipedia. If you ever need any help, don't be afraid to drop me a line. I'm here to help afterall! 8) -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 00:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC) BhutanGood catch on the Bhutan vandalism, but you didn't get it all. That was three consecutive vandal edits in the past 40 minutes. I've placed your talk page on my watchlist, so you may reply right here, to keep the discussion all in one place. --Smack (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
"spurious"spurious \SPYUR-ee-uhs\, adjective:
NP, apology accepted. I am harsh, I know. Who knows, maybe you'll grow even harsher. It's almost inevitable. But Blnguyen is convincing as usual. - crz crztalk 05:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Signpost updated for December 18th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC) AfD ClosingsPlease be sure to place Template:at above the section header so Mathbot doesn't get confused when he puts the lists of old deletions together. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! :) Cbrown1023 03:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Template:windowHomewindowHome template is widely used in Italian Wikipedia. I found nothing similar in English one. Of course, if any is available, even similar, I will be glad to use it. Otherwise I really would appreciate if you could restore it. I'm open to discuss the reason for delation to find an agreement. Thank you in advance.--Dejudicibus 14:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC) "One TfD can't fix this..."What would you suggest, then? There doesn't seem to be another place to discuss deleting a template... -Amarkov blahedits 17:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Templates for deletionSure. The templates to be untranscluded are Template:20 Largest Airlines by Fleet Size as of December 20, 2006, and Template:Month disambig. The noms are found on the main TfD page under the December 20th and 18th subsectyions, respectively. You can close the noms if you want, or let me do it once the templates are orphaned, your call. Either way, thanks a lot for the help. Best Reagrds, RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 01:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Thank you for your supportThank you for your support in the RfA on my behalf. It is an honor to have received your expression of confidence. To be chosen as an administrator requires a high level of confidence by a broad section of the community. Although I received a great deal of support, at this time I do not hold the level of confidence required, and the RfA did not pass. It is my wish that I will continue to deserve your confidence. Sincerely, --BostonMA talk 20:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC) ThanksThanks for blocking the IP address that has done repeated vandalism to North Dakota politician articles. It is greatly appreciated. --MatthewUND(talk) 22:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC) lonelygirl15 editWhy did you revert my LG15 edit? I was updating a seriously outdated page that is shoddy and no longer up to date. Do you even follow the series?75.46.167.76 22:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC) My Request for Adminship
I can't find Template:Jupiler League (and something like Template:FA Premier League teamlist) put it on tfd, the deleted one should be Template:Jupiler League Matches 2006-07 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Why you remove all from club's article? Template:Jupiler League Matches 2006-07 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) is included in Template:Jupiler League, but not equal to. Matthew_hk tc 10:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Hi _ I disagree with the "no consensus" ruling. What are my options for a next step? -- Stbalbach 15:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Insignia templateHi, I have noticed that you removed {{insignia}} from Image:Mpflag.svg, and have not replaced it with anything despite your edit summary implying a replacement. Please explain this and if indeed the insignia template is deprecated, please tell me of a template which best fits the image, which is a flag of a military corps and has the same copyright status as country flags and such. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 15:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
My RFAHey, thanks so much for supporting my recent RFA. A number of editors considered that I wasn't ready for the mop yet and unfortunately the RFA did not succeed (69/26/11). There are a number of areas which I will be working on (including changing my username) in the next few months in order to allay the fears of those who opposed my election to administrator. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you sincerely for your support over the past week. I've been blown away by the level of interest taken in my RFA and appreciate the time and energy dedicated by all the editors who have contributed to it, support, oppose and neutral alike. I hope to bump into you again soon and look forward to serving you and Wikipedia in any way I can. Cheers! The Rambling Man 19:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC) (the non-admin, formerly known as Budgiekiller) Template:Catholic-link on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Catholic-link. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stbalbach 02:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC) perhaps you should read the reason the people "voted" keep, and check against reality, then another picture might be drawn. At least, the result is not "no consensus", but I can understand if you want to keep the template. →AzaToth 01:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC) Vandalism???Dude, what is up with this? Did someone get your password? —Angr 10:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
catholic-link DRVOver at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Template:Catholic-link, you said, "I believe that my closing was correct (obviously) but I believe that according to policy, the template should have been deleted." Could you elaborate on what policy you're talking about? I've been arguing against it purely from a pragmatic standpoint but I'd be interested in the policy. Also, if you have time to read it, I've addressed the "no consensus" ruling and why I believe it was mistaken, back at DRV. I invite you to take a look if you're still interested in that discussion (I don't blame you if you aren't). — coelacan talk — 10:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
