|
User talk:RyanGerbil10/Archive 23Please imagine a different catchy song:
Happy First Edit Day!
Willking1979 (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC) SigI'm probably just being thick, but I don't understand the four more years bit... --Dweller (talk) 11:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Hey man - what's up? You're normally one of the rational guys here, yet you seem upset about something on Kanonkas' RfA. May I ask why you don't want to support anyone with over 3500 edits? I'm interested to hear your RfA thoughts - I suspect you don't like how things are going at the minute :-( Really hope real life's treating you well. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC) You're not crazy Ryan…more like dangerously sane, sleep with one eye open from now on.--Goodmorningworld (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC) your "protest"I'm not really understanding how the standards at RfA are "ridiculous." I also wasn't aware that there were any standards there. Can you elaborate on exactly what it is that you're protesting against? flaminglawyerc 21:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ItsmejudithHello. Please forgive the spam but since Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Itsmejudith is heading toward a very close decision, I'm contacting all editors who were in the "Neutral" section in the hope that they can take a second look at the RfA and make a more explicit recommendation (either way). Thank you, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 18:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 00:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC) RfA thankspam
Denbot (talk) 22:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delivered at 04:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable) thank you
Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 22:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Language skillsI have been told by other metapedians (for example)that I undersold my language abilities, for what it is worth. -- Avi (talk) 18:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009From the editor — A new leaf
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC) ThankspamDear Ryan Gerbil, many thanks for your support in my RFAs   Thanks to everyone who participated in either my successful RfA, or the trial run, whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. Special thanks to I'm Spartacus! and Cyclonenim for nominating me, and for those of you who treated this as a !vote not a vote and reviewed your position as the discussions developed. I am deeply humbled by the trust that the community has put in me. I'd also like to thank my tallybots, the closing crats, the vandalfighters who wiped vandalism from my RFA, the users who initially welcomed me and gave me rollback, everyone whose worked with me here, those who created the various guides and tools for aspirant admins, the Lolcat who nommed me in my first RFA and everyone else who has helped make Wikipedia such a wonderful site. ϢereSpielChequers The lycanthropic loquacious fruit tree.
WereSpielChequers 23:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
