|
User talk:RyanGerbil10/Archive 16
Please imagine a different catchy song:
responsibilityYou said you didn't appreciate what you regarded as a patronizing tone. Well, I don't know how I can write about this without risking hurting your feelings. I set my mind to working from an existing template, to create one that I think met your two most concrete objections. I did my test in User: space. Tranclusion doesn't work across namespaces. I believe that a template like the one I tested here would work fine in Template: space. You didn't take the time to clarify your two concrete objections
It seems to me User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/TalibanBounty fully satisfies the concerns you mentioned. I wrote before that I think it is extremely important that those who administer policy should be scrupulous to follow policy. I continue to think it was a mistake for you to close the nomination for deletion discussion as delete based on novel arguments -- that had not been mentioned in the nomination -- or by any of those who chose to comment on it. I continue to think that you should either have voiced your concern as just a regular discussion participant, or you should have let someone else close the discussion, then initiated a new discussion based on your concern. As you know the nomination for deletion discussion provides a period of time when articles with problems get fixed. When you choose to close a discussion as delete, based on novel arguments, that were not mentioned during the discussion, you preclude any opportunity for a fix being tried. I know you thought, based on your experience closing 2000 earlier {{tfd}}s, that a fix was not possible. I am sure this was an honestly uttered statement. But doesn't my experiment shows your notion this was unfixable was mistaken? Even if you were correct, and the template was unfixable, I still think it would have been better if you had made a different choice which would have allowed an opportunity to try a fix, prior to the template being deleted. It is not like you were erasing slander -- something that had to be done right away. I've moved this information from the beginning of this note, to the end.
Candidly Geo Swan 10:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC) I owe you a big thank you for supporting me in My RfA, which was successful with 67 supports and 20 opposes. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 23:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Template:Republic of Korea armed forcesPlease do not delete Template:Republic of Korea armed forces. A Navbox template seems to be a common element for the military of a country article. The template has replaced the old South Korean army template.--Bin2k1 09:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC) No consensus?I proposed that Template:911tm be deleted. You stated that there was no consensus. Why not? I see 18 "deletes" and 6 "keep" votes. 75% seems like a consensus to me! Thanks. Timneu22 19:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Pitt UserboxThanks again for answering my question about the Main Page's In The News candidates. I saw that you are attending the University of Pittsburgh. I happened to go to Pitt for college. There's a Pitt userbox available on Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Education/United_States#Pennsylvania Enjoy! Synesthetic 06:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ryan Gerbil. First, I appreciate the consideration you put into the decision of Template:User en-6 (Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_June_19#Template:User_en-6). However, I'd appreciate if you consider:
Is this template used to make fun of the language templates? If so, I don't think it needs to be here. That's all, thanks for your consideration (which I am sure you will take). / Fred-J 18:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
Automatically delivered by COBot 02:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! :D
RE:Your RfAThanks for the question. I hope I answered it satisfactorily. Happy editing! --Agüeybaná 19:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC) My recent RfAThank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 01:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC) RFA Thank You Note from Jehochman
Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC) Re: Sockpuppet caseBSDB was not blocked, however, I believe it should be blocked indef. since the account was only created to revert a few edits and blank his talk page disruptively after being warned. As Caribbean~H.Q. said on that sock case, Ken shoryuken (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has the same editing pattern as BSDB, but does that warrant a block? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
CSD of The Light (Tatyana Ali album)?Hi, I notice that you removed the CSD tag from this article. I'm just wondering why you don't think that this article is a clear WP:CSD#G5? It was created by a (now banned) sock puppet of the banned User:JJonathan, a known hoaxer and adder of misinformation. --Kurt Shaped Box 18:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Survival UnitHey man, just wondering why you deleted this page? I'm not arguing, but I just happened to be looking for info on the band, and couldn't find it! --John Lunney 22:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Dearest Supporter, Infobox...you need a copy, you say... by that you mean a translation, or one which has been reconstructed to meet en. wiki coding? ThuranX 21:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you very much for translating the article of my hometown into Englisch :) de:Benutzer:Jodo --217.94.222.175 22:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315 You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Your block of Hi246Good call. Acalamari 03:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
TfD for CSD-DB-NoticeSure. Azatoth has already stated that he will update Twinkle as soon as he can. I'll let you know. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit 11:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Thank you
Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
My recent RfAThank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC) GlassCobra's RfA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
