en User talk:RyanG222

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pixie Lott discography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that Wikipedia administrators can block editors who engage in vandalism and other disruptive behavior. Thank you. Mister sparky (talk) 13:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pixie Lott discography, you will be blocked from editing. Mister sparky (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please note that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your persoanl opinions or judgements, as you did in the article Gravity (Pixie Lott song). JamesBWatson (talk) 20:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC)~~ My apologies: I acted hastily, without reading your edit carefully enough. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Successions boxes

Hi RyanG222 ! Please, not that when a song is number one on a chart, only the first and the last weeks at number one should be mentioned in the succession boxes. Therefore, when a song is #1 for one week, a sole date should be put. Regards, -- Europe22 (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Spark (Amy Macdonald song)

I have nominated Spark (Amy Macdonald song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spark (Amy Macdonald song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CTJF83 chat 20:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I'm Not Mad

The article I'm Not Mad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable song from non-notable singer. Fails WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP (talk) 21:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SFG

Hi RyanG222,

I notice that you've been doing some great work regarding Scouting for Girls. Please consider joining the Scouting for Girls WikiProject;an effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scouting for Girls. If you would like to participate please pop over to the project page where you can join the project and see an open list of tasks that you can help with. Thank you for your time.

Regards, Rock drum (talk·contribs·guestbook) 15:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of I'm Not Mad

I have nominated I'm Not Mad, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Not Mad. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GregJackP (talk) 23:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"TBA" or "TBR"

hey, could you please stop putting "TBA" or "TBR" into discography tables? it just needs a dash. Mister sparky (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Songsfromthetainedcherrytree.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Songsfromthetainedcherrytree.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Florence and the Machine discography, you will be blocked from editing. Mister sparky (talk) 13:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Songsfromthetainedcherrytree.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Songsfromthetainedcherrytree.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:510Rmms3O9L. SS500 .jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:510Rmms3O9L. SS500 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pixie Lott discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mister sparky (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of My Love (Pixie Lott Song)

I have nominated My Love (Pixie Lott Song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Love (Pixie Lott Song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Amalthea 15:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Pixie Lott discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. please stop. stop adding unsourced sales, stop altering formats, stop changing country order to randomness and stop ignoring advice from others. Mister sparky (talk) 20:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pixie Lott discography

You've had quite enough warnings now about disrupting this page. I'm asking you to explain the rationale for your constant edits and reverting and changing around of formatting of Pixie Lott discography on its talk page before making any more edits or reverting it again. If you're going to continue to ignore other users, style guidelines or consensus, it will lead to a block. - eo (talk) 20:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Love (Pixie Lott Song)

I noticed that you also redirected this page [1] to its album's article while there was a WP:AfD tag on it. This AfD discussion is still open; please don't do this. If you have something to add, post your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Love (Pixie Lott Song). Thanks. - eo (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You'd have enough warnings

You've been warned enough times and you've been asked repeatedly to explain your edits, as others have found them disruptive. You also have ignored communication on your Talk Page, including a request to discuss your edits on Talk Pages. Please make constructive edits upon the expiration of this block. Enough is enough. - eo (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 48 hours, for disruptive editing, ignoring attempts at communication. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Until You Were Gone

You have restored this article for a song which appears to fails WP:NSONG, which I find surprising since you previously said it should be redirect at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Until_You_Were_Gone_(song)). I disagree with your latest action; what was it that changed your mind? I42 (talk) 19:36, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bulgarian chart info you added to this article is deemed unsuitable for inclusion. See WP:BADCHART. I42 (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No TBA/TBR

As you've been asked before, please do not add TBAs and TBRs to charts tables, as you did with this edit. [2]. - eo (talk) 11:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More unsourced sales

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Plan B discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 11:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing, ignoring talk page communication. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

- eo (talk) 11:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:510Rmms3O9L. SS500 .jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:510Rmms3O9L. SS500 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:510Rmms3O9L. SS500 .jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:510Rmms3O9L. SS500 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RyanG222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I will not do anymore vandalism to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 15:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--RyanG222 (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have decided to try and impersonate the blocking admin to unblock yourself, I have taken away your ability to edit this page for the duration of this block--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discographies

Wikipedia clearly outlines rules at MOS:DISCOG. I've spent over 1hr yesterday working out widths and alignments that are the same and work for every table. Do not revert back or re-edit these. It would be a clear breach of policy. Thanks Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:19, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marina and the Diamonds singles

I have notice that you have frequently changed the singles section to Marina and the Diamonds discography. This is just a friendly note to let you know that the information in that section (and the article) is correct and shouldn't be changed. Thank you. =] Jonny (talk) 16:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

discographies

why do you constantly keep merging "singles" tables and "as featured artist" tables? every single time you do it gets reverted so please stop doing it. Mister sparky (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

and links to chart providers homepages are not references. so stop adding them. either provide a link to the actual page verifying the position or don't add anything at all. Mister sparky (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010 / Final warning

Stop! RyanG222 this is your final warning about Discographies. I have on several occassions (with at least 2 recent notification) asked you to refrain from altering the appearance of disographies. Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies/style clearly shows the rules and guidelines for how discographies should be laid out. All tables should be aligned equally. If you breach the rules once more we will be entitled to notify administrators who will take further action as appropriate.Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:58, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic the distuptive editing of discographies and vandalism. Thank you. — Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:15, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your continued disruptive editing, despite several warnings, two prior blocks and no attempt to change your behavior or seek guidance. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — ξ ^xplicit 02:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RyanG222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I not to do anymore disruptive editing

Decline reason:

That's what you said on April 28 - apparently, no change. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:14, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment

As the user who issued the final warning (i'm not an admin) i would like to point out that only several hours after being warned RyanG222 went ahead and made further disruptive edits to other discography pages. RyanG222 has shown no understanding of MOS:DISCOG and failed to understand that his/her edits were damaging and disrupting articles. Furthermore a failure to reaxt or discuss warnings and multiple reverts show clear failure to understanding basic wikipedia principles. Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sheneedsme.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sheneedsme.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:11, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]