User talk:Rtkat3/Archive 6

AfD nomination of Stolas

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Stolas. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stolas. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Apparently, you said that Tom & Jerry Kids and its spinoff Droopy, Master Detective aired first-run on Cartoon Network. It aired on Fox, not that network. Besides, Cartoon Network launched two years after Tom and Jerry Kids premiered. These edits should not have been made. MadManAmeica (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! Sorry about that! It turns out that edit was made by an unregistered user. My apologies. MadManAmeica (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rtkat3! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Michael McConnohie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Steve Kramer (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Michael Lindsay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Colin Murdock (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Steve Cassling - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Dan Lorge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Pat Musick - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Ray Bill in Planet Hulk

I have the movie, right here in front of me no doubt, and it says, "Paul Dobson as Beta Ray Bill." If you would read the discussion page, I clearly noted them when the film comes out. As well, if you have any other questions about the film, feel free to ask. Thank you. Ottertron (talk)

I'm still kinda of new to the wikipedia editing, so I'm trying my best, but yes, I will add more names to the cast and who will be appearing. Thanks again. Ottertron (talk)

You're latest edits to the Planet Hulk article is awesome. Just wanted to tell you. Ottertron (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottertron (talk • contribs) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted Zeigler

The article Ted Zeigler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability per wp:ENT - very minor roles, no sources here and I can't find much besides imdb etc. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ErikHaugen (talk) 17:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit summary said you couldn't find the talk page for the deletion proposal. This is because this is a "proposed deletion" (see wp:prod) and not an "article for deletion" (see wp:AfD). prods don't have discussion pages; you can just use the article's discussion page. ErikHaugen (talk) 15:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now I've nominated it for deletion a la AfD, please see the entry here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Zeigler ErikHaugen (talk) 22:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong section heading....AGAIN

Your edit here [1] shows me that I need to remind you of the rules for proper headings.

• Only the first word in a heading should be capitalized. (An exception to this rule is when the heading is a title; for example "Dark Reign" would be a proper heading.)
• "Other media" is an INCORRECT heading. The proper heading is "In other media".
• "Alternate versions" is an INCORRECT heading. The proper heading is "Other versions".

If you could try to remember that in the future it would be GREATLY appreciated. Spidey104^contribs 21:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I greatly appreciate all of the references you added in this edit [2], but you again added an incorrect heading. Do you purposely do that just to annoy me or do you completely ignore your talk page and remain ignorant? Spidey104^contribs 21:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1) This was at least the third time I've put this on your talk page, so it shouldn't be news to you. (2) It has been a rule of Wikipedia since it first started that headings should only have the first word capitalized. Spidey104^contribs

Here's a gentle reminder that this edit [3] adds an inccorect heading. Spidey104^contribs 16:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And again the heading has incorrect capitalization here: [4]. Spidey104^contribs 20:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You had been doing so well!! Why did you revert to your old/wrong ways??? The majority of these edits [5], [6] are wonderful, but you purposefully changed the headings to be wrong. Spidey104^contribs 14:28, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit [7] you fixed an incorrect title! Yay! Thank you! Please keep this up and don't revert back to your old ways! Spidey104^contribs 16:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kearson DeWitt: Did I speak too soon? ([8], [9]) Spidey104^contribs 16:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Probably, [10]/[11] Spidey104^contribs 14:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you need another reminder of what to do. Spidey104^contribs 03:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SCREAM OF FRUSTRATION!! Spidey104 18:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Just a reminder that we don't as a rule insert extraneous information about television series; games etc. The articles should ideally be encyclopedia standard, and as such a mention is enough. Regards Asgardian (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this, a full frontal of a character is always preferable, and for such small articles only one image is really necessary. Also, we don't use the term "vast" as it is too nebulous. Regards Asgardian (talk) 01:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jeff Bennett

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jeff Bennett. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Bennett. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur King: Zara --> Zahrah

Is there a difference in pronunciation? Because I don't see a difference. --DQ13|Dino Queen 19:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Supercade

I'm not even sure what you mean by your edit summary in this edit, because this isn't IMDb, but for the second time the relevant info should be presented in a better manner. If you can't fit the credits in the infobox, try creating a episode chart to list the credits along with episode title, airdates, etc. An example of this kind of setup can be found at List of 30 Rock episodes. Believe it or not, television show articles do not have to include the credits of every person who ever worked on the series. We're here to document why the show is notable, not to document who worked on the show. Further, there's no reason why any of this text should be bolded (per MOS:BOLD#Boldface), and there's really no reason why the copyright stamp to "RUBY-SPEARS ENTERPRISES, INC." should be included. It appears you just copied and pasted this text from somewhere which I'm sure you're aware isn't acceptable. Pinkadelica^♣ 03:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it. Your last addition to the article is acceptable. Pinkadelica^♣ 01:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of allies and other characters in Codename: Kids Next Door

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of allies and other characters in Codename: Kids Next Door. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of allies and other characters in Codename: Kids Next Door. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Info

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to McDonaldland. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Morenooso (talk) 21:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Legend of Legaia

Is there any reason you reverted [12] without giving any explanation or edit summary? I explained already that your edit, while well-intentioned, was not an improvement. If you think it is, please engage in discussion rather than edit warring. rʨanaɢ (talk) 22:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this revert: you forgot Saryu, Lapis, and I believe one or two others. But in any case, video game articles are not meant to be like walkthroughs, and they generally do not include boss lists; just take a look at any of the well-reviewed Wikipedia articles on video games, such as Final Fantasy VIII.

As for the rest of your additions, they introduced unnecessary details (Wikipedia is meant to be written in summary style) and grammatical errors. rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stryker's Island

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stryker's Island, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.angelfire.com/mi2/dcuniverse/strykersisland.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rtkat3. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Current_requests.
Message added 03:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steve Cassling

The article Steve Cassling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no evidence of any particular notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 04:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re Juggernaut

Right - You have two other editors point out "Don't do a massive revert". And you have proceeded to continue doing it. ing While you did break up you edit you still are make other wonder what you did.

Please:

• Break it up to one thing at a time and
• Provide an edit summary that accurately reflects what you are doing.

Thanks. J Greb (User talk:J Greb) 21:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost (film)

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Ghost (film) . You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 23:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links & bolding

None of this is necessary.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:53, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Josiah Wormwood

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Josiah Wormwood. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josiah Wormwood. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dave Fennoy

A tag has been placed on Dave Fennoy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Ben 10: Ultimate Alien episodes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ElationAviation 23:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chimera (mythology)

Lioness is correct. Before you make a thoughtless mis"correction" do look at the illustration, which I'm copying here to save you the effort: those are dugs.--Wetman (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fictional history of Spider-Man

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Fictional history of Spider-Man. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional history of Spider-Man (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Splice article and Overlinking in general

Not every instance of a word/name with an article needs to be wikilinked. On the Splice page the actors already had wikilinks, so there was no need to add them multiple times. Please see WP:LINK#Overlinking and underlinking. Thanks, - Jonathon A H (talk) 20:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Numemon

The article Numemon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 14:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phantomon

The article Phantomon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 17:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mammothmon

The article Mammothmon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 19:54, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments needed

Following a month-long process of multiple editors to have "Fictional history of Spider-Man" conform to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction), one editor has objected and wishes for the article, which has been the subject of three deletion discussions, to remain as is.

Alternately, the proposed new version appears at User:Spidey104/Fictional history of Spider-Man sandbox.

Your input, as an editor involved in the deletion discussion, is invited at Talk:Fictional history of Spider-Man#Rewrite and replacement. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional history of Spider-Man

There is a discussion now about an article you are one of the major contributors too. Talk:Fictional_history_of_Spider-Man#Rewrite_and_replacement It concerns replacing the entire article with something fairly unrelated. Dream Focus 10:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Digimon Xros Wars

Nowhere in the show is Starmon referred to Starmon #2. I understand that he is a radically redesigned version of the Starmon that has been around for quite some time but that should not be reflected on the Wiki page, much like how Agumon and Crowmon in Data Squad are not Agumon #2 and Crowmon #2, despite both being redesigns of previous Digimon. If the character was named Starmon #2, then I'd keep it, but nope, the Digimon is only referred to as Starmon. I understand your reasoning for the Generals, therefore I propose a new four-section system: Leaders, Generals, Cavalry and Other Members, for those who were only seen in the dream. - Katanin (talk) 01:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Understandably so, much like what is done with Greymon on the Xros Wars page. I say we leave it for now and wait until we get some more information. - Katanin (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gauntlet merge proposal

You have contributed significantly to The Gauntlet (comics) article. I recently proposed a merge involving the article. I wanted to inform you since you may be interested in the outcome of the discussion. Spidey104^contribs 14:42, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that removing a template for something like a merge proposal before the discussion is concluded is inappropriate. Therefore something like this is vandalism. Please make a constructive comment in the discussion instead of keeping others from seeing there is a discussion to be had. Spidey104^contribs 03:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I did not realize that the two articles were merged, for two reasons. One, you did not explain in your edit summary (the first time around) that the articles were merged. This is something other editors have told you to do, so please include edit summaries. Two, the merge discussion wasn't really completed, but I'm not going to fight about that since I support the merge. I was only trying to stand with Wikipedia policy so no one would claim we moved too fast on the merge. Spidey104^contribs 22:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment in the discussion, because making edits without commenting in the discussion will mean that your opinion is ignored by those that are at loggerheads with you. Spidey104^contribs 22:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xros Wars

Would you stop removing the formatting I'm attempting to put in place at Digimon Xros Wars's character list? This is the formatting that is used on every other anime character list.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just use the new formatting rather than the old one.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to DC Universe Animated Original Movies, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. -5- (talk) 16:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Decade characters

There was a reason these were not linked or bolded. As those characters only existed in a short instance in the series, it is not necessary to give them any weighting or unnecessarily link to the animal on which they are based. In addition, it does not help the reader to link to the name of the monster under Makamou on that page, when it links to the mythological being rather than any sort of information on the Makamou.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romanization for words of English origin

On the MOS:JP talk page, a discussion has been started about including or not including romanizations for words of English origin, such as Fainaru Fantajī in Final Fantasy (ファイナルファンタジー, Fainaru Fantajī) (for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics here).

Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties. One suggestion on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.

One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those selected in the process.

What this invitation is:

• You should give feedback on the first suggested compromise and are highly encouraged to provide other solutions.

What this invitation is not:

• This is not a vote on including or excluding such romanizations.
• This is not a vote on compromises either.

It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the MOS:JP talk page and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. Prime Blue (talk) 11:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Digimon Xros Wars 2

Good to hear about the Troopmon. But at this point, all they are are a bunch of generic mooks who act as backup for the current enemy and are taken down easily. Not every individual Digimon needs to be noted in the article. - Katanin (talk) 02:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other T2 Dopants

There is absolutely no reason to add sections for the T2 Nasca, Weather, Gene, IceAge, or Violence Dopants. It is better to merely link to their sections on other articles because they do not receive any characterization in the film. In addition, the other dozen or so Dopants never appear, so it is pointless to even list them as you did. There was never a Rocket, Unicorn, Ocean, or Key Dopant in the movie.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:57, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are no "never-before-seen Dopants". They are just Gaia Memories that are in the film. The T2 Accel, Bird, Dummy, Fang, Key, Ocean, Puppeteer, Queen, Rocket, Unicorn, Xtreme, and Yesterday Memories are never used and do not turn anyone into Dopants.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mad (TV series)

For empty sections we have {{empty section}}. I prefer not to use {{expand}} at all; see WP:EXPANDALTS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^(Otters want attention) 01:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi. Just a friendly note to say it's important, and expected, that Wikipedia editors provide edit summaries with their edits. Thanks! --Tenebrae (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ban on the Fun

The article Ban on the Fun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television episode, fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JJ98 (Talk) 20:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the Species

Please don't. I redirected the page to avoid that very thing you just suggested. There is no reason to believe (yet) that this storyline will be notable, so let's wait to see if it is notable before making a full page for it. All Spider-Man storylines are NOT notable and a lot have received articles more out of Recentism than actual notability. Spidey104^contribs 18:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're worried about keeping track of the villains involved without going back to re-read the actual comics I would suggest a piece of paper, or start a list in a sandbox page of your own. I just don't see this storyline being very notable outside of how it affects Menace and whichever villain gains a reward, but that would just be information in their own articles instead of an article to itself. The Character Assassination article was already merged into Menace when editors were going to delete it for being non-notable. Something crazy could happen and make it notable, but it is better to save your effort and wait until that happens then starting the article hoping it will become notable and then have all your work deleted or merged/shrunk. Spidey104^contribs 20:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Sasha or Ana need a separate article; how they're already included in Kraven's article works fine. Well, it seems that you already have a list of villains going based on what I see in your article. Place that list here and I will add to it as I read the comics that come out. I don't have the time until next week to work on that, so if you can put the work you've already done there I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks! Spidey104^contribs 21:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Doom

What on earth are you doing? --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And to do this you needed to remove and wipe out sourced real world material about his creation and what Jack Kirby was trying to do? How many times do you need telling? It's not real, don't write as if it's real. Write about the character as the object of the narrative. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Doom captured Scarlet Witch. This is what I'm talking about - who gives a shit? if a reliable independent source isn't talking about it, why are we? We aren't not trying to capture every aspect of a fictional character's existence, we are trying to build an overview using reliable sources to guide us. Going off your edits, you simply want to blow by blow scenes of every comic out there. Moreover, as I'm already told you - it's not real, don't write about it as if it's actually happening - please read the MOS and try and least grasp in some small way how articles are suppose to be written. At the moment, all you are doing is adding lots of content that either needs to be deleted or completely rewritten to conform with the MOS. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:21, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional edits of future announced appearances

Hi, Rtkat3. I wanted to explain why I've reverted your edits about future appearances of Marvel characters. Wikipedia is distinct from Wikinews, and we generally wait until an event has occurred or a thing has been published. Otherwise, the types of announcements that you're adding are essentially advance promotion for Marvel. Also, such terms as "the new event" are hype-y tone and also breach WP:DATED. Thank you for understanding. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hulk in other media, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.-5- (talk) 00:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Joe J. Thomas

A tag has been placed on Joe J. Thomas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional voices

additional voices are trivial, we areonly suppose to put in that is notable enough to be kept. additional voices, are voices that have no star, have no credibility, and no reception>Bread Ninja (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darkseid

See WP:PLOT.-5- (talk) 00:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mac Gargan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.-5- (talk) 20:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On Set Indexes

Blunt points:

1. WP:BRD - "Discuss" happens on talk pages not edit summaries.
2. Characters in Ultimate Spider-Man might be a start for one.
3. If you had bothered to look, another suggestion was mate on the SI's talk page.

- J Greb (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Percy Jackson characters

Please do not add characters from The Heroes of Olympus. The corresponding under-construction userspace draft is in progress. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perseus, Son of Zeus (talk • contribs) 15:34, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Hackett

The article Joe Hackett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that the subject meets WP:ACTOR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 21:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Hackett for deletion

The article Joe Hackett is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Hackett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 21:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matt K. Miller

The article Matt K. Miller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources found. Several roles but most are trivial. No biographical info found. Article fails WP:1S.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^(Otters want attention) 04:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matt K. Miller for deletion

The article Matt K. Miller is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt K. Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^(Otters want attention) 04:31, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Tell me how being a "good actor" is a reason to keep an article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^(Otters want attention) 02:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Monster

I'm curious as to why you put back a lot of what I had previously slogged off from the insanely extensive "Characters" section. The point of editing out much of the unnecessary and spoiler-full stuff—which I'm not done with, by the way, even if it's been a while—is to make the article shorter and concise while not telling (or, in this case, spelling out) the whole story for the casual reader. I'd greatly appreciate your reasons, as I'm not keen on removing people's edits without knowing their intentions (except for vandalism).
• H☼ωdΘesI†fl∉∈ ^{KLAT} • 02:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

American Dad!

Hello, Rtkat3. You have new messages at Talk:List of American Dad! characters#RfC: Style guide standards on fiction.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I invite you to weigh in on the discussion at the talk page. Thanks!Luminum (talk) 16:19, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Batman: The Brave and the Bold

If you think a voice credit is in error, before you correct it, please check the links attached. They lead to verifiable sources for the voices you're "correcting". Mr. Quibble (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]