User talk:RoverTheBendInSussex

ANI Notice.

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Please answer a simple question

The Yes/No question is at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#In_the_end.2C_this_is_quite_a_simple_concept_and_one_answer_from_the_editor. If you fail to answer it and edit elsewhere, I will assume the answer is "No". Black Kite (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RoverTheBendInSussex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Talk:Nigel Farage". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 May 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 21:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Talk:Nigel Farage, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Transfermarkt

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with Dominic Samuel. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Callum Dolan's nationality

The page history of Blackburn Rovers F.C. Under-23s and Academy shows you added Callum Dolan with American Samoa listed as his nationality. I am not denying or challenging this, but can you confirm where this was sourced from. I cannot find any reliable record elsewhere online. Thanks. Sixtrap (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RoverTheBendInSussex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Blackburn Rovers F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RoverTheBendInSussex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 Blackburn Rovers F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harrison Reed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Blackburn Rovers F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Conway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Bowyer. GiantSnowman 20:48, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding unsourced content to BLPs. You have been here long enough to know better, no excuse. GiantSnowman 17:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon I don't understand why you are being so hostile and rude. I notice someone else has taken issue with your unpleasant attitude as well (talk) from your recent message on your wall. Do everyone a favour and adjust your attitude. User:RoverTheBendInSussexUser talk:RoverTheBendInSussex 19:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Players will not actually be released until their contracts end on 30 June 2021

Please do not remove them from squad listings/change their articles until that date. GiantSnowman 20:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I have clarified as much on their player pages, and the club season pages. User:RoverTheBendInSussexUser talk:RoverTheBendInSussex 10:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why have you said that e.g. Brad Lyons and tom White have a) left Blackburn (when they won't until 30 June) and b) left their loan clubs (when their seasons are still ongoing with the playoffs). Why, in short, are you repeatedly adding misleading information to articles about living people?! GiantSnowman 20:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As I have already said to you. I have clarified on their player pages that their terms at the club will end on that date. The contract terms are final as disclosed by the club today. Your conduct and attitude is now bordering on abuse/harassment. Have spent hours adding significant information and all you can do is moan. Lay-off the harassment. I do not wish to communicate with you any further. User:RoverTheBendInSussex User talk:RoverTheBendInSussex 21:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohamed Elneny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carrie Symonds, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 12:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly because being a married relation of someone isn't a position appointed. Please tell me you are joking? What an absolutely disgraceful retraction. The edit to the page was vandalism and I was removing it. RoverTheBendInSussex (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Blackburn Rovers F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Armstrong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Steve Bray. It's not appropriate to expand on a quoted tweet with your own interpretation of it, particularly to make a claim as extreme as Bray wanting all Brexit voters deported. Wikipedia should not quote Twitter attacks directly, regardless, per WP:TWEET. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What complete and utter nonsense! I didn't offer up personal commentary I literally repeated what he said and has clearly shown as his intent. Are you really saying that what he has said in person in quotable text format cannot be repeated on Wikipedia because it hasn't been published in media/tabloid format? Again, what complete and utter nonsense! The way it is written up on Wikipedia at present is open to intepretation as well. It is clearly worded to favour Bray by denying racism and implying James Cleverly interpreted what he said rather than reflecting what was literally said. Your Wikipedia page states the following: "Assume good faith", "Be polite and avoid personal attacks", "Be welcoming to newcomers" and "Seek dispute resolution if needed". You have failed on three out of four. User:RoverTheBendInSussex (talk) 16:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The tweet you linked said
I make no apology for wanting those that have betrayed the United Kingdom and devastated the lives of millions out of my country! END.
You quoted it as
Slightly later the same day Bray clarified on Twitter that he wished for all who had "betrayed the United Kingdom" (Brexit voters, campaigners and politicians) to be "out of my (United Kingdom) country (deported)".
Your interpretative additions in brackets seem to be personal commentary, which is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. If you were quoting from a different source for the idea that Bray wishes to see 17 million people deported, you should clarify where you're getting that from. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackburn Rovers F.C. Under-23s and Academy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Buckley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Thomas Evans 01.jpg

Notice

The file File:Thomas Evans 01.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal file

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mattbr 07:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]