This user may have left Wikipedia. Rory096 has not edited Wikipedia since 24 November 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Care to discuss before you revert? I'd like to split the article between the office and the officeholder. I think there is more then enough room for both. Benkenobi18 (talk) 03:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that, I didn't look into it closely enough to see that it wasn't vandalism (and I saw that you'd just been reverted by AdamBishop). I actually edit conflicted with you while trying to revert myself. Ignore me... --Rory09603:48, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the support, and taking the time to contribute your opinion in the first place. I'll hopefully see yoy again in 6 months or so when i reapply :).
My RfA
Thanks for the support, and taking the time to contribute your opinion in the first place. I'll hopefully see you again in 6 months or so when I reapply :).
Link
I am not advertising anything and almost all links are to sites other than mine and as stated on the page I HAVE NO AFFILIATION WITH. I have been asked for this page so many times and just wanted to provide information for people coming to Tamarindo. I have even removed the name of my website from the title tags and almost all of the links to other pages in my website. This page is 100 times more relevent than * Tamarindo beachInformation about Playa Tamarindo and surroundings
Have a nice day and once again I couldnt care less about advertising for anyone I am just helping people out and thought i was doing something good. If it was seen the wrong way I have taken steps to minimize that appearance. It eeven has a great running map.. show me one website that has a running map of Tamarindo and people love running there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imblock (talk • contribs) 02:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Rory. I don't believe we have met before, so I wish to say hi. On the basis of "too many co-nominators", I do believe it is a point which should be made. Although, I could have explained my position further by emphasising the aspect that it is only something minor. I have worded that part of the neutral badly, and have given a somewhat misrepresentation of my true decision. I included that as part of the neutral because I feel that not resisting co-nominations indicates a likely two things: poor judgement and also demonstrates a likely gap in their knowledge (i.e. not knowing that three is usually the maximum). This point has been brought up in quite a few RfAs, and I feel it should be taken into account. Regards, Rudget (logs) 17:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. You posted a final warning to 24.45.22.130 for abuse/vandalism. I think it's time to have that IP (which, if memory serves, is (embarrasingly) Canadian; Rogers@home is the provider) permanently blocked, due to recent vandalism at Diana, Princess of Wales. I'm not sure how to make that happen.. I'm hoping you do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrinceOfCanada (talk • contribs) 03:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! We generally don't permanently block IPs, as the users behind them often change as the addresses are recycled, so we only block them for short periods of time when they're actively vandalizing. In this case, my final warning was over a month ago, so it doesn't really apply anymore (though it may be appropriate to start at a non-first level warning), and the IP only vandalized once today, for which he was appropriately warned. If it continues, or you see something like this in the future, revert the vandalism, give the user the appropriate warning template, starting at number one (or two, in this case, since the IP has a previous history of vandalism), and counting up to 4. Once you get there, if the IP vandalizes again, you can report it at WP:AIV for a block. Thanks! --Rory09604:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.
Rory096, just to inform you, I've released a long-overdue upgrade to the cactions tool, which you should be able to see already (Ctrl-F5 if not). The tool should still work just as before, although you will need to update your JS to the new configuration system to keep the original tabs functionality; see User:Haza-w/Caction tool for the documentation. If you find any bugs or have any queries or feature requests, please get in touch. Thanks, and enjoy! haz(talk)19:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.
There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Rory096. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Rory096. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Are you still active on Wikipedia? I saw a comment you left on my talk page from over 12 years ago, and I haven't edited Wikipedia in so long since then. Wow, was that a long time ago. 80.44.78.55 (talk) 18:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Rory096. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello Rory096! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot IItalk17:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Parry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
.svg)
