User talk:Ronnie Macroni

Welcome!

Hello, Ronnie Macroni, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Draft:Battle Of Kangra (1333) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Introduction to referencing
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle Of Kangra (1333) (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle Of Kangra (1333) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ronnie Macroni! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle Of Ghanaur (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle Of Ghanaur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Delhi (1783), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Rohilla, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 10:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at First Battle of Chamkaur. - Arjayay (talk) 10:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Battle of Chappar Chiri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Am I allowed to add battles in List of battles between Mughals and Sikhs and other? Ronnie Macroni (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Shahi Tibbi, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 21:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to find the sumbit your draft for review option Ronnie Macroni (talk) 22:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Shahi Tibbi moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Battle of Shahi Tibbi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar and Re-draftifying article.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Shahi Tibbi (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Shahi Tibbi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 07:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sikh Attack on Nader Shah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sikh Attack on Nader Shah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh Attack on Nader Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HistoryofIran (talk) 11:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Outnumbered Sikh battles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outnumbered Sikh battles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outnumbered Sikh battles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lennart97 (talk) 02:49, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ronnie Macroni! Your additions to Battle of Kahlur have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kahlur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Kahlur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 14:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kiratpur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Kiratpur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Battle of Sutlej is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kiratpur

Hello

Just so you know I added some reliable sources to the Battle of Kiratpur and added some details and have submitted the page for review. Good work on creating the page it just needed some touch up. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Battle of Pipli Sahib is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Pipli Sahib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dal Khalsa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Peshawar (1834), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your creation of articles related to Sikhism

		The Sikhism Barnstar
		Thank you for creating and improving many articles relating to Sikhism. Here is a token of my gratitude.

CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 07:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ronnie Macroni (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your creation of articles related to Sikh military history

		Military Barnstar
		Thank you for your creation of articles related to Sikh military history. You have created many articles covering various battles and we all appreciate your hardwork and efforts in doings so. Happy editing! ThethPunjabi (talk) 00:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ronnie Macroni (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Anandpur (1695) moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Battle of Anandpur (1695), is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for creating new high quality articles about Sikh battles almost everyday. You have done an amazing job. Keep it up! CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Bassi Kalan moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Siege of Bassi Kalan, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 08:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ronnie Macroni! Your additions to Bhai Gaura have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses ^(Contribs) (Talk) 05:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Guru Gobind Singh into List of Battles of Guru Gobind Singh. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Nanautu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Nanautu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^TT me 12:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs

Hello Ronnie Macroni! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.280259/2015.280259.History-Of_djvu.txt, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 23:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invasions of Kiratpur

Hello. That was an amazing article you made. Can you add some of the details of the battle to the Early Mughal-Sikh Wars page. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 08:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Your edit to Battle of Rorī Sahib has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 02:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your fourth copyright warning on this talk page in four months. Further violations may result in an indefinite block. Anything you add to Wikipedia needs to be summarized in your own words, not copied from elsewhere. DanCherek (talk) 02:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 06:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New article

Can you create article on Battle of Sirikot in 1822 which followed after Hari Singh's defeat at Battle of Nara. Source [1]. You can also refer to source by Gupta, Sikh lion of Lahore. 24.154.112.204 (talk) 22:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uh maybe in 2-3 days because I am working on a big project right now Ronnie Macroni (talk) 22:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, this battle of Sirikot was Sikh victory immediately after battle of Nara.....please make sure it's not copyright and reworded to meet Wikipedia policy. Thanks Ronnie. 24.154.112.204 (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make sure to do it as soon as possible Ronnie Macroni (talk) 22:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronnie Macroni If you need any help with the big project just tell me. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 22:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, if you could name some Hari Singh Nalwa battles which are unknown. Im making an article like Wars of Alexander the Great for Hari Singh Nalwa since his shaheedi day is on april 30th Ronnie Macroni (talk) 01:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Really good idea. I will try to find some. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 01:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Campaigns of General Hari Singh Nalwa This is probably a good book for it. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you, I am focusing on battles by the Sikh Empire nowadays because I ran out of ideas for the eighteenth century lol Ronnie Macroni (talk) 01:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

lol CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Military Campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa add more information or battles if I missed any please and thank you Ronnie Macroni (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will go through it. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ThethPunjabi @Twarikh e Khalsa Draft:Military Campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa feel free to edit and ping others who might be interested Ronnie Macroni (talk) 20:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fourth Battle of Panipat

The article Fourth Battle of Panipat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no historic proof of this nor do the sources in this articles themselves ever site that something called Fourth Battle of Panipat ever occurred. They don't describe a full fledge battle. Just a mere conflict of interest, not even a battle. What has come now is anyone can claim something has occured and use selective lines from some source to claim that something that never happened has actually occured? This is totally historically inaccurate and fails WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:RS, WP:Notable and should be deleted. The term Fourth Battle of Panipat isn't used in any WP:RS or historical context either but a 2023 joinee (no PA just saying) User:Ronnie Macroni is making up fictional battles related to India like this all across Wikipedia and they don't meet the basic requirements of being encyclopedic historic articles and all meets criteria for deletion. Please prevent fictional battle from becoming Wikipedia articles, this is Wikipedia not wikia/fandom also Fourth Battle of Panipat lacks any credibility unlike the First Battle of Panipat, 2nd and 3rd ones and should be deleted!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

The recent page you created (Siege of Amritsar 1748) was really well made.Good Job Brother!Have a Pie as a treat. Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

tasty Ronnie Macroni (talk) 02:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shafi's Campaign against the Sikhs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^TT me 09:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

If there is anything that is needed to be updated on the page Battle of Sirikot (1824) you are free to do so! Festivalfalcon873 (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for creating Siege of Mankera (1821-1822), it is a very good article. Dylan | ✉ | ✓  04:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle Of Kangra (1333)

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle Of Kangra (1333), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle Of Ghanaur

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle Of Ghanaur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello. Do you have Instagram? CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 22:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No 😅 Ronnie Macroni (talk) 02:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok no worries. BTW you have a youtube channel? CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 02:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Ronnie Macroni (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Shahi Tibbi

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Shahi Tibbi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Gandgarh

Who won this battle why background show that this battle won by pashton? 2404:3100:1000:20E6:1:0:83DE:B095 (talk) 13:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The pashtuns won the first part of the battle. However, reinforcements under Sada Kaur defeated the Afghans. Ronnie Macroni (talk) 13:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any references? 2404:3100:1002:D785:1:0:86BA:36D (talk) 03:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

do you have refrences? not only a sikh reference. 2404:3100:1002:D785:1:0:86BA:36D (talk) 04:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have already cited a reliable reference. Ronnie Macroni (talk) 11:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An idea

Hello

I have an idea. Since you are amazing at creating battle pages can you make some about battles featuring kharkus. I have made 2. They are Battle of Manakpur and Operation Mand. Tell me your thoughts on this idea? CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 05:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will start doing them today sounds like a good idea. Ronnie Macroni (talk) 15:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only problem is that I have 0 knowledge about Sikhs in the khalistani era... Ronnie Macroni (talk) 15:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Well maybe read a little bit online about Avtar Singh Brahma or someone and you will get an idea of the period. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 17:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Vadhi Pahar Ronnie Macroni (talk) 04:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 04:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Battle of Kahlur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Battle of Kahlur. Thanks! Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 06:41, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I completely forgot that I have a draft about Battle of Bilaspur (1711) Ronnie Macroni (talk) 14:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Anandpur (1695) (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Battle of Anandpur (1695) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 07:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. Thank you for your work on Second Battle of Lahore (1759). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle Of Kangra (1333)

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle Of Kangra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 00:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle Of Ghanaur

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle Of Ghanaur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 04:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Kahlur (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Kahlur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 02:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of battles involving the Sikh Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poonch District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ideasss

@Twarikh e Khalsa@ThethPunjabi@CanadianSingh1469@Usingh0663@Lovepreet Singh Bahadur

I am completely out of ideas. Do you guys have any suggestions of what battle pages should i create? Ronnie Macroni (talk) 22:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronnie Macroni

What about the battle of bahrampur? or the capture of sirhind by the sikhs and marathas in 1758? There are alot of battles in the afghan sikh wars infobox that need pages. You can check it out. Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 04:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

alright thanks, my brain hasn't being functioning nowadays Ronnie Macroni (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronnie Macroni

No problem mine hasn't either lol Twarikh e Khalsa (talk) 17:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronnie Macroni @Twarikh e Khalsa – Battle of Agampura (1700), no article exists on it. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its a part of First Siege of Anandpur Ronnie Macroni (talk) 21:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any other battles you want? Ronnie Macroni (talk) 00:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronnie Macroni - Besides that, I can only think of battles of the inter-misl wars. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 03:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have just seen this now as it has been a while since I have went on Wikipedia, here are my ideas if you want to make pages on them:

Battle of Nangal Gujjran (1635), Skirmish of Dhubri (1669), Battle of Chittorgarh (1708), many of the Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Ji's battles need pages whether they were small battles like small cities or big battles like Battle of Sadhaura (1713) or Battle of Lohgarh (1713), Battle of Sunam (1735), Battle of Sirhind (1735), I think a battle in Kasur happened in 1747, Battle near Khanpur (1748), Skrimish of Ravi (1751) (this was a skirmish which was the Shaheedi of Bhai Sukha Singh Ji and a few Nihangs against the Afghans), many battles of Baba Jassa Singh Alhuwalia Ji needs battles through the Mughal battles in 1753-1758 and Afghan battles later on, a ton of battles on the Sikh-Afghan Wars page needs battle pages, lastly there are Kharku battles which need pages on.

These are my ideas and I already know there are a lot more battles that I didn't mention on here but this is good for now. Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 15:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Military Campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa has been accepted

Military Campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Nanautu

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Nanautu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skirmish of Chenab (1739)

The article Skirmish of Chenab (1739) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails verification - no mention of "Skirmish of Chenab" in Singh or Gupta, the two main references. Singh does briefly mention an attack, but gives it no name and there is not enough here for WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 21:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skirmish of Chenab (1739) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skirmish of Chenab (1739) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skirmish of Chenab (1739) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

asilvering (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. Thank you for your work on Battle of Amritsar (1738). User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siege of Bassi Kalan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Bassi Kalan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Bassi Kalan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

asilvering (talk) 22:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Ramkani

Hello! How are you? You created a page "battle of Ramkani". In this battle Afghans retreated from battle and failed to capture peshawer. So sikh got victory in this batle You also wrote that result was sikh victory

But some people are changed it and wrote that battle was inconclusice. WikieditorGujrat (talk) 10:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Peshawer 1835

Hello! How are you? You are doing great work. I want to request you to creat an article on battle of Peshawer 11 May 1835. Thanks! WikiKunjah (talk) 16:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Third battle of Anandpur (1704) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Third battle of Anandpur (1704) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third battle of Anandpur (1704) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Kahlur

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Kahlur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siege of Manchar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Manchar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Manchar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way Ronnie, I will be going to ANI/AN if you continue to write these poorly sourced articles that are clearly intended to erroneously aggrandize a certain side's military achievements. I'm sorry but you have absolutely inundated Wikipedia with hundreds of these poorly written articles, it wastes unnecessary time and effort, not just for the person who nominates these articles for deletion, but also the community's as well. We have to parse through these articles and their sources and determine which ones to keep and which to delete. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Ronnie Macroni (talk) 13:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shafi's campaign against the Sikhs

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shafi's campaign against the Sikhs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Sangrana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Sangrana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Sangrana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Invasions of Kiratpur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Invasions of Kiratpur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invasions of Kiratpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 12:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Haidru (1828) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Haidru (1828) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Haidru (1828) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 15:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Mangal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Mangal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Mangal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 20:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Battle of Sangrana" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Battle of Sangrana has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Battle of Sangrana until a consensus is reached. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 20:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Michni for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Michni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Michni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 06:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Sutlej for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Sutlej is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Sutlej until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 06:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Haidru (1828) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Haidru (1828) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Haidru (1828) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Kalanaur (1748) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Kalanaur (1748) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Kalanaur (1748) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 22:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Chamkaur (1764) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Chamkaur (1764) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Chamkaur (1764) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Anandpur (1695)

Hello, Ronnie Macroni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Anandpur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 13:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Mangal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Mangal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Mangal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 02:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Michni for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Michni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Michni (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 02:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Anandpur (1703)

The article Battle of Anandpur (1703) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly written article with very little coverage from its sources (the battle section only spans one paragraph). Very little notability outside the two sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 17:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Ghanaur

The article Battle of Ghanaur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly written and sourced articles. Most of the sources are from unreliable religious self published websites and the Indian Express sources only contains a few sentences about this battle.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 18:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Wan (1726)

The article Battle of Wan (1726) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All the sources are from religious self published websites. Just another one out of the dozens of badly written and sourced articles published by the author to promote religious heroism.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Siege of Gujranwala (1763)

The article Siege of Gujranwala (1763) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable source for the siege, the source used beforehand was the Panth Prakash, a source written in 1914 (WP:AGEMATTERS) and was explicitly deprecated by admins involved in this topic area. The remaining sources either make no mention or passing mention of this event (less than one sentence) -Lee's book states:"In November 1763, Jahan Khan suffered a heavy defeat at Gujranwala and the Sikhs followed up their victory by sacking Malerkotla and Morinda". Very little notability and reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 05:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Sirhind (1781)

The article Battle of Sirhind (1781) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The actual battle section is sourced to a note in a book published in 1939; the note itself is a mere reiteration of a primary source written in 1741, with no input/commentary from a secondary figure, making the section de-facto sourced to a primary, eighteenth century letter. Other sources like Sarkar do not mention this battle and were included to erroneously bolster source count. Very little notability and RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 05:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Jalandhar (1750)

The article Battle of Jalandhar (1750) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is spammed with sources (mostly non HISTRS ones) which do not mention the battle. Hari Ram Gupta's book which appears to mention the battle only includes 2-3 sentences about this battle, and contradictory to the article's title, strongly indicates that it took place well before 1750. Obviously not a notable event and fails SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 06:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Sialkot (1789)

The article Battle of Sialkot (1789) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actual battle section is sourced to 1898 vernacular source (fails WP:AGEMATTERS and WP:HISTRS). Article fails SIGCOV, RS, and notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 06:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Shahi Tibbi

The article Battle of Shahi Tibbi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is spammed with sources which make no mention of battle. PROD in line with message put last year about lack of SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 06:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Operation Vadhi Pahar

The article Operation Vadhi Pahar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nonsense WP:HOAX article sourced to user generated religious websites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 07:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Sohana

The article Battle of Sohana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources. Author has a history of making poorly sourced and written articles which aggrandize a certain religious side.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 06:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Rorī Sahib

The article Battle of Rorī Sahib has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly written article spammed with sources which do not make mention of battle. Article erroneously mentions "Sikh victory" despite the article's content insinuating otherwise.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katoch–Sikh war

The article Katoch–Sikh war has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A few unreliable sources (Khazan Singh, Mark Brentnall, Amarinder Singh) were added to bolster source count. The remaining sources make only passing mention of this battle, all of which include merely a generic sentence about the outcome of the battle; fails WP:SIGCOV by a long shot. In addition, the creator of the article created numerous low quality pages to inundate Wikipedia with articles aggrandizing his religion's military history.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 21:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katoch–Sikh war for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katoch–Sikh war is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katoch–Sikh war until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Baghaur

The article Battle of Baghaur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is mainly sourced through Sri Gur Sobha and Dalip Singh's " Life of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji" , the former is a 17th/18th century primary source, which has been explicitly deprecated by admins in this topic area. The latter was written by an army officer, not a historian, thorough a self published source- see publisher: https://csjs.com/product-tag/author-dalip-singh/. Thoroughly unreliable, poorly written and sourced, and low quality article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Bajrur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Bajrur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Bajrur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 01:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Rumal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Rumal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Rumal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 01:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Bhimber (1812)

The article Battle of Bhimber (1812) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The cited sources do not substantively cover this battle, and as such it appears to fail the general standard for notability. Additionally, the content in the article only vaguely resembles the content in the sources; as such, even if this is a notable topic, we need to rewrite this from scratch.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Talwara (1770)

The article Battle of Talwara (1770) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All encyclopedic content that is about the battle of 1770 is already covered in the article about the commander. There is no evidence that this battle is notable, nor that this name is used in sources. Unverified content abounds, and the page would need to be entirely re-written to be policy-compliant, even if notability were not a concern.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Military campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa

The article Military campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Largely redundant to Hari Singh Nalwa, from which it was created as a marginally modified, unattributed copy, thereby violating WP:CWW. The only unique content is the table, which is WP:SYNTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Ropar (1710)

The article Battle of Ropar (1710) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Largely duplicative of Banda Singh Bahadur, constructed using unreliable sources, and an unlikely search term, meaning a redirect is not warranted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Saharanpur

The article Battle of Saharanpur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Considerable source misuse in this article: most contentious statements ("atrocities against Sikhs and others") are not borne out by the sources. Unclear whether the battle is notable at all. Encyclopedic content already exists at Banda Singh Bahadur.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:25, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Anandpur (1703) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Anandpur (1703) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Anandpur (1703) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 16:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Wan (1726) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Wan (1726) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Wan (1726) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mr.Hanes Talk 18:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]