Hello Richard Yin, I've read your comments about this page, and it seems you believe this is a promotional page of the PR agency who wrote this article. Actually, all the 3 people who contributed the page are not any PR agency, but we are working in the Communication team at Translated, the tech company the page was about. We do not represent any PR agency, but I agree we should disclose the COI about our employer. As you noticed, we have tried to make the content as much neutral and full of sources as possible, as it is not our aim to publish anything less than objective and factual about the company and its scientific contributions into the AI ecosystem. Anyway, we are eager to make the necessary edits. Can you help with that, to have the page live again? thanks Dpatrioli (talk) 11:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Dpatrioli: I don't have the ability to delete or restore your page; you'll need to request that it be undeleted using the process at WP:UNDELETE -- though reading the process described on that page it doesn't appear that your article would be eligible. I also strongly recommend that you contribute to the discussion on the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard here in order to present your perspective to the wider community.
- As a side note, you should also be aware that articles added to Wikipedia are typically deleted unless they satisfy notability standards, and additionally content is generally removed from articles when it isn't presented from a neutral point of view. If I were you recreating the article, these would be my primary concerns.
- For notability, I recommend taking a look at the general notability guideline as well as the notability guideline for organizations and companies. The general notability guideline can be satisfied if you show in your references that the company has received significant coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources. In other words, you'll need to show that one or more reputable publications has presented your company's activities in a significant amount of detail, not just quoting press releases or opinions presented by the founder.
- For neutral point of view, I'd honestly read the entire NPOV tutorial if I were you as well as what Wikipedia is not, but I would pay particular attention to using an impartial tone and avoiding presenting the company's reputation as fact. This was one of the issues that led me to suspect the involvement of a PR firm.
- Finally, to comply with the Terms of Use, I strongly recommend that the three of you each post a statement on your respective user pages describing your relationship with the company.
- I hope this helps. --Richard Yin (talk) 11:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- thanks @Richard Yin very appreciated. We don't like partial tone either. I will add this to the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard. Dpatrioli (talk) 14:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
