User talk:Rhain/2020 July–December


talk

2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014
2015 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2016 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2017 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2018 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2019 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2020 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2021 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2022 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2023 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2024 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)




Possible assistance on The Last of Us Part II article

Hello Rhain. I understand that Wikipedia invites everyone to be bold, and likewise your response may be to propose I do this, but I felt that your extensive re-write of the Reception section for Uncharted 4: A Thief's End (as part of a wider revision for the article) some months ago was very well done, and as a result I was wondering if you might consider at all spending some time when you can on re-working the Critical response section for The Last of Us Part II? As it stands, the majority of it needs a complete re-work as much of the praise and criticism focuses on just the story and is split around 50/50, for what has been seen as an acclaimed title, and consequently lacks balance, depth, and opinions on all features of the game. I'm sorry if I come across as brazen asking this of you and of course admins are under no obligation to cater to other editor's needs, but I hope my request will still be acknowledged nonetheless. Thanks. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Wikibenboy94, I appreciate the kind words about my previous work. I've actually been doing some offline work related to The Last of Us Part II over the last few weeks, but it's mostly related to development; I've been a little hesitant to touch the Critical response section until things settled down. It seems like we're finally starting to get to that stage, so I'd be happy to take a look and try to make some improvements where I can. – Rhain ☔ 21:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
I've just seen your edits Rhain, thank you, it's much appreciated! A comprehensive reception section should also now help settle some of the discourse that has arisen recently on the talk page with regards to accurately illustrating the overall reception the game received. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Appreciate the kind words, Wikibenboy94, and glad I could help! – Rhain ☔ 22:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
That time you have spent on expanding The Last of Us related articles is insane, Amazing. Are you really The Last of Us fan?. 5.56.96.117 (talk) 13:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ellie (The Last of Us), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

new order

At first I thought it was sequel too but it is actually a partial reboot. For example the old blood is a retelling of RtCW. The game also shares some degree of continuity with wolfenstein 3d. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metin karasu (talk • contribs) 19:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metin karasu (talk • contribs)

My edit on Trevor Philips

Why did you undo it? (64.20.139.52 (talk) 11:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)64.20.139.52)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Development of The Last of Us Part II

On 3 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Development of The Last of Us Part II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a team of approximately 350 people developed The Last of Us Part II over seven years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Development of The Last of Us Part II. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Development of The Last of Us Part II), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for List of The Last of Us Part II characters

On 12 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of The Last of Us Part II characters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the actors of The Last of Us Part II could improvise their performances and were allowed up to 20 or 30 takes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of The Last of Us Part II characters. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of The Last of Us Part II characters), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Red Dead Series

Hello there. I would like to know how my sources were unreliable. The videos I linked showed "Red Dead Revolver" characters being mentioned in "Red Dead Redemption". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.14.244 (talk) 03:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joel (The Last of Us)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joel (The Last of Us) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neil Druckmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Art Vandelay Short Stack cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Art Vandelay Short Stack cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Zoe Saldana signature

Hey Rhain, I was wondering where you found Saldana's signature. Thanks! ~ HAL333 20:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi HAL333, the signature was sourced from the open letter by the Guardians of the Galaxy cast regarding James Gunn’s dismissal: [1]. – Rhain ☔ 12:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Ok, that seems perfectly fine. I'm guessing you know abot the discussion at Talk:Zoe Saldana. ~ HAL333 13:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joel (The Last of Us)

The article Joel (The Last of Us) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joel (The Last of Us) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Joel (The Last of Us)

Hello! Your submission of Joel (The Last of Us) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Binksternet (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Joel (The Last of Us)

On 15 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joel (The Last of Us), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the young Troy Baker was cast as the older Joel Miller in The Last of Us because of his voice and movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joel (The Last of Us). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Joel (The Last of Us)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kena: Bridge of Spirits
added a link pointing to Balinese
The Dalek Invasion of Earth
added a link pointing to Amazon

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

N. sane Trilogy

Hi there. I see that the description on this page says remaster. But many sources refer to it as a remake. I think the game has enough improvements to be called as such. What's the real difference between remaster and remake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galagahunt (talk • contribs) 13:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@Galagahunt: Most reliable sources—including the developer—refer to it as a "remaster". I personally think that "remake" is more accurate, but we must follow what the sources say, and not base information on our own opinions. – Rhain ☔ 13:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Planet of Giants

The article cites "Wilson 2017" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Dalek Invasion of Earth

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Dalek Invasion of Earth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 15:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kena: Bridge of Spirits, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pure Pinball game cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pure Pinball game cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Possible assistance on the Super Mario Bros. 35 article

Essay time! Woohoo?

I bolded what's important if you don't want to read.

When I saw that the Super Mario Bros. 35 article was uncomfortably short, I decided for the rest of the week, it'd be my goal to improve it. I got a lot of progress on it, with other people coming in and out to do some fixes. Around half-way through the week, I was invited to join the Nintendo Task Force, which was an honor, even if it labels me as even bigger of a nerd. Coming to Friday, woke up at 5:30 for some reason, I saw 2,000 characters have been removed. I assumed it was vandalism, and went to check to see what it was, and saw that (most of) my progress has been removed. (This is not a passive aggressive hate comment, stay with me.)

Me being awaken at 5:30 in the morning and without coffee, I thought you were just some jerk that overly followed the rules and can't have anything nice in the world, yady-yada, etc. But 5 minutes later, I'd like to thank you. It really does come down to be more professional, with improper citation removed and excessive wording cut. I was just shocked by how stub-like it was. I did a lot of writing on it and in the back of my head, was wondering why nobody was fixing anything I did. I knew there was room for improvement, but everyone thought it was fine, so I just kept goin'.

So thanks for the refresh of it, but now I'm stumped. I don't know where to begin to continue on a more big brain level than before. Then I thought, he has SO many checkmarks, maybe he can help? I know you already did your part and cut the fat, but can you help re-expand on the new big brain level? Maybe give me some pointers on what it needs fixing, and I can go out, maybe extend my time limit to fix it? Or you can come help and I follow your lead? I'd just like some help, but I know The Last of Us is more important. If this came off as sarcastic and mean, whoops! I was trying.

Thank you for coming to my ted talk. Le Panini (talk) 13:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

@Le Panini: I apologise if my edit hurt to see; the article is well-written, but it used some unreliable sources and had some unsourced statements, so I figured I'd make some brief changes. I don't really have too much time at present to do much editing myself, but perhaps I can point you in the right direction.
  • The Gameplay section currently looks pretty good; the main thing it needs is additional citations, particularly for the last paragraph.
  • Development is pretty small, but honestly I'm not sure if there's much more that you could add at present. After a few quick search online, there doesn't seem to be any information about the development of the game. Hopefully the developers will give some interviews in the near future.
  • Reception definitely needs an overhaul. If I may cite some of my own work, I'd recommend having a look at the Reception on articles like The Last of Us or Red Dead Redemption 2. Each paragraph discusses the critical response of a specific element of the game; in the case of The Last of Us: overview, story, characters, combat, visuals, world and environments, sound and music, depiction of violence, depiction of female characters. Within each paragraph, I try to group similar statements; I usually start with the praise and end with criticisms, keeping the heavier critiques to the end, but some paragraphs may require a flipped approach depending on the most prominent opinion from critics—I'd recommend looking at The Last of Us Part II for a better example of this.
    I'm not familiar with the reception of Super Mario Bros. 35, but I'd recommend separating paragraphs for different elements of the game—consider elements like: the game's concept, control scheme, multiplayer component, coin/powerup systems. Sometimes you'll find that one element won't have much commentary from critics, so you could consider merging them; for example, reactions to the actual concept of the game could fit neatly in the overview paragraph (alongside Metacritic's verdict), and the control scheme and coin/powerup systems could be merged if there's not enough information individually.
Once you've finished with the sections, I'd recommend revisiting the lead and expanding it. It's meant to be a summary of the article, so it's usually safe to have around two sentences regarding the gameplay, one or two (in this case) about the development and release, and an overview sentence about the general reception. You can look at the previous articles mentioned for examples of this, though they likely have more information than Super Mario Bros. 35 and therefore a much longer lead.
I hope this makes sense. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns about anything. I'd be more than happy to take a look over the article at any time, too! Best of luck. – Rhain ☔ 23:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
For Super Mario Bros. 35 cleanup. Thanks! Le Panini (talk) 14:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Dalek Invasion of Earth

The article The Dalek Invasion of Earth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Dalek Invasion of Earth for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Achievement Hunter
added a link pointing to Lindsay Jones
Crash Bandicoot (video game)
added a link pointing to Aku Aku

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pure Pinball gameplay.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pure Pinball gameplay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Refs in Willie Nelson

This edit broke a few {{sfn}} footnotes. I have fixed them. Please be more careful and also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

The script doesn't work in preview mode, which I wasn't aware of, so I didn't proofread after publication. I'm careful enough. I'm not even that familiar with Nelson, I just wanted to help out. – Rhain ☔ 23:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Crash Bandicoot template

Hi there. I wonder what you think about the template. Should we use two sections since there are two different continuities now, or should we put all main games in one section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blazer Phoenix (talk • contribs) 12:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@Blazer Phoenix: There's only two games in the current continuity, so I think it's safe to keep it as it is. The "Main games" group currently has nine links, so it's not too crowded at present. – Rhain ☔ 12:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
So is there gonna be a change if Crash Bandicoot 5 is released? I think we shouldn't stuff them all in one section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blazer Phoenix (talk • contribs) 12:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
@Blazer Phoenix: Possibly. That would largely depend on the game itself. It's not really necessary at the moment, though. I wouldn't exactly call them "stuffed in" at present; there's only nine links, so it's still pretty sparse. – Rhain ☔ 13:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Dalek Invasion of Earth

On 26 October 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Dalek Invasion of Earth, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one critic wrote that he had banned his children from watching Doctor Who due to the ending of the first episode of The Dalek Invasion of Earth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Dalek Invasion of Earth. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Dalek Invasion of Earth), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Last of Us Part II

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Last of Us Part II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ImaginesTigers -- ImaginesTigers (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Last of Us Part II

The article The Last of Us Part II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Last of Us Part II for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ImaginesTigers -- ImaginesTigers (talk) 00:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Last of Us Part II

The article The Last of Us Part II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Last of Us Part II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ImaginesTigers -- ImaginesTigers (talk) 00:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Roger Clark

hi! You just removed Roger Clark's birth date that i have added please add it again on wikipedia! Vedant04072005 (talk) 04:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

@Vedant04072005: Please provide a reliable source that confirms his date of birth before adding it to the article. Read over WP:DOB for more information. – Rhain ☔ 04:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The date of birth says on Google page of roger Clark's Vedant04072005 (talk) 16:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

@Vedant04072005: Google is not a reliable source. – Rhain ☔ 20:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 03:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

I’m aware, but when I’m quickly reverting vandalism on my phone, I don’t really have time for that. Besides, when it comes to edits like that, warnings are pointless. – Rhain ☔ 03:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Last of Us Part II

On 6 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Last of Us Part II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the themes of violence in The Last of Us Part II were inspired by Neil Druckmann's (pictured) memories of watching footage of the 2000 Ramallah lynching? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Last of Us Part II. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Last of Us Part II), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

RE: Crash Bandicoot (character)

Not sure how I'm going to find a legitimate source to confirm that Brendan O'Brien's famous "Woah" line was reused for Crash Team Racing, because he didn't receive credit for voicing Crash Bandicoot in that game.

All the other Crash Bandicoot lines from Crash Team Racing — including an additional "Woah" line — were provided by Chip Chinery, but he didn't receive credit either. But there is evidence in this upload that Brendan's "Woah" line was used. Although it's possible that it was shoehorned in by the uploader.

But once again, even if it turns out that Brendan's "Woah" line was used, not sure how and where to find a legitimate source. I don't have the game so I can't do any test runs and have Crash get injured repetitively to see whether Brendan's "Woah" line plays. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 01:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

@C.Syde65: If you can't find a legitimate source, then it doesn't fit in the article. Running tests in the game and coming to the conclusion ourselves is original research, which definitely doesn't belong there. Unless a reliable source reports on it, there's not much we can do. Besides, a single line being reused in a later game is pretty trivial information anyway. – Rhain ☔ 22:23, 10 December 2020 (UTC)