Shiny star for 243 Ida. The reviewers have conceded that it meets all the featured article criteria, and I think we have written an awesome article. It's been a pleasure working with you, keep in touch! Wronkiew (talk) 05:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pat on the back for the Ida 243 article, which is well-enough written to be informative even to the non-scientist.
(I will note that technically both spectra and ejecta are plurals, so verbs should be plural, and the relative pronoun should be those not that, but I haven't made the changes since this is very much a lost cause. A bacteria, anyone?)
And is there any particular reason why you have a snadbox rather than a sandbox?!?
When I first set it up I was going to spell it the right way, but I made a typo. I thought it looked funny so I decided to keep it that way. ReykYO!20:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Reyk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondarysources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 10 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
