User talk:Renamed user 1e23409a06e0b7922c2dfc98dde51974

Dylan Mulvaney moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dylan Mulvaney, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^TT me 10:38, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lori and George Schappell, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 11:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to East Anatolian Fault did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 10:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on 1-Bromopropane

Please discuss changes to articles after they are reverted on the article talk page, rather than simply waiting to input the change again at a later time. Also please avoid removing sourced material without a reason. XeCyranium (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the sentence carefully. It says "phased out (...) under the Montreal Protocol". This is not a sourced sentence and perchloroethylene is not affected by the Montreal Protocol. Nobody removed a sourced sentence.

Don't forget to sign your comments on talk pages. Please do not remove sourced content again, if you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia sources for content in the lead are often found in the body. I've reverted your edit again, I hope I won't have to fix it another time. XeCyranium 02:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

For your dedication to LGBTQ+ topics, and in recognition of your identity as a transgender Wikipedian! ^-^

 Atomic putty? Rien!  20:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Carbon tetrachloride, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 03:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a beginner editor. I provided a source that proves it in the edit summary. I don't know what do you want by "reliable source". It's a TV show, a Fandom wiki page is enough. Saint concrete (talk) 03:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don´t think that a Fandom wiki page is a reliable source in the Carbon tetrachloride article. I think the content is WP:UNDUE. I did not look into your editing history but several of your good faith additions to the article appear to be unsourced or inappropriately sourced. Every medical, pharmaceutical or toxicological claim should comply with WP:MEDRS, primary sources are generally not recommended and sources from a 100 years ago are rarely helpful. Additionally there is no shortage of modern, high quality sources about carbon tetrachloride. Please see WP:BURDEN and stop adding unsourced or inappropriately sourced content. Thanks JimRenge (talk) 04:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of these were medical claims, just historical uses. The Fandom page is for the Popular Culture part, nothing medical. I didn't add anything unsourced there, I add my sources always. "modern sources" are often paywalled and inaccessible even with services like sci-hub. There is no modern record of carbon Tetrachloride's historical anaesthetic use. Saint concrete (talk) 04:17, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dry cleaning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IARC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Translated pages

Obviously using one language's article as a basis for another language's article is a good start. But be sure you note that you are translating rather than writing content from scratch in your edit-summary. See Help:Translation for more details. DMacks (talk) 03:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --Dustfreeworld (talk) 11:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas to you too! ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ (talk) 12:10, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox synax

The Wikipedia syntax for templates is: "vertical-bar parameter-name equals-sign parameter-value", not vertical-bars like parentheses around the name=value, and one cannot pass sets of name=value to another name. For example, when you created 1,1,2-Trifluoroethane with:

| Formula = |C=2| |H=3| |F=3|

you have a syntax error that is flagged as Category:Pages using Chembox with unknown parameters. Each "element=number" is its own parameter, not a set of things for "Formula" (conceptual mistake), and having two consecutive vertical bars is always a mistake (flagged as an error). Instead, you can use something like:[1]

|C=2 |H=3 |F=3

Please try it on Bromotrifluoroethylene to clear your same error there. DMacks (talk) 22:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Almost there. You have:

| Section2       = {{Chembox Properties
|C=2 |Br=1 |F=3|
| MolarMass      = 

Two consecutive vertical bars is an error. After the F=3 is not needed, because there one on the next line before MolarMass. DMacks (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! DMacks (talk) 02:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ. Thank you for your work on Trifluoroethylene. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dichloroethylene

Maybe you didnt notice, but 1,2-dichloroethylene was relabeled. That is the reason that I reverted your edit. Hopefully you understand! Cheers, --Smokefoot (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the renaming, that's why I changed the title on its chembox to be consistent with the article name. ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ (talk) 19:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tetrachloroethylene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reduction. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now fixed. ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ (talk) 18:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tetrachloroethylene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volatility. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kübra (series)

Hello Necatorina, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kübra (series), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kübra (series).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did at Tetrachloroethylene, you may be blocked from editing. Your revert and edit summary are contrary to WP:CON and WP:RS. Despite your minority view that government sources are not to be trusted, most of the world does trust them, especially internationally reputable agencies that were sourced in your revert.

Further combatant positions as you are exhibiting on the talk page will get you reviewed and likely disciplined by an admin. Zefr (talk) 01:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Tetrachloroethylene shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Be collaborative and follow WP:CON on the talk page. You are not only warring beyond reason, you are on the edge of discipline for WP:UNCIVIL behavior. Zefr (talk) 01:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Necatorina reported by User:Zefr (Result: ). Thank you. Zefr (talk) 01:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing only the tetrachloroethylene article. The other ~6 million articles on Wikipedia are still availabe for you to edit. Please be mindful of WP:MEDRS, particularly WP:MEDORG. Also please review WP:CIVIL, and restrict your discussion to be about the edits and not about the editors (e.g. implying that someone has a particular bias). ~Anachronist (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing post-vanish

Hello. After I vanished your account, you have returned to edit without logging in, including identifying as your former username in this edit. Account vanishing is intended to be a permanent departure from the Wikimedia projects. If you continue editing, I will unvanish your account, despite the reason for your request to vanish.​​ — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]