This is an archive of past discussions with User:Reedy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Would it be possible to get an SVN update for AWB please. Theres a few new edits I would like to take advantage of. Thanks. --Kumioko (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
I left a note on the AWB talk page about possibly removing users from the AWB access list after being blocked (I mean longterm not short periods) and long periods of inactivity (like a year or more). Magio suggested I ask you about it. My reasons are in the comment I left. Thanks. --Kumioko (talk) 15:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
I.e. Add a box in the generic template: Image class. If unchecked then image namespace gives class=N/A as before. If checked then class is "Image". -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
If you manually update using SVN snapshots, there should be no need to run the updater. If it's built as a debug build (which all SVN snapshots should be), it will put the SVN revision number onto the edit summary. The packager grabs the files based on whether a SVN snapshot or a release was requested to be gathered. 7728 is a RELEASE, hence, doesn't do it. 7780 I'm guessing is a typo. But whatever. Unless you manually go back, you should only be going forward. Though, going back from a SVN snapshot to a release would be a reason to go back. I've uploaded a 7734 snapshot now. Reedy (talk) 14:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, that helps somewhat. Yes, 7780 was a typo. It might be good to change the WP:AWB page to mention that bleeding-edge users should refrain from running the updater and just look at the snapshot page regularly. Now I'm going forward to 7734. Cheers! Christhe spelleryack15:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello! A few days ago you closed a request for creating an alias in ukwiki. Please note that when performing the upgrade a probable mistake occured, which I described on bugzilla. I don't want to bother you once again, but at the same time I can be sure that my remark there will be processed soon, therefore decided to remind you of it personally. Since the remaining adjustment is extremely minor, nothing will happen if it's dealt with out of turn. Thanks ahead. --Microcell (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Reedy - I see that AWB is up to SVN 7850, but the most recent published snapshot is 7794. Any plans to release a new snapshot soon? I'm looking forward to some of the bug fixes and the redirect template parameters functionality. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Is the bot tagging the dab pages for AFT5 on purpose, or is this something that's been overlooked? I reverted one, but then noticed that the AFT5 cat contains a number of dab pages already, so I thought I'd ask. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 14, 2011; 15:54 (UTC)
Cheers for the ping. I've rolled back the 7 with "(disambiguation)" in the title as the obvious ones, and removed the similar ones from my TODO list. Doing the non obvious ones now is a bit of an issue. As per the usual with enwiki, doing any more that include one of 5 million templates isn't gonna work very well...Reedy (talk) 16:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Glad to be of service :) There are still a few dabs remaining that do not have "disambiguation" in the title, however. If you install this script, all of the disambig pages in that cat will be highlighted yellow, which will make cleanup easier. Or, if you don't want to install it, I can go through the cat later this week and take the dabs out.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 14, 2011; 16:54 (UTC)
I'll try and get round to cleaning it up. Just won't bother doing it till I've finished or maybe I should. Circa 10k pages to go... Reedy (talk) 16:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Don't know why I didn't do this earlier.. I just added existence of "{{disamb" in the page text as a reason to skip. Won't give any false skips (and even if it did, it's not a big deal), but will stop at least some of the disambiguation pages being tagged wrongly! Reedy (talk) 01:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
234 disambiguation pages removed in a run just now. That should probably have cleaned up most of those issues. Reedy (talk) 15:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
I noticed four dab pages that are on my watchlist had been tagged for this today as well. I'll roll them back for you. Mlaffs (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
I've stopped the bot due to the improper stub tag moving. I noticed it appears to only be moving the stub tags when there's a {{DEFAULTSORT}} tag on the page though, perhaps that might help with fixing it? - The BushrangerOne ping only20:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
The article about Québecair, Saint-Augustin-de-Desmaures, Québec is in the list of Cities Served. I think that it was more the isolated village of St-Augustin, on the Basse-Côte-Nord, Québec that was served. There is an airport there. A lot of small villages as Natashquan, Havre-Saint-Pierre, Baie-Johan-Beetz, etc. where also served as correctly listed.
Saint-Augustin-de-Desmaures is a suburb of Québec which is well served by Jean-Lesage International Airport. The Lac St-Augustin Water Airport, in Saint-Augustin-de-Desmaures, is only a general aviation airport for small planes that land on water.PierrotDeLaSalle (talk) 21:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubwith Community Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
AWB SVN Update
Greetings Reedy, I was just wondering if you could do an SVN update for AWB when you get the chance. There have been quite a few changes in the last couple months. Thanks and Happy Holidays. --Kumioko (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Reedy, I had to do AWB rev 7881 as it seems the API doesn't like 'COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT' (U+0301) in page text, gives 'badmd5sum' exception on save. Have you got any info on how the API deals (or not) with these Unicode characters? Ta Rjwilmsi10:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Any ideas how to replicate? I just removed it from the blacklist (ie reverted your rev 7881 locally), and was able to get it to let me save ́... Reedy (talk) 16:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)