|
User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/8
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
WikiCup 2012 January newsletter WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20. A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.
We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition. A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Non-free files in your user space
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC) Dəmi Lovato listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dəmi Lovato. Since you had some involvement with the Dəmi Lovato redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JayJayTalk to me 02:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Begin chess cover.jpeg Thanks for uploading File:Begin chess cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the barnstar!As you know, disambiguated can be a massive task, so I appreciate the recognition. It's when Wikipedians give each positive feedback. Thanks for your own contributions! --JamesAM (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 06 February 2012
File moverHi Rcsprinter123, I see that your account has been granted the file mover user flag. If you looking for something to do, there is currently several hundred files that require renaming under file rename criterion #2. Best, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 13 February 2012
DYKTemplate:Did you know nominations/Lourdes Central School, Mangalore has been failed because of multiple issues. SL93 (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Conservatism PortalIt seems that you were a little overzealous in the number of articles to which you added the Conservatism Portal link. Here are the ones I would dispute as being either not related specifically to conservatism or too broad of a topic to warrant linking to such a specific portal:
Let me know what you think. Otherwise I plan on reverting the portal additions. johnpseudo 13:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Incomplete portalHello. I have undone your recent addition of a redirect to your user space at Template:Announcements/Community bulletin board. Please read Wikipedia:Portal/Instructions and Wikipedia:Portal guidelines and follow them if you want to create a portal. --Mirokado (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
GOCE March copy edit drive
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
Teahouse bannerHey Rc! Thanks for being bold and creating the Teahouse talk page template. I changed some of the language on the template to reflect that it is a pilot, and I also removed the part about inviting folks to become hosts. During the pilot we aren't going to be opening the doors to new hosts, but, if the project is a success, hopefully we will soon :) Thanks for creating it! SarahStierch (talk) 19:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC) Teahouse updatesHi Rcsprinter! A few updates for you about Wikipedia:Teahouse, since you're one of our awesome Teahouse hosts!: 
Very exciting things are taking place, and we'll be opening the Teahouse no later than Monday. Feel free to ping me on or off wiki, and I can't wait to work with you to welcome new editors with a warm cup of tea :) SarahStierch (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC) persondataAre you adding description manually thru person-o-matic? Sounds like it. If manual, let me first go thru with a bot adding description to the sports people. This will save you alot of time. I'm sure there are some tools that I don't know about, this could help you better organize the articles so you could do certain politicians in a row or dancers in a row, etc... Bgwhite (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Bug me anytime you want. Seeing how they won't let a bot do the sports people, the sports ones are a good spot to start as over 99% of the descriptions will be just the sport. I've done it before and it gets ooold fast. So you may want to mix it up. I've asked Dcoetzee if there is a way to incorporate a function to use a list of names in person-o-matic instead of a randomly generated one. There is another way it could be done, but person-o-matic is such an easy tool to use, lets try that route first. Lets wait for Dcoetzee's answer. Bgwhite (talk) 20:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC) The Teahouse is Open! Hi Rcsprinter! Great news: The Teahouse is open for business! We're ready to start inviting new users, answering questions and inspiring one another. If you haven't already taken a look at the links provided in the most recent Teahouse update, posted on your talk page, please do! Don't forget to add yourself to the Host page if you haven't already. What's next? Inviting hosts and reporting your invitation information.
See you at the Teahouse! SarahStierch (talk) 18:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
WikiCup 2012 February newsletterRound 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design. The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC) |
