User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/3
Nomination of The Meanest Genie for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Meanest Genie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Meanest Genie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC) Edit summariesHello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this: Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes) Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Edit summary content is visible in: Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
BR symbolHi, I see you have been adding an image of the former BR "double arrows" to various articles, such as Aylesford railway station. However, clicking on the image directs to Transport in London which of course, is not particularly relavent. Please can you change this and ensure it directs to something more globally relevent. Although the symbol is generally still in use, I'm not sure what it now officially represents, as it is not used by Network Rail or any of the TOCs. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
IglooHey Rcsprinter123. Careful with Igloo. Remember you should only be reverting definite vandalism with it - [1]. Just hoping to nip this in the bud ;) WormTT · (talk) 19:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC) GraduationHi Rcsprinter123. I've been watching you over the past few weeks and I think you're actually about ready for this. What, I hear you ask? Well this big fluffy graduation certificate. The one that caught your eye before you read this text. Oh, and it's not fluffy - I just wanted to know if you'd read this.
So well done! I do think you should watch yourself, you work very quickly and are quite prone to making mistakes. If you can keep them under control, you'll do very well. Remember that using automated tools mean you are more likely to make mistakes, not less! Good luck for the future, and let me know if I can do anything. WormTT · (talk) 19:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Automatic reversionJust a note to say your bot reverted an edit of mine as suspected vandalism; perhaps it responds to any text deletion in a quotation? The page was Shirley, New Zealand; I have now put my proposed edit on the associated discussion page. Basically my edit harmonises two currently unrelated explanations for the origin of the suburb name, so we need to remove the speculation (by an unnamed source) about where the name 'Shirley' comes from; it is now clear. Will have another go at editing the page later. JulianHeyes (talk) 19:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC) Template check requestI saw the note that CAT:PER was backlogged, so I'm trying to help out, but template work is new to me. The infobox book series one looks straightforward, as it appears the sandbox has exactly what is needed (unlike the last one I worked on) but I'll still like you to check to make sure I didn't break anything.--SPhilbrickT 15:36, 30 July 2011 (UTC) TalkbackHello, Rcsprinter123. You have new messages at TParis's talk page.
Message added 14:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. v/r - TP 14:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC) me....,againi've made another one if your intrested Ace10000 (talk) 10:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC) oh and i've got my own website if you want to visit it (its got links to my other sites as well: http://editthis.info/ultipedia/Main_Page Ultipedia Ace10000 (talk) 10:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
about the adoption thingcould you do a bit more advanced stuff for me to learn, i mean no offence but i learnt all that before i even had an account! you know stuff like userboxes, templates, how to use forums you know not too basic, not to advanced and strangely that's how i prefer the internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace10000 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC) 1)should i call you rc,sprinter,sprinty or the sprinster
--Ace10000 (talk) 11:48, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
questionsi put some questions on the adopt page just in case you didn't know --Ace10000 (talk) 12:09, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
finishedive finished the test --Ace10000 (talk) 13:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC) what does trout this user mean?--Ace10000 (talk) 14:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC) have you used my police dog user box like you did wit the no dogs one if you did could you give me the link please--Ace10000 (talk) 14:11, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
you wanna know why I ain't been editinI'll tell ya why cause you f***** revert my edits when they were perfectly fine so ya betta gimmi a good reason to carry on editin otherwise I'm outta here never coming back and boosting my website up to make you website go down so gimmi a reason or your sites history! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace10000 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High . SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC) Maybe, but how do we know? I reverted the change and left a uw-unsourced1 tag on the talk page of the editor who made the change. What source do you have for 1979? --Hammersoft (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
AfD closesHi Rcsprinter123. When you close AfDs as keep, please remove the AfD tag from the article. You neglected to do this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dade Behring, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race course, Ooty, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Oceanographic Society, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeina Awad. Also, please carefully consider the arguments made by participants before you decide to close an AfD as keep. Some keep votes are not firmly grounded in policy, like those at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeina Awad, where participants did not point to specific policies/guidelines or did so vaguely without specific discussion of the subject. When votes are not based on policy, it would be a better choice to relist. Goodvac (talk) 06:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
|