User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/20
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High . SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC) ReadyHi, I'm ready to take the test. Hop n hop (on the arctic ice) 16:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles for creation/DentaaDear Rcsprinter123, Thanks for looking over the Dentaa article. I have made some additional edits which I feel brings the article within Wiki's guidelines and would be most grateful if you could please review the page again. If it still falls short then it would be useful if a more detailed explanation could be given as to why this is, as the subject is noteworthy, the points are all backed by references and each reference is from a legitimate third-party source. Many thanks, AnnieRemell (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
That's great. Thanks for doing that. AnnieRemell (talk) 08:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC) uhmyeah, you're right with that edit, but please, (for your own sake), don't do that edit, many editors don't want to see that kind of edits... do like in IRC style: * Reverted PROD on Chris CottrellHi sprinter, I was the reviewer that promoted Chris Cottrell to full article. I followed WP:BIO and established his notability per the independent reliable sources provided by ASU, the Phoenix New Times, and the Arizona Secretary of State. You need to add his involvement in the Chris Law and his presidency of the Arizona College Republicans to establish his notability. Per WP:PROD I reverted your nomination as I contest it. If you still believe the article must be deleted I suggest you follow the normal WP:AFD process. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Jonathan Galway-Jackson the Nouvelles frontman and Belfast peace activistHi Im trying to do a article on my favourite bands singer. The references are from a N Ireland national newspaper full page and recent and also the massive Manchester Evening News and a full page there also. There are other articles on him, these satisfy the golden rule the most. Please explain as to why you are turning this guidance led article down? Thanks, Wikigeek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikigeek2011 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Regarding the rejection of my ArticleDear Rcsprinter123, My article was rejected by you recently and can I know what do you mean by "Citations need to be inline"? It would be kind of you to clarify this, as I am new to wiki. [[User:Krish.ganz|Krish.ganz]] (talk) 09:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)krish.ganz
Adoption testBased on my frequency, it seems I shall be taking one test every month :P Please post the test. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 08:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC) The Signpost: 14 January 2013
My first try at an essay/WikiProject -Tell me what you thinkUser:TheOriginalSoni/Rolling Ball. Do leave your feedback on the talk page. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 21:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Fujiwara no Michimasa articleHello Rcsprinter123, Thank you very much for reviewing my article. After reading the comments above in which there was some confusion as to whether you declined a submission based on inline citations/notability I would like to point out that the subject of my article meets multiple notability criteria. If I have not sufficiently demonstrated that in my article, could you please let me know which criteria has not been clearly stated in the article?
I received some feedback from the livechat that encouraged me to resubmit. However, I seem to have a problem with the resubmit button. How do I resubmit the article? Thank you. miyabeajisai — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miyabeajisai (talk • contribs) 09:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approvedGood news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
GOCE mid-drive newsletter, January 2013
Submission on Community Professional LoudspeakersFirst of all, thank you for taking the time to review my submission. Could you please clarify the reasons for declining it? I significantly improved the referencing from the previous submission, adding more secondary sources that all demonstrated the subject's notability. Your rejection also wanted "clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." However, I detailed how the company revolutionized its industry and influenced the works of some of the greatest musicians in rock and roll history. I'm not sure what else to do - could you please help? SFall34 (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Hello, The page is up and running. You can now join by adding your name at the end of the page here. We also have a Wikipedia:Rolling Ball/Hang Out Zone for everyone to discuss whatever they want. You are also requested to watchlist/keep and eye on the Hangout page so you can keep track of whatever everyone's talking about. Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 13:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC) Quick question RcRegarding citations... How do I organize citations used in say a paragraph when some of them are pertinent to the entire paragraph and one is only pertinent to one particular line? Do the ones that are relevent to the entire paragraph go at the very end and the specific one go after the specific line it's referencing? Thank you, — dain- talk 15:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC) adoption???hello, im new to wiki. any chance you could help me out with my editing? i could really use it. Thanks. NHCLS (talk) 09:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotWe are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High , while for quality the scale goes from Low to High . SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NumbersGreetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |