User talk:Raymond Cruise/Archive2009/2

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mérida UD.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Mérida UD.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Copa Rey Baloncesto 2009.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BM Sagunto.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BM Sagunto.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro(talk) 20:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Atlético Astorga FC.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Atlético Astorga FC.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro(talk) 20:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:CD Becerril.gif}

Thank you for uploading File:CD Becerril.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:CD Becerril.gif}

Thank you for uploading File:CD Becerril.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:UD Santa Marta.png}

Thank you for uploading File:UD Santa Marta.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:UD Santa Marta.png}

Thank you for uploading File:UD Santa Marta.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Arandina CF.png}

Thank you for uploading File:Arandina CF.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Arandina CF.png}

Thank you for uploading File:Arandina CF.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SD Rayo Cantabria

The infomation about Rayo Cantabria is wrong. You are using Racing B&nbsp's infomation. Racing B was called Rayo Cantabria until the 1990s. The club now called Rayo cantabria was founded in 1993 and was at one time the second reserve team for Racing. Raul17 (talk) 14:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about the club history. SD Rayo Cantabria was founded in 1993 and Real Racing B was founded in 1926. The league infomation should be switched around. The shield should not have have the foundation date. Cheers! Raul17 (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. My Spanish is very poor. Can you repeat what you stated in English? Raul17 (talk) 03:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Copa Rey Balonmano 2009.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Copa Rey Balonmano 2009.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Copa Rey Balonmano 2009.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Copa Rey Balonmano 2009.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deporte en San Fernando

Hola Cañailla. He visto tus colaboraciones en el deporte y me pregunto si querrías hacer algo con el deporte en La Isla... mejor artículos, crear nuevos. Si tienes algo que decir... en mi página de discusión española, ya que no colabora en la Wikipedia inglesa. --Rolafer (talk) 21:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, se si lo habrás leído, pero me gustaría que redactadas algunos artículos ()si quieres

Bahía Sur, por ejemplo. --Rolafer (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cartagena local football team

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cartagena local football team, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This team is not notable. They have played once. There is no reason to suggest they are a national team, as the infobox and navboxes do. They were most likely a select 11 from FC Cartagena, or an amateur side, as the number of redlinked player names would suggest

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stu.W UK (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Defaultsorts

Hola RAYMOND, VASCO de Portugal al habla,

Lo has hecho en muchos jugadores, pero te dejo este ejemplo: en Alberto López Fernández, por favor no pongas el DEFAULTSORT como LOPEZ FERNANDEZ, ALBERTO. El jugador es conocido como ALBERTO, no como LÓPEZ, y una búsqueda por jugadores de, en este caso el Valladolid, nos llevará a la letra A, pero si queda como tú pones, entonces ALBERTO estará en la letra "L", de LÓPEZ. Lo que WP pide en los DEFAULTSORTS es que la información contenida ahí sea igual al título del artículo, o sea que si el artículo pone ALBERTO LOPEZ FERNANDEZ, y el DEFAULTSORT lo mismo, entonces queda OK, creo yo.

Espero haber quedado claro, un saludo y hasta otra.

Vasco Amaral - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 02:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saludos, Vasco - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • ?????Porqué tantos aspavientos y acoso verbal? Sólo quiero/quería ayudar...Qué solamente haces lo que crees correcto? No lo dudé ni un segundo, pero uno no lo sabe todo (ni yo ni tú), te ofrezco my ayuda (humilde pero no desechable) y basicamente me envías a freír espárragos. Y sigo pensando lo mismo: hay gente que no tiene ni idea que APOÑO se llama ANTONIO GALDEANO BENÍTEZ, por eso su defaultsort debía ser ANTONIO GALDEANO BENITEZ (ya que no puede ser APOÑO, porque no es el nombre del artículo) y quedar en letra "A", y no GALDEANO BENITEZ, ANTONIO. Si haces de otra manera, lo respecto, no lo comparto, pero con buen rollo. Y vuelvo a decirlo, si necesitas mi ayuda en lo que sea - lo dudo, visto tu reacción - no lo pienses y "llamame".

Tu mismo, hasta otra, Vasco, PORTUGAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 14:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hola compañero...Completamente de acuerdo contigo hombre. No se cambiar nombres de páginas, pero escribo para decirte que estoy 100% de tu parte, se debe de cambiar, APOÑO y demás como el. Un saludo cordial, hasta otra - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ray, lo dije en mi ultimo mensaje, a lo mejor algún error de comunicación (tengo que limar algunos flequillos en mi Español :)), claro que puedes cambiar para APOÑO, creo que es lo mejor. De paso, cambia también, si puedes, el compañero de APOÑO, CHELI, creo que está en la misma situación. Un saludo - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 15:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Buen trabajo, hombre. Yo soy de Beja, al sur de Portugal, y tú? No, no tengo ningún equipo favorito, ni siquiera en Portugal, pero me gusta mucho lo que hace el Athletic de Bilbao, el fútbol esta cada día más estropeado (equipos como el INTER, el ARSENAL me dan asco, pronto el REAL MADRID, sin RAÚL, GUTI y SALGADO estará en las mismas condiciones). Los bascos, creo yo, conseguirán, una vez más, iludir el descenso, y están en la final de copa. De que club eres? Espero que si eres del MADRID no te hayas sentido ofendido, no fue mi intención.

Hasta otra Ray, y suerte para el Sábado contra TURQUIA (por cierto, ahora en las selecciones, más de lo mismo con los nacionalizados - en Portugal ROLANDO, DECO, PEPE, y posiblemente LIEDSON, de pena). Un abrazo, Vasco - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 16:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ya he visto el artículo de APOÑO, de nuevo buen trabajo. Solamente te tengo que decir esto más sobre los Defaultsorts, como ayuda: quando pones allí un nombre, no puedes poner accento (así, APOÑO queda APONO, o JOSÉ MARI queda JOSE MARI, no sé el porque de esto, solo sé que los sorts no se activan si llevan accentos). Hasta otra hombre, Vasco - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More DEFAULTSORTs

Thanks for cleaning up the Spanish football players DEFAULTSORTs, fixing DEFAULTSORT is mostly what I do and you did a good job. If you feel real ambitious (and are ready to stand the flames and screaming), the Brazil players are in need of a similar cleanup. I primarily do sorting on Wikipedia, but don't touch the Brazil players 'cause I can't stand the arguments. There's more than I can do elsewhere anyway.

Purely FYI, one minor point that you might not be aware of: we want a case-insensitive sort, particularly of family names, so that things like "DuBois", "duBois" and "Dubois" all end up together. Sadly, the software in Wikipedia (in the database, actually) does a case-sensitive sort. To work around that with sort keys for people, we conventionalize capitalization; capitalize all first letters and lowercase all subsequent letters, e.g. "Dubois" for all three. For the Spanish names, this means "de Whatever" and "de la Whatever" sort as "De Whatever" and "De La Whatever". I've fixed your recent changes. Studerby (talk) 21:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Cajasol Sevilla.png}

Thank you for uploading File:Cajasol Sevilla.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Cajasol Sevilla.png}

Thank you for uploading File:Cajasol Sevilla.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Cajasol Sevilla.png}

Thank you for uploading File:Cajasol Sevilla.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Kalise Gran Canaria.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Kalise Gran Canaria.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Kalise Gran Canaria.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Kalise Gran Canaria.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Kalise Gran Canaria.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Kalise Gran Canaria.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:MMT Estudiantes.gif}

Thank you for uploading File:MMT Estudiantes.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:MMT Estudiantes.gif}

Thank you for uploading File:MMT Estudiantes.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:San Sebastián Gipuzkoa BC.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:San Sebastián Gipuzkoa BC.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro(talk)(review) 20:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Basket CAI Zaragoza.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Basket CAI Zaragoza.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Basket CAI Zaragoza.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Basket CAI Zaragoza.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]