User talk:Rawling

WikiProject Narnia

Hello, I noticed that you edited an article related to, or expressed interest in The Chronicles of Narnia. I thought you may be interested in knowing that there is a WikiProject working to improve articles about Narnia, your help would be greatly appreciated. Please consider joining the WikiProject Narnia. Thank you! Bornagain4 18:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling correction improperly reverted

In Kagome Higurashi, you reverted a spelling correction by User:76.212.81.32. He changed "realises" to "realizes". The latter is correct. So you should not have reverted him. JRSpriggs 07:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Realises" isn't wrong, it's British English. As far as Wikipedia guidelines state there's no preference, and since I don't go round Wikipedia changing everything to British English, I'm often slightly annoyed by coming across an edit whose sole purpose is to change something to American English. Hence this revert. Rawling 12:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was not aware that this was one of those words which we colonials systematically mangle. JRSpriggs 07:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for spotting and reverting the Vandalism on my talk page. :3 I believe that's his {{test5}}, too. PumeleonT 22:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, glad to be of help. Recent Changes patrol is a good form of catharsis ^^ Rawling 22:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, I usually do main namespace RC, though, so I miss a lot of the libellous vandalismery. Yes, I just made that word up. OH NOES NON-NOTABALE NEOLOGISM! X3 PumeleonT 22:49, December 16, 2006
Heh, you missed signing that. Duly noted on your talk page :p Rawling 22:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User page. And DAMN! :P PumeleonT 22:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for the revert on my userpage. many thanks.--JWJW Long Live Esperanza! :) 15:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UNATCO - nom for deletion

I have an idea of solving this by nominating the article for deletion. Well, it may pass or not, but AMIB will blank it anyway w/o that. If you can, please add some sources prior to that. Or comment if you disagree. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 00:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may have me wrong here; my revets of the blanking of a few Deus-Ex related articles were part of a normal RC patrol - I hate to see anything just deleted, especially when there is an actual discussion going on. However, I have played Deus Ex so i do have a little invested in the decision - I will try to remember to look in on the AfD discussion when it gets underway. Rawling 00:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, don't worry yet then, just wanted to discuss with people involved. I'll post when it comes to that, if he continues to blank the articles. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 00:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ROTS

I'm sorry, I think I'm going to give you permission right now to talk to me like I'm a four-year-old. I'm confused on exactly what point you are trying to make. From what I understand, Lucas changed something in Return of the Jedi that resulted in Anakin and the suited Vader not being played by the same actor. What changes are you speaking of? The Filmaker 17:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Rawling! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. frothT 23:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My editor review

Many thanks for reverting the edits on my editor review, somehow I don't think those comments were going to help me be a better editor! Thanks again RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Minor Barnstar
I award this barnstar to Rawling. You've only just arrived in WP:UW but your contribution already stands out and if you continue in this manner, will be a welcome asset to our project. Khukri (talk . contribs) 22:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

an in group (mathematics)

Hi. I didn't want to revert you twice at group (mathematics), but I don't understand your last edit. What do you mean with "or other suitable composition depending on the group operator"? What other composition is there? -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't like the way that line assumes the group operation is multiplication, when it could be addition, or composition of functions, or presumably some other operation. That said, I didn't word it very well. I was going to put in the whole definition of an I just got in my Algebra 2 course (which includes the cases when n=0 and n<0, as well as being for a general group operation rather than just multiplication) but I couldn't really see a good place to put it. Rawling4851 12:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~Smile~

PolarWolf ( sign ) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

For no reason- I just feel bubbly today (^_^) --PolarWolf ( sign ) 03:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. I'll try to pass it on sometime that I feel capable... Rawling4851 11:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oh I know, but my browser window is big enough that it appears below the toolbox and doesn't cover up the wikimedia logo unless I scroll all the way down. It's just for my convenience anyway. .froth. (talk) 21:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rawling. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]