User talk:Ramaksoud2000/Archive 2

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Hi

I am not understanding your message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dino.hb (talk • contribs) 03:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Can you elaborate a little? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 03:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
I am just starting to use this and I am bombarded by stuff ... i posted the article few mins ago and already is going to be deleted I just dont get it.... its not worth my time. You should be more friendly to new people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dino.hb (talk • contribs) 04:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry if you feel that you are being bitten, however, the text you added to that article appeared to be a copyright infringement, a legal issue that we have to take very seriously. It also appeared to not adhere to a neutral point of view, and about a company that does not meet the notability guideline for corporations and the general notability guideline. This may seem overwhelming. You are free to create a draft so that you can edit without the fear of deletion, however, you may not insert any material that violates any copyrights, as stated at the top of every edit window. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
I dont even know how to chat on here, it is complicated and not user friendly. You should give people more time to get stuff dealt with. The text I have copied was from the website and ok, its deleted. What would be the problem on the article now??? It would be nice to just tell people what they need to change and not to bombard them with all of your rules that I took time to read and still it does not say what should I change. SO if we are taking the time to text on here, maybe instead of sending me links to rules you could just HELP by actually talking to me. This is actually really frustrating and If you are going to send me another msg with links and stuff that will take hapf day to read then I just give up, delete my article and my account. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dino.hb (talk • contribs) 04:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. The problem with the article now definitely has nothing to do with you. Rather, the subject matter may not be notable enough for inclusion. I linked you to all those pages because they can explain the rules much better than I can but from now I will link to the pages but provide my own explanation. The general notability guideline states that to be included in Wikipedia, topics must have significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources, independent of the subject. This means that many others must have reported on the subject prior, so that it can be included in Wikipedia. This is really all the matters. I am in the process of finding some sources for you and will put them in the article. While I'm looking, can you find some websites that report on it? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
I have added sources to your article now and it might be fine. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Other than the website www.skateprincegeorge.com that I have taken off from the article because I was not sure if that was the "promotion" that was not allowed, I have seen articles about the Northern BC Centre for Skating in local news paper. Would that be enough to keep the article? Can I post the links in the article or that is not allowed? I am just not sure how to add references to the article ... Dino.hb (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

There are very good instructions on how to add link s at Help:Citing sources. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 12:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Gee Bee R/Doolittle edits

I'm looking for clarification and instruction, in a constructive fashion as noted above.

I understand that links to "personal" websites are discouraged. However, I didn't link to a page about me; it's only my "personal" site in that I host it and my name appears in the byline. I'm not selling anything at all on the Doolittle page. (On some of my other pages visitors can follow a link to purchase the back issue in which the articles appeared, but that's not the point of the site, I make no profit on such purchases, and the Doolittle issue has been out of print for 20 years.)

I'm an historian in my humble fashion, published in numerous magazines and in hardcover. The article on my Doolittle/Gee Bee page is accurate, fully backed up with sources, and includes material not offered on the Wiki page. I sincerely believe it is of use to people looking into Doolittle and the Gee Bee.

Over the past year or two, I've made similar Wikipedia links with some of my other articles, most of which raised no flags and are still active. So I need some clarification on when it is OK and not OK. From my perspective it seems to depend on which Wiki editor reviews my edits. If somebody else had made the same edit I did, and added a link to my site, would the link have been deleted?

Thanks for hearing me out, and sorry again for any misunderstanding. I really was offering the links in good faith.

Don Hollway (talk) 14:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Per WP:ELNO and WP:ELYES, links to sites should be avoided if they can be integrated into the encyclopedia or are simply an article similar to what a Wikipedia article might look like. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 16:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

I suspect you did not look at the linked site but just rejected it automatically. ["Doolittle Tames the Gee Bee"] If you believe that page, with its quotes, photos, video and sources, "can be integrated into the encyclopedia or are simply an article similar to what a Wikipedia article might look like," then let your decision stand and feel free to rewrite the wiki. Seems to me that a link was the best and simplest way to "integrate" it into the Wikipedia page, unless you believe the extra info is of no benefit to Wiki visitors.

I repeat, I'm not making any money off the site. The article was published and paid for 20 years ago. This is offered in the spirit of Wikipedia.

Don Hollway (talk) 14:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

I did read the link before I removed it. I thought that it could be integrated. However, after reconsideration, I think it won't be possible to integrate due to the way it is written. I won't have any objections if you re-add it, however, other editors might. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 15:41, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Breakon

This user has used his account for vandalism and self-promotion. You gave him his last warning. He needs to be banned. At http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia&diff=554856357&oldid=554459426, he almost removed the entire Wikipedia article on Wikipedia.Surfer43 (talk) 03:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

There has been no edits since the last warning so it can't be reported. How exactly did you find that account, and why the push to get it blocked if it is stale? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

R-commerce

Hi Ramaksoud2000, This is Ahmed Zaini. I need you to explain to me what should I do to make my article "r-commerce" accepted. I have made the changes for the issue you wrote which is my article is orphan. Could please check it and tell what else, if there is any, should I do?


Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed Zaini (talk • contribs) 20:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

The concern is that it is a Neologism. You can improve it by adding sources to your article to show that it has mainstream usage. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 01:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/The bot flag

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/The bot flag. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Australian roads)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Australian roads). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

DOB of non notable minors

Hi Ramaksoud2000, I see on the jimmy fallon article you accepted the edit of an ip who added the exact dob of a minor. This has actual been an edit war over this. Just wanted to let you know I have removed that material again. Thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 22:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Could you point to a reason for excluding information? WP:DOB states that when it has been been widely covered or comes from a primary source, it is OK. Here's the primary source. It is is also widely published. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 22:57, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Darn, I thought you might ask :) I believe that refers to the subject of the article. There seems to be a consensus, please don't ask me to link to it, but I could dig, that when it comes to non notable minors/children we do not include their exact dobs. Now somebody like Suri Cruise is a little different, and I would NOT edit war over that because she might not have her own article, but she is pretty notable. I will have to skip on over to mr. cruise's bio to confirm this. For child actors who have their own bios, I would have no problem including their exact dob. The general rule of thumb seems to be if the person is not notable enough to have their own bio, how does having their exact dob add to the understanding of the bio. I seem to remember that sarah palin was having the dob of her first child included because it showed she was having pre marital sex or some nonsense but that's a different can of worms. Does this help?Cheers, --Malerooster (talk) 23:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
I stand corrected. Suri's dob is not included. I might have even removed myself, not expecting that it would last :). If we don't give her dob, then nobody should have it :). I am sure others could comment on this as well. --Malerooster (talk) 23:09, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Well, it's only a date versus a month, so I'm not really going to argue over something so trivial and I'll take your word on that consensus. Have a nice day! (Or night) Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 23:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

STiki emergency

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 Wikification Drive

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

BACKLOG OF THE WEEK Category:Pages with broken reference names

Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing pages with citation errors. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting and in Category:Pages with missing references list as in Category:Pages with broken reference names (more than 1500 yesterday). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a "Blitz" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.

Only with WikiBlame Search it is possible to find and repair such errors.

Best wishes --Frze > talk 08:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Backlog template made by User:TheJJJunk

Backlog status (Purge)
Category Current status
Pages with incorrect ref formatting  Not done
Pages with missing references list  Done
Pages with broken reference names Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character ",".

Best wishes --Frze > talk 04:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

New REFBot

There is a suggestion on Wikipedia:Bot requests#New REFBot for a new REFBot working as DPL bot and BracketBot do. I beg politely for consideration. Please leave a comment if you wish. Thanks a lot in anticipation. -- Frze (talk · contribs) 04:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

You Made me feel as if I was not welcome to your page, I feel as if you like 8===D up your ass and like to beat the coochie bowchickawowwow ;)))) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.132.191 (talk) 02:23, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

MATE PARSA IS THE HEADMASTER

youre wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swaggadons (talk • contribs) 20:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Yusuf ali khan

Why would you like to suggest deletion for a page on someone who is a national hero please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fauziamohsin (talk • contribs) 04:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia. I feel that the subject may not meet Wikipedia's nobility guidelines. This can be addressed by WP:Citing your sources. Wikipedia generally only has articles on subjects that have been thoroughly written about in secondary sources. If you have some of these sources, please let me know or add them to the article. Thanks! Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

The Blackened Beneath

Yeah,

I'm the singer of this band in question. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theblackenedbeneath (talk • contribs) 04:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

You have to change your username or else you will be blocked. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Jean Marc Lopez' father was the creator of the flower abstraction

Hello, You have deleted my article because I did not put the subject correctly. Can you just publish the page and put as the subject "History of Floral Abstration" ? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tradico (talk • contribs) 00:15, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

@Tradico: I did not delete your article and have no ability to republish it. It was deleted by the administrator User talk:Kudpung, however, changing the title will not get it undeleted. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert. I just wanted you to know that the IP was me. I was using my phone upstairs while eating, it crashed, and was oblivious to the fact that I logged out. Thanks for helping. Sportsguy17 03:03, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

ArjuanaNua

Thanks Ramaksoud, I had intended to come back to do a better job anyway but I see that the point I was trying to get across is below in the section titled Shankya Yoga Tradition. I suppose that is more concise than Hinduism on it's own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArjunaNua (talk • contribs) 00:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

sulvec, ilocos sur

sir/mam:

sorry if i edited the article without any permission. it's just my first time to make an edit. i just noticed that SULVEC, ILOCOS SUR and NARVACAN, ILOCOS SUR has been merged, but actually, SULVEC is just a part of NARVACAN. I hope we can clarify that SULVEC is not NARVACAN, it is just a part of it.

thank you for your kind consideration and i hope that it would be fixed Carl23josef (talk) 06:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC).

@Carl23josef: Yes, it is clear in the article that they are not the same thing. And you do not need any permission to edit articles. Be bold in editing, and if another editor feels that an edit was wrong discussion can follow. Just next time, please use an edit summary so that other editors know what you are doing. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 18:18, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

New LYNN CORCORAN

Lynn knows me and knows I am a Wikipedian. She asked me to remove the REDIRECT. Please respect her wishes.BOOLE1847 (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Could you possibly get her personally to come or you to give a reason? Reading WP:BIOSELF and WP:ASFAQ would help you tremendously. This specific section may be of particular interest to you. Could you explain more? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 19:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Because you appear to have been using multiple accounts, I did not notice that you are the one that created the redirect and then wanted it deleted. Since you created it, this falls under WP:CSD#G7 and will be delted. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 19:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Re:

Hi RS2000,

Thanks for notifying me about that. However, you have tens of thousands of users with the same or similar designs to make them aware. Just an FYI. Sportsguy17 (R.I.P Jackson Peebles) 02:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Why did you revert edits on my user page?

I don't know you, you have never contributed anything there, yet you sneak in and remove the edits of others without discussion or warning.InterpreDemon (talk) 23:04, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Per WP:EVASION, users who evade blocks may have their edits reverted. User:Xqpoiu98 was blocked for evading the block of User:Grundle2600. You are perfectly fine to leave it. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 23:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, it's getting pretty confusing for this newbie. Is that why, when I tried to go to his X...98 entity talk page , I got this:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts to evade a block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: (link deleted) However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MastCell Talk 22:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

That message suggests that I have been blocked from editing by MastCell, who is openly hostile toward me, and I do not have multiple accounts.InterpreDemon (talk) 01:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

That message, and any other messages on user talk pages are intended for whoever's talk page it is on. That particular message is intended for User:Xqpoiu98 only. I'll leave a template on your talk page that has a ton of links about Wikipedia and editing. Any questions, please ask. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 01:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

MummyGirl110000

You are tot. Dellusional it is not fake. I know because I'm the director and its premiering in Kentucky live at school. So it's not fake dude. You need to learn kindness. What did I do to you, dumb head — Preceding unsigned comment added by MummyGirl10000 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Dates with Monsters does exist — Preceding unsigned comment added by MummyGirl10000 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't usually respond to WP:Personal attacks but WP:CSD#A11 is about whether the subject is made up or not. A play is fiction by definition. You should read WP:CSD#A11 and WP:MADEUP, although you appear to be WP:NOTHERE by this edit. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

site not accepted

why my page for Pinkcakeland was not accepted but you accept pages for thousands other companies ??? If my company is not large company so its mean that I must be banned ? Its no fair — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkcakeland (talk • contribs) 00:21, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

It isn't "not accepted" in anyway. Also, you never created an article. You only created a WP:Userpage. Your userpage was promotional and you also indicate a WP:Conflict of interest. Your userpage qualifies for deletion under WP:CSD#G11. Any other questions? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Asuvaliyal

Who are you man to give me ur annoying advices to me ??? kindly tell me about this all... why U wrote those lines N all that... I'm new here on Wikipedia so explain me in detail about that matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asuvaliya (talk • contribs) 19:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. It appears that you have been promoting yourself across wiki articles as explained I'm the message I left on your page. Any particular questions? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:43, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion notice

Hi,

Apologies as I seem to have created this in error and I do understand that we have violated the terms of this. Just wanted to drop in a mail regarding the same. I have deleted the same myself to save the troubles' at your end.

Unsure of how to use it, so was just figuring it out.

Once again, apologies.


Regards, VarnaazTechnologies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varnaaztechnology (talk • contribs) 06:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not use Wikipedia for promotion. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

"Paige Sports Arena"

There is no such place and it should not redirect to Mizzou Arena. Regardless of the possibility, it was never known by that name. Eodcarl (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

This source in the article claims the contrary. Stop disrupting the redirect. You just redirected it to itself now after I reverted you for blanking it. For an easy link, Paige Sports Arena. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Please stop redirecting the imaginary Paige Sports Arena to a real place, Mizzou Arena. Eodcarl (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Are you going to address the source or discuss why you think it is imaginary when I just presented a source that claims the contrary? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 17:30, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
No, I am not going to address the source. It does not rise to the level of its own Wiki page, and it is intended as harassment that it exists as a page in the first place. The facility started from day one as Mizzou Arena. It doesn't really matter, except being wasted electrons, since no one will ever search of Paige Sports Arena. Eodcarl (talk) 01:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
You just said it was an imaginary place. A redirect is not a wiki page. In fact, redirects should be used when a subject doesn't meet the level of a wiki page. Please do not make random claims of harassment, why do you think this is harassment? You can view how many searched for it here. If it's just wasted electrons, then why does it matter? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
FWIW it is my opinion that Ramaksoud is in the right here. He/she has presented a source. Eodcarl has not (although im not sure how you could give a reliable source for the claim that it was never "known" by that name). I shall be enforcing this point of view on Mizzou Arena and Paige Sports Arena until it's shown to be wrong. Benboy00 (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013 - January 2014 AfC Backlog Elimination Drive

I noticed that you have signed up for the drive. Please note that the AFCBuddy script does not appear to be functioning at this time. Therefore, user Backlog Elimination Drive log pages will need to be manually updated. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 13:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

for the barnstar and the words of encouragement. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Gill Tract

Hey -

Responding to your restoration of the redirect to Occupy the Farm on the Gill Tract page:

I think it is integral and imperative to include that link on the Gill Tract page, but I think that an actual Gill Tract page needs to go under construction. That is why I deleted the redirect and started writing the page.

I am going to really get into it over my winter break from school. But for now I hope that others will begin to land on the page and contribute.

Thank you for your kind word of advice and your attention. I am new to wikipedia, etc.

-corey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digswales (talk • contribs) 23:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

@Digswales: Oh yeah sure. When I saw it, it was blank, so that's where the confusion arose from. You are perfectly welcome to keep writing. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 23:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

--Digswales (talk) 23:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Thank you!

December 2013

You reverted an edit I made to Shambat (city) and said I didn't leave an edit summary. I did leave a message. I put Wikipedia:Patent nonsense in the edit summary. The page seems to meet the criteria to me. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 01:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

@Blaylockjam: I saw that you left it an edit summary, but WP:Patent nonsense does not authorize complete blanking of the entire thing. It says "Remove it from the article if there is any acceptable content left in the article after that." I'll look through it and salvage a stub. To delete an article, look at WP:AFD. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:58, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
I also apologize for being ambiguous. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
OK. That's fine. That must've been a lot of work. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 06:47, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Redirects

Thanks for fixing my redirect to Hawke–Keating government. I'd never thought of creating separate redirects for each issue in the character string. Tony (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 12:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Kafziel arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kafziel. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kafziel/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 29, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kafziel/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 22:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank for renaming one of my pages and thank you for the nice post you left on my talk page. You said that my request for a rename was "done even though it wasn't a file and wasn't needed." I apologize if I did something wrong. I pretty new to the who "active participation" in the Wikipedia thing and am trying to learn as I am going along. Could you please explain what you meant by "wasn't a file and wasn't needed," and what I should've done instead? I am in no great hurry so just whenever you get the time I would appreciate the feed back. Thanks again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Oh no problem. That wasn't meant to be a snide remark. I was just informing you that you could have done it yourself quicker. The reason I saw your page was because you placed {{rename media}} on it, a template used to request that a file be renamed, as only file movers can rename files. When I attempted to move the page using the move feature, which you can use as well, I saw that the destination was on the Wp:title blacklist. Usually, if you encounter this, you should make a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves, however, since you were the only author of the content of that page, you could have simply made a cut-and-paste move, even though it is normally not allowed for the reasons described at the link, because the specific entry on the title blacklist still allowed you to create it manually. If I you have any further questions about this, or Wikipedia in general, please ask. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
@Ramaksoud2000: Thank you. Learning something new each day. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
@Ramaksoud2000: I have a question. How can I add User talk:Pol430/Editnotice to the edit part of my Talk page? Thanks. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
@Marchjuly: Go to User talk:Marchjuly/Editnotice and simply copy and paste User talk:Pol430/Editnotice there, make all the modifications you want, and leave a note saying where you copied it from like I have. You can see Wikipedia:Editnotice for more details. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:56, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
@Ramaksoud2000: Thanks for that. Screwed it up the first time, but got it right on try number 2. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Sure thing. Ask me if any questions pop up later Marchjuly. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 01:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

AN/I

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Article review disappeared

Hi Ramaksoud2000, sorry to bother you; it's a silly think, but when I logged on to WP I had a notification that said [[[No page]]] was reviewed by Ramaksoud2000 5 days ago

Now, the date field says "December 15th", so I looked at your review log but I can't find an entry for that day (probably because the page was deleted).

I just wanted to ask you if you knew which page was that, because the only recent change I made was on Tracy Spiridakos (at least that's what I remember) and I have no idea what other change I might have made that needed reviewing!

Thanks,

--Claudio ping! 19:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyingstar16 (talk • contribs)

Ah yes. I remember. You created Utente:Flyingstar16 (which is in your signature) with a redirect to the Italian Wikipedia, which appears to be the user namespace on the Italian Wikipedia, however, that namespace does not exist on the English Wikipedia. Our User namespace is "User:" and I tagged that page for deletion under WP:CSD#R2, which allows for deletion of redirects from the Wikipedia article namespace (which you created the redirect in) to user namespaces. Your signature should be modified to be "--[[User:Flyingstar16|Claudio]] <sup>[[User talk:Flyingstar16|ping!]]</sup>" so that it works on the English Wikipedia. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 20:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Oh, thanks! I amended it; I believe it was replicated automatically when I merged my accounts (or maybe I did it manually, can't remember). In any case, thanks! Claudio ping! 15:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Michael Collins

File:Michael Collins "Free State Demonstration" March 13, 1922.jpg
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Michael Collins "Free State Demonstration" March 13, 1922.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 21:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: User:Bitburn

I had tagged this user page as db-spam, and you reverted that edit here a couple of weeks ago. I'm typically very good at judging these things, so what makes this case different? --| Uncle Milty | talk | 21:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:G11 is for content that is exclusively promotional. Merely describing yourself and linking to websites that you have is not exclusively promotional. The links were not the majority of the content by any means and the userpage was describing the user, not the links. If I maintained a blog and I put a link on my userpage, would it be G11? We also had a brief exchange on your talk page after I left you message about my revert. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
For personal future reference, it was User_talk:Uncle_Milty/Archive_3#User:Bitburn. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 07:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Closing ANRFC discussions

Hi Ramaksoud2000. I noticed that you have been closing discussions at Template:Centralized discussion. Your close at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 108#Proposal to move the Orphan tags to the talk page, which I listed at CENT, showed attention to detail by addressing the alternate proposals. Would you consider closing discussions at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure if you have the time and inclination? If not, then no worries. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Sure. I'll go through those when I get the chance. Thanks. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 12:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Melania the Younger

Sorry about that. That was my sister on my account and I think she accidentally edited it. Sorry for the trouble! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.58.103.248 (talk) 00:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
yu SabbirE.P 13:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
yu SabbirE.P 13:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Hatnote

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Hatnote. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-admin closure

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-admin closure. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I see you have not been editing for a while. The wiki-kitten misses you :) Cheers,

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks so much! This is only temporary as some real-life things have started piling up. I'll be back though! Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 03:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list

Hello Ramaksoud2000! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

A brownie to you for reviewing at least 15 submissions during the WikiProject Articles for creation December 2013 - January 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks for contributing to the backlog elimination drive!
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 10:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Ramaksoud2000:

WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive

Hello Ramaksoud2000:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) Josve05a (c) by {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bank Audi Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bank Audi Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Was replaced with better image. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 17:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014 Wikification Drive

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lcd.png

A tag has been placed on File:Lcd.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

RfC: AfC Helper Script access

An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015 Wikification drive

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!!!

Happy Valentine's Day, to you and yours! Cheers, Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on WP:AN#Closure review: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script

Hello! You have been selected to receive an invitation to participate in the closure review for the recent RfC regarding the AfC Helper script. You've been chosen because you participated in the original RfC. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. This message is automated. Replies will not be noticed. --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 14:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015 Wikification drive.

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

File:Chocolate-Easter-Bunny.jpg
All the best! "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 23:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

June 2015 Wikification drive.

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:52, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Better map

Sorry to bother you, but I just want to make sure that the comment on the talk page of Statewide opinion polling for the Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 "Could we change the map such as the gop map?" was not made by you. Was it made by you? I know that after 30 days Wikipedia automatically logs users out so I want to make sure that didn't happen to you. Prcc27 (talk) 08:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

It wasn't made by me. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 17:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit War

There is an on-going edit war on this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind

Corrections made to abide by NPOV are consistently reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolusty33 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

How margin of error works — Statewide opinion polling, Democratic Party primaries, 2016

User All4peace (talk) has initiated a discussion, on the article talk page on English Wikipedia about how we present MOE.

I would very‐much appreciate your participation ! Info por favor (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Overseas Security Advisory Council

Template:Overseas Security Advisory Council has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:08, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jamal Saeed Abdul Rahim.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jamal Saeed Abdul Rahim.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Traditionalist (talk) 22:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

New newsletter for Notifications

Hello

You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bank Audi Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bank Audi Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Ramaksoud2000,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)