User talk:Raintheone/Archive 5

Doctors

Hey – after seeing your edits on Al Haskey, I just wanted to say thank you for contributing so much to the article! If you have any extra time afterwards, I really need help with other Doctors character articles on the Doctors category, as a lot of them are tagged with improvement templates. I plan on working on them over the next few weeks, but having your contributions would be a huge help – no pressure though! – DarkGlow (talk) 00:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is okay, I thought it was worth improving the article. I will take a look through those. I can work on some over the coming weeks.Rain the 1 09:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the article for Sid Vere has been proposed for deletion, I was wondering if you'd be able to help out with additions on the page? Also pinging @JuneGloom07 and Soaper1234: – DarkGlow (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DarkGlow: I'm not finding much online, so I'm having a look through my Inside Soaps. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:36, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chantelle Brader for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chantelle Brader is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantelle Brader until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bethany Platt

Hi Raintheone,

Thank you for correcting the mistake that I made when I edited the Bethany Platt Wikipedia page on 24 January 2020. My apologies, it wasn't my intention to be disruptive.

Scaramanga731 (talk) 23:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Maloney

Hi, noticed you expanded Matt's development but I was wondering if you had anything for Lee (a pretty short term character but was around long enough to be considered a regular) in her own right as character? Information on Maree Ackehurts is pretty scant as she's pretty much invisible these days. Conquistador2k6 10 March 2020 21:03 (UTC)

@Conquistador2k6: Hey and sorry for the really late reply, the information for Lee is the same that I have added for Matt's article. So there is something for a list entry, have you worked on the relevant list?Rain the 1 12:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Worked on it? I have that page in a Userspace: User:Conquistador2k6/List of Neighbours characters (1989). You're welcome to have a bash. If I can get some stuff for Bob Landers (he had a pretty major arc 1991-92, Prison escape and Todd harbouring him, holding Phoebe, Pam and Dorothy hostage and shooting Brad), that'd be good. Also, pipe dream at this point, but I'd be looking to get Mary Crombie out of others. Conquistador2k6 22 March 2020 13:00 (UTC)

I had not realised you were working on the list. I just added similar to the information I added to Matt's article. I looked and I used everything already.Rain the 1 13:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Conquistador2k6: I have an article about the hostage situation/shooting, but the magazine is currently at the bottom of a box, behind another box. I'll try to dig it out when I get a moment. - JuneGloom07 Talk 16:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks. No pressure, You can add that, too when you find it. You've got a fair bit on your plate from what I've seen. Conquistador2k6 22 March 2020 18:08 (UTC)

Re: Sections

IMO, 60% of it seems fine (Characterisation, Relationships in particular and Departure) but feel free to revert until you've got everything you need. 14:31 28 March 2020 (UTC) Conquistador2k6

BLP discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well done

Thanks for your kind words, but more than that thank you for calmly reflecting, working out how you might have approached the situation differently, and then putting your realizations in words for all to see. Appreciating others and being willing to learn and grow are signs of a great Wikipedian. Congratulations!!! --Slp1 (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, I did not notice this message. Thank you for your kind words too. If we can all be kind to one another in these difficult times then it is a bonus!Rain the 1 13:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dominic Copeland.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dominic Copeland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leela

Just a note for the characterisation and development details, Leela Lomax was named after Doctor Who character Leela (Doctor Who). Link as follows [1]. Please don’t mind me mentioning this.--82.132.243.222 (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aussie Soaps 1992-93

Hey, I noticed you've put a rocket up a couple articles from that time period (UK pace anyway) and wonder if you had anything in your little bag of tricks for the following

• Kelly Chan from the unifinished 1992 Home and Away characters list
• All the Meg stuff, she packed a fair bit into the short time she was in the show
• Cameron Hudson, The last member of the Willises I'm hoping to get their own article or at least off impending my Neighbours 1992 characters listicle
• Jill Weir

Conquistador2k6 10 January 2021 01:56 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I think I already mentioned that I'm working on a Cameron article, and it shouldn't be too long before it's ready to be moved to the mainspace. I don't know how much more info there is for Kelly since the first lot I added to her section. It was only a short guest stint after all. I've definitely seen some Jill info, so if Rain doesn't have much, I can take a look. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. That would be great. It's just I've been stalling for months on a couple of my projects and the last few months, I've been mainly patching up missing citations on Corrie and Enders actor/character articles. For Neighbours: 1989 only really needs Bob Landers fleshing out, 2nd half of stint mainly. 1992, The Blurb for Cameron and getting Jill out of others. 1995 my main concerns are getting Adrian, Melissa and Andrew out of others. 1989 and 1992 are of a higher priority, to me however. If you can spare the time, I will be grateful.

Conquistador2k6 11 January 2021 21:26 (UTC)

@Conquistador2k6:@JuneGloom07:I definitely think we can help. JG you will probably be able to help more with Jill Weir as you covered Doug's affair quite well. The July 1993 issue of TVTimes has information on Bob Landers too? Then I could add any extra info. C2k I do not recall anything else for Kelly aside from the bonus Inside Soap article. I never know what to do with Meg but I know I have the information. I will start a sandbox and begin bringing the information together. If the end result is lacking then we can put the info in the list. There could also be more information to bring characters trapped in the "others" sections from the lists you work. I will get looking in little my bag of tricks. lolRain the 1 08:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, you're a Diamond.👍 Conquistador2k6 15 January 2021 11:05 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited It's a Sin (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blondie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your improvements on It's a Sin (TV series), combining an amazing drama series with a high quality Wikipedia article from the outset. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: - Thank you, I am glad my efforts have not gone unnoticed. I became determined to improve it after finding so many errors.Rain the 1 18:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Olivia Johnson.jpg

The file File:Olivia Johnson.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fair use image that is no longer used on any articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diane O'Connor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diane O'Connor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Olivia Johnson.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Olivia Johnson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Beale

The official EastEnders website has removed Ian Beale. They have no history of removing characters who are on breaks, temporary or otherwise. June Brown remained on the list for 13 months after her initial departure, Tameka Empson lasted a year and a half. There is no up-to-date sources that state that this is a temporary break. Connorguy99 (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Woddyatt is returningand is just on a temporary breakRain the 1 00:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Place him in the returning section, the BBC cast list does not consider him currently part of the cast. He is off-screen for a "lengthy period of time". Connorguy99 (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Doreen

I basically harvested Brookside Soapbox (a wiki before wiki, I guess) for info. God, I created some messes back then or at least half-arsed! Conquistador2k6 00:48,7 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sammy Rogers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Choi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Well done for all of your hard work at Sammy Rogers! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: - Thank you Danilo. :)Rain the 1 19:51, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sammy Rogers

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sammy Rogers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Simple Lie

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Simple Lie you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sammy Rogers

The article Sammy Rogers you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sammy Rogers for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sammy Rogers

The article Sammy Rogers you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sammy Rogers for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Simple Lie

The article A Simple Lie you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Simple Lie for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:21, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Congratulations on the recent GAs! Hugely deserved for your efforts.

– DarkGlow • 08:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you DarkGlow.Rain the 1 10:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Duffy (Casualty)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Duffy (Casualty) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query?

Tis it time 4 Mackenzie harlow hendrix and Vi all to hv articles as all r significant on neighbours80.234.164.36 (talk) 12:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Duffy (Casualty)

The article Duffy (Casualty) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Duffy (Casualty) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Duffy (Casualty)

The article Duffy (Casualty) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Duffy (Casualty) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hollyoaks Advert Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hollyoaks Advert Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emma Chambers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emma Chambers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Myra McQueen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Myra McQueen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Chase (game show).JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Chase (game show).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Margaret Clemence

Hello! Your submission of Margaret Clemence at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: Sorry I had been on holiday but I added the QPQ, so good to go.Rain the 1 15:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hollyoaks Reveal Scene.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hollyoaks Reveal Scene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Margaret Clemence

On 22 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Margaret Clemence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brookside character Margaret Clemence was featured in a female same-sex kiss that was rebroadcast during the opening ceremony of the 2012 Summer Olympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Clemence. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Margaret Clemence), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (Talk) 00:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roy Farmer.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roy Farmer.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I just want to thank you for your efforts adding new photos to Andrea Somers, Melanie Pearson and Stonefish Rebecchi. Your work is much appreciated. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. They needed the refresh.Rain the 1 09:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe you replaced my "Shane in the dark" pic lol. But thank you for finally replacing that awful Dee image. I also love that Stonie still has a surprised expression in his new one. – JuneGloom07 Talk 17:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the Shane one. :D I really want to find a better one for Darcy Tyler as that has annoyed me for years! Rain the 1 18:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, blurry Darcy! Good luck! - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melanie Pearson.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Melanie Pearson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adam Black GB (talk) 04:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Matthew Glover

Hello! Your submission of Matthew Glover at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — GhostRiver 16:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where the Heart is: Cast tenure

You keep deleting useful info re which series the main cast members joined and left Where the Heart is. I am watching repeats on a weekly basis and this info would enhance my viewing. Martin 2A02:C7F:563D:5100:B42F:A65C:B84A:4B90 (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I keep removing unsourced information/original research. If the information would enhance your viewing you are free to find sources for debut and departure dates and re-add them. I think it will be extremely difficult to source all of them.Rain the 1 18:35, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diane O'Connor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diane O'Connor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for VFC (company)

On 28 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article VFC (company), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that staff at the vegan food brand VFC interact with internet trolls on social media platforms to grow their online brand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/VFC (company). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, VFC (company)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Matthew Glover

On 29 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Matthew Glover, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that businessman and activist Matthew Glover's charity challenged Pope Francis to become a vegan for Lent? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matthew Glover. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Matthew Glover), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Squeaky Bean

On 30 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Squeaky Bean, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the vegan-food brand Squeaky Bean produces food that does not contain beans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Squeaky Bean. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Squeaky Bean), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

British Soap Awards nominees

Hello Rain, hope you're well – I was wondering if you had any sources offline (or online but I've scoured the web and can't find anything) that cover the nominations for the British Soap Awards for 2000–2003? I'm looking to add them to the main article and potentially expand articles on individual awards (eg villain of the year, potentially dramatic performances, partnerships and comedy) but am just coming to a loss with finding the other noms. – DarkGlow • 23:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. I originally read this incorrectly and thought you wanted the Inside Soap Awards. I am not sure if I can find the British Soap Awards for you using old magazines, they seemed to just cover winners. I will look through other magazines. I can use the British News Paper Archive to piece together some of the nominations. This source [2] states that at the BSA 2003, Shane Ritchie was nominated for "Sexiest Male", "Best Comedy Moment" and "Best Newcomer". Jessie Wallace and Kacey Ainsworth were nominated for "Best Actress", which it confirms Ainsworth won. Dean Sullivan won his award. Brian Capron won "Villain of the Year", "Best Exit", "Best Storyline", "Best Actor".Rain the 1 22:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images

Hello, raintheone. I hope you are doing well. I am aware that you are quite experienced with uploading images for Wikipedia articles and I was wondering and hoping that you would be willing to upload one for me for an article. Thank you. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I have been busy and only just noticed this. It is fairly easy to upload images. On the right hand menu select "Upload file" or go here - it is easy from there and even easier when you click on "Old Guided Form" and select the relevant category.Rain the 1 19:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mackenzie, Harlow and Hendrix

No word of those three getting own articles? Only asking :) --82.132.247.27 (talk) 23:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure they will be created eventually.Rain the 1 10:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance please

I want to add this link [3] to the soap opera villains list as Creasey calls Mick an “inept villain” but I am unable to, would you be able to help? Just letting you know I’ve also asked JuneGloom for help also. --82.132.247.110 (talk) 09:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like JuneGloom07 already stated, the Daily Mail can no longer be used for adding information.Rain the 1 17:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where the Heart Is

Deleting information and then starting a discussion seems like the wrong way round to me. If you're willing to leave some unsourced information because, as you put it, it would cause issues, then why not leave all of it? I notice there's another comment on here from someone who found the information useful and was wondering why you deleted it. I'll discuss this further under the discussion you mentioned. Skteosk (talk) 22:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Billy Kennedy.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Kennedy.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hello, Raintheone, I hope you are doing well. I was wondering if you would please be able to find an image for Harlow Robinson? I would do it myself (and sorry if this request seems rude or lazy), but I still have not really wrapped my head around the whole images system! I am trying to learn, but have not quite gotten there yet. I hope you are having a good day. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 08:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Not rude or lazy, most editors seem to ask me so.. Basic low-res screenshots taken from episodes are less likely to be deleted. So in line with the rest of Neighbours articles, I have opted for that. I see you worked on the article offline? I have started creating an article for Nicolette offline too.Rain the 1 19:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mainly just used User:Therealscorp1an/Harlow and worked on the article over the course of a few days. I think an article for Nicolette would be good, since there are an array a lot of things to talk about, especially the baby storyline (if you need sources for that, there may be some in the Robinson family#2020s section). Anyways, thank you very much for uploading the image for me. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I was wondering if you have a picture of Levi Canning and Wendy Rodwell? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 05:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealscorp1an: - I added the picture of Levi to his infobox. As for Wendy - Is it a good idea to create an article about her? She is quite popular and Leask definitely helped elevate Wendy's popularity with fan interaction on Twitter. Had the show continued it would be a different story no doubt.Rain the 1 21:34, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think an article for her is good, although there may not be enough storylines and 'behind-the-scenes' information, if you know what I mean. I was thinking for the meantime we could just add a photo of the character to her infobox on the 2021 article and in the future (or now if you want!) we could work on an article for her. I have actually been working on improving my skills when it comes to uploading files, such as for this article, but it's definitely been a bit difficult! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot add non-free images to lists as it is an easy fail of the guidelines. Adding non-free images to lists of characters is frowned upon and an easy target for deletion since the article is about a collective of characters and does not illustrate the entire subjects. The image you have uploaded to the article you created about the Cathedral of Saints Constantine and Helene will unfortunately be deleted. It is already tagged for deletion. As this church can easily be photographed in real life, a non-free image is not suitable. You should photograph it yourself and upload it.Rain the 1 22:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thought so, got it. Also, I did not know about that when adding images to the list of character articles. Thank you for clarifying. In that case, I think an article would be suitable for Wendy. I am working on a few projects at the moment, but maybe in the near future it can be worked on. If we were to write an article for her, what do you think the major subheadings in the development section should be? Anyways, thank you so much for all your help. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think there would be any subheadings since she has had no big stories. Creating an article for Wendy will only create problems for the wider Neighbours project.Rain the 1 21:05, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I may write a draft up and see how much information I can get. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 00:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings

I have been asking a few other editors this too; do you know of any ways to access past television ratings (specifically 2015 ratings) for Australia and even the UK? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 09:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editors get UK ratings from BARB. Digital Spy and others used to do daily ratings updates but those are long gone.Rain the 1 16:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you so much. I am specifically trying to find March 2015 ratings for Neighbours, do you know where I may find them within BARB? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 20:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems we are too late. The general public appear to only be able to search back five years in BARB. I am not sure other than the off chance the media reported on the ratings? Did you notice that someone used a curation tool on the Wendy article. I guessed this could happen. :(Rain the 1 18:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dammit, I guess I am going to have limited ratings information then. Also, yes, I did see the notability tag on Wendy. I don't know what to think about it because the information is definately there, it's much more developed than other articles too, so I don't know. Thanks for the help, though. Now to try and access old TV Week magazine pieces... - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealscorp1an:They are probably incomplete articles that can be expanded or from a time we cannot easily access information from. Perhaps you could consider making the information more concise and adding Wendy to the list? Something to think about? In more positive news, I solved it, take a look at this:

16 - 22 March 2015 Channel 5 (SD+HD) - Column 1 = 7 day data, column 2 = 28 day data

• NEIGHBOURS (16th March 2015 MON 1346) 0.78 0.82
• NEIGHBOURS (16th March 2015 MON 1729) 0.86 0.86
• NEIGHBOURS (17th March 2015 TUE 1345) 0.78 0.82
• NEIGHBOURS (17th March 2015 TUE 1729) 0.86 0.87
• NEIGHBOURS (18th March 2015 WED 1346) 0.78 0.83
• NEIGHBOURS (18th March 2015 WED 1729) 0.88 0.89
• NEIGHBOURS (18th March 2015 WED 2200) 1.33 1.4
• NEIGHBOURS (19th March 2015 THU 1346) 0.72 0.79
• NEIGHBOURS (19th March 2015 THU 1729) 0.77 0.78
• NEIGHBOURS (20th March 2015 FRI 1345) 0.78 0.83
• NEIGHBOURS (20th March 2015 FRI 1729) 0.84 0.85

Source - Select Channel 5, 2015, 16 - 22 March. - You can find the following weeks too.Rain the 1 21:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, thank you so much. I really appreciate all of this. Let me know if you need any help with anything so I can repay the favour. Thanks again. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ross Newton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ross Newton, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Newton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you @Raintheone for your improvement on the Ross Newton page. Happy editing! Jamiebuba (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, glad to help!Rain the 1 19:30, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hey, @Raintheone, how are you? I hope you had a good Christmas and New Year's. Nice work on the Nicolette Stone article! I was wondering if this would be possible to upload as an image file: I have been working away at the Death and funeral of Constantine II of Greece article and I am hoping to spruce it up by adding some images to it and I stumbled upon an Instagram account that posted a photo of many European monarchs seated together at the funeral. This account is not the owner of this photo, though, and I was wondering if it is possible for one to upload this photo to the Wikimedia Commons for use? Thanks. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 09:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealscorp1an Hey. You can only upload a photograph if you took the photograph and want to upload it. Or if not, the original owner gives permission to release it under the correct licence so it can be added to commons. Rain the 1 10:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And how would you be able to gain permission (and even prove it)? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealscorp1an if the owner had a Flickr account they can change the license and you can use a tool to upload it. Or you can ask them to release it to commons via a ticket request VRT/OTRS team can review. Search Commons:Volunteer Response Team on Wikimedia Commons to learn more. We used to explain, ask and beg people on Flickr and did gain numerous cast photos for soaps as it was easier. Rain the 1 10:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you so much for your help. I might try contacting a few people who have helped me work on the article to see if they have any images. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 10:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Raintheone. After countless discussions, it seems I have been led back to you. You stated before that "We used to explain, ask and beg people on Flickr and did gain numerous cast photos for soaps", so I am presuming that you have a Flickr account? If this is the case, I was wondering if you would able to do quite a large favour for me. I have found Flickr images of what I have been looking for, but they are all licensed under "All rights reserved". Would you please be able to try and ask the owner to downgrade the rights of the images (if he says no to all of them, then specifically just at least this one or this one, despite how great the material like this and this is)? I wouldn't be able to express my gratitude if you did. Thank you in advance. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealscorp1an I haven't used Flickr for years and couldn't recover my account last time I tried a few years back. So won't be able to help with that. Sorry. Rain the 1 23:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alright then. Do you know anyone who might be able to? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 23:43, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some Hollyoaks editors used to help. All inactive now.Rain the 1 22:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so I guess that's a no then. Alright. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you could try and learn? Those are from a journalist and freelance photographer who is probably looking to get paid for his work. Though sometimes people help out and donate. We once contacted an Australian photographer and she gave hundreds of free photos of famous people she had encountered from press events. If you don't ask, you don't get!Rain the 1 22:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just not too sure about creating a Flickr account and getting involved in something I'd probably use once. Also, it's my first time and I think if I stuff this up, there's really no other chance to get images for the article! Not only that, but it seems I'd have to use my real life details to sign up, if that's right? - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A delicious brownie for you!

Thank you so much for expanding Siobhan Marsden and for all of your help on soap opera character lists!! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 23:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just came across it when I read the magazine.Rain the 1 15:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just to check, are you annoyed at me? I know I just saw this but I got a bit worried. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aww no, do not worry! I am not annoyed at you. What made you think that?Rain the 1 18:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jodie Nash.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jodie Nash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soaps improvement drive

Hello, I pinged you on the WP:SOAPS talk page about this so sorry to double on the message but I want to get as many on-board for this as it's ambitious, even for me. Due to the recent surge in scrutiny on soap articles, we all need to come together and improve soap articles, so I've created an improvement drive with dates and articles for the soap WikiProject to focus on improving articles each week. Right now, it's focused on Hollyoaks, but the plan is to keep it going until we get to each soap. I did not include a section to sign up as I didn't want editors to feel that they are signing their life away and are expected to edit the articles mercilessly. I hope for some level of dedication but it's not a drive with huge pressure. Are you interested in joining in? – Meena • 11:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will reply via the discussion you created then.Rain the 1 09:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you so so much for all of your help with Darlene and others! I really struggled to find sources so thank you so so much! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. No worries. I am just adding bits here and there as I go along.Rain the 1 21:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of revert

Hello. As you know I did a partial revert of your own revert. Here is my rationale: HighBeam was basically an archive of regularly published material. When they pulled the plug on Highbeam, they took all of those archives and made them useless. (As you know, the same thing occurred with Questia.) So, unless the waybackers made archives of the HighBeam urls, we (as editors and readers) basically had nothing to use for Verification. Unfortunately, many of the wayback archive urls are useless. Some only give a partial repeat of the story title, some give a story title and a bit of author, journal, date info. Some give partial renditions of the original sources. With all this in mind, I think WP:Verification is fulfilled when we can point to the original-original source. That's all we need. In the particular case which I re-reverted the archive of the HighBeam archive only had two sentences from the original source. Those sentences did not Verify any original material. I hope all the verbage explains what I've been trying to do overall. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 16:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining that to me. I understand completely. I only added it back because there were archived links in place. Like you state, the archive bot was not successful in crawling the Highbeam articles entirely and the resource is now defunct. I still view the loss of Highbeam as a terrible shame, especially since editors worked so hard extracting information from it, only to have the whole website removed and make verifiability so difficult.Rain the 1 18:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reece and Krista Sinclair

Hey, User:Raintheone. If you haven't already seen, I'm writing up an article for Reece Sinclair, you can find the draft here. In the development section, I'm trying to include a section about her sister, Krista, but I'm struggling to find sources. I'm looking for sources that have either actors may explaining their relationship or the storyline, but not just articles that explain what's happening in the show with no BTS. You don't have any sources by any chance that I would be able to use? Thanks! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealscorp1an:I do not at have anything at the moment for Krista/Reece. I have the Inside Soaps for Reece so far if you do not already have them?Rain the 1 20:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, no, I don't have them! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Therealscorp1an:Okay so here you go. Links live for 24 hours only so save them quick.

• For Reece's article: Inside Soap, Issue 37, 16-22 September 2023, Page 14, written by Sarah Ellis: [4]
• For Reece's article: Inside Soap, Issue 39, 30 September - 6 October 2023, Pages 48, 49, written by Sarah Ellis: [5][6]
• For Reece's article: Inside Soap, Issue 40, 7-13 October 2023, Pages 26, 27, written by Sarah Ellis: [7][8]
• For the Flashback Week article: Inside Soap, Issue 45, 11-17 November 2023, Pages 14, 15, written by Sarah Ellis: [9][10]Rain the 1 22:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks a tonne! - Therealscorp1an (talk) 09:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there again, sorry for disturbing you once more. Since I don't really have access to Inside Soap, do you by any chance have some sources for Byron, do you? Thanks a heap. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can take a look for his original stint. Obviously you have the ones linked to Reece. Are you building this one like I am for Ha and JJ? I wanted to work on the sandboxes for a good few months until there is more information and notability.Rain the 1 19:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that'd be great. I'm lacking sources for his original stint. And yes, I'm just slowly building up the articles like you are. I'm in no rush to finalise it any time soon. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 21:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Thank you for all of your hard work at Callum Stone and for getting it so improved that it avoided being deleted! Well done! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 08:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate it. But it is always a chore trying to improve an article at AFD.Rain the 1 20:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing my changes, it's annoying me.

Editing 217.158.88.114 (talk) 23:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanity Fair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanity Fair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanity Fair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Shiv Palekar

On 7 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shiv Palekar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Shiv Palekar is trained in both the Suzuki method and Butoh form of acting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shiv Palekar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shiv Palekar), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 02:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]