User talk:Qwertyus/archive4

Template:Cite doi/10.1145.2F375360.375365

Re your edit to {{Cite doi/10.1145.2F375360.375365}}: linking to a copyright violation is a copyright violation. See WP:COPYLINK. Glrx (talk) 21:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the copyright notice at the bottom of the first page of the ACM article: "To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, to redistribute to lists, or to use any component of this work in other works, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee." There is no indication that ACM has surrendered its copyright for this work. Do not reinsert a link for this article unless you can show that ACM has allowed its republication or that it is otherwise not under a copyright. Glrx (talk) 21:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am not a lawyer, but shouldn't ACM have sued Purdue ages ago for this alleged copyright violation? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's not relevant here. ACM may not even know. Glrx (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do you reckon a link to the summary page on CiteSeer counts as a copyvio? That does have a cached link, until ACM cares. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the link would be a contributory copyright violation. Right now, there's a standard DOI that goes to the ACM page where people can download the articl for ACM's fee. The only point of posting the Citeseer link would be to give others an indirect link to a copyvio of the material. Glrx (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, the link to CiteSeer's summary page also gives a third-party citation count. That's important additional information; it comes up in AfD discussions. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your purpose in editing the cite DOI/x template has been to provide the article text. That motive would squelch any additional claimed purpose. Glrx (talk) 23:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regularization (mathematics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross-validation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

André Van Lysebeth

Hello, I apologise for having caused "un malentendu". My article in English on André Van Lysebeth is not a translation of the French article. It merely incorporates information from there. This concerns in particular the date of his birth. The German Wikipedia claims he was born in November 1919. I decided to go with the French Wikipedia which states it was October 1919. NordhornerII (talk)

{{translated page}} isn't just for word-for-word translations. It's meant to express that the page you wrote is a derivative work, in the sense of copyright. If it's only the birthdate that you copied, then there's no pb, but you cannot cite Wikipedia itself (also not frwiki) as a source. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tf-idf Article

Hello,

I have added my description again that you decided to remove. Please add to the article instead of deeming the changes that have been made as "Incomprehensible". This is clearly not a progressive approach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcgoo (talk • contribs) 11:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit is simply wrong. is not "the count of all unique terms in the document d", it's the frequency of the most common term, as the article already explains. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COBYLA

Could you please explain why you removed the links to the C# and Java implementations that I recently added? These implementations are well established in the field and they have been thoroughly tested, both using the example test cases that are provided with the original COBYLA2 Fortran 77 package and on real cases in for example time-series analysis: [1]. Anders Gustafsson 10:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anders9ustafsson (talk • contribs)

Because I don't see any proof of these implementations, of which you are obviously the sole author, being "well established" in any field. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's right, I am the sole author of these ports, but they are evidently being used successfully in various applications. I honestly do not see the point removing my links; the code is open-source and the links were provided in good intent. There are unit tests in the repositories, so anyone using the code can verify for themselves that the C#/Java code produces the same results as the F77 code for the same problems. Anders Gustafsson 13:50, 5 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anders9ustafsson (talk • contribs)
Evident from what? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:10, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I give up. Contrary to what you are implying (LINCOA edit[2]), this is not an attempt of COI editing[3] but simply an attempt from my side to provide links to freely available source code that could be valuable to other readers of Wikipedia. But you seem determined to withhold this information from the Wikipedia readers, and I don't find it worth the effort to insist otherwise. (Great job discouraging new contributors...) 15:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anders9ustafsson (talk • contribs)
I'm not implying anything; I'm pointing out quite explicitly that you have a conflict of interest here. Your only edits so far, apart from a typo fix, have been links to your own product. If you still want to contribute to Wikipedia, please read WP:PLAINANDSIMPLECOI. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Which product are you referring to? I am not selling or marketing these optimizers in any product, I have simply published source code under very permissive open source licenses to the benefit for anyone who would find it useful.--Anders Gustafsson 16:39, 5 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anders9ustafsson (talk • contribs)

Generalized iterative scaling

Neither the first sentence of this article, nor even the second, which was the last one, would hint to the lay reader that statistics is what it's about. I added a context-setting initial phrase.

Generalized iterative scaling (GIS) and improved iterative scaling (IIS) are two early algorithms used to fit log-linear models,[1] notably multinomial logistic regression (MaxEnt) classifiers and extensions of it such as MaxEnt Markov models[2] and conditional random fields.

Michael Hardy (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I wasn't really sure about what context to start with, since GIS was indeed invented by statisticians, while its improvement IIS was invented by computer scientists working in machine learning. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 20:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spark Streaming citation

Although I was able to provide a citation for the machine learning and graph processing, references comparing Spark Streaming to Apache Storm are not common. The best is my own blog, and I chose not to include a self-serving citation. If you think it would be helpful to add a cite, the link is http://datascienceassn.org/content/real-time-data-science — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelmalak (talk • contribs) 16:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Organisasyon

On the talk page (now deleted), you had asked why the article was named Organisasyon while the subject matter was Sindikato or Phillipine Syndicate. There have been a bunch of sockpuppets trying to create an article about their fraternity's gang. Instead of trying to create it under the same name, they have been creating it under multiple names: @Sindikato, Pinoy Syndicate, Filipino Mafia, Filipino Syndicate, and so on. Trying to avoid detection, I suppose, but it obvious that it is the same group. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. The article seemed fishy. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It just got recreated at Filipino sindikato mafia by a "new" user; I'm not sure what kind of action is appropriate now. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 19:24, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Arsten cleaned up the mess. I'm sure this will not be the last time they will be recreating it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Falcon soldier

I cannot disagree with you. The subject is really, doubtful. From where it starts, where it ends. You tell me, what should be done? OccultZone (Talk) 14:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria, Qwertyus!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Musing

If you want really obscure x86 Unix'es, think Esix (Everex's flavor). I actually had an Everex 486 EISA with that at work ages ago. I later replaced the OS with a Slackware based on Linux 0.99. Someone not using his real name (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria

Hello! Your submission of Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria

The DYK project (nominate) 10:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bias-variance dilemma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regularization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

debootstrap

Hi Qwertyus,

You inserted the template on 27 February 2014 with: The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for seven days, i.e., after 16:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC). and blanked it after one day. Please be more careful when doing such tasks like this one. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 14:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I wasn't really thinking. An IP user had removed the tag, and I wanted to avoid AfD per the snowball clause. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CBR link(s)

FYI: I filed a new batch at MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist#cbronline. See also Wikipedia:RS/N#Computer Business Review. Someone not using his real name (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Named entity recognition

Out of interest - what was wrong with those edits you reverted, e.g. [1]? They seemed reasonable, if slightly evangelical wrt: the quantum side of things. Leondz (talk) 17:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's completely off-topic. Quantum information retrieval has AFAIK nothing to do with named entity recognition; I'm not aware of any research that combines the two, and the cited works are about IR, not NLP. Note that there's no reference for the final claim, "the mathematical formalisms of quantum theory […] has produced significant results in entity extraction and recognition". That would have been the interesting part. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure that I agree. The Widdows book is certainly an NLP book, which IR have taken interest in recently, rather than the other way around. I didn't recognise the NER link drawn by the edit immediately - I'll check my copy of the book. The final claim is the interesting part, but a reference is critical, I agree; for example, someone laying claim to modern statistical NLP because it relies on universal concepts like Hilbert space is a bit of a stretch. I will re-read the reverted material more carefully. Leondz (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Particularism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GDebi

I found a number of manuals (including at Linux.com, Softpedia.com, Ubuntu.com) that included instructions for using GDebi, as it was integrated into Ubuntu at one point (though newer versions of Ubuntu no longer have it). But looking further I don't see that GDebi was given a substantial amount of coverage (probably because it's such a simple tool) and these manuals didn't actually have GDebi as the subject of the entire manual, so I'm reversing my decision and re-implementing the expired PROD to delete the page. Sorry about the hassle. -- Atama頭 15:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday perhaps not so deadly

Dear Qwertyus: You may recall that I promised some weeks ago to further "mix it up" with you; and so please see the "Overture to the AI Community" segment of my newly-created User:Synchronist page, and which is specifically intended to enliven your early March Sunday.Synchronist (talk) 05:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Platt scaling may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • :<math>t_{-} = \frac{1}{N_{-} + 2}</math> for negative samples, {math|''y'' {{=}} -1}}.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Flemish revolts against Maximilian of Austria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tournay and Crèvecœur
Platt scaling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cross-validation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obama-ism

I believe it would have been more productive to develop the article and have a discussion on the talk page before nominating it for deletion. 11 minutes after the article's creation is a little quick. Would you reconsider? --HansBarack (talk) 14:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we have such a discussion at the AfD page. Btw., my preference would be to transwiki to Wikiquote, not outright delete. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

mpicc

Someone looking for information on mpicc won't find it in the Message Passing Interface article you redirected mpicc to since Message Passing Interface doesn't contain anything on mpicc, so perhaps you should have copied the information in mpicc over to the [[Message Passing Interface article before redirecting and thus rendering the information inaccessible to those who may need it? Information is a too valuable asset in this universe to let it be destroyed so easily with a redirect without copying the information over to where it should belong, unless the information is not wanted in the first place. Sofia Koutsouveli (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe people looking for information about mpicc should type man mpicc to their command prompt. You're free to edit the information into the article about MPI, but I don't consider a script to run a compiler of encyclopedic value (see also WP:NOTHOWTO). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Qwertyus. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 02:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion of Hypertext Application Language page

please read Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#Hypertext_Application_Language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyhana8 (talk • contribs) 09:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving-average model

Hi,

I see you have recently removed by Gaussian noise entry on the Moving-average model. You removed it and added a comment that it wasn't relevant to the topic. I just want to know why. The MA model often uses Gaussian noise for the error terms. When implementing this algorithm in a programming language, you will have to figure out how to generate the error terms. I think it is a good idea to have a link to some algorithms that can be used to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goocreations (talk • contribs)

That might be, but the problem of generating Gaussian noise is in no way specific to MA models and should be discussed on its own page. (Besides, it's a solved problem that libraries deal with, and even if it weren't discussing implementation details without proper sourcing may be in violation of WP:HOTHOWTO.) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in

WP:ANI#Europa Universalis vandalism and copyvio from Charles Esdaile - need range block - I think you know something about earlier events dealing with these socks. Dougweller (talk) 14:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't deeply involved. I think I did some tagging on Revolutionary empire because it was of extremely low quality. That page seemed to have been created by someone who played too much EU and cited the first three hits on GBooks. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for replying. No problem. One way or another I'm hoping to get a range block now. Dougweller (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Naive Bayes classifier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boolean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Platt scaling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scalar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ https://code.google.com/p/time-series-store/
  2. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LINCOA&action=history
  3. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict-of-interest_editing_on_Wikipedia