User talk:Quintote

This user may have left Wikipedia. Quintote has not edited Wikipedia since 8 December 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Quintote, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Provide an Edit summary
• Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
• Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. ----CTSWyneken 15:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)^(talk)[reply]

Re: Reeves, Louisiana

It should be noted that your quick to delete without thinking revert of the entry for Reeves,_Louisiana comes from the nationally syndicated talk show Coast to Coast AM which sited the link that was used as the source for entry onto the Reeves page. Sadly, you quickly deleted it without much thought even though documented and mentioned on a nationally syndicated program. I guess you know better than the 1M listeners to that radio show. This isn't Quintoteipedia. This is Wikipedia not your own personal domain.

Ironically, if you rearrange the name of the town, "Reeves, Louisiana," into an anagram, you get the phrase, "Arise Evil One! USA!"[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.214.171 (talk) 00:58, 1 January 2008

Calling an anagram "ironic" is unlikely to be worthy of introduction in an encyclopedia. Furthermore, the link you provided requires a login, which I can't even verify the content.

For what it's worth, maybe even ironically, I'm a fan of anagrams.

Happy New Year! --Quintote (talk) 06:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Maine East High School

Just letting you know, I reverted your edit on Maine East High School because it accidentally restored a line of vandalism from an earlier edit. I used VandalProof to do it, but I know your edit wasn't vandalism. :) --Coredesat talk. o_O 01:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CSD fun with images from http://visualsonline.cancer.gov/

I've moved Image:Scintillation counter.jpg to Image:Quintote_colony_counter.jpg (per someone's CSD notice), but I'd still like clarification about which cancer.gov page it came from, because I can't find it there. When uploading images, don't just give the internet domain, give the full URL. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making sure this image didn't get thrown out, Mgm. As I indicated on your talk page, I've clarified the URLs for this image and the others I got from http://visualsonline.cancer.gov/ and will work on making sure I'm as clear as possible on image source and licensing. I also hope that whomever flags items CSD with great abandon can work to keep the contributors better in the loop. I'd accurately specified the license for this image, and the others like it, as qualifying for public domain status as a work of the US Government. Again, I'll be sure to provide exact URLs to source and will try to continue to list out the explicit public domain status whenever I can as well. - Quintote 02:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Ah, I see the issue. The image is called a scintillation counter on http://visualsonline.cancer.gov/, but Deglr6328 believes this is not a scintillation counter. I....don't know what it is :-) so will defer to the experts. Now I think I understand the issue, though I'll still try to be as clear as possible with future images. Thanks again for the heads-up. - Quintote 02:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quintote

I don't like this chump.

neither do I --69.233.37.32 02:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do prefer that people like me. However, I also prefer that people not vandalize Wikipedia, as both of you did to retention factor. I neither know nor dislike either of you (if there are indeed two separate people behind these two IP addresses), but I do wish you'd use your energy to constructively edit Wikipedia. -Quintote 02:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quintote you are a true chumpette. -- 69.105.72.47 05:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Scintillation counter image

Sorry that Image:Quintote_colony_counter.jpg apparently wasn't what it said it was. I retrieved this image from http://visualsonline.cancer.gov along with the captions indicating that this was a scintillation counter. Here's a link to the same, which I hadn't provided in the original upload of the image: http://visualsonline.cancer.gov/details.cfm?imageid=2044

The site's well organized and the captions coherent, so I thought I made a good call assuming it was it said it was. Sorry about that, and thanks for the catch. My goal is to help Wikipedia to be as rich and complete as possible, and I certainly intended to improve, not compromise, the article.

not your fault! I am frequently shocked at the lax accuracy in the descriptions of PD images on gov sites. Just looking at the device though you can see it is some kind of overhead projector like thing which has a petri dish being projected onto the screen. a search for "artek counter" + colonies [1] reveals its actual use. It looks like the company went out of buisness ages ago..... anyway I do have one request. could you include the date that the image was taken in the descriptions? some of the techniqes depicted in those images are horribly out of date. also why not upload the big 300dpi image versions? wiki has the space!--Deglr6328 03:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I've taken another look at the description page of Image:Quintote_colony_counter.jpg. You did everything right (specific URL, and even a site specific licensing info instead of the implicit gov PD). Thanks! - Mgm|^(talk) 08:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of picture

Hello! I i'm asking if you're willing to license this image under cc-by-sa, so that it can be used on this article on Wikitravel. Please respond either here or mail me on [e-mail]. --Andreas

Thanks, I'm happy I can contribute! This was one of my earliest Wikipedia image contributions, and I was a little stingy on the image resolution the first time, so I've upped it as much as the image seems to support. (In case if you're wondering why I didn't just upload the original, the camera's white balance didn't seem to correct enough, and because the image was taken using available light, the full-res 7 megapixel version was a bit grainy.) I also bothered to upload it a third time since I noticed using Photoshop's "Save for Web" option dropped out the Exif details. If you care, the photo time of 03:18 reflects my home time zone of GMT-06. -Quintote 11:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Quintote! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see this for the approved list. Betacommand ^(talk • contribs • Bot) 16:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful with the tool and remember to look at the page history before reverting anything - your recent revert to Hurricane Rita reverted to a version containing vandalism. – Chacor 15:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, thanks for the catch. I'll watch that more closely. -Quintote 15:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Counter-Strike

I made a revision to the Counter-Strike page in reguards to hacking/cheating. I'd like to clarify that it was in no way an attempt at vandalism. The information I added was accurate. A quick google search will verify that the clan "myg0t" is in fact one of the most notorious cheating/hacking clans in all of first person gaming. The information I added would have only informed more people of myg0t and explained the actions of their members further. If it was truly inappropriate I apologize, but I do not feel it was vandalism.66.228.252.142 02:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the follow-up. I updated my comment on your talk page. I think that mentioning myg0t around here is a hot-button thing that is likely to get reverted, but I believe you that you didn't intend to vandalize. -Quintote 03:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IP Vandal

The ip vandal whom you issued the last warning has acted again [2]. May-be time to get to blocks now?--Constanz - Talk 08:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, though I could've reported it to WP:AIV had I been on. The next time you see something like this, the best thing to do is report it directly to WP:AIV. At this point I've seen several good edits coming from this IP address, which could mean the user had a change of heart, or a different person is now editing under that IP address. A block at this point would be counterproductive, unfortunately. -Quintote 19:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re Aussie vandal

An admin told me - "I can't block him. It's coming from a shared IP address. Those can only be blocked for short periods to stop a vandalism in active progress. Sorry. " - Kittybrewster 09:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Putin

That Putin has been implicated in poisoning his critics is "nonsense"? Do you even read the news? Do you think Yushchenko and Litvinenko just fell ill?

Question: Why is it that Putin's enemies keep getting poisoned, but no mention of that appears in the article? Do you consider it not worthy of an encyclopedia, but examples of his "humor" are? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.252.113.75 (talk) 20:23, 24 November 2006

I reverted your edits because including the category at this time is nonsensical. I have no dispute whatsoever with your assertion that Alexander Litvinenko was poisoned, and were I the betting sort, would place money that Putin was behind it. However, Wikipedia articles are not a place for conjecture. Instead, they are a place where verifiable facts are collected, organized and disseminated.

I truly appreciate your passion, especially your desire to provide a complete view of Putin. I only rejected your edit based on its inability to be determined factual. I welcome you to discuss this further on this article's Talk page, or by including this in the article framed up with text indicating it's a current event and providing links to articles that allege Putin's involvement.

-Quintote 01:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot didn't fully correct vandalism to strudel

Hello. Your bot did not remove all the vandalism to the strudel article. It removed the most recent vandalism, but since it had been vandalized several times and not corrected, your bot kept some of the vandalism. I have manually corrected. Carmela Soprano 21:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Thrivent-logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thrivent-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your hard work reverting vandalism, I award you this barnstar! Keep up the good work! ShakingSpirit^talk 16:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you earned it ^_^ ShakingSpirit^talk 16:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Thanks for your message, I do RC Patrol every now and then and I'm sorry I reverted to the wrong edit, thank you for correcting it. Cheers. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 14:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem --Quintote 14:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

My addition was not vandalism. George Bush is a c--t so I was writing about fact. I even have many sources agreeing with the fact that he's a c--t. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.230.129.22 (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Umm, okay. Here are some tips to see to it that I don't mistake your future edits with vandalism:

• Avoid profanity
• Provide verifiable source for facts.
• Add facts to appropriate article. In this case, the George W. Bush military service controversy article isn't the on-topic place for your information.
• Stating an opinion is not a fact. It may be a fact that someone notable or suitably qualified has this opinion, or has commented on others having this opinion.

There we go. I think that's all the constructive comments I can make on this. Seriously, please don't vandalize Wikipedia, but feel welcome to add appropriate content. -Quintote 15:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert to Fly system

Although badly worded, 76.214.161.231's edit to 76.214.161.231 was not vandalism. What they are trying to say is that some flymen will prefer to have uneven weight on there flying rigs that will allow them to fly battens (or pipes) in or out faster. Cheers. Leaderofearth 09:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on your user page. Summary: I flagged the change as "unhelpful", not as vandalism per se. In hindsight, however, I wish I'd tagged the section for cleanup instead of simply reverting the change. My goal is helping Wikipedia be as great as it can be, and that comes with a balance of quality and quantity. I see, too, that I may have discouraged someone from contributing further, which certainly wasn't my intent. I've incorporated the user's content, cleaned up. -Quintote 00:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I have reverted a few things that I shouldn't have as well. Easy to do, I can see how it would look like vandelism to someone who is not familiar with the subject.

BTW keep up the good work to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. Leaderofearth 03:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Luther

I can see how that could happen from reading the previous edit summary.--ChesterMarcol 03:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doug

Eek! Thanks for catching that. · j e r s y k o talk · 04:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misstep

Hello and thank you for your outstanding vandalfight. However I came here to report a small misstep, you reported vandalfighter Luckyluke to WP:AIV for vandalism [3] when he was actually reverting it. The real culprit is now blocked though. ;-) Keep up the good work. Regards, Húsönd 00:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doh! Mea Culpa. Thanks for doing what I meant, not what I said. -Quintote 00:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

School's IP Address

Hello, this is the ip/adress of a school :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.169.140.56 (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I believe this is in reference to a vandalism warning I posted to this IP address back in November... Hmmm. This changes nothing about what I would have done, though I've now added the {{SharedIPEDU}} template to this page so that others posting warnings are aware this IP address belongs to an educational institution. --Quintote 17:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV at Rogue wave (oceanography)

Just to clarify, the point of the words "which had problems in and of itself" was that there are some problems of factual accuracy with the way the bombing was presented in the film, as is noted in The Poseidon Adventure (2005 film) and on its imdb page. It's not really important to rogue waves though, and I'm fine with your removal of it. Phaunt (talk) 16:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

You reverted an absurd edit I made within 30 seconds. Congratulations! This signifies that you are spending every second of your life doing something incredibly worthwhile and in no way wasteful of those precious seconds before your impending death :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.182.123 (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, that made my day ;-) --Quintote (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad I've been able to improve your day. But just one piece of advice - get off Wikipedia, there's a world out there! Ever since I learned that, my life has been infinately better. Don't edit articles about history - make history. :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.182.123 (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I spend my day in the world, and relax in front of Wikipedia instead of watching TV. I think it would sound too preachy to suggest you do something more constructive than vandalize a public reference tool, so I won't say that.  ;-) --Quintote (talk) 01:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... just as long as you aren't one of these people who spends half the day on Wikipedia. I know people who don't leave their room at Uni... Good night —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.182.123 (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Comment from Quintote

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bromine, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote (talk) 03:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I clearly didn't make the edit you have linked to. Nor do I see anything wrong with my recent edit to the page. Would you care to explain? – Gurch 03:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, so sorry. I pulled from your page as soon as I looked back at the screen. I could swear I'd highlighted only IP vandal work, but it happens here and there. Again, apologies. Resume your uber vandal patrolling.  ;-) -Quintote (talk) 03:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of McDonald's restaurants

An article that you have been involved in editing, McDonald's restaurants, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McDonald's restaurants. Thank you. Sawblade05 ^(^talk to me ^| ^my wiki life^) 19:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conurbation edit

all right, i deleted the line in conurbation. LA is not the largest urban area in the us - that claim is patently absurd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.86.174.19 (talk) 17:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Eric Theodore Andres

An article that you have been involved in editing, Eric Theodore Andres, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Theodore Andres. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Eric Theodore Andres

A tag has been placed on Eric Theodore Andres requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr Senseless (talk) 22:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

well.. my English is very bed, so keep distance ;) i want to add to soulseek page more information about users, like the list of some of them. and i add link to my home page, where is'n any adss, i'm not a f---ing businessman ;) so meybe you will turn on my edits? /uookie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.96.117.15 (talk) 14:22, 31 December 2007

Soulseek has many users, and I don't think it is possible or makes sense to provide links to all users. Links to some users with no consideration of notability doesn't make sense either. Finally, I don't feel that including your link falls within the style guidline of Wikipedia:External links. --Quintote (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you have right... but i think, that i'm firts person who want to add own nick name to this article, so mayby you will think about it again - be human, it's not only for fun or friends, i'm try make wiki more usefull... i gave list of music gengre that i have - it's not useless? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uookie (talk • contribs) 14:47, 31 December 2007

I'm not too concerned with the changes you've made. I'll remove the spam warning from your user page so other editors don't see that, because I believe you didn't intend something bad. However, expect to find many other people who don't think your link should be there, and expect them to be a lot less polite than I am.  :-) Actually, it's sad that people can be rude about this sort of thing, but it's a fact. Especially since you now have a user account, I'm unlikely to notice your edits; I focus primarily on IP-based vandalism. Cheers, --Quintote (talk) 20:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okey thanks ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uookie (talk • contribs) 20:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject St. Louis

Hello, I noticed you've made edits to St. Louis articles or that you are in some way connected to metropolitan area. I thought you might want to become a member of the St. Louis WikiProject. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve St. Louis related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to featured article status. Hope you can participate!

Grey Wanderer | Talk 20:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

Sorry if I shagged up anything, the link (within Ümlaut) was dead and had been for quite a while, and I assumed that dead links were just considered clutter.

I'm still pretty new to editing, and when I get the time i'll make an actual account and get to know the process better.

Again, thanks for the welcome and sorry for the trouble! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.139.105.115 (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem at all. I'd reverted your change because it removed some templates and categories at the bottom of the article. I've since gone back and removed the dead link, which is what you meant to do. Just watch for those extra codes in the future to make sure you mean to delete them (or not). Here's to many more contributions. :-) --Quintote (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP spoofing?

Well, you being a software engineer, you will understand how they do it better than i do. But I can only assume someone did the vandalism using my IP address. I have not edited anything without being logged in under my username, for a long time.

Would always being logged in under my Username prevent this? --Eeyore tim (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current revision

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia.
 Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Hardcore, have been
 considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. 
... If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, 
please contact me. Quintote 02:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:69.55.144.192"

Looking at your IP address, you appear to be on dial-up, probably via a dynamically-assigned IP address. These typically get re-used and cycled through. So, I wouldn't worry about what you see from a given IP address. If you see vandalism occurring with your user ID, that's a problem and probably means somehow your account was compromised. I would hope that no one would mistake changes made from a particular dynamically-assigned IP address with changes made by a logged-in user.

I hope that helps. Don't hesitate to contact me again if you have any more questions. --Quintote (talk) 00:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lhmlogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Lhmlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LutheranHour logodown.png

Thanks for uploading Image:LutheranHour logodown.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding user warnings

When warning a previously warned user, please try to go in order. Placing a level two warning, after a level three one (As you did Here) doesn't make much sense. Thank you :) Dadude3320 01:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USS Windsor (APA-55)

Nice work on this article! I've made a few improvements: I added a reference link to the DANFS entry and an external link to a photo gallery, and tweaked the infobox data to use conversions. If you're interested in ships and ship articles, I'd be happy to point you in the direction of additional online resources. You may also want to consider joining WP:SHIPS. In any case, have a great day :) Maralia (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't my edit...

That wasn't my edit that you reverted at Hillbilly with vandalproof, but rather that of an anon, although it was identified as one of mine. Otherwise, keep up the good work. Cheers. youngamerican (wtf?) 18:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Ships

Hello Quintote, and welcome to WikiProject Ships! Please see the navigation sidebar on our main project page for information about our project guidelines, resources, and pending tasks. You can post any questions at the project talk page. Thank you for joining - we look forward to working with you! Maralia (talk) 19:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism - Help needed!!!

Hi, I've seen you've reverted a couple of bits of linkspam vandalism (on Adultery etc) which were done by 70.59.228.117. They have been extremely active again on a number of related sites. I've had to undo a stack of previous edits thay have done on 5 or 6 sites and it's becoming a bit tedious! Could you block the IP address? Thanks! --hydeblake (talk) 20:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I do fight vandalism, I'm not an admin, so I'd defer to them to provide this for you. The WP:Vandalism page has some great information to familiarize you with how vandalism (including linkspam) is dealt with on Wikipedia, but I can tell you that while an admin might block (on WP:AIV) with a lower threshold, they're more likely to act if you demonstrate that vandalism continues to occur after all levels of admonishment are exhausted.

In the case of linkspamming, there are warning templates uw-spamx, where x is a number from 1-4, to be issued in increasing order. You need to have a user exhibiting the behavior even after level 4 warnings are issued, and really post-dated warnings don't serve the intent, which is to make sure the user is aware of the consequences before proceeding to the next level. The user had been warned up through level 2 before you contacted me. I've warned them at level 3 for the latest place you caught them. I suggest you use the level 4 warning the next time they act, and after that WP:AIV will be likely to act. Here's an example of how the level 4 template would look when you typed it in: {{subst:uw-spam4|Adultery}} ~~~~

It may seem like a slow process, but blocking is really a last resort. Thanks for working to improve Wikipedia, and keep patient! --Quintote (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about vandal fighting

That edit to bullshit was for good reason. Wow music is not gibberish. But how can you like classical and rap at the same time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.46.52 (talk) 22:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the convenience of anyone interested, here's a link to the edit in question. --Quintote (talk) 12:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 03:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Drewes Photo

Great work on the Ted Drewes night photo. It greatly adds to the quality of the article, particularly in illuminating the intense popularity of the establishment! Thanks for sharing it! Roscoestl (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you liked my picture. I just happened to realize that I had this picture, and the other Wikipedia picture doesn't capture the crowds (or the glowing, campy charm you get at night). The picture looks extra cool because of the glow off the streets, which is because it had been raining and was in fact misting when I took the picture--and then pouring down rain thereafter. Throughout the crowds remained consistent. As you know, the crowds can get a lot bigger than this on most weekend summer evenings!

--Quintote (talk) 19:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kyriakos (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 21:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conurbation

The conurbation revert made a couple of months ago - re: Los Angeles, should have left my edit as was. The claim put out there was LA is the largest conurbation in the US. According to the definition of conurbation, this is false - the Washington-Baltimore corridor is the largest conurbation by far, dwarfing by several times the number of people. The claim was on its face absurd, factually laughable information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.86.174.19 (talk) 19:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You appended a statement in the conurbation article with the phrase "this particular claim, of course, is nonsense," which I reverted as a non-constructive, non-helpful comment. You subsequently made a constructive edit that removed the questionable claim, and I made no further edits to the article. I wasn't particularly following this article, as I generally watch all articles for vandalism or unconstructive edits, and since I've made over 1,000 edits since then, I can't tell you any more about things other than what the revision history shows. However, when I review it again, I agree with the decisions I'd made, and your edits have remained in place. Is there something else to this that I'm missing? --Quintote (talk) 20:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi! I've noticed that several vandalism comments have been made on the St Mary's Springs IP address page. Every one of them threatens blocking, but it has only happened once. As a Springs student I hope that the vandalism stops, but as a wikipedia user I dislike vandalism, so my question is could you direct me to the user in charge of blocking? We are a small school and I'm sure that everyone that uses wikipedia has a user account so I think the school should be blocked. Springerjkreb (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in improving Wikipedia. WP:AIV is where vandalism cases get escalated, though note there's a high standard put in place for blocking to get enacted. From the AIV page:

1. The edits of the user you are reporting must be considered vandalism.

2. The vandal must be active now, and have vandalised after sufficient recent warnings to stop.

3. IP addresses cannot be blocked indefinitely; The person behind a single IP address may frequently change and this needs to be allowed for.

If it seems like Wikipedia tolerates a lot of vandalism before blocking occurs, you're right. The goal is to be as open to editing as possible, so particularly in the case of shared IP addresses, blocking only occurs as a last resort.

Be patient. At times there is a lot of vandalism, but I think the good of openness outweighs the bad.

--Quintote (talk) 02:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Harm Intended.

Just thought I'd let you know that my edits were meant simply as jokes and there was no harm intended behind them. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.193.15.172 (talk) 01:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

revert

ok.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chickenpox ???

You sent me a bizarre message about an edit I did on a page about chickenpox??? 1- I never edited that page 2- Not that it is any of your business, but that wouldnt even be my IP address as I only set this account up during the summer (and you claim the edit was made in April User:Kav2001c

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chickenpox, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you view Wikipedia without being logged in, your machine is identified by its IP address. IP addresses for home users (which I'd bet you are) are usually dynamic in nature and get constantly reused and reassigned. I suspect this is what happened to you. Please accept my apologies, and know that my "business" in watching edits is to remove vandalism, and through warnings (like the one you saw), possibly deter the casual vandal. Whether they serve as an effective deterrent is another matter altogether, and you can find on WP:Vandalism lengthy discussions on how best to keep editing open but prevent vandalism.

Rest assured that someone with your IP address made a silly edit to the aforementioned article. Clicking on the revision link will leave no doubt in your mind. However, it has nothing to do with you personally.

Hopefully at this point you understand and agree that my comments weren't directed to you, but to someone who made an edit from the IP address recently assigned to you. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or comments regarding this. --Quintote (talk) 20:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism warnings

You ahve no right to give me vandalism warnings. You should go back to third grade, you crazy person. 204.186.77.110 (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eugene Earle Amick

The article Eugene Earle Amick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

According to the article the person was an officer who died on a ship. Perhaps a brief bio on the article about the ship is adequate. Pknkly (talk) 00:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pknkly (talk) 00:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:35, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members	Editorial LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced; Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy	Editorial Opportunities for new military history articles
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants	Editorial In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 19:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)	Editorial In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:56, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 21:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 00:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 00:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 10:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 02:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 00:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 15:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Stlouiscomomap.png

The file File:Stlouiscomomap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Albert T. Harris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert T. Harris, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Henry Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. http://www.theusofe.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=38372#38372