Hello, I'm Johnnie Bob. I noticed that you recently removed content from Qigong without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also, adding unsourced material. Johnnie Bob (talk) 06:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- dear Johnnie Bob,
- Thank you for your message and explanation, I am new at editing and therefor didn't know about the edit summary. I didn't take anything vital from the qigong page, just added some text that it is not always safe to use; when and where it is and when not..
- I base this on my experience of 40 years practicing and teaching. Puanan96 (talk) 06:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Qigong. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Qi, you may be blocked from editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
