This is an archive of past discussions with User:PseudoOne. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:PseudoOne. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is a msg from you that appeared on the computer in the executive boardroom here in Australia, and which is not to be used for non-corporate pursuits. So I am wondering who posted what to Wikipedia from this machine. I could not find the "recent edit" you refer to in your msg in the history pages. Perhaps you could enlighten me. Thanks 210.1.198.109 (talk) 06:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Your msg read:
User talk:210.1.198.109
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PseudoOne (talk) 04:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:PseudoOne. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Ridirect
Greetings, the page had already been redirected, but user Vegard is undoing it. The page was a disarm, and was agreed apoin by admin User:Garzo, yet this user refuse to redirect. Chaldean (talk) 00:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Please take a further look at the users edits. He is going on a vandal rampage (for a while now), and I can't seem to stop him. I have also suspected him of being a sockpuppet (and have reported him), but I need admin help to stop him. Chaldean (talk) 00:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia should not be based on what you think. Wikipedia is based on real facts. The real facts is that Syriac(aramaic) people are not assyrians. Therefor should there be an article about the syriac people VegardNorman (talk) 00:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, if you carefully look at the log I FIXED the Hhahaha this is fun and reverted Greenhouse back to original. You then reverted it back to hahaha this is fun. The perp is Islander, not me. thanks Golgofrinchian (talk) 23:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
No, if you look closely at this diff, you can see that you probably made an error and reverted ClueBot's edit, which I reverted back to. Thanks. PseudoOne00:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
That is why I got confused, and thanks Golgofrinchian, but I don't appreciate the little reference to my being the perpetrator - check out your facts before accusing people. Cluebot had happily reverted the vandalism before you stormed in with your tool. Please learn how to use it properly before using it again. TalkIslander00:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Those warnings were from you two. Sorry for the perp comment I was thinking you had it out for me being you also deleted one of my articles when the original speedy poster and I were discussing it. Its difficult to be a good editor here when there are so many trigger happy admins. If I blatently post something inflammatory then I feel I am fair game for retributrion. On the other hand I am just trying to write helpful articles and most of the time before I even finish them they are instantly deleted. It causes me to be jaded and quick to anger, which I am working on. Once again I appologize for the tool error. I think I figured out what I did wrong and shouldnt cause an issue again.Golgofrinchian (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
(sorry to PseudoOne for temporarily taking over your talk page...) It is for that very reason that I suggested you develop the article in your own userspace first; get it perfect, and then copy it over to the mainspace. If you've done it properly, it won't be deleted. Having said that, some topics just aren't notable, and this could be one of them. We'll see how the AfD goes, and take it from there. TalkIslander00:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Your actions
Hi would you mind explaining why you reverted me, im the only person who works on the page, im removing info that it already in other pages, is unsourced or has long standing pov tags. Realist2 (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Looking at this here i was wondering if you could put those columns side by side like the discography is. It makes it easier to scrowl down and gives the illusion its a shorter article. Realist2 (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I'm afraid that I have declined your application to use autowikibrowser. This is a very powerful tool that could cause havok in inexperienced hands. For this reason there is a rule that you must have 500 edits to mainspace before you can be considered for the tool. Please feel free to reapply when you have reached this milestone. SpartazHumbug!10:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Stephen ruse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Redfarmer (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Your script tagged it after an admin had speedy deleted it. Your script actually recreated the article with just the tag and listed you as the creator. That's why Twinkle sent you the notice. Redfarmer (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Cheers
For the user talkpage revert. I was finding it very hard to decide whether to let them down politely or give a simple one-worded answer of two letters to this. Thanks for making it easier :) AngelOfSadness talk 21:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
It did sound a little creepy, didn't it? :-) PseudoOne 22:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes very much so considering it was the first. I mean I've gotten threatened(implied threats anyway) and attacked but a marriage proposal is possibly the creppiest one I ever got :) AngelOfSadness talk 22:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
From what I understand, the user was vandalizing and when you reverted them, he reverted them back, and was reported to WP:AIV? :-) PseudoOne 22:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
My edit of pood was within the standards of wikipedia. It provided no information about the subject matter, wasn't verifiable, and included garbage like syntax and structure. In those ways, it is exactly like every other wikipedia article I've read that reference stupid blogs and other such things. Your threat to ban me is laughable. I counter your ban by banning you from banning me, effectively immediately and in accordance with the prophesy. If you think you're helping society by trolling through this horrible reference, you should find a new, more constructive hobby, such as burning ants with a magnifying glass or littering. They're both more productive than this stupid webpage. Even the content I changed to something more in line with reality is somewhat questionable, with the laughable insertion of a stupid Russian salt eating proverb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.3.75.179 (talk) 21:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
The reason I reverted your edit was because it blanked the content, was not useful, and was contradicting, and so was not in good faith. The only reason I issued a final warning message is because you did this after a recent block of your IP address, and if any more vandalism continues, you may be blocked from editing again. Thanks. PseudoOne 21:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:PseudoOne. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Revert of vandalization of "superconductor classification" and other articles
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your vigilance against vandalism, but I believe you are mistaken in performing this revert. I was simply removing text inserted by a user who seemed to aimlessly click the buttons on the top of the edit box. -- atropos235✄ (blah blah, my past) 01:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:PseudoOne. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:PseudoOne. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
ACC
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Werdan7T@02:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
