User talk:ProfessorPaul

This user may have left Wikipedia. ProfessorPaul has not edited Wikipedia since May 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

	Oklahoma NA‑class
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. NA This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Welcome!

Hello, ProfessorPaul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Eivind^t^@^c 04:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(formerly "help me" Wiki indicator--now removed)ProfessorPaul 01:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What help do you need? ForestH2

Not a silly question at all

OK, I apologize for this "silly question," but I feel compelled to ask. While I was actively editing an article at Wikipedia (a little before 8:00 pm Central Daylight Time) all of the sudden, all the blue Wikipedia "links" became blue and underlined. OK--silly question time: Why did this happen? Was this vandalism? Or did the Wiki-Administrators order a system-wide change over? Please tell me what happened, please? Thank you in advance. 01:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)~ User:ProfessorPaul

This happens to me sometimes as well, it's probably a local memory(RAM) problem at your computer.

It can happen while you are:

• A) reading a very large article
• B) use several programs at the same
• C) after the computer has been on for a long time
• D) a combination of the three.

You might want to run a anti-virus program, just in case. Computer viruses and other malicious programs can take a big bite of your computers memory.

Do you still have the same problem or did it go away? --Eivind^t^@^c 01:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, after a few minutes, the problem "fixed" itself. But thank you for responding to me. I really enjoy Wikipedia. Editing it is my "recreation."  :) ProfessorPaul 01:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's good to hear and it's nice to see that you're enjoying Wikipedia, happy editing. --Eivind^t^@^c 01:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it is OK now

Thank you for responding so quickly; the problem seems to have fixed itself.  :) Thanks again. ProfessorPaul 01:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, good to see a newcomer getting settled in nicely. I thought it might interest you to look at our list of Wikiprojects here. --HappyCamper 01:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link on my user page...Happy Editing. ForestH2

Please provide edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

-Will Beback 05:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS:, Please do not delete material without an explanation, and please respect the WP:NPOV policy. Thanks, -Will Beback 05:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

US Illegal Immigration

You did a great job in helping this article along. It is quite an achievement to change and improve something like this, without having POV disputes etc. Well done! wallie 22:00, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wallie!

Thanks, Wallie. I appreciate that. I am not finished yet, and I will continue to work on that article with NPOV.  :) ProfessorPaul 02:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I note that it has already attracted a POV flag. O well. That's to be expected, given the subject matter. Whatever is in the article will never please everyone... Wallie 20:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Twilight Zone

Nice informative work with your Twilight Zone episode edits. Thanks! Travisl 01:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal

I have proposed that the Lyle H. Boren article you recently created be merged with the Lyle Boren article I created back in January, 2005. --TommyBoy 05:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-established Lyle H. Boren as a redirect page. You may want to check that page's edit histoey to ensure that information you included in that article is included in the Lyle Boren article. --TommyBoy 19:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the Twilight Zone

Sure! I'd be happy to help! I enjoy contributing to Wikipedia and I'll do anything I can to make it better. Just let me know what I can do. By the way, just out of curiosity, why did you choose me? --Tuspm ^[Leave A Message] 22:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About the 13 Illuminati Bloodlines Article

I know that you have just added some links onto the article. That is good job. Thank you. But the main problem still remains; I need to find people who are experienced with good writing, NPOV, and formatting to write out the best article possible for the 13 Illuminati Bloodlines. I prefer explanations on the history of each bloodline, where they are from, and what each bloodline is currently doing. I hope it is possible for you to help me find good edittors, writers, and administrators who are experienced with Wikipedia, and are able to ensure that the article works out to be the best. It may sound as if though I am not a good writer. I am a good writer, the only problem is that I need the fire to start in order to give me some idea of what to write about. Also - since I already know too much, I may be too biased, so please help me to write the best possible article on Wikipedia - in 3 years - FEATURED ARTICLE! Thanks. --Lord X 17:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)USer:Xinyu[reply]

I need your cooperation in the issue with the vandalism issue.

Copy this message to the user that is changing everything on the episode pages; thanks

216.244.12.76 I need to talk to you

Hi, I am an administrator, Xinyu, and I got a report from ProfesorPaul, about how you've been, "vandalizing" EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF The Twilight Zone. Discuss your intentions, what you have editted, fixed up, and under what pretext you have for doing so. I need you to tell me all the information you can get, and I promise both you and ProfessorPaul, this problem would be negotiable, once the facts has been laid bare, and then I'll see that NPOV, justice, and peace would be restored on this article. Thank you, please reply on my user TALK page. Thank you. --Lord X 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)User:Xinyu[reply]

This way, we can solve this problem nice and early - in every single talk page where the discussions take place. Thanks for your cooperation. --Lord X 01:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)User:Xinyu[reply]

ps. that way - we, more specifically I can talk to him one way or another. Thank you. --Lord X 01:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)User:Xinyu[reply]

Please don’t copy the same thing to lots of places (use templates, if you must) and sign your posts using your own username. Also, Xinyu is not an administrator (and never was one) and it’s a bad idea to claim otherwise. —xyzzy_n 05:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about - this --Lord X 20:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)User:Xinyu is my signature...--Lord X 20:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)User:Xinyu[reply]

My remark was addressed to User:ProfessorPaul. —xyzzy_n 21:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I’ve looked at some of User:216.244.12.76’s edits. I think that the editor did not state his or her intention well enough (or, for that matter, at all…), but, taken as a whole, the edits were apparently not in bad faith. I can think of several reasons related to WP:NPOV and WP:V to delete those sections; I’m not sure, however, whether that editor had these in mind. (As for section headings without any text to follow them, removing those was clearly a good thing.) Anyway, if you want to know more about vandalism and how to deal with it, see WP:VAND.

I need support on AfD for 13 Illuminati Bloodlines

The article is posted for an AfD. We either need to fix it up more, or get more, "Verifiable." sources. Also, for or against deletion of article on Thirteen Illuminati Bloodlines? Thanks, you're my only support, considering everyone else wants the article to be deleted...Thanks. --Lord X 22:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)User:Xinyu[reply]

Comma splice

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict&curid=6299613&diff=69913180&oldid=69912646 ISn't that unnecesary? The original sentence has the pre-comma clause as dependant with the use of "as that", so it is not a comma splice since it cannot stand by itself. -- Avi 23:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of minority-opinion scientific theories

Great to hear your enthusiam, and thanks for the input on this article! —Pengo ^talk · contribs 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice adds on Synar

Just wanted to say good adds... Tvccs 02:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note - I met him and liked him a lot as well, and he was also decent enough to know when he'd been beaten and do the honorable thing, which is something very rare in and of itself. Tvccs 00:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Big Foot Expansion

Wow, i really like how you expanded the whole article, there was no information before that, but could you cite your sources, like books, because the websites mentioned seem just like some inofficial sites...--Larzan 16:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NC16002 disappearance

I have deleted your last change to NC16002 disappearance. We don't really need to state the obvious in articles, like saying that someone who disappeared in a 1948 aircraft crash has been missing or presumed dead since. Also, all of those subheads in such a short article were overpowering. Furthermore, two of the subheads, The last flight, and The takeoff for Miami, actually preceded a paragraph which led with the previous flight (Miami to San Juan). Moriori 07:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Lincoln Conspiracy

Hi ProfessorPaul. Nice job on the edits you made on The Lincoln Conspiracy articles I started (wish I had thought of some of them). I had not heard anything previously about National Treasure 2: The Book of Secrets. Although I am sure it will be crap for history (like the The Lincoln Conspiracy itself), I still look forward to viewing it. Thanks. Edeans 02:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism at "Infamous" disambig page

Thanks for taking care of that, ProfessorPaul. It seems like the user in question might be a bit confused about the page, so I've gone ahead and tried to clear things up. -- Natalya 03:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ross Thomas (actor)

Very nice work with Ross Thomas. I've removed the notability tag. All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Unexplained

Your "wikifying" of The Unexplained is a bit excessive. The alphabetical sections are unnecessary and only clutter up the article--plus, they completely kill seeing how many episodes there are total, and have numbering themselves which is just excessively overly complicated. -Eep² 19:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Loomis fargo bank robbery

I just want to say, it's a nice, well-written article. Good job! :) Mahanga^Talk 02:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Oklahoma Newsletter

Greetings! This is a random delivery of the Wikiproject Oklahoma newsletter, the "WikiOkie Reporter".

The WikiOkie Reporter WikiProject Oklahoma's Newsletter Issue 1 - September 2007 Discuss this newsletter	Your second or third stop for WikiProject Oklahoma News Sign up to receive this newsletter Oklahoma Portal Current article statistics
WikiProject Oklahoma releases new newsletter September 2007 brings a new face to WikiProject Oklahoma: a newsletter. As in all of Wikipedia, the new WikiOkie Reporter (tenative name) is intended to be a collaborative effort among editors. Anyone can edit it: this month's newsletter is placed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Oklahoma/newsletter/aug07, but next month's will be placed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Oklahoma/newsletter/oct07, with the following month at /newsletter/nov07, and so on. While this month's article's were initially written by User:Okiefromokla, it is hoped other editors will be excited to contribute to articles, content, layout, and ideas. This is a completely new child of WikiProject Oklahoma, and it should reflect the collaborative work of everyone who's bored and has nothing to do for a few minutes. As such, anything can be discussed here: anything - layout, color scheme, pictures, content, etc. The behind-the-scenes workings for the WikiOkie Reporter will be simple: anyone wishing to receive the newsletter in their talk page may place their name at sign-up list, but they are more than free to remove their name from the same list at any time. Anyone wishing to discuss ideas or anything at all related to the newsletter may look no further than here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oklahoma/newsletter/talk. Several WikiProjects already have ongoing newsletters, including Wikipedia: WikiProject North Dakota, from which WikiProject Oklahoma's newsletter has been based. For the time being, Okiefromokla will assume distribution responsibilities for the newsletter, maintaining the template, and writing articles from scratch if other editors have not done so by the 1st of the month. Promotions on the rise For many Wikipedians, summer is a time to kick back, relax, and make an occasional minor edit to their favorite few pages. Not so in WikiProject Oklahoma. Between May 12 and September, editors have been busily working on Oklahoma, Tulsa, and Woody Guthrie, and all three have been promoted. Prior to May, there were only seven Featured or Good articles in WikiProject Oklahoma. On May 12, Tulsa was promoted from B-class to FA class after a few months of extensive editing. Its primary editors were User:Nmajdan, User:SandyGeorgia, User:Okiefromokla, and a handful of others. On August 25, Oklahoma was promoted from B-class to FA class after a month-long blitz. User:Okiefromokla, User: SandyGeorgia, and several anonymous IPs contributed heavily to the article. On June 13, 2007, Woody Guthrie was promoted from B-Class to GA class after two failed attempts at promotion. User:Dannygutters, User:Gaff, User:Maenpong, and a handful of others contributed most to the article.
This month's task: Assess articles! Check out all these unassessed articles to help out!
The WikiProject Oklahoma newsletter is a work in progress so please share your ideas about how the newsletter can be improved. If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the sign-up list.

This newsletter was delivered to you by Okiefromokla•talk 19:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Republican In Name Only

An article that you have been involved in editing, Republican In Name Only, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican In Name Only (second nomination). Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 20:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of American Entrepreneurs

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of American Entrepreneurs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of American Entrepreneurs. Captain panda 03:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of category from your userpage

Hi. In enacting consensus from User categories for discussion, I have removed the category Category:Wikipedians interested in books from your userpage. It was determined in that deletion debate that this category should be depopulated of individuals, but kept as a parent category. If you wish to display a category reflecting your interest in books, please consider one of the specific sub-categories under its umbrella. Thanks, and please excuse the necessary editing of your user page! ----Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of people who have disappeared

An editor has nominated List of people who have disappeared, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have disappeared and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge program

Thank you for starting the article and taking the maintenance template in the spirit it was offered. Erechtheus (talk) 11:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

typo on your user page

"Wikipedia is must less mysterious than the Da Vinci Code". Bubba73 (talk), 02:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wyoming Attorney General

I've just created the Wyoming Attorney General and Bruce A. Salzburg articles to address the deficiency. Currently, they're mere placeholder articles. -- The Anome (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Lobby

Hi. A newbie here. I was reading the Liberty Lobby page and saw I knew a ref I could add--but the graf in which the ref would appear is still partly in 1st person POV I am sure. Look at the History of the page and you will see what happened. I mention this to you as you stated you wanted to do more cleanup. Kcor53 (talk) 16:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I judge your re-write of what I will call the Jeremy Horne graf removes the objection to 1st person POV which I raised above. I see the ref to the Trento magazine article remains. I think by these edits we've left the article stronger in terms of the warnings at top of article--but it still has problems I believe you will agree. Quick, new question: The ref for the Drew Pearson suit misspells Pearson's name, so the text is accurate but does WikiPedia usage call for a sic notation in such cases? My interest in this article is not great but I will pay attention to anything you think or discover. Thanks. Kcor53 (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smart Money (radio show)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Smart Money (radio show), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unremarkable local radio program. Fails WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 21:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Smart Money (radio show)

I have nominated Smart Money (radio show), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Money (radio show). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 09:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Oklahoma Statehood Stamp

An article that you have been involved in editing, Oklahoma Statehood Stamp, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Statehood Stamp. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blue/Bourbon

Considering the comment you left at Talk:Bourbon Democrat is going on three years old, I suppose you've probably either found the answer or completely forgotten about it by now. But for what it's worth, I don't think the Blue Dogs trace their roots to the Bourbons, at least not directly. I suppose you could consider the 1924 election the Bourbons' proverbial beheading, but really, the conservative Southern wing of the party never truly died until the era of George Wallace gave way to that of Ronald Reagan. The Blue Dogs trace their heritage more to the Dixiecrats, both in being conservatives and in that their goal was to retake areas that had once been dominated by Democrats but subsequently switched to Republican in the same realignment that brought Strom Thurmond across the aisle.

Sorry for the rant. Hope it was at least somewhat helpful. :) Recognizance (talk) 05:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

financial smuggling

there is apparently another case of smuggled bonds found at malpensa airport [1]; I did't found many sources but it's online on some italian newspapers websites. big mystery--Melaen (talk) 17:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

again something about Malpensa-bonds! [2]

I can't translate into english very well but it says that:

• philippine nationals hoped to build churches in the philippines for a evangelic- pentecostal religious organization using the bonds
• it says the bonds (207 for 500mln$ each) where sent in a package (by post maybe?) from philippines to genoa there was a phone number that lead to the arrest of 2 philippine people. some more bonds (26 value of 500 mln each) were found in philippine nationals house. the 2 philippine nationals were a man and a woman, the woman is already out of prison, the man not.
• also U.S Secret Service people went to Italy to examine the bonds: they declared they are fake because “non esistono titoli emessi nel 1934 di quel taglio”_ in 1934 were not printed any bond with value 500mln.

npthing is still being said about the chiasso bond, I don't know if they were definitely declared fake by u.s..

hope it's useful, bye --Melaen (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joseph C. Battaglia

An article that you have been involved in editing, Joseph C. Battaglia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph C. Battaglia. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cptnono (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goldline

I made a laundry list at the talk page. I am leaning towards it meeting the general notability guidelines but we need ot figure out a complete rewrite with the expansion.Cptnono (talk) 04:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goldline

Hello,

FWIW, there's a draft article on Goldline International that a user with a COI conflict has created. See User:Gold1933/Goldline

70.29.208.10 (talk) 03:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of largest U.S. bank failures

Thanks for saying thanks, we professors need to stick together :) Little Professor (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIPROJECT OKLAHOMA

This has been sent to you requesting that you respond to whether your not you are an active member of WP:OK Please respond Here. By following the instructions there.

--Steam Iron 22:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Goldline International

Hello ProfessorPaul, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Goldline International, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Quidam65. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Quidam65. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Quidam65 (talk · contribs) 08:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Professor Paul--I placed the tag there because I do not believe this company meets the notability criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. Outside of its sponsorship of Glenn Beck's programs the company isn't all that well-known (it doesn't sponsor any of the other major Fox News or talk radio shows). Quidam65 (talk) 15:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello ProfessorPaul! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 12 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Mike Padden - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merry, merry

Bzuk (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to Support WikiProject Oklahoma and Tulsa

This has been sent to you requesting that you share your thoughts to an ongoing discussion that's taking place on the projects talk page.

--Kumioko (talk) 23:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gypsy moth Republican for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gypsy moth Republican is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gypsy moth Republican until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GrapedApe (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Wikipedians

Saw how active you were in Oklahoma topics and your edit count, and that you haven't been here in over a year. I've added you to the page above, so if you come back, please remember to take your name off it. God bless, LazyBastardGuy 20:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern!

I have loved editing Wikipedia; it's just that the ordinary concerns of life have kept me busy; I'll resolve to log-on more often and "get back into the game." Thank's everyone, especially Bastard ProfessorPaul (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Richardson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Richardson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Richardson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Thanks for creating the List of Most Expensive Divorces UVemNJvA (talk) 01:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the pie! Yum! ProfessorPaul (talk) 17:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ProfessorPaul. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Bridge program" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bridge program. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 28#Bridge program until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]