Hello, Poojasharma20, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Casey Christopher, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Casey Christopher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Christopher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 18:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Praxidicae, I did not responded to COI because this article was already deleted. My profession is completely different, I am a chartered accountant and work for an auditing firm which has nothing to do with making article or promotion. Its strictly not allowed in my profession. I do not promote anyone here or get pad for my work, I do it for my satisfaction. Whenever I find someone or something which I think has sufficient reliable sources to be on wikipedia, I try to create one. However I have not succeeded even once, which is unfortunate because everything is considered here is COI. So according to you whoever is creating a wikipedia here is getting paid in one way or another?Poojasharma20 (talk) 13:03, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Poojasharma20, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Shivdeep Lande have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 19:39, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I.V. Doc until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmīrīTALK13:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Narayan Jewellers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Poojasharma20. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Poojasharma20|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
When you write an article about a business
you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
Jimfbleak, Thanks for the tips about improving my wikipedia knowledge, I will follow the guidelines. I however do not think if all the moderators here are unbiased, I think they like to let new authors down. Instead of teaching them they simply tag them with COI or something else to stop them from writing articles. I did not even know this word before it hits me. I am writing it in this thread again which I wrote above that, "I do not promote anyone here or get pad for my work, I do it for my satisfaction. Whenever I find someone or something which I think has sufficient reliable sources to be on wikipedia, I try to create one. However I have succeeded even once, which is unfortunate because everything is considered here is COI." Poojasharma20 (talk) 13:15, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping and your assurance that you do not have a COI; you will appreciate that it's a question that's bound to be asked because most people writing about a company really are working directly or indirectly for that company, which is not permitted under our T&Cs. I block people every day for undisclosed paid editing. The other main point is that if you choose to write about a company it's bound to be promotional if you rely on press releases and interviews with the bosses for your sources Jimfbleak - talk to me?13:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jimfbleak Thanks for the quick reply and understand my position. However 1 point is not clear to me that how to write an neutral article if we cannot rely on online articles, because thats the only source of knowing about that company or person. If I contact them directly, which is not possible in every situation and also it will come under COI. Then without contacting them its nearly impossible to know something which is already not published in any article. The article I wrote about Narayan jewellers was according to me in neutral note but according to wiki guidelines it was not. Is there a way to retrieve that article so that I can modify it or is there a way to move that article to my draft space again so that I can work on it. Also I have 1 other article in mind. 1 kid from my city, he got 7-8 guiness world records and he is only 6 year old. He also received few national awards and I think he deserves to be on wikipedia. How to write about him? Can you show some light on how to go about these. thanks in advance Poojasharma20 (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You can use online articles if they are genuinely independent, but not of they are press releases or self-serving interviews. If your 6-year old has the Guiness World records, that's probably fine, Since Guiness is an indepedent reliable source. Same with the national awards, if they have been reported in national newpapers. What you can't use is social media, blogs and the like.
With regard to the jewellers, you seem to be saying that you can't find out anyting about them except their own press releases, but surely they must publish annual reports which give basic financial and other company details? If you really can't find anything beyond "look who wears our stuff!" you are wasting your time with a non-notable company that will never have an article here because of lack of real facts. Jimfbleak - talk to me?06:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jimfbleak I have written the article about the boy, is that possible for you to check it once and guide me to fix errors in it. This is the link to that article Draft:Devaagyh_Dixit
Devaagyh Dixit
Jimfbleak Hi Have made few changes to Devaagyh Dixit and moved to main space, please suggest if it needs more modification? Thanks for your help.
Hello, Poojasharma20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Devaagyh Dixit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shailesh Tyagi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Reads like a piece of marketing collateral.
Too much of the content (incl. entire sections and paragraphs) is unreferenced.
--
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fratelli Wines and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fratelli Wines, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Poojasharma20!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Poojasharma20. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fratelli Wines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vishweshwari Devi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
