User talk:PlanetStar/Archive 7

Thanks

Thanks for catching my typo on list of stars in Scorpius. StringTheory11 (t • c) 01:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear physics

I noticed your creation of the proton-neutron ratio article. First, the hyphen in its title irritates me: it should bear either en-dash (proton–neutron ratio) or colon (proton:neutron ratio), although I am not sure that the latter would be punctuationally acceptable.

Second, could you review the {{Nuclear physics}} navbox? Your article may deserve inclusion into its “Nuclear model and stability” section, but I am more interested in a feedback about my recent restructuring of it. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:54, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

forest planet

{{Original research|date=December 2007}} {{Unreferenced|date=December 2007}} '''[[Forest]] [[planet]]''' is a category or type of [[hypothetical planet]] with surface covering of larger plant life in at least a majority percentage, or a surface close to or entirely of forests. The Earth, though covered with some forests, is not considered a forest planet since it is covered by forest by only some 9.4% of its surface (or 30% of total land area);<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.earth-policy.org/Indicators/Forest/2006.htm|title=World Forest Cover, 1990-2005}}</ref> also because the Earth is covered mostly, 70.9% with oceans. Forests function as [[habitats]] for [[organisms]], [[hydrologic]] flow modulators, and soil conservers, constituting one of the most important aspects of a planet's [[biosphere]]. Since the first microlensing detected the signature of what may be far away planets, it follows [[Syllogism|categorically]] that Forest Planets are as likely candidates for detection orbiting other stars as [[super-Earth]]s and other [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/terrestrial_planet| Earth-like] [[terrestrial planets]], and "[[almost surely]]" by the same mathematical principle. ==Planetary Characteristics== There are limitations to what parameter ranges such planet will exist, survive, and thrive. The main climate type of the planet will be conducive to the forest plant life, and abundant (local version of) precipitation would be necessary, i.e. rain. ===Physical Characteristics=== Such a planet would require a minimum amount of water or equivalent major life component. Hydrospheric (or equivalent) percentages would fall between 29.10% minimum and a 71.90% maximum.{{Fact|date=January 2008}} ===Orbit Characteristics=== The orbit of such a planet can not take it too close (periastron) to its star or the plant life would burn. The orbit of such a planet can not take it too far (apoastron) from its star or the plant life would freeze. Although current understanding of forest planet life is that it can hibernate for periods of time, long lasting winters would have a petrification effect that would lead to severe erosion of biomatter and cause death. ==Physical Appearance== === Appearance of planet from space === Depending on the orbit characteristics of the planet, there will be seasons if the axial tilt is greater than nil. <br />And even if the axial tilt is nil there may be sufficient eccentricity to the orbit to cause a periastron/apoastron season cycle. Such planets may appear green if forest is made mainly of Earth-compatible trees. This type of planet may also appear in other colors such as red if some forest is made not only of [[trees]], for example tree size [[mushrooms]]. If the forest planet is made of trees, the planets may appear green only for part of its year. When it is autumn, the color of planet changes to autumn colors such as yellow, orange, red and brown, because tree leaves change to these colors like it does on Earth. When it is winter, most trees lost all the leaves and planet may appear brown by the presence of wood. It may also appear white in some spots because of its snow on its planet's surface. When spring comes, the planet color will turn back green as leaves in the most trees grow. By summer, the planet will be greenest. In contrast, though, mushrooms don't change colors throughout a seasonal year. ==Detection and Classification== Another complicating factor in the search of criteria is that only a tiny portion of a planet needs to be habitable to support some "Forest" life. Astrobiologists often concern themselves with "microenvironments" noting that "we lack a fundamental understanding of how evolutionary forces, such as mutation, selection, and genetic drift, operate in microorganisms that act on and respond to changing microenvironments."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/roadmap/g5.html |title=Understand the evolutionary mechanisms and environmental limits of life |work=Astrobiology: Roadmap|publisher=[[NASA]] |month=September |year=2003|accessdate=2007-08-06}}</ref> More mainstream researchers have arrived at related conclusions, however, without necessarily accepting the [[teleology]] implied by Lovelock. [[David Grinspoon]] has suggested a "Living Worlds hypothesis" in which our understanding of what constitutes a life-bearing planet. Planets that are geologically and meteorologically alive are much more likely to be biologically alive as well and "a planet and its life will co-evolve."<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1720 |title=The Living Worlds Hypothesis |accessdate=2007-08-06 |date=September 22, 2005|publisher=Astrobiology Magazine }}</ref> ==Further Study== So far forest planets have been found to occur mainly in science fiction, such as Star Wars and Star Trek. *[[Terraforming of Venus]] - future Forest Planets *[[Terraforming of Mars]] - future Forest Planets *[[Chicken or the egg]] - the teleology of planets ==See also== * [[Forest]] * [[Hypothetical planets]] :*[[Vulcan (hypothetical planet)]] *[[Hypothetical planetary object]] * [[Planets in science fiction]] :[[List of Star Wars moons]] ::[[Forest moon of Endor]] :*[[Desert planet]] :*[[Ocean planet]] * [[Extraterrestrial skies]] * [[Planetary science]] :*[[Planet]] :* [[Minor planet]] :* [[Dwarf planet]] * [[Planetary system]] * [[Landings on other planets]] * [[Planetary habitability]] * [[Infinite monkey theorem]] ==References== {{reflist}} ==External links== *{{Sww}} *[http://www.starwars.com/databank/location/endor/index.html Endor] at star wars databank. *[http://www.theforce.net/swtc/holocaust.html Endor 'Holocaust'] at Star Wars Technical Commentaries.

There you go. DS (talk) 19:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Chicago White Sox season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Matt Harvey and Mike Baxter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Chicago White Sox season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ice planet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enceladus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barren planet

See "Home Soil" for ethical issues with terraforming barren planets in science fiction. Viriditas (talk) 00:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of I (Almost) Got Away With It episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osceola County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Profit of Doom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at your wiki for predicted elements

Just a note that elements 165 and 166 (your pasturium and hubbium?) make +3 and +4 states (and perhaps more?) with 7d, not 8p1/2. Due to relativistic effects 8p1/2 is buried together with 8s by this point! Thus 172 shouldn't be able to make +10.

(If you love high oxidation states, you can go crazy with them in the superactinides. Pyykkö predicted that element 148 should be able to go up to the +12 state.)

On the superactinides: the region around 128 should be mostly tetravalent in simple compounds (halides, oxides blah blah blah) but should not need much convincing to go up to insanely high values like +10 or even perhaps +12. By 132 though the craziness will have ceased and anything beyond +6 should be very difficult. 140 and its region should have trouble going past +3 and +4, and 154 should be extremely noble and need considerable persuasion to go even to +2. The superactinide contraction should be around 20 pm per element.

On beyond 172: These should be "superactinides Mk. 2" with generally lower oxidation states. For example 184 should be mostly +4 in aqueous solutions and +5 and +6 in solids. Anything beyond +6 is very unrealistic, as the 6g shell is so buried that ionizing its electrons also ionizes 9s and 9p1/2! I can't tell you where this ends unfortunately, as nobody bothered to predict it. :-(

On melting points, boiling points, and colours: I honestly dunno. Is there some way to predict melting and boiling points from properties we do know? (Or we can extrapolate them and take into account the additional "g-block" insertion...) Double sharp (talk) 15:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good to learn that elements 165 and 166 share electrons with 7d, not 8s and 8p1/2 because they are buried, so pasturium can go up to +5 and hubbium to +6, you agree. This is unlike two above elements, which share 7s and 7p1/2. I knew that for superactinides, the highest oxidation states occur around element 128, due to their low ionization energies. Then ionization energies would slowly get higher with increasing Z until element 154, which I know is the most noble metal on the periodic table. I predicted melting and boiling points based on electron configurations or elements above it. I also well aware of closed shell affecting phase transition points. For amperium (element 158), for example, I have melting and boiling points lot lower than tungsten and seaborgium above it, due to its closed 7d3/2 orbital. For faradium (element 148), due to its interplay between closed 6f5/2 and half-filled 7d3/2, I have melting point about the same as lead (over 600 K) but its boiling point is over 5500 K. I know relativistic effects affect energy exchange of electrons between orbitals, which in turn affect colors. Well, look at the famous case of gold, it is uniquely yellow, and it is prelude to greater variety of colors for metals with higher atomic numbers. For example, keplerium (element 163, two rows below gold), can sometimes be called "red gold" because the metal is orange (red + gold = orange) due to same reason why gold is yellow. Metals in periods 8 and 9 can be blue (ex: kelvinium (element 157)), lime green (ex: vanthoffium (element 155)), teal (ex: faradium), red (ex: amperium), apricot (ex: lavoisium (element 121)), or other colors. That's what I'm going to plan on doing for elements beyond 172, but instead of creating individual articles about elements beyond 172, I'll create an article called transramsium element, and I'll include info about element 184.
Maybe you forgot to mention nuclear stabilities. The trends of generally decreasing maximum half-lives for increasing atomic numbers is believed to be close to correct, and values are estimated. Elements 122, 124 and 126 have max half-lives of billions of years, with a 117 billion year half-life for 126. After this element, max half-lives generally decrease with increasing atomic numbers. I predict that maximum half-life for element 137 (feynmanium) has a half-life of only 1 millisecond. I predict there will be increase in max half-lives from element 158-164. The element with shortest maximum half-life on the 172-element periodic table is element 171 (bunsenium) with half-life of just 1.4 nanoseconds, and the element after that has a max half-life of 162 nanoseconds. The lightest 14 elements beyond 118 undergo mainly alpha decay, and then undergo cluster decay then spontaneous fission for odd-numbered lighter elements, followed by even-numbered heavier elements.
I will update individual element articles in about two months, as well as datas on table pages, especially some oxidation states, plus their atomic masses and their derivatives. I now think that atomic masses were overestimated you see. For nowadays, I'm in progress using Microsoft Word, and in November I will copypaste to articles. Also I'll create new articles, including transramsium element mentioned, transmoscovium element, series of elements, and up to couple others. PlanetStar 22:45, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, islands of stability around 122 and 164, with off-shoots at 114, 126, and 184.
Yeah, the atomic masses are really heavy. Fricke's predictions seem closer (504 for element 172).
I personally predicted that (using your names for now) pasturium(I) should behave like potassium or silver, pasturium(III) like thallium(III), and pasturium(V) like your average transition metal. (Hubbium(II) like calcium, hubbium(IV) like tin(IV) or lead(IV), hubbium(VI) like your average transition metal.) What do you think? (I could very well be wrong.) Double sharp (talk) 08:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
You deserve it for your substantial work related to exoplanets. Stilgar27 (talk) 14:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! PlanetStar 20:35, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Scum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enslaved (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Eye for an Eye song.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eye for an Eye song.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Starbox threeplanets

Template:Starbox threeplanets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Double tap.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Double tap.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Frontlines song.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Frontlines song.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Eye for an Eye song.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eye for an Eye song.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Back to the Primitive.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Back to the Primitive.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Carved Inside.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Carved Inside.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:World Scum.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:World Scum.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Umbabarauma.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Umbabarauma.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Downstroy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Downstroy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Soulfly Bleed.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Soulfly Bleed.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tribe song.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tribe song.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Son Song.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Son Song.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Seek 'n' Strike.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Seek 'n' Strike.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Prophecy song.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Prophecy song.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Omicron Velorum Cluster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Omicron Velorum Cluster.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Teenage Girl.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Teenage Girl.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tribe (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Aboriginal and Maori
Carved Inside (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Old school
Double Tap (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Operation Geronimo
Prophecy (Soulfly song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Prophecy (album)
Rise of the Fallen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Digital download
Seek 'n' Strike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Digital download
Tree of Pain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Digital download
Unleash (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ambient
World Scum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Digital download

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seek 'n' Strike.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seek 'n' Strike.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed move

Although I'm pleased to have found out that you created a talk page attributing the text, you still didn't discuss this move so I've reverted it. Start a discussion and get consensus - which will probably take a couple of weeks given the holiday period. Dougweller (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]