User talk:PizzaMan/Archive 3

Please comment on Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry at DRN

You asked at DRN, "I'd still like some advice on how to deal with an editor who keeps reverting without engaging in dialogue on the talk page." There's no fixed answer to that, but see my recommendations here. Having said that, however, I really don't see that as what has happened here. Once you posted to the article talk page, your opponent made quite a substantial reply in three posts. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)[reply]

Thank you, TransporterMan, that's just what i was looking for. He did revert after i explicitly pointed him to the talk page. His argument was "nonsense" even after the two other editors who expressed an opinion on the matter (Cal-linux and Mmetro) shared my point of view. Anyway there's an rfc now. He invited people on the big bang theory talk page, which will skew the opinions towards notability of 73 in the big bang theory rather than the other way around, but i can handle the discussion on that. PizzaMan (♨♨) 18:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:73 (number) RfC

Sorry to be a pain but it's glaringly obvious that without breaking the Talk:73 (number) RfC into separate "survey" and "discussion" sections, it's going to be impossible for anyone to determine the outcome of the RfC. Your opinion seems clear but it would be inappropriate for anyone else to formalise your desired outcome in the "survey" section so could you please do so when you have some time. Thanks. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, User:AussieLegend, thank you for notifying me of that. Please also notify the other editors if you haven't done so. Some people (on both sides) dropped their opinion but didn't engage in dialogue, so perhaps we will see more dialogue if they revisit the talk page. PizzaMan (♨♨) 17:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your question at Talk:G._Edward_Griffin#RfC:_.22conspiracy_theorist.22_in_first_sentence. Atsme☯^Consult 22:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I again responded to your question at Talk:G._Edward_Griffin#Survey

Please comment on Talk:Islamic calendar

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamic calendar. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:International Space Station

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:International Space Station. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Azure

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Azure. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Lloviu virus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lloviu virus. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Los Angeles Fire Department

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Los Angeles Fire Department. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Foie gras

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foie gras. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

hi Pizzaman it is dfrr i thought you would want this cute kitten.

Dfrr (talk) 23:34, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Magneto (generator)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Magneto (generator). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Brown rice

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brown rice. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Please comment on Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your comments on my arbcom candidacy - and good luck on your PhD! On the neurology and medicine articles, you probably already follow the WikiProject Medicine talk page, but in case you're looking for more articles to work on, Category:Science articles needing expert attention and its subcats are a good place to find some that are really neglected and in need of work (and unlikely to lead to an arbcom case ;) Opabinia regalis (talk) 23:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edits

No, I did not "completely removed my edit" nor am "trying to discourage occasional editors from contributing". The information added was copyedited for clarity and brevity. Your wording was too detailed and put too much weight on a subject that could be explained in just two sentences. ViperSnake151  Talk  03:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see that some of it was left in because i didn't expect it where it was. Why not give this Windows 10 version it's own heading, ViperSnake151? PizzaMan (♨♨) 04:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It does not need its own heading no matter how much you insist. It is merely an OEM-only version of Home which designates participation in a Microsoft program. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Bering Sea Gold

An article that you have been involved in editing—Bering Sea Gold —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.  Paine  ^u/c 03:15, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PizzaMan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]