User talk:Pincerr

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pincerr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ysangkok (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to PS3 and Xbox 360 articles

Hi there. I thought I should probably let you know that I have reverted your edits to the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 articles. I do not wish to discourage your editing of wikipedia, and the information you added seems accurate (for the most part), it just doesn't belong in the intro, at least in the form it was in. Release dates for both consoles are region specific, so any mention of them should reflect that. Also, it is not important or overarching enough to belong in the intro. The intro is supposed to be a blurb giving only the most relevent information so that people who do not need details (such as release dates in their respective locations) don't have to read through it. Let's take the Xbox 360 article as an example.

  • "The Xbox 360 is the second video game console produced by Microsoft, and the successor to the Xbox. The Xbox 360 competes with Sony's PlayStation 3 and Nintendo's Wii as part of the seventh generation of video game consoles."
    This provides quick, almost bullet-pointed info no the manufacturer, successor and brand. The links to the competitors are relevent so as to easily provide a comparison. This is relevent to all regions.
  • "Some major features of the Xbox 360 are its integrated Xbox Live service that allows players to compete online, download arcade games, game demos, trailers, TV shows, music and movies and its Windows Media Center multimedia capabilities. The Xbox 360 also offers region specific access to third-party media streaming services such as Netflix in the USA or Sky TV in the UK."
    This shows the main features of the 360, informing people of what it does, both showing unique features and features which compare with other systems. Again, this is relevent to all regions.
  • "The Xbox 360 was officially unveiled on MTV on May 12, 2005, with detailed launch and game information divulged later that month at the Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3). The console sold out completely upon release in all regions except in Japan and, as of January 2010, there are over 39 million Xbox 360 consoles worldwide. The Xbox 360 is currently available in two configurations—the "Arcade" and the "Elite"—each with its own selection of accessories."
    This is again relevent to all regions. The date it was announced is not specific to a region (MS simply told the world it existed, what it did etc) and it also shows how popular it is (sales wise) and what versions are currently made, which is relevent to consumers.

As you can hopefully see, all that information is likelly to relevent to a large proportion of people reading the article, while the US/Canada release date is unlikelly to be for anyone outside of North America, and if it is, then they are likelly to wnat more information than can be provided in the intro, so will read the other sections.

I hope I have explained this well enough.

AlphathonTM (talk) 13:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The information regarding the PS3s manufacturer is just wrong I'm afraid. AlphathonTM (talk) 13:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, don't worry about it. You are obviously trying to improve the articles, rather than vandalise them or something. I can understand why you added the info you did - you felt it was relevent. Unfortunatelly, when it was first sold isn't all that relevent for current consoles (it might be for older ones like the SNES or Dreamcast or whatever, as it releates to lifespan). If worded properly and put in in a relevent place it may be relevent to the intro even on current-gen consoles (for example, if it was in relation to the sales...like "...over 39 million Xbox 360 consoles worldwide since its North American launch on <insert date here>"...although the wording would have to changed in such a way as to make it flow properly) but it is not relevent enough in its own right.
As for the manufacturer of the PS3, it is not manufactured by SCEI, but by a separate division of SONY - Sony EMCS. Look here: [1] (a google translation of the Japanese Wikipedia article on the division - there is no english article on it for some reason, and I don't know enough about it to accuratelly convert the Japanese one for the English site - otherwise I'd do it myself). AlphathonTM (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monster 4x4: Stunt Racer

The article Monster 4x4: Stunt Racer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Template:Microsoft Windows family

Hi, Gaming&Computing

What is this persistent business of these non-constructive edits to Template:Microsoft Windows family? Why do you insist on misrepresenting Windows 2000 as a strictly-server OS or a strictly-client OS? And why do you keep adding duplicate links? Whistler redirects to Development of Windows XP which is already in the template. And why do you keep adding a second link to Windows 2000? (We do not added a second link an anchor section to a navbox, unless that section is requently visited.)

Please stop these non-constructive edits. you are welcome to add constructive edits to Wikipedia.

Fleet Command (talk) 20:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Pincerr. You have new messages at Reach Out to the Truth's talk page.
Message added 21:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

8th gen article

Please see WP:BRD and WP:3RR. Adding the information the first time is bold, and appropriate, but once its revert, you are supposed to stop and discuss it, not readd it to insist you are right. That edit-warring. --MASEM (t) 18:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and also as I said in my edit summary, please read WP:V and WP:RS, as they explain policies that say that reliable, third party sources are needed to include info in wikipedia articles. Your claims about EVO 2 and 8th gen lack this, as of right now. Sergecross73 msg me 18:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EVO 2 on official site.png

For info on how to properly label File:EVO 2 on official site.png to comply with policy, please read over Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. You need to add a fair-use rationale to the page or it will likely be deleted. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 22:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much; since the copyright of the image doesn't belong to you, you cannot licence it and are only allowed to put it on Wikipedia under the US fair-use doctrine. To see vaguely how it's done have a look at another non-free image, such as a software/game screenshot, or a copyrighted logo. A good example would be File:PSP E1000.png, since it is also a non-free promotional image of an item. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 18:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "Rip-off"

I did remove it manually. If you look at the diff between what was already there before you edited and my edit afterwards (can be found here) you should see some of your additions/changes remain. Other than removing "rip-off", I only changed "type" to "notes" (since "type" is far to vague) and removed instances of "main" (which were under "type") since that doesn't really make sense, especially with the column changed to "notes". (What does "main" mean in either context?) Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 19:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It really depends what you're trying to convey - if you mean something that's based on old hardware (NES or whatever) then "NES clone" (or "SNES clone" or whatever) would be more appropriate. If you mean the external design, then as you suggested "resemblance" would be a far better way of putting it… so something like "resembles the Nintendo Wii".
Also, if you don't specify that it is a clone of an existing system (or whatever) in the notes column, it can be assumed to be a stand-alone console with its own games, and that way you don't have to have one column for "type" (which is vague anyway) and another for miscellaneous facts.
Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean a "resemblance section"? Do you mean like a separate column for what a console resembles? If so, I don't think that's really necessary, as it fits pretty well in the misc column, and there would be many it wouldn't apply to. I was thinking like this:
Name Manufacturer Release date Notes
Game Wave Family Entertainment System ZAPiT Games 2005 Built-in family games
Vii Jungle Soft 2007 Resembles the Nintendo Wii
< Example console that looks like a PS1 but plays built in NES games > NES clone with integrated ROMs
Resembles the PlayStation 1
Seems OK, but I'm still not sure it justifies its own section. Also, saying there aren't consoles that resemble the PS3/360 is false (e.g. the PolyStation 3) and even if there weren't, you can't just assert that it's because of the motion controller (if I had to guess, I'd say it was because of the Wii's relative popularity and possibly the tech-savyness of potential PS3/360 buyers vs Wii buyers). Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 21:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resemblance

Hi, I thought I should maybe briefly explain why "Resemblance"/"Resemblances"/"Resembles" don't make sense there. A resemblance is something that an object or person has, a state of being if you will. For example, "The Vii has a resemblance to the Wii", which means "the Vii looks similar to the Wii". To say something resembles something else is to say it has said resemblance, so the previous sentence can also be worded "The Vii resembles the Wii". As such, putting "Resemblance" or "Resemblances" as the title suggests that the section is talking about the visual similarities, not the consoles that possess that property, while "Resembles" doesn't work as a title at all (in this context at least - the only place it would work is if the section is about the word resembles, so would only really be found in articles about language). I hope this has made things a bit clearer. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 20:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The only way I can think of that "Resemblance" would make sense in such a heading would be if the heading were "Consoles that have a resemblance to other consoles" or "Consoles that resemble other consoles", neither of which is very concise, and they doesn't really get across the idea that the resemblance is intentional. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, got it.--Gaming&Computing (talk) 16:01, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS2 image

Hi. As you may have noticed, I have reverted both you changes to the PS2 images and the PS2 article. For the image(s), the original versions of both are FAR higher resolution and the original PNG included transparency (which was the only reason it was saved in PNG format - otherwise JPEG is preferred for photos). If you wish for the order to be flipped (and I can certainly see the logic behind it), that can be done quite easily, but it must be done properly. The change must not degrade the quality in any meaningful way (as your edits did), especially as the reason for the change is so minimal (while possibly preferable in the new order, it isn't worth quality degradation). Also bear in mind that those images are on Wikimedia Commons, and the PNG version is included on various other Wikipedias besides the English one. as such, the captions etc on those pages would also need to be changed. If you really feel the need to flip them, then I will do so; I work with images professionally so can do it (properly) and it would likely take less time than it would to upload. Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 20:06, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There you go: File:PS2 versions (reversed).png. Have at it. Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 21:59, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As mentioned, other versions of Wikipedia are still using the original order, so the captions etc would need to be changed. If they wish to reverse it they are free to, but I see no reason to force them. P.S. I did give a reasons for the reversions - did you even look at the edit summaries? Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 22:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure I can, but not now (it's a (slightly) more complicated edit, so will take longer than I have at the moment). Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 22:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EVO 2 on official site.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EVO 2 on official site.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

EVO 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to PC, PCI, Charity, Portable and RJ45

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evo 2 and 8th Gen

It's simple. Provide a reliable source calling it 8th gen. Otherwise, it should not be listed as such. It has been challenged, and so it is your burden to provide a source. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 15:56, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you noticed that the PS4 has no article, and has no mentioning on the 8th gen article? You just proved my very point. Look, if it's as obvious as you keep on saying, then you should have no problem providing a source... Sergecross73 msg me 16:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. What was the point of providing an irrelevant example then? Sergecross73 msg me 16:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not add it until there's a source. Please read WP:VERIFY. Chances are though, it wouldn't take hardly any time to find such a source, as Sony and the Playstation Brand is much more widely accepted and viewed as a video game system in part of the generations, and thus, such a source would pop up relatively quickly. Sergecross73 msg me 16:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There's most discussion going on about this on my talk page now, FYI. Sergecross73 msg me 20:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would think it goes without saying, but it should go both ways: Do not add Evo 2 to the 8th gen article either, as you did here. Sergecross73 msg me 20:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:EVO 2 on official site.png

Thanks for uploading File:EVO 2 on official site.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:EVO 2 ad.png

Hello, Pincerr!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:EVO 2 ad.png. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited I'm Watch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Italian and Santa Clara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Electronic Entertainment Expo 2012

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Electronic Entertainment Expo 2012, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 21:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Image (EVO 2 console.png)

I've taken a look at it and while it is indeed dark, it appears that that is largely because it is a black console. Also, it is not so dark that detail cannot be seen. As such I don't feel that any editing is necessary.

If it appears too dark to you (such that you cannot see it properly) then it is certainly possible that you need to tweak your monitor's settings/computer's display settings. Quite a lot of people (even some professionals believe it or not) have their monitors calibrated to give the highest possible contrast, or to make it as bright as possible, or whatever. This is also how many monitors (and TVs for that matter) are set up by default, as it makes the what is displayed more "impactful", and so people are more likely to be drawn to them in shops (it increases sales). However, this is not a good way to view things accurately, as it throws off colour calibration and causes details in the low and high ends of the scale get lost, especially in dark images like that (or similarly bright images). Many consumer monitors (especially laptop screens) also don't handle brightness particularly well anyway, which exacerbates the problem.

Anyway, I'll take a look at it on some of my other screens to see how it shows up on not-so-high-end screens, and if it doesn't display well on those, I'll see if I can "optimise" it a wee bit (the image is useless if most people can't see it properly after all).

Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 22:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Cloned video game console, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third-party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EVO Pocket.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EVO Pocket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012 in video gaming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Android
EVO 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to AAA
Envizions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Storage device

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EVO 2 and Next Gen (Again)

Please, before re-adding EVO 2 yet again, please discuss on the articles talk page, and wait until there is consensus. One person agreeing with you doesn't make a consensus, and even that person who "agrees", says that the EVO 2 info would have to be scaled way back in detail, so this edit wouldn't be acceptable. But there's no consensus either way yet, so you need to wait. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 23:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

6th gen listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 6th gen. Since you had some involvement with the 6th gen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). -- ferret (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EVO 2 ad.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EVO 2 ad.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EVO 2 console.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EVO 2 console.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited PlayStation Vita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Switchbladeconcept.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Switchbladeconcept.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Cloned video game console

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cloned video game console, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Uzma Gamal (talk) 16:11, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

McRoll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Japanese
Rickrolling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Japanese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Video game clone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yobo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of McRoll

The article McRoll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this is a notable meme. No reliable sources appear to discuss it. YouTube videos, a few blogs, a few wikis...but no real source that I could find

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onorem♠Dil 22:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article PlayStation 2, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
If the Sony "Net Play" is a real thing, please cite sources about it. I was unable to find any sourced regarding it. TreyGeek (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to PlayStation 2. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 19:01, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS2 NTSC online

As far as I can tell, North American covers have a completely different logo/icon in the bottom right corner. I'm currently looking for an example that isn't on a blacklisted website so I can link you to it. I have no idea what Japanese versions have. Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 15:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here's a comparison, using TimeSplitters: Future Perfect as the example:
North American Version
UK (PAL) Version
Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 15:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Dreamcast network games, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages POD and Online gaming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Network Q RAC Rally Championship (1993)

Hi,

I notice you started this article. The article is titled "Network Q RAC Rally Championship (1993)", but the box and other searches indicate that it's simply titled "Network Q RAC Rally" (i.e. no "Championship"). Is there any reason for this? Cheers. Ubcule (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Comment copied from Ubcule's talk page):- Hi. Oh yes, I've just realised it is in fact called simply Network Q RAC Rally. It is part of the Rally Championship series however... --Gaming&Computing (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Is this an officially-declared series, or just a succession of (obviously related but not officially grouped) games. If it's the second, then the Lombard RAC Rally game probably belongs there as well. Ubcule (talk) 18:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AC3WiiU.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:AC3WiiU.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mephistophelian (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GPCWiiU.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GPCWiiU.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:JustDance4WiiUcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:JustDance4WiiUcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited History of video game consoles (sixth generation), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OS and S60 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aliyun OS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alibaba
Bounce (video game) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to S40

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MiGen

The article MiGen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Consisting of basically primary sources, there's no notability here. No reliable sources found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Яehevkor ✉ 00:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

MiGen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Audio, Keyboard, PC, SD and Ubuntu
WikiPad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to HD, Tablet and Tablet PC
Archos GamePad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tablet and Tablet PC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PlayStation 2 online functionality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Online gaming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:EVO 2 ad.png)

Thanks for uploading File:EVO 2 ad.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tekken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dead or Alive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:EVO 2 logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:EVO 2 logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:EVO Pocket ad.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:EVO Pocket ad.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:EVO 2 cropped.png)

Thanks for uploading File:EVO 2 cropped.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EPOC (operating system)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of EPOC (operating system), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://english.turkcebilgi.com/EPOC+(computing).

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 23:50, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Symbian, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages EPOC and S60 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Development of Windows XP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:EVO 2 cropped.png)

Thanks for uploading File:EVO 2 cropped.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sailfish OS, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mobile and Tablet PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Wii U Pro white black.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wii U Pro white black.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Use of non-free content in articles

I've reverted a number of changes that you made to Windows XP. Most noticeably, the addition of several images to the article breached our non-free content policy. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. (see WP:NFCC#8 All non-free content requires a non-free use rationale for each article in which it is used (see WP:NFCC#10), and only low-resolution content is permitted. (See WP:NFCC#10) Typically, a 300px or less width meets this requirement. Per WP:IMAGESIZE, image sizes should not generally be forced unless there is good reason to do so, and there are drawbacks to forcing image sizes. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I indicated above, all non-free content requires a non-free use rationale for each article in which it is used (see WP:NFCC#10). The images that you added to Windows XP do not have appropriate non-free use rationales for use in that article, which is the main reason that they were removed previously. Further, galleries are generally discouraged. Images should be placed near appropriate content, but articles are not image farms. See Wikipedia:Image use policy for more guidance. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also as I've explained above, image sizes shouldn't be forced unless there is good reason. i.e. when adding images, just use [[File:name.ext|thumb|right|description]], not [[File:name.ext|thumb|right|250px|description]]. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:XP Welcome.png

Thank you for uploading File:XP Welcome.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 16:25, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FURs

This is not an adequated non-free use rationale. Each FUR must be detailed, explaining why the image is used. Compare what you added with the files existing, appropriate, FUR, including File:Windows Media Center on Windows XP.png, which has FURs for multiple articles. Instead of simply edit-warring, perhaps you should ask for advice before restoring non-free content to the article. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:XP Control Panel.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:XP Control Panel.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Your recent editing history at Windows XP shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please participate in the talk page discussion concerning your edits, as multiple editors dispute them. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should be aware that, regardless of the polite warning above, you have actually breached 3RR, haveing made 4 clear reverts in only 4 hours. --AussieLegend (✉) 04:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Pincerr. You have new messages at Jasper Deng's talk page.
Message added 21:40, 1 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thinking you are right and even explaining why in edit summaries is no license for edit warring. Jasper Deng (talk) 21:40, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:XP Welcome.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XP Welcome.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 04:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

As indicated on the article's talk page in this discussion and in this edit summary, File:XP Welcome.png was removed from Windows XP because there is no consensus to breach our non-free content policy by adding files without appropriate non-free use rationales to the article. You have been warned about edit-warring at the article and have previously breached the three-revert rule. Yet, even after I suggested to you that you should ask for advice before restoring non-free content to the article, you've gone ahead and restored File:XP Welcome.png to the article without doing so, knowing full well that it is deficient.[2] You simply cannot continue to breach policies, especially important policies like WP:NFCC. You should consider this your final warning. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:XP Control Panel.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:XP Control Panel.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Refimprove

Netscape Navigator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Hi, I have reverted your last edit and brining back the refimprove maintain tag. That long article has indeed too less references and contains too much uncited/original research. mabdul 22:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nintendo 64 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 1997 in Brazil. It is Nintendo's last home console to use [[ROM cartridge]]s to store games (Nintendo switched to a [[MiniDVD]]-based format for the successor [[GameCube]]. Succeeded by

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Nintendo 3DS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NFC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Information icon Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Nokia N1. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Date formats typically depend on "strong national ties to the subject". MDY is only used on articles relating to subjects with close ties to the United States or other countries that use MDY dates. Europe (and Finland) uses DMY ViperSnake151  Talk  00:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nokia Nseries, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages N82 and N86. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hi there. Can you...slow down a bit? Maybe make a lot more smaller edits rather than one or two massive ones? Myself and other editors are finding a lot of factual errors and original research in your work - you're taking too many liberties and making too many assumptions from the information actually presented in the sources. If you make smaller edits (and address these sorts of problems) then so much of your work won't be lost. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 13:47, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PlayStation Portable, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Atari Lynx, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atari_Lynx&diff=646572011&oldid=640386129

I am echoing what Sergecross73 and others have told you above. Do you not understand what WP:OR and WP:RS and WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK are? They are the absolutely mandatory cornerstones of what an encyclopedia is, and all contributions that defy these principles must be removed. People would be quite happy to explain it, possibly even to go through a step by step analysis with you. Seriously, we know it's a real challenge and nobody is lesser for not completely understanding it. Please check your sources at WP:VGRS and if you think it should be on the list but it isn't, then ask about it at the Talk page, because it's loaded with reliable experts who can say for sure. Also do you see how many warnings you've gotten about disambiguation links? Don't you want your research and writing to be worth anything, rather than wasting everyone's time in forcing them to just delete it? Why are you blasting past so many warnings without replying? I am warning you that people get blocked for doing things like this or not unlike this. Also, please fill in your citations, like with reflinks. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 00:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to comment on your reverts of my edits. They are improvements because they prove a point that is not opinion based (from me) but rather more a fact. For example, the fact that the Sega Nomad sold poorly (1 million) is a fact - I don't want to sound rude but it's common sense if you know about the market. --G&CP (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I should add more references that prove this point? (that way the information would be more reliable since there are several sources claiming that point). I'll do whatever I can to make sure these information are mentioned. --G&CP (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@G&CP: Hey there. So are you saying that you didn't read any of the exhaustive summary explanations given to you (including some step by step long ago), nor the exhaustive set of links to policy pages given to you? Or are you saying that you did read them several times (because they are hard at first, for everyone) and you still didn't understand them? Let me know, including what you specifically don't understand, and I'll be glad to walk you through it. The specific point you just raised is explained at WP:RS even if it's not always WP:OR. I don't do this for everyone; only those who have genuine talent and desire to overcome the difficult hurdles involved in encyclopedic contributions. We can tell that you're a good writer and researcher. By the way, I did follow my own advice by taking some of your sources to WP:VGRS and getting some investigated and vetted. Thanks. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 23:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I've taken a quick look at those Wikipedia policy pages. This is what I've understood:
  • Original research refers to information that is not claimed in a reliable source. In my case, the assumptions that I made were actually mentioned from the source(s).
  • Identifying reliable sources mean that the published references will need to be reliable enough. If I add more than one source claiming my assumptions than it should be more reliable right?
  • Neutral point of view is, like its title would suggest. In my case, I wrote in Atari Lynx for instance that it had very good graphics (a positive point) but a weak software library (a negative point). What's not so neutral about that?
  • Peacocks is something I clearly understand and admit that I done wrong. I will make sure that words such as great or award-winning would be referred to the actual source.
I personally believe the Reliable sources and Neutral POV policies can be applied to my given information if there is more than just one source which I added. When there are multiple sources claiming a point, the information is more reliable and neutral. The Peacocks policy is clearly an misunderstanding from me which I know I done wrong. However the original research policy, I don't understand why it has been cased. The information I stated in the article were clearly written in the given source. What's your say to this? --G&CP (talk) 14:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Albabrandlogo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Albabrandlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BlackBerry Messenger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proprietary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nokia
added links pointing to CRT, S60, Clamshell and N-Gage

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neo Geo (system), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Verbatim Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SmartDisk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

GD-ROM
added a link pointing to Arcade
QuickTime
added a link pointing to Mac
Saber Rider and the Star Sheriffs - The Game
added a link pointing to Run and gun

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Dreamcast games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homebrew. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NEO XYX DC.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NEO XYX DC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pier-solar-hd-dreamcast.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pier-solar-hd-dreamcast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMD global, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Royalty and Household name. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nokia N9, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gizmondo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

CAANOO
added a link pointing to Homebrew
PC-FX
added a link pointing to Composite

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Style and use of galleries within articles (WP:GALLERY)

Hi there,

I notice you added a rather large gallery of audio cassettes to the TDK article. Thanks for your contribution; however, as AussieLegend noted back in 2012, "galleries are generally discouraged". While *some* images of the type you added might be useful, the overall quantity and similarity of the content is probably excessive according to the gallery guidelines:-

"Images in a gallery should be carefully selected, avoiding similar or repetitive images, unless a point of contrast or comparison is being made. [..] Wikipedia is not an image repository. A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article, and a gallery consisting of an indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject should generally either be improved in accordance with the above paragraph or moved to Wikimedia Commons."

I've kept the gallery, but trimmed it to three representative images and widened it out to cover more of the company's products.

Hope this explains things,

Ubcule (talk) 20:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, G&CP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, G&CP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HMDgloballogo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HMDgloballogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pear Linux listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pear Linux. Since you had some involvement with the Pear Linux redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mikomi

The article Mikomi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This doesn't look like a notable company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Gorthian (talk) 21:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

TurboGrafx-16
added links pointing to CRT and Composite
PC-FX
added a link pointing to 3D

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Wikipadtablet.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wikipadtablet.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asterix: Mega Madness for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asterix: Mega Madness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asterix: Mega Madness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 03:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Network Q RAC Rally (video game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Network Q RAC Rally (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network Q RAC Rally (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pear Linux for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pear Linux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pear Linux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pincerr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suomen Kumitehtaan logo (1965).svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Suomen Kumitehtaan logo (1965).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Excitehomepage21012010.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Excitehomepage21012010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rally Championship

Template:Rally Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bionicle: Matoran Adventures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bionicle: Matoran Adventures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bionicle: Matoran Adventures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 18:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bionicle: Maze of Shadows for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bionicle: Maze of Shadows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bionicle: Maze of Shadows until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 18:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nokian logo (1865).svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nokian logo (1865).svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PacMania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PacMania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PacMania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 17:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jet Set Racing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jet Set Racing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet Set Racing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GamerPro64 00:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PS2Online.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PS2Online.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PS2Online.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PS2Online.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]