User talk:Philg88/Archive 7
HiHi, sorry for changing Stroke information. I am currently writing a report for uni purposes on Wikipedia about authentic information, who monitors this information and how fast corrections take place once someone edits false information. Gotta say, im impressed :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.175.222 (talk) 08:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Plea to change elementsPhilg88, In sense of discussion here I would like to appeal on You with request for "Vandal 2" deletion from me. I just claim for two-sided misunderstanding. My apologize. --89.176.227.251 (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
RE: Zajdi, zajdi, jasno sonce Song Vandalism!!!!Hello Philg88 Zajdi, zajdi, jasno sonce Macedonian song is not written and composed by Aleksandar Sarievski !! Aleksandar Sarievski was just a Folk singer not composer or song writer, so reference to him "composing and writing" this song is Vandalism. This song is much older than he was and there is on way that could compose or write this song. Aleksandar Sarievski just recorded this song among many other traditional Macedonian songs in post WWII Yugoslavia era in early 1950's on Jugodisc Label 78rpm Record. Originally this song belongs to Macedonia and Bulgaria, since part of Bulgaria was always part of Macedonia (Reference Macedon History). Your reference to this song history given by Todevski,K. (2002) - is pure lie, deviation and making of fictional Macedonian history!!, therefore my version is not vandalism of this song it is truth and only true version on history of this song 1. ^ Тодевски, К. (2002) „Од Галичник до легенда“. Дирекција за култура и уметност, Скопје
Re:RE: Zajdi, zajdi, jasno sonce Song Vandalism!!!!please, but what do you know about history of this song to revert my edit!!! it is like talking to you about traditional Chinese song and claiming that i am the expert. You should allow my version couse simply you don't know what are you talking about —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.144.54 (talk) 02:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Re:Re:Re: Zajdi, zajdi, jasno sonce SongThat is exactly what i did ____________________________________________________________ reword the current version without removing too much. ____________________________________________________________ - claims that this song is written and composed by Aleksandar Sarievski (June 20, 1922 – December 19, 2002). [false] & I removed this entry _ Song is performed at least last 500 years Song firt time appeared on Jugodics 78rpm 1950's. Before that is was sung in weddings, when male goes to military, taverns, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.144.54 (talk) 03:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Hollingworth MagniacHello! Your submission of Hollingworth Magniac at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady (talk) 03:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
song Zajdi Zajdi sonceSong Zajdi zajdi sonce, please don't revert my edits to this songs history, couse claims that Aleksandar Sarievski composed it are [false]!!!!!! Aleksandar was Macedonian traditional music - folk singer and thats it, he was not composer nor song writer and { Zajdi zajdi song } is ancient and at least 500 years old. Im guessing Mr. Sarievski lived 500+ years Please don't make Macedonian history based on lies and fiction. I lived in SFRJ long enough to know what is what and who is who.--70.130.144.54 (talk) 10:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC) vandalism level 3?Hi, last night you left a vandalism level 3 notice on my talk page. I removed it because I think it must have been done in error. Either way, please let me kniow what happened and if it was not in error, please tell me what I did that caused such a warning and also what does "level 3" mean? Itabletboy (talk) 14:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: 采购全生命周期管理Hello — I'm just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 采购全生命周期管理, a page you tagged, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Let me know if you have any questions Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 07:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC) SecunderabadMy edits to Secunderabad are not vandalism. The previous edits made by User:Omer123hussain are POV edits which I am reverting. Refer Talk:Secunderabad--Dodgeballpro (talk) 23:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Jeld-Wen FieldThe station has officially been renamed. See timetable at http://trimet.org/schedules/w/t1100_1.htm Please undo your revision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MojaveNC (talk • contribs) 01:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Kingdom of SardiniaThanks’ for your advertisement, but before reverting, I’ve read the discussion page and I think somebody is trolling. --151.32.187.185 (talk) 11:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2011 (UTC) Hi. Please explain how my edit to Slap-a-Ham was unconstructive. I reverted edits that changed the information to Spanish (this is an English article), and moved release info into the release history box, instead of outside it. What was the unconstructive part? 72.37.244.28 (talk) 17:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
TalkbackHello, Philg88. You have new messages at Sitush's talk page.
Message added 02:39, 12 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hello, Philg88. You have new messages at Schunck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hello, Philg88. You have new messages at Schunck's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. CE on Jan Lokpal BillWhile your work copyediting Jan Lokpal Bill is helpful, I'm concerned about the timing. That article could almost have a {{current}} tag on it. It's in the top 3 news stories on several different Indian newspapers as we speak, and is actually getting multiple stories in them simultaneously. Thus, copy-editing has two problems: first, any edits you do will more than likely disappear as updated information gets added, replacing the old info, and 2) keeping the in use tag on an article about breaking news prevents other editors from adding content to the article. So, in my opinion, you probably should let the copy-editing go for now, and handle it at a later date. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
|