User talk:Peterkingiron

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Abdeslam Serghini

Hi Peter. I am writing regarding the discussion on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abdeslam_Serghini I am the author of the article and I put some comments on the talk tab of that page, but no editor is responding or willing to discuss the matter further with me. I don't even know if the editors saw my comments on the talk tab. Also, I am not sure either that this is the right way of contacting you (editors don't have a visible email or clear way of how to contact them, and please ignore my ignorance on the wikipedia subject and how it works). I agree with you that the article is very badly written and I also agree with you that it should be edited and corrected and not deleted. Some of the editors keep arguing that Abdeslam Serghini may not be notable (famous). I am from Morocco, and I am an expert on the "Sufism" field and I know all the past great scholars in Morocco. I know 100% that he was a great scholar. He taught the grand-father of the current Moroccan King. The royal family in Morocco know about him. Notability is not an issue. The editor CoffeeWithMarkets even go further by saying notability is not inherited. What CoffeeWithMarkets does not know is that those influential figures in Morocco, most of them were the student of Abdesslam Serhini, and it was the professor who taught them the activism and the one who initiated the movement in the first place. The reason the students were more famous later and more mentioned on the Internet than their professor, that is a different story, which I can explain in a different place (not here). Concerning the non-relevant (or bad) references I included in the article (some of them were mirrored by other sites, which I did not know) is because one editor told me that only English and French references can be included. I could not find any good source in English or French to include. There are however a great number of sources in Arabic, but I was not allowed to include them. I also mentioned in my comments that I have the book of Abdesslam Serghini (one of his many lectures was recorded and published as book. The book includes a detailed official biography). I am willing to upload the book, and collaborate in anyway needed to make the article well written. However, and very unfortunate, I am not hearing anything from the editors. Please advise me what to do. I have a huge respect and love for this great scholar and he deserves to be on wikipedia. I can even contact the royal family in Morocco and provide a confirmation from them that he was a very notable great scholar.

Thanks Peter. I can be notified by email at [e-mail] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sid.bm (talk • contribs) 19:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notification

You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at Template talk:Succession box#RfC. Please see a related discussion at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#RfC Congressmen's tenures in infobox. Kraxler (talk) 15:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Irish language in Britain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irish language in Britain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish language in Britain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

University of Leeds accommodation

Peter You contributed to the deletion discussion last year. I have hopefully improved the article and would appreciate your comment. I am considering renaming it University of Leeds halls of residence although Nottingham uses upper case H and R? I have added to the list and included partnership buildings as there will probably be 100% privatization eventually. Keomike (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Next meetups in North England

Hello. Would you be interested in attending one of the next wikimeets in the north of England? They will take place in:

• Leeds on 12th April 2015
• Manchester on 26th April 2015
• Liverpool on 24th May 2015

If you can make them, please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page!

If you want to receive future notifications about these wikimeets, then please add your name to the notification list (or remove it if you're already on the list and you don't want to receive future notifications!)

Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?

In this discussion, did you mean Category:Buildings and structures completed in 1701 rather then 'Buildings Category:and Structures completed in 1701'?

A CFD discussion you may be interested in - Churches/Church buildings

As a participent in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 October 17#Category:Churches, you may be interested in knowing that I've just initiated a new CFR discussion to fix the whole tree - Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 May 1#Churches/Church buildings. Feel free to participate there. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to reply

Just like to know, do you intend to reply to me at the Category discussion regarding your slurs against me or not? AusLondonder (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD: Pantacles of Athens has closed

The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantacles of Athens discussion has closed as a consensus "merge." The closing admin, SamWalton, identified four of the 40 articles for further talk page discussion whether they should be merged to the list or maintained as stand-alone articles: Talk:Dandes of Argos, Talk:Philinus of Cos (athlete), Talk:Oebotas of Dyme and Talk:Eurybus of Athens. Your input is requested on those article talk pages. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of blast furnace iron production in Great Britain and in RF

Hello. I do not know if it is interesting to you but there are two articles — History of blast furnace iron production in Russian Federation and History of blast furnace iron production in Great Britain. You can understand the text using Googl translator. I am sorry for trouble. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Post Towns in the US

I wish we had this term in the U.S. because many people in rural areas identify strongly with their mailing address "city" even if they live far outside their city limits. For instance, I'm rewriting the Felton, Delaware article and 90%+ of the population who identifies as living in Felton is outside the municipal limits and that's hard to explain to an (urban) American reader. RevelationDirect (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kopychyntsi

Hi! maybe have you change your mind?--Бучач-Львів (talk) 08:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About User:Basicdesign/sandbox

Hi, I'm an AFC reviewer, I have just declined the above-mentioned draft. I see you had previously (in February 2014) been involved with helping the draft-writer. I left a review note briefly explaining the problem. I hope you could help as it certainly looks like a worthwhile article - if the terminology problem can be resolved. I think WikiProjects such as Technology, Mining or Archaeology could also be of assistance. (Removing the "discussion" above the start of the actual article to the Talk page would help "declutter" the page. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject TAFI

Hello, Peterkingiron. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles with collaborative editing in a week's time. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Article nomination board. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thanks for your consideration. North America^1000 08:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1866_establishments_in_British_Burma

Hi, I think you !voted the opposite way to your intention at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 9#Category:1866 establishments in British Burma. – Fayenatic London 20:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marcocapelle interpreted your comments the same way. It would be helpful if you would edit your !vote to say "Support" rather than "Oppose". – Fayenatic London 15:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

British Burma in 1866

In 1866 British Burma would be another name for Lower Burma while Upper Burma was an independent country outside of British control.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dry places in New Jersey

Following the "keep" closure for the CFD of Category:Dry places in New Jersey, I've followed the closer's recommendation and submitted a new CFD to rename it to Category:Dry municipalities in New Jersey. Please offer your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 16 if you have one. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Welsh-speaking sportspeople DRV

Hello; I recently closed a discussion for the above category CFD here. A deletion review of the decision has been opened DRV here. I'm notifying you because you participated in the CFD. Thanks, Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 23:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion/Keeping

Hey hope you are doing well. There is a page again is being considered for deletion: List of Christian Nobel laureates. You are welcome to put in any input on the issues by going to the page and clicking on the link for that article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian Nobel laureates (2nd nomination). Jobas (talk) 15:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Climate change deniers

You participated in the recent discussion which resulted in Category:Climate change skeptics being renamed to Category:Climate change deniers. The new category has now been nominated for renaming back to Category:Climate change skeptics. The new discussion is here. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 05:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Peterkingiron. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Burleson.
Message added 08:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Request to revisit the discussion per sources presented there. I pinged users there, but the ping may not have worked (per a comment at the discussion). North America^1000 08:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposals re British, English, Scottish & Irish politicians by century

Please see my two proposals to create categories for English, Scottish & Irish politicians by century Discussion of 8 January 2016. Hugo999 (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A name of the category

Hello. Wich variant for category's name is better and more correct in the English language - cooling system of blast furnace or blast furnace cooling system? I'm going to create this category in the Wikimedia Commons. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The latter would be perfectly acceptable, but does it really need a category? Peterkingiron (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the profession

Hello. Look, please, on the upper left corner of this picture File:The Pennsylvania railroad. What is the English name of the profession of those men who are on the top of the blast furnace and charge it? Dictionaries I have do not contain this word. How do you call a wheelbarrow on their hands? Have it a specific name or not? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I assume the men are filling a blast furnace. If so, I would call them "fillers". I am not sure that there is a specific name for the barrow, though I suspect that it would have a precisely defined capacity. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But have you ever seen the name of the profession in the literature? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will allow myself to trouble you once more. I'm a little surprised that the English language does not have a special name for this profession. Well, I think that there may be such a category name: "Blast furnace fillers", "Blast furnace chargers" or just "Fillers" or "Chargers". Which variant you choose? Please, answer my question, I'm going to create a category in Wiki commons just after your reply. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have seen them called fillers, but I cannot think where. A furnace would have a founder (who was the chief workman), a keeper to oversee the furnace when he was asleep and a couple of fillers. However this was not a particularly skilled occupation (certainly not a "profession"). He might bee referred to as a filler at a blast furnace. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, word "fillers" is main. But wich variant is better, "Blast furnace fillers" or "Filler at a blast furnace" or "Fillers at blast furnaces"? I need your opinion as of a man who are a native-English spiker. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any of these would do, buy furnace(s) should only be plural if the same man was filling several of them. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you for your answers. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3rd party opinion of experienced wikipedia user wanted

Article in question: Batn Rabigh Caravan Raid

On above article I quoted Sahih al-Bukhari, 5:57:74 . This primary source EXPLICITLY mentions Sa'd was the first to shoot an arrow for Islam,

The secondary sources in Batn Rabigh Caravan Raid also EXPLICITLY mentions Sa'd was the first to shoot an arrow for Islam.

I have been accused of violating WP:SYNTHESIS. What is your opinion, is this synthesis? --Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• If that is what the sources say, I do not see why WP should not repeat them. If other serious sources say something different, or deny the event, they should presumably be referred to as well, to give a NPOV. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

English Overseas Trade

Ed. Hicks. Were you by any chance at the book launch last year in Winchester? Hope all is well! _Fortuna ^Imperatrix Mundi 09:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. I might have been if I had known of it, but it is a long way from here. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could've got a lift with Tony Pollard! _Fortuna ^Imperatrix Mundi 11:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new section in CFD

I started a proposal at village pump here for a new section in CFD called CFRc (Categories for recategorization) where users who like to change sub- or parent-categories, can ask the experienced community. I believe you will like to join the discussion and poll. CN1 (talk) 22:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

deletion proposal

The category was empty because Betty Logan removed all the pages tagged under the category without discussion. The user has seems to be been blocked before for moving pages without consensus. Do you know of the process on how to restore a deleted page or category? Where should I go?--Taeyebaar (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sahitya Akademi Award

At Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_April_14#Category:Writers_who_have_returned_the_Sahitya_Akademi_Award you mentioned that the subject article does not have a list of awardees. Its actually a forked list at Lists of Sahitya Akademi Award winners, which in turn has links to language-wise recipients. Just fyi... §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. The fork is insufficiently highlighted in the main article. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First Serbian Volunteer Division listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect First Serbian Volunteer Division. Since you had some involvement with the First Serbian Volunteer Division redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alcherin (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. I created this. When I did so, I knew it was far from ideal. I had hoped that someone would in due course convert this to a substantive article. Unfortuantely what has happened is that the section pointed to has been removed. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lines of succession to thrones

Hello! Could you give your opinion on this issue: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Guidelines#Lines of succession to thrones, please? --Editor FIN (talk) 05:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article on Stecknitz Canal

I read your new article about the Stecknitz Canal. I commend you for your attention to detail and dedication to quality. It is a terrific piece. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signing

Hi, you forgot to sign your comment here. Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 12:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion/Keeping

Hey hope you are doing well. There is a page you have contributed to that is being considered for deletion: List of Christian Nobel laureates. You are welcome to put in any input on the issues by going to the page and clicking on the link for that article. Jobas (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53

Hi, you previously contributed to a deletion discussion for London bus route W7, another similar deletion discussion is ongoing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53 which you may wish to give your input on.

Note: I've placed (or am in the process of placing) this notification on the talk page of anyone who took part in the original deletion discussion, as the most recent similar discussion, regardless of deletion preference, which is allowable under WP:CANVASS. The only exception being if that person has already contributed, or has indicated on their profile that they are inactive.

Thanks for your time. Jeni ^(talk) 10:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

I am notifying everyone who took part in the AFD discussion on Daniel Romanovsky. Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 August 3 Thoughtmonkey (talk) 18:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An other CfR discussion for US city categories

There's a new Categories for Renaming discussion going on about categories of US cities listed in the AP Stylebook. As you have participated in at least one of the more recent discussions in the subject, you may want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 August 17#Seattle. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Callum James Greens AfD

Hi Peter. I am notifying all the participants in the previous AfD for this article that it has recently been re-created and has been nominated for deletion again. The new discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Callum James Greens (2nd nomination). Voceditenore (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion you may be interested in

I have just made a new nomination for renaming categories for those U.S cities where the article doesn't include the state name. Since you participated in a recent discussion about this, you may want to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 September 6#Major US cities. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

Hi, how do I merge one article into another (per the decision here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master of Fogdö)? Thanks! Yakikaki (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Hello, in this discussion, do you perhaps mean rename instead of merge? Marcocapelle (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you! (excuse this, my daughter Marma loves kittens and made me send one of these to someone) have a nice day.

Holly Arcshaw (talk) 02:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blue ribbon badge

Peter, would you swing by for a 2nd look at Blue ribbon badge, I think there's more there than met the eye. Thanks. E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Peterkingiron. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Malvern, Worcestershire

I have finally got round to listing it for review as a Featured Article. All help needed! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Roman fortifications in Snowdonia

You requested this deletion at the last Ancient Roman Forts CFd as an exception. I've opened a CFD.Laurel Lodged (talk) 11:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho

Iryna Harpy (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.

Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories

This is a notice that a discussion you participated in, either at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 February 8 has resulted in a Request for comment at Wikipedia talk:User categories#Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFD of interest

Hello! As a participant in previous discussions about a related topic, you may be interested in commenting on this AFD. I am notifying everyone involved in previous debates on the subject. Thanks! Fyddlestix (talk) 17:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Hey you may not have been aware, but you have been supporting in my sandbox :-) - Marcocapelle (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrier of Tannerre

This, with which you helped me a lot re. technical terms, got deleted last year. Eurêka, it's back. That is, I retranslated it. Wld you care having another look at it? If you're around and got the time, that is. Any further critics wld be very welcome. And anyway you have no idea how just knowing you were around gave me a good push to tackle it again. So very much thanks for that alone. Good evening to you and good continuation. Basicdesign (talk) 18:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Carter Spann

Hello! You recently weighed in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamie Lincoln Isham and mentioned Jimmy Carter's siblings. After a review of his sister Gloria Carter Spann, I have nominated her page for deletion. I thought you might be interested. Best, Kbabej (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Montgomeryshire Architecture

Because nobody offered a reason not to use "Buildings and structures", and because that's clearly the naming convention, I've closed the "Montgomeryshire Architecture" CFD (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 28) as "move to Category:Buildings and structures in Montgomeryshire". I've intentionally ignored the Powys-Montgomeryshire issue, since that's not so clear-cut, and I've started a new discussion specifically to address that issue. Please visit Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 July 17 (bottommost section) to offer your opinions. Nyttend (talk) 04:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial history

I noticed that the article Industrial history has been boldly redirected to Industrial Revolution apparently because all former content of Industrial history was about the industrial revolution. Do you know if there is something like industrial history before and after the industrial revolution, as a notable topic by itself? I came here via Category:Industrial history which still exists and has quite a few subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Sutton (criminologist)

Dear Sir,

I'm very sorry to have missed the discussion on the deletion status of the biography page on Mike Sutton (criminologist). If I had taken part, I hope that I could have contributed. Having collected 18 months worth of evidence showing multiple examples of misconduct by this individual, atrocious research abilities and extensive abuse of fellow academics, I am disappointed to see his personal page removed from the deletion list. Comprehensive refutation of his claims against Darwin and Wallace, plus many of his "myth busts" are presented via 3 websites: Reign of Error, Natural Histories, and the Patrick Matthew Project.

Sutton is very much driven by ambition and pride. His Wikipedia page fuels his egocentricity, more so than it should considering it was entirely his own composition until recently, when I began following the flagged recommendations for the page, and edited some of the self aggrandisement. However, the page should be removed as it was created and written by him at the outset, and remained so for years. He even lists his Wikipedia page and others he has created under his publications section on page 21 of his 25-page CV. I find that odd, but it is also irrefutable evidence of his hand in the matter. Furthermore, there is no question that it goes beyond the impartial outlook supposed to be enforced on Wikipedia. Please can we have another look at this case?

[Update] Sutton has been aggressively trying to get his ideas onto Wikipedia for years, taken on different anonymous accounts (there is a record of his sock puppetry), and has an anti-wikipedia editors hate campaign documented on one of his several blog sites.

Thank you and best wishes, Jfderry (talk) 17:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting out musical groups by number cats

I have nominated several specific categories today and yesterday (see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 4#Category:Musical sextets for example) which you may wish to comment on, based on the previous discussion. Mangoe (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Peterkingiron. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Willhern

What happened at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_4&diff=prev&oldid=814721557? 208.95.51.38 (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. It is probably a consequence of my thumb touching the mouse pad accidentally and causing the cursor to jump to the wrong place. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

	Happy Holidays
	Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great Elm

Thanks for your edit to Old Iron Works, Mells however I have reverted it as the link to Great Elm was correct.— Rod ^talk 14:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I must have misread what I got by following the link. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oldham

So are you going to fix History of Oldham Athletic A.F.C. with the sourcing that supposedly exists, or are you going to just let it stink up the wiki forever?! Ten Pound Hammer • ^(What did I screw up now?) 21:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thus: There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ongoing trolling by TenPoundHammer. Andy Dingley (talk)

I do not reckon to work on football articles, as I do not know enough of the subject. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:05, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Afd

When assessing articles for "keep" or "delete," do you assess them all on whether or not they're contribution to history is sufficient, even if the purpose of the article is not based in history? As I proceed with any new articles, it'd be helpful to understand the criteria of you and other editors.--IndyNotes (talk) 17:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. You said that some of the history AFDs concern historical authors and that for them you look at the significance of their body of work. In the case of Joshua Claybourn, he is under contract for a historical book, but it seems to me that the primary justification for the article has more to do with politics than history, so I was confused about why you voted to delete it on history grounds when that seemed to have little to do with the discussion. But I appreciate your response.--IndyNotes (talk) 14:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An author has to be a notable author before they can have an article. I judge that on the apparent quality and quantity of the work. One or two books on an obscure topic (including local history) is certainly not enough. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that although he's an author, the authorship has little to do with the point of the article. Karl Rove has written books but that's not why he has a Wikipedia article, and you wouldn't judge his article based on the quality and quantity of writing.--IndyNotes (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert C. Seacord for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert C. Seacord is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert_C._Seacord until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Rogerthat94 (talk) 23:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why I have been notified about this. It is not a subject on which I am qualified to comment. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Charles II's escape night

Please see Talk:Escape of Charles II#Flight from Worcester to White Ladies. As you know the area I would appreciate your thoughts on the route of the first night of his escape. -- PBS (talk) 17:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Escape of Charles II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dunsley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Rat Killer

I have noticed that you have commented that article Operation Rat Killer is poorly presented. It would therefore be helpful if you could edit the article to present the information in another way, so that it is well presented. It is a short article so this would not take long at all. I look forward to the improvements. Thanks. Mesoso2 (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I regret that I have neither the timenor specialist knowledge to do what you ask. My reaction to the present text is largely that it is too short: it does not say what the American and southern forces did to eliminate the guerillas. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sostre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Peterkingiron. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Pyari Gurjar (The Lady Chieftain).
Message added 22:07, 14 August 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXray 22:07, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aspersions

Please avoid from indulging in blatant ad hominem personal-attacks (Banner seems intent on persecuting Jesuits) as you did at this AfD.Baseless accusations/aspersions might lead to revocation of editing privileges.Thank you.∯WBG^converse 18:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CFD notice

Hello, because you participated in one or both of the CFD nominations for "Ancient Greece" in July, I wanted you to know that I've created a second nomination for Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 September 1#Ancient, and thank you for contributing to the discussion. Nyttend (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Curriculum (England and Wales) (2nd nomination)

Notification re Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Curriculum (England and Wales) (2nd nomination). Algarve1233 (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Peterkingiron. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 December 6#Foreign relations of Ireland

Hi Peterkingiron, I never refered to your statement at this discussion and in particular I did never claim that your vote is perverse. But you are implying this with your recent comment regarding my vote. Your comment was apparently misplaced. Would you please fix this? Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 15:30, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wp:ITSACASTLE

Hi, thank you for your sensible comment in an AFD about a castle, a fairly long time ago now. I found my way back there just now because I subsequently wrote an essay wp:ITSACASTLE which just was nominated for deletion at MFD. I do appreciate your original intention to be selective about approval of castles, but it happens i took a lower, somewhat sarcastic mode which I personally feel is justified by AFDs about castles, museums and other public attractions which I personally feel are pretty obviously notable. Any which way now about the ongoing MFD, about your comment, thank you, and I am glad you are intelligently participating in Wikipedia. Cheers, --Doncram (talk) 05:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthony Bliss for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Bliss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Bliss (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TSventon (talk) 16:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

World oil market chronology from 2003

It may be that I have included too much detail (I seem to be the only person adding significant information) or it may be time to split the article. I am asking you because you commented eight years ago when it was renamed.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the last version from before I got involved, when I was following someone else's advice, and no one ever bothered to tell me I was doing anything wrong. I can sort of see what you're looking for, but again, I wouldn't know what a good summary would be. I really hate to throw out all that work I did.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would you make your comments here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at this draft and tell me if this is how you want the main article to look. I still need advice about a lede for the three other drafts which will contain the content that you thought was too much for the man article.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Belarusian music chart "LF Top Songs"

This page is not related to Alex9777777, please do not delete the category!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Billboard_Hot_100_number-one_singles there is , then let it be and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Belarusian_music_chart_%22LF_Top_Songs%22 The world is equal for everyone, the category has the right to exist !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The chart has official pages -> https://posts.google.com/share/ZazhHI6x Please respect the work of other people and do not delete the category!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Music proekt (talk • contribs) 18:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe we have normally not allowed such categories, but I do not intend to interfere further. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Listed buildings and structures

So the CfD for Category:Listed buildings and structures has finally been closed. I'd taken another look at the category, and it seems untangling the member cats might be a bit complicated. It would probably be better for me to leave this to you, presuming you'll be able to take up the task? --Paul_012 (talk) 18:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはPeterkingironたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sign

You forgot to sign your comment there. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Deletion

Hi, I see that you took part in a discussion of the proposed deletion for an article on Frederick Goold in August 2018, and the result at the time was "no consensus". I am just letting you know that I have renominated this article for deletion here.[1]. I am contacting all contributors to that discussion to see if you wish to comment again. In my view, the additional sources provided at the time did nothing to establish notability as definied by WP. I have also proposed two others for deletion for the same reason here [2] and here [3]. Thanks -- Sirfurboy (talk) 11:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Priory Grammar School

Thank you for your message of support for my proposal concerning the naming of the Priory Grammar School. You mention the need for an article on the Priory Grammar School for Boys, and you may well have guessed that that is what I am working on at the moment. It would be good also to have a parallel article on the girls' grammar school, but I have not yet managed to find suitable material. RoachPeter (talk) 08:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for today's message and advice. I'm feeling a bit rudderless at the moment, as the short article I submitted on the Priory Grammar School for Boys, Shrewsbury has been turned down by the WP reviewer as not substantial enough. It's still in my sandbox, if you have a moment to give it a look - I'd value your advice on how to make it better. It could obviously be expanded as I discover more history, but it's not a great time to be making enquiries. The reviewer's suggestion that I add it to the site of Shrewsbury Sixth Form College would not work, I feel, though I have asked the College what their view would be. RoachPeter (talk) 15:48, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for the help with Luis Miguel Romero Fernández…

"Fight the Good Fight Every Moment"

Roberto221 (talk) 21:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Auxiliary Bishop

Sorry to impose but I need your voice again on this one:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey S. Grob

Roberto221 (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your support on Russian Empire physicians

You seem to be the only person who supports me attempts to improve this category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson Yarn Clearer

Hi, the article you created is proposed for deletion because it is unreferenced and of unknown notability. Care to fix? Lembit Staan (talk) 19:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I looked up in the history and it seems that user Pwilon cut-and pasted a big chink from Uster Technologies PR materials. Lembit Staan (talk) 19:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no recollection of creating the article, though I see that I did so. I described it as "forking deleted content". I think this must have been deleted from a more general article, which would have been appropriate as this would be much too detailed for it. I know little of the subject and cannot defend or amplify the article. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution

Thank′s for you contribution to discussion on the proposed deletion of the article World Council of Arameans (Syriacs). There are not many editors who fully understand the complexity of those subjects, related to Arameans and other Christian communities of the Near East. During past few days I tried to improve that article, in a hope that it would be kept. So far, there is no support for deletion, but for some reason discussion was relisted. Sorabino (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NatWest Group

Hi Peterkingiron, I noticed you contributed to the discussion at Category:Royal Bank of Scotland Group litigation. Would you mind commenting at Category:Royal Bank of Scotland people and Category:Chairmen of Royal Bank of Scotland Group. Cheers, Chrisieboy (talk) 13:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blast furnace

Blast furnace, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 12:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of direct effect of European Union law

@Peterkingiron:Regarding your comment on the deletion. You said that "Move articles to Category:Cases on European law". Does that mean you want to create a whole new category? Could I just add it to Court of Justice of the European Union case law. Isn't it counterintuitive to just add another category? Sorry if it comes off hostile, I'm just curious.
Also, will this be implemented by the admins or do I need to do it Chefs-kiss (talk) 23:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Croatian principalities has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Silverije 22:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter WikiProject Worcestershire

Worcestershire - one of England's oldest and still existing (with some minor boundary changes) ceremonial and political shires, famous for its nearly 1000 year old cathedral, the River Severn, the AONB of the Malvern Hills, some of the oldest schools in the country, England's fastest growing university, apples, pears, cider and cricket, and of course its world famous sauce. The Wikiproject is now in need of some attention. Created 12 years ago, this project amassed a huge resource for editors working on all kinds of articles and categories related in some way or another to the county. Kudpung is more or less retired from Wikipedia getting on for 2 years ago and it would be good if a group of editors could get it up to date and continue to maintain it.
Opt out of this message list here.
WikiProject Worcestershire 14:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Deaths of anti-vaccine advocates from COVID-19

I think this draft is ready for mainspace, and would like your opinion. I have moved the list to the talk page for now, to develop a specific consensus as to how it should be included. BD2412 T 02:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People who don't exist

Why do you keep voting merge for people who don't exist (1, 2)? Do you even look at any given nomination for more than a split second? Avilich (talk) 00:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(replying here) They are, in fact, very close to hoaxes at times (I refrain from using the word because that implies bad faith on the creator's part and I cannot be certain of that), and it's not certain that those connections you mention (which would justify a merge) even exist. In this AfD, where you voted merge/redirect to husband, it's not certain that the target is in fact her husband, while in this other one, where you voted exactly the same, she was most certainly not the target's husband (subject is 100% invented). The "Aka II" one has swathes of content that appear to be 100% original research or someone else's invention, and not supported in the slightest by any reliable source which the article cites (even completely ignoring the fact that the subject most likely did not exist as a person).

A merge implies that, whether or not a topic is notable, there is information in the article that must be preserved and attributed to the original author. If the articles were freer of egregious errors and inventions, or if the connection between them and the merge targets you propose was actually reasonably well-established, a merge would be reasonable. But these ones are simply not in a good enough state to warrant what you propose, and by merging you end up perpetuating these mistakes and bits of original research. Avilich (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your misinformed decision here to support a merger of someone who doesn't exist with a person who isn't her husband led to a mistaken close and quite a discussion to overturn it. Please consider only voting merge or redirect (1) if you have the slightest understanding of what is being discussed and (2) if you can point out what content you want to merge or why the specific title deserves a redirect. Else you're just unnecessarily complicating what ought to be a simple keep vs. delete discussion, which wastes community time. Avilich (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sewa Dynasty

At the AFD you commented "... any article should be about the polity ruled, not about the ruling dynasty." Are you suggesting that is a general principle? If so on what basis? We do, of course, have many articles on dynasties. This includes legendary ones such as Yngling, which is why I found your comment so surprising. SpinningSpark 17:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am suggesting that for small polities it is important to have a historical article on the polity, before we have one on the ruling dynasty. The dynasty article will normally be a list. Such a list can appropriately be included in a wider article on the history of the polity. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you are suggesting, that wasn't my question. From the lack of answer, I take it that there is no justification in guidelines for such a stand. The example I linked to is an article that has prose beyond a list and there is no corresponding article on the polity. So clearly things don't have to be the way you say they should. SpinningSpark 14:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

I have opened a deletion review: Wikipedia:Deletion_review#David_Rohl. Please comment if you'd like. TuckerResearch (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sewa Dynasty (2nd nomination)

You expressed an opinion at the first deletion discussion. I am alerting you to the second, where you may wish to contribute. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi! This Barnstar is for you! This is for not accepting the Deletion nomination for the Apostolic Catholic Church article in the 2nd and 3rd nomination for its deletion Ploreky (talk) 11:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stuff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warp. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot 177.170.198.104 (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bromsgrove and Redditch

I've reverted your change to this page. The Statutory Instrument clearly shows the constituency was defined as containing the whole of the Rural District of Bromsgrove, not "most of" it. It may be that the map is wrong as you suggest. I would refer you to this map, but then the SI shows there was a change in the boundary between Warwickshire and Worcestershire under the 1969 Order. All the same, I think the map looks fairly accurate. FieldOfWheat (talk) 20:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be right, but it would be good to cite the map you now refer me to. I tried to find the statutory instrument on-line, but it was not on legislation.gov.uk Peterkingiron (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Worcestershire Newsletter - May 2023

WikiProject Worcestershire newsletter

Note that if you are in mobile view you will have to enter desktop view to see the Newsletter.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Worcestershire Newsletter - September 2023

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Nawab Mir Khudrath Nawaz Jung Bahadur#Question to User:Peterkingiron

Hello, would you perhaps care to answer the question on the talk page? Kind regards—Alalch E. 21:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A2199 road (2nd nomination)

There is currently an ongoing conversation over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A2199 road (2nd nomination), which may be of interest to you. You received this because you participated to the 1st nomination. Thanks, Roads4117 (talk) 10:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Worcestershire Newsletter - December 2023

Happy New Year, Peterkingiron!

Happy New Year!

Peterkingiron,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 13:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 13:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Constantin Krebs article

Hello, May you tell me how can i publish the following article: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:Rbmn/Arthur_Constantin_KREBS_(1850-1935):_Military_engineer,_Automotive_industrialist,_Great_projects_manager Thanks a lot Rbmn (talk) 08:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]