User talk:Petercannon usf

Welcome!

Hello, Petercannon usf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dawn Bard (talk) 22:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of chemical ecology

Hello Petercannon usf,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Journal of chemical ecology, may be copied from http://link.springer.com/journal/10886. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 00:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hugh Lofting.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hugh Lofting.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2 Thanks. It may be a problem so I think it is best that I take it down.Petercannon usf (talk) 16:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Petercannon usf. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tampa Bay Library Consortium

Hello Petercannon usf,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Tampa Bay Library Consortium, may be copied from http://tblc.org/about. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, while I'm unable to double-check the deleted version of the article, the version you have recreated is entirely fine copyright-wise, so there should not be any further issues. Wizardman 03:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anton Brees Carillon Library, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ronald Barnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victory for the Slain (poem), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shrapnel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
The missing Philobiblon was a great gap and you filled it.Linking technologies. JuanitaNM 13:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Helen Marot

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Helen Marot, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://womenshistory.about.com/library/bio/blbio_marot_helen.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clara Breed

Hello, and thanks for the article on Clara Breed! Let me know when you are done creating it - I would like to nominate it for "Did you know...?" --MelanieN (talk) 18:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing some tidying up and wikifying. Do you have any information about when and where she died, and her actual date of birth? That would normally be included. Also, can you expand on how she "expanded the city's modern system" - putting it under the "career" section? Do you have internet links for any of your references, or are you working entirely from "dead tree" sources? --MelanieN (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, here's a problem: portions of the article are copy-pasted from other sources, such as this one. That's a big problem and has to be fixed at once; Wikipedia is very strict about copyright violations, they don't even allow close paraphrasing of sources. Can you rewrite these passages in your own words? The article would never be accepted for DYK with copyright violations in it; in fact it would be in danger of deletion. --MelanieN (talk) 16:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I think it's ready. I have nominated it and you can follow the progress of the nomination here: Template:Did you know nominations/Clara Breed. You may want to watchlist that page since the reviewer will often have questions or comments, or want more information.
I see that you like to write biographical articles. Good for you! I do too. Wikipedia is woefully lacking in articles about people from the pre-internet age, especially people from unglamorous professions. When I have a little more time I'll post here a few tips on writing biographical articles. Nothing wrong with yours, but there are some additional (sometimes invisible) steps that Wikipedia likes to see. --MelanieN (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, somebody's approved it already! That's a near-record! 0;-D What happens next is that it will be moved into a "queue" and slotted into an 8-hour time period to appear on the front/main page of Wikipedia. The queue can be seen here. You'll want to check it out; it's always fun to see your own work featured there. (I gather this is your first DYK.) The next day you can go to the page history, click on "page view statistics", and find out how many people looked at it. Also, don't be surprised if over the next few days people will be editing and improving the article. --MelanieN (talk) 22:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's in the queue! Looks like it will be on the Wikipedia main page between 5:45 PM tonight (Friday 2/28) and 1:45 AM tomorrow (Saturday 3/1), Eastern time. More good news: it is the first item in the list, and they did decide to use the photo. --MelanieN (talk) 16:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful hints for biographical articles

You already know most of the obvious style points of biographical articles. Here are a few more subtle things:

  • Always include the full dates and places of birth and death, if known, somewhere in the article. The parenthetical dates in the lead sentence can include either the full dates or just the years; that's up to you.
  • An infobox is not required, but many people like them. A generic template for an infobox about a person is here: Template:Infobox person. Copy/paste into your article at the very top. Leave blank the sections that do not apply.
  • Wikipedia:Persondata is an "invisible" summary of the basic biographical information. It is only visible in "edit" mode. It is a kind of metadata that allows for automatic searching for basic parameters. Take a look at the persondata box I added to your article to see how it works. Copy/paste it at the bottom of the page, below all the visible parts of the article (References, External links, etc.) and above the categories.
  • Defaultsort is placed between double curly brackets: {{DEFAULTSORT:Last, First M.}} (note: no space after the colon). It should go immediately above the categories. It controls how the person's name is alphabetized in categories.
  • Wikipedia likes to include the birth and death years among the categories, as in Category:1938 births and Category:2012 deaths.

BTW you might consider joining WP:WikiProject Libraries. I don't know how active it is, but it could be a way to work with other Wikipedians in your area of interest. I look forward to seeing more of your work here! --MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Clara Breed

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested citation

Somebody has challenged a couple of the things in the Clara Breed article, asking for citations. I was able to find a citation for the claim that she wrote letters of behalf of fathers who were considered security risks. But I was unable to find a citation for the fact that she visited the children in the camps. None of the online citations says she did. Do you have evidence for that in one of your offline references? --MelanieN (talk) 00:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... somebody cited that claim to the San Diego History Center, but I don't find it there. --MelanieN (talk) 01:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have two: Shaw mentions it: Deeply moved by the unjust treatment they were receiving and missing their steadfast presence in her library. Miss Breed visited the children in the camps (Breed, 1943a, pp. 120-21), sent books and presents throughout their internment, and spoke out publicly against their treatment.

Petercannon usf (talk) 01:17, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! Shaw was the reference for the preceding sentence; I just moved it to the end of the paragraph. --MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MelanieN! You got it! I was trying to edit it but you did it already. Thanks!

ALA References: ask for help

Hi, I am an Italian librarian, trying to translate the article about American Library Association. Some references (e.g.: McCook, 2011; Rubin, 2004; Berman, 2001) have no further bibliographic description, and I could not find them in the web page of ALA. Could you please help me to understand which materials they refer to? Thank you very much, Silvia --Silvia Girometti (talk) 18:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much indeed, I'm going to fix them in the Italian article right now. Kind regards, Silvia --Silvia Girometti (talk) 22:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Location

Hi, thanks for the article Gazi Husrev-beg Library. I gather it's in Sarajevo. But it isn't stated in the article. Can you be more specific about its exact location in the lede ? Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:17, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Great collaboration

I've had a great time collaborating with you on so many librarianship-related articles. Thanks for leaving me the two tags for my user page. I hope we can work together more in the future! Let me know if you create anything new and need another critical eye. - LiteraryJess (talk) 00:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
You have expanded human rights and librarianship through excellent entries on many exemplary people. Kmccook (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lucius Beebe Memorial Library

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lucius Beebe Memorial Library, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wakefieldlibrary.org/wakipedia/index.php/Lucius_Beebe_Memorial_Library.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a quick look at this, and it seems to me that the content was indeed copied from elsewhere, possibly http://www.wakefieldlibrary.org/libraryinfo/librarybuilding/libraryhistory/; but it makes no difference if it was taken from the source the bot identified, that content is not apparently freely licenced. Obviously I hope to find that I am wrong about this – I'm sure that you understand that copying other people's text is against our policies here as well as being unethical. I've blanked the page and listed the article at Copyright problems for review. This clumsy hand-written note is instead of the usual large and invasive template message. Sorry about this! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(moved here from my talk)I did some editing to that page after I got the original notice and can clean it up some more. The content has been changed but I will work on it some more this weekend.Petercannon usf (talk) 23:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, a couple of things: as the bot notice (rather ungrammatically) says, "Note that simply modified or rephrased text is still an infringement—to remove the copyrighted contents you will need to completely remove them and then write totally new text to replace it" - making some changes to tainted text just does not do the job. Secondly, now that the article is blanked, you should not edit it at all; you can of course work on a rewrite if you wish (follow the instructions on the template), but if you do so, please make a point of not copying any text from the old version unless you are 100% sure that you wrote it yourself. And thirdly, without wishing to offend, I should ask you if you think there might be other pages where the same has happened? If so, please mention them here and I will help you to fix them. This is quite important - copyright policy is taken seriously here. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have completely rewritten this article from a 1925 history of the library and have not used any information from the previous article. I understand your copyright policy. Thank you for your concern and I appreciate your help.Petercannon usf (talk) 00:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The funny part about this is that the website has definitely taken material from a book in the public domain which may have been incorrectly identified as being copyrighted. I guess I will let you figure that out but it's good to know, especially the part about the medallions.Petercannon usf (talk) 03:40, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to take care of this as soon as possible. Can you either unblank the page or redirect the new page. In either case, I'm afraid that you may have incorrectly identified the material that was used as being copyrighted. The material on http://www.wakefieldlibrary.org/libraryinfo/librarybuilding/libraryhistory/ is not copyrighted as it is from a library history book in the public domain. I may have been unclear about that. I understand that the bots cannot realize this and that is why I removed the original "bot box." Unfortunately, you could not realize this was information taken from the public domain. I have used this book in the past, know it well, and have worked for this library. All photos and material are in the public domain and no one can claim a copyright to this material. Your statements above are, indeed, incorrect.Petercannon usf (talk) 14:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to this on the talk page of the article, showing an example of text that was copied into our article verbatim from the website, but which is phrased quite differently in that book. I suggest that you are mistaken that the content you copied is in the public domain – the library website carries no copyright release notice. Anyway, this will be dealt with in due course by one of the other volunteers at WP:CP (since we don't agree, I will not be processing it myself); the usual timescale is a week or two, depending on the backlog at that board. Meanwhile, I invite you to check your other contributions for similar problems. A couple of other things: you created the rewrite at the wrong address; I moved it, but it was then, due to a misunderstanding, deleted; I've asked for it to be restored. Also, please don't post comments in article space – that's what we have talk pages for; I moved to the talk page the comment you'd added to the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks! However It is my opinion that these two texts are pretty close and it is clear that this book served as the source for the website and is a derivative, with modification. A website (or any work) cannot claim copyright if it is a derivative and not an original work. This is basic copyright law.
In any event I would like to get this issue resolved and I appreciate your help with this matter.Petercannon usf (talk) 18:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to disagree but I would like to get this resolved. Here is a listing of the library medallions, one from the book and one from the page:

Website:

David, the poet of Hebrew literature (d.962 B.C.) Homer, the father of epic poetry (9th – 8th cent. B.C.) Euripides, the master of tragic poetry (484-406 B.C.) Cicero, the Roman orator (106-43 B.C.) St. Augustine, the great religious teacher (354-430) Geoffrey Chaucer, the father of English poetry (1342-1400) Dante, author of the Divine Comedy (1265-1321) Desiderius Erasmus, the classical scholar and theologian of the Middle Ages (1466-1536) William Shakespeare, the greatest of English poets and dramatists (1564-1616) Moliere, the writer of French comedy (1622-1673) Goethe, the greatest German poet (1749-1832) Ralph Waldo Emerson, American poet and resident of nearby Concord, Mass. (1803-1882) Robert Browning, English poet (1812-1889) Henrik Ibsen, the great Norwegian playwright (1828-1906)

Public Domain:


1. David, the poet of Hebrew Literature. 2. Homer, the father of epic poetry. 3. Euripides, the master of tragic poetry. 4. Cicero, the Roman orator. 5. St. Augustine, the great religious teacher, whose vision of the "City of God" shaped the course of an empire. 6. Chaucer, the father of English poetry. 7. Dante, whose "Divine Comedy" made the Italian language a classic. 8. Desiderius Erasmus, the classical scholar and theologian of the Middle Ages. 9. Shakespeare, the greatest of English poets and dramatists. 10. Moliere, the writer of French comedy. 11. Goethe, the greatest German poet. 12. Ralph Waldo Emerson, America's seer and poet. 13. Robert Browning, English poet, master of narrative, lyric, and dramatic verse of the nine-teenth century. 14. Ibsen, the great Scandanavian playwright, who laid the foundation for modern English and American drama.


These two texts are pretty close and it is clear that this book served as the source for the website and is a derivative, with modification. A website (or any work) cannot claim copyright if it is a derivative and not an original work. This is basic copyright law. In any event I would like to get this issue resolved and I appreciate your help with this matter.Petercannon usf (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


As for the delay and about our disagreement, since I have rewritten the article (I understand it is lost at the moment) can we not redirect that one once it is undeleted? Thanks!Petercannon usf (talk) 18:16, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The rewrite will be checked for lingering copyright problems. If it's found to be OK (as, without having looked at it, I'm confident it will be) it will be moved into the place of the existing page, which will be deleted. As mentioned above, this normally happens in a week or two, though it can take longer, depending on the backlog. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:50, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Justlettersandnumbers I appreciate ALL of your hard work and patience.Petercannon usf (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronald E. Day

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ronald E. Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Petercannon usf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Petercannon usf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover murderpastdue.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover murderpastdue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]