User talk:PerryPerryD/Archive 1
Welcome!Hello, KniteRite, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:KniteRite Studios, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained. There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC) Rename from "KniteRite" to "PerryPerryD"Rename from "KniteRite" to "PerryPerryD" --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC) This did not warrant a quick fail. I want a second opinion. GamerPro64 16:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Second 'fast' GA declineI see that for a second time you have 'fast' declined a GA application rather than engaging in a proper GA review process. In this instance, the nominating editor GamerPro64 took Warlocked from 3 to 15 refs and 2,262 bytes to 9,000 over a period of more than a year, and deserved more than your instant decision. In both instances, if you had looked at the submitting editors' User pages, you would have seen that they had successfully brought articles to GA status in the past. I strongly recommend that you hold off from any more GA reviews until you have more experience, ideally having yourself submitted and succeeded with a GA nomination. David notMD (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Hello David. The article was already placed under 2nd opinion after a discussion with the nominator. I would advise that you take a look at my Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle GA Review, As it is not always required to spend an entire week on a single article. PerryPerryD 01:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mario Kart WiiHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mario Kart Wii you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Admin Help
Hello. I am concerned about user "Wretchskull", More specifically about their comments on [Talk:Autism spectrum], I am not the best when it comes to wikipedia rules, or identifying if something is wrong, however I feel that his comments are a bit harsh and maybe even threatening, I do not know if this is against the rules or not. I simply want to inform an admin that i am concerned about this users actions. I apologize if this is wasting your time. Cheers.
@PerryPerryD: I wasn't threatening anyone or anything, but rather said that trying to merge them would go against WP:MEDRS. However, as I've stated from my final comment here, I have given up trying to maintain the article. Anything I do will be against the majority and my voice doesn't mean anything, so I've unwatchlisted the article and left the discussion completely as it is a waste of time and energy. Wretchskull (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Join the Nintendo Task Force!
(Oinkers42) (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Courtesy ANI noticeBe advised that Tambaram97 opened a thread about you at WP:ANI#user:PerryPerryD. —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mario Kart WiiThe article Mario Kart Wii you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mario Kart Wii for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2022)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:KniteRite Studios
A tag has been placed on Draft:KniteRite Studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wii U you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rlink2 -- Rlink2 (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC) The article Wii U you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Wii U for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rlink2 -- Rlink2 (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2022)
This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2022)
Important NoticeThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ~TNT (talk • she/her) 22:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Realme223What happened here, I’m curious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realme233 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 15, 2022)
I reverted the information out as undue, and started a discussion at Talk:Jedlice, Opole Voivodeship. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 23:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC) ANIJust a quick fyi to let you know I've closed the ANI discussion you opened. Whatever issues this user had are apparently in the distant past and they were upfront about it. So we are going to cut them some WP:ROPE and see what happens. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC) UAAHi PerryPerryD, just as an FYI regarding your comment to the user reported at UAA here: there was an edit that the user has made, but it was deleted. In the future, consider reviewing the user talk page to see if there is a deletion notice for any edits, as non-administrators are not able to view the content of deleted edits. Best, SpencerT•C 00:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC) Alesbi And ReamI don't know if this report was intended to cheer us all up. But I had a good old chuckle, anyway. Thanks for making my wiki-day. Shared use, indeed! Nick Moyes (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC) ...Im DUMB. IM TIRED, AND DUMB. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 05:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC) This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2022)
|