User talk:Penguins Are Animals 5327/archive1

Please vote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ramallite

I've noticed that you and several other people have been trying to marshall opposition to this nomination for adminship based largely on what is percived to be too many POV edits, most of them pro-palestinian. I'm going to be avoiding this debate entirely for two reasons - the first is simply that I'm too new to wikipedia and still learning the rules and social protocols, and I don't think I know enough yet to make an informed vote. The second reason is simply that I avoid politics like the plague, and this entire debate smack of political bias (on both sides). --Bachrach44 21:14, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Penguins Are Animals 5327/archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  and Shalom! IZAK 11:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi Bachrach: Thank you for contacting me. Please see my response to your questions at User talk:IZAK#Gamliel. Thanks. IZAK 11:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2nd reply

Hi again Bachrach: See my second response at User talk:IZAK#Gamliel. Shabbat Shalom. IZAK 16:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Very much for your kind support of my adminship. I'll do my best to live up to your and my other supporters' expectations. If you have any comments or concerns on my actions as an administrator, please let me know. Thank you! — MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip — 14:45, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy changes by Gilgamesh

Unfortunately, User:Gilgamesh is now imposing his own views by changing the transliterated Hebrew names of articles with redirects to unreadable Hebrew names and fonts, as if his criteria are the only ones to reckon with, when there are in fact several. My computer, as I am sure many others' as well, does not pick up his type of fonts, and thus he is messing up articles such as Safed, Hadera, Holon, Afula, Arad, Israel and many others defacing them and making them unreadable on the web. He is going to DESTROY the normal usage of Wikipedia's Hebrew transliterations to satisfy his own needs without there being any consensus. Common usages are being thrown out in favor of obscure and pedantic academic usages familiar to only a handful of unkown academics. He should be called upon to stop BEFORE he rushes to do further damage without any consensus being reached. All his changes should therefore be reverted. See all his recent contributions via: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gilgamesh I thank you for your interest, and urge all readers here to act. IZAK 03:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew naming conventions

At the present time there is a serious discussion taking place, aiming at some consensus that will result in "official" Wikipedia guidelines about how Hebrew should be used and written in Wikipedia articles. Because of your past or ongoing interest in these type of articles with Hebrew words in them, your attention is called to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Hebrew) [1] TO MAKE YOUR VIEWS KNOWN AND TO ADD TO THE DISCUSSION BEFORE THE "DOORS ARE SHUT" PLEASE SEE THE RELATED DISCUSSION PAGE AT Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew) [2] Thank you! IZAK 03:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Florida population updates

Hi, my apologies for not responding back as quickly as I should (it's been a tough two weeks for me), but thanks for the edit tip about the brackets. I didn't think about it until I recently saw your example. Thanks for the compliment and for the tip about the brackets! --Moreau36; 359, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Anus language

Re: Fast food wars

I'm sorry that I didn't contact you first about this article. It semed to me to be a hoax, & I have listed it at Articles for Deletion. Do you have any proof that this movie (or computer game) actually existed? I couldn't find any listing of it nor its cast on IMDB. -- llywrch 23:03, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was just worried that you knew something that I didn't, & now I would need to fight against this article's deletion when I could be spending time on something more useful. And in response to your comment about "six degrees of wikipedia", if you look (at the moment) at the top of my Talk page, Asbestos offered me a link to Six degrees of Wikipedia at Kate's Tools. I guess I ought to update my user page & mention that. -- llywrch 03:22, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ecstatic

AFD? Why not just change it to a relink? Or speedy it.

Prodegotalk 01:08, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary def is not actually a criteria for speedy deletion, although sometimes admins will certainly do so anyway. As for relinking, if you've got any ideas as to where to relink, feel free cause I certainly don't have any ideas off the top of my head. --Bachrach44 01:35, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moshe Dwek

I've read over some of the Hebrew articles provided by the author of the Moshe Dwek article, and they do seem to confirm the contents of the article. I've been trying to find an English source and coming up short. See my full comment on the AFD page. --Bachrach44 00:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I did see your comments there, and I definitely appreciate your efforts. I'm going to withdraw my nomination and suggest that someone speedy keep the article. Thanks. → Ξxtreme Unction {yakłblah} 00:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your work clearing up the building pages. I may have gone a little overboard --Ctrl buildtalk 03:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC) (I have to fix my sig)[reply]

G'town pictures

I think a shot of the main intersection at M & Wisconsin would be ideal for the Georgetown, Washington, D.C. article. Try to include that bank on the corner with the gold dome. Such a picture might also be useful for M Street (Washington, DC). Thanks. --דוד ♣ D Monack 19:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Debate

Bachrach44,

Been a while since I visited Wikipedia. And when I got back, the article "Ethionx Studios" is deleted. One of the reasons were "That, combined with the huge number of duplicates on google (309 hits but only 8 displayed) suggests that this is advertising."

The above reason is VERY untrue. If you tell Google to repeat the search with the omitted results included, you can see that the rest of the results are BLOG entries, and I see no reason why should that be rendered as a valid reason for deletion of my page and considered as "ADVERTISING" my website.

Next, the reason, "Its notability is not established though. It is a bit confusing to me what the hell it is." Before the site was rebuilt again, the site features latest news article ranging from the computing field to game reviews.

"Their official website should have been included in the article. It says on the website, though, that it was written by Raven Ryan, the same guy who first contributed to the article." My website IS in the article, unless someone edited it out. And yes, I wrote it.

"Non-notable." Please do enlighten me who starts out big.

If you still do think that you want to leave the article as deleted, it's alright with me. But the very first thing you should do before you delete my article is to inform me. Whatever the policy or disclaimer of Wikipedia stands at, this is still manners.

Raven Ryan 08:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I responded here --Bachrach44 02:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

redirects

Just as a heads up, when making a redirect page, don't have a space between the character # and the word REDIRECT. For example:

#REDIRECT [[target]] <-- good
# REDIRECT [[target]] <--- bad --Bachrach44 19:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oopsie. Thanks! (Geez, one would think I've been doing this enough!) -- Tenebrae 19:32, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

reply: FerRacimo

Hi Bachrach44! Thank you for the information, I think it will truly come in handy. Pleased to talk to you. FerRacimo

Human-based units of measure

Yeah, I thought it would be interesting to list all units of measure based on the charcteristics of humans ex. 1 foot is supposed to be the length of an average human foot, the decibel is tied to human hearing, etc Your help is appreciated.

Re:welcome

Thanks for the welcome. After about a month I was begining to think no one ever visted the pages I edit. --Zytsef 18:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Zobole

Why do you feel the information needs verifying? Zobole is a very well-known artist in Wales and there is plenty of info about him on the web. Deb 18:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I replied here --אריאל יהודה

Rejection of Tanakh

Hi: Please see and vote at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 December 12#Category:Hebrew Bible at [4] where it is being suggested that the word "Tanakh" is "not neutral", and I am trying to explain to them that it is in keeping with NPOV to convey the way Judaism uses certain terms to describe the Hebrew Bible/Tanakh. Thanks. IZAK 21:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I have read the comments and weighed in appropriately. --אריאל יהודה 03:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

Thanks for the welcome message. If you wouldn't mind taking a look at the page I have been working on and telling me how I am doing, I would appreciate it - the page is Bidding fee scheme. Also, is it proper to leave these messages at the bottom of the talk page, or is descending prefered? —Preceding unsigned comment added by pbone (talk • contribs)

I replied here --אריאל יהודה
Thanks for the reply. I have put most of the suggestions into the article. I actually wasn't that familiar myself with these schemes, and they seem quite rare compared to other kinds of internet schemes. Since most of the information is first hand observations (it is not the kind of thing that Brittanica would list), I didn't know if there was a name for these auctions. Late in my research for the article, I came across another article that deals with the auctions under another name, Unique bid auction. I think the proper wikipedia thing would be to merge them, but I don't know how merges work. What would you do? --PB1 01:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SQWM

What seems to be the problem? This is a band that I like and I think that more people would as well, also I'd like to know what other people can say about the band. Daviddec 03:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

reply is here

Finally. Someone who can give me a good reason that SQWM should not be taking up precious space on the servers. I appreciate your reply, past admins told me that they would simply be ignoring me on this topic. One conversation between him and I-

Why would expounding on the article now not be allowed? If there was a problem and it could be fixed, why won't the ability to fix it be hindered? You still have not answered my first questions about you labeling the article nonsense. And just because my name is the same as one of the band members does not mean I am being vain. It could be a coincedence. I think that its protection now is irresponsible wiki etiquette. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Daviddec (talk • contribs) 

   Please. No amount of "expounding" will fix an article on a subject so completely non-notable.

Tagged as nonsense, should have been expanded A7. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 03:04, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

To me this 'please' seems very unprofessional and lacks any weight behind his argument. I still think that it shouldn't be a big deal if we have the article up or not, there is so much other bull shit on wiki that goes with being the modern hitchhiker's guide to the earth. I found some intresting problems on your talk page that I had never thought of before- the pro palestine or judaic slants of some articles is something that we'll see how it works out. though, sadly, probably not. Take care. Maybe SQWM will be up here one day. Thanks

New vote for pro-Tanakh

Hi: Please see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Speedy [5] for ANOTHER vote to rename the following. Thank you, IZAK 16:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hebrew Bible/Tanakh --> Category:Tanakh
Category:Hebrew Bible/Tanakh events --> Category:Tanakh events
Category:Hebrew Bible/Tanakh people --> Category:Tanakh people
Category:Hebrew Bible/Tanakh places --> Category:Tanakh places
Category:Hebrew Bible/Tanakh prophets --> Category:Tanakh prophets
Category:Hebrew Bible/Tanakh-related stubs --> Category:Tanakh stubs
Category:Jewish texts/Ketuvim --> Category:Ketuvim
Category:Jewish texts/Nevi'im --> Category:Nevi'im

New vote for Tanakh moved

You can find the NEW vote to rename Category:Hebrew Bible/Tanakh --> Category:Tanakh etc. now located at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Hebrew Bible/Tanakh [6] Thanks again. IZAK 17:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oy vey

Would you consider the redirect I suggested (after you edited) on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oy vey -- Jmabel | Talk 03:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Thank you for supporting my recent bid for adminship, which passed 64-2. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 07:14, Dec. 17, 2005

vanity page

simple accident, i am still trying to get the hang of editing, ect. cheers. urban909


Thanks for the welcome

I know this is the second instance of this title here, but I'm new and not sure of all the protocols yet, at any rate I appreciate the info. Drn8 20:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hamburger

I see you're working on Binyamin Shlomo Hamburger. Good luck! I only have the introduction to his Shorshei Minhagei Ashkenaz, with which I strongly sympathise, but lack the pecunia to get the three (?or four) volumes that he has written on the subject. What are you planning to use as your source material? JFW | T@lk 23:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is remarkable that people who have managed to stay out of controversy don't get their name into Google. Hamburger is a world expert in synagogue textiles yet Google is woefully silent. Using the spelling you prefer on Google actually yields your working page[7]! It seems volume IV of SMA is out[8]. We'll need to base ourselves on book reviews in English-language publications to get a picture of Rav Hamburger. PS Have you seen Rav Shimon Schwab, mostly written by yours truly, and minhag (which I started)? JFW | T@lk 08:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This page will fascinate you. JFW | T@lk 08:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
He also wrote meshichei sheker, which has been translated into French[9]. JFW | T@lk 08:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ase500

Ase500 is a user page, not a "test page", to which I added the text link "What goes here?" in an effort to encourage users editing a particular set of articles to distinguish themselves from other users being accused of being sockpuppets. If this is not the way to go about it, can you recommend another way? - CobaltBlueTony 15:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

response --אריאל יהודה


Hey

Yea I tried finding stuff on glasmine 43 on the net but there isn't a lot there. If you could, and since you probably know the community better than me, could you find a wikipedia war expert of someone to work on that. I am sort of interest to seeing what exactly that thing is. Arizonabass 03:08, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I am the writer of Thou shalt not give Hitler posthumous victories. I wrote it yesterday and a new page patroller seemed to have thought my first save could not grow beyond a stub. I respect your articulate opinion.

Given the nature of the subject - at the nexus of several highly sensitive issues - I have done my best to treat the subject with the balance, discretion, and sensitivity that it deserves. A first attempt can hardly be perfect and circumstances exposed this work to scrutiny before it was ready.

Would you be willing to offer constructive criticism? I understand the potential to give offense and I assure you it was unintentional. In defense of the article I would like to say that it conveys positive messages outside the Jewish community: it offers a powerful reason to Christians against attempts at converting Jews, it conveys the importance of supporting Israel, it serves as a rebuke against anti-Semitism, and it raises awareness of the Holocaust. These are worthy reasons to keep the article if your serious concerns can be addressed - and I am optimistic that they can.

Would you join me in making this a better article? Respectfully, Durova 05:08, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

I notice that you've created the Eldridge Street Synagogue article. I was wondering what would be your opinion of 770 Eastern Parkway, one of my personal little handiworks. In addition, I was wondering if Yair Chaim Bacharach and Burt are related. Daykart 04:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit count link on your user page is broken. Cheers. 67.183.154.41 16:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it appears that Interiot's tool is dead. Alas. --Bachrach44 23:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

I was planning to edit that page into a redirect, but you got their first. You're too quick; I had never done a redirect and wanted to kind of try it out. But don't worry; I was still able to add Template:R_from_alternate_name. Thanks! —James S. 03:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the violin tools link. By example, I learn. :-) Just plain Bill 15:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Georgetown photo

I really like your picture of the bank at Wisconsin & M. I've added the photo to Wisconsin Avenue. --דוד ♣ D Monack 20:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:AWB

I've added you to the list. Cheers. enochlau (talk) 00:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


deviantART

I think its probably the nickname which is notable. the nickname receives more google hits than the real name -- Astrokey44|talk 02:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

horses and donkeys

Re: your question on the commons, I don't know for sure. The picture was on flickr and I added it through the flickrlickr project. So your best bet is to find someone who knows animals well to try to distinguish them. Matt 12:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not nonsense

You flagged our entry on Me Og. No, this is not nonsense. We are new to Wikipedia, but we have evidence from cave paintings as early alphabets about inventions, mathematics, and early writing that is substantial. Give us a chance to write our article, complete with citations before you wipe it out. Thank you. Look, for example, at history of mathematics, for evidence of bone calendars and calculators base thirty, established by women who recorded their cycles. We have taught our students about Og (Me Og) and Ugga, and it is important information.

subst

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. 


howcheng  {chat} 07:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Bachrach44, thank you very much for supporting me during my recent RfA campaign! Thanks to you, I am now an admin. Please drop by if you need anything - I'll be glad to help you. Once again, thanks! --M@thwiz2020 22:57, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if someone else has sent this your way or not, but a few of us have been using AWB for bad link repair. The most common problem we see is that people frequently put double brackets around an external link. We've been using the following regexp for find/replace. If you wanted to include it in the general cleanup part of the AWB, I'm sure people would find it useful. 

 find: \[\[http:\/\/(.*)\]\]
 replace: [http://$1]

take care. --Bachrach44 03:15, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This feature was added last weekend - versions 1.6.3 and up now include bad link repair, including fixing uneven bracketing, replacing pipes with spaces in external links, etc. All you have to do is check the "general fixes" box on the AWB. If the feature doesn't seem to be working or if you want a more detailed explanation of everything that it does, just ask me.--M@thwiz2020 20:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VfD: Jews and non-Jews

Hello Bachrach: Please see and VOTE at two important Vote/s for Deletion (VfD): at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary persecution of non-Jews by Jews and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancient persecution of non-Jews by Jews. Best wishes and Shabbat Shalom! IZAK 07:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question from Jimbo

Hi! I'm trying to do what I can to help RC Patrollers feel empowered to do a better job, and so as a part of that I'm asking people about particular edits to try to better understand why people do the things they do, and why they don't do other things. :-)

This edit caught my attention after we got a quite reasonable complaint from the subject of the article. Why did you not simply speedy delete the article, rather than add the 'wikify' and 'verify' templates?--Jimbo Wales 20:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bible verses and chapters on Wikipedia

Hi Bachrach: Shavua Tov ! It is important that you see the following proposed Wikipedia policy pages and their discussion pages at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Verses of 1 Kings 4 and 5 AND Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Whole bible chapter text. Thanks for giving this matter your serious attention before discussion is closed and the "policy" is set. IZAK 09:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...has been updated. Thank you for reminding me to do so. -- Beland 09:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

halakha or Halakha

My main intention with the changes I made was to change halacha to halakha not to capticlize Halakha. I don't have such strong opinions on the matter but I think Halakha is a proper noun and hence it should be capitalized. I think we should bring to up on Wikipedia:WikiProject Judaism and see what the consensus is. Jon513 17:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

opinion requested

Please add your opinion on merging with regard to these two articles:

Yad_Sara | Bezalel Academy

Thanks --Shuki 22:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two House Movement

I note that you marked that article as "disputed", but didn't put anything on the talk page. I've put notes on the talk page indicating that the article needs some context. I gather that this is some sort of theological dispute, but I have no idea what it's about. It has 327 hits in Google, but the titles are things like "MJAA Inroads of The Hebrew Roots Fringe". It's coming across as a flame war. I'm tempted to mark the whole thing for deletion as non-notable. --John Nagle 06:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

test

hi.. this is a test message. did u receive it?