|
User talk:Pedro thy master/Archive 2
Status: Online
Family Guy copyeditWhen I went to the page, there was already a notice that it had been copyedited, so I didn't do anything. Does it need to be done again? MSJapan (talk) 18:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC) Re:FLCI'll get to it in a bit. The Flash {talk} 21:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I've left some comments. The Flash {talk} 23:04, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS October NewsletterThe October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC) FG3Actually, I won't be able to help much. I'm starting a 2nd job, so 2 of them will keep me busy. I'm just gonna be doing minor editors, and finish up my FAC, no more no GAs for right now. CTJF83 chat 06:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
QuickHey Pedro, hope you're doing well. I just took a quick look at the FLC you're working on, and thought I'd drop a couple notes:
All in all I think it looks pretty good - keep me posted and I'll follow along on it all. I'm not a regular reviewer on featured content or anything, so I'm very flattered that you'd ask my opinion on this. Something I can learn here, so I enjoy looking things over and seeing how they progress. Cheers. — Ched : ? 19:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC) Quick helpHey, could you address User:Ophois's recent request to expand the reception section of the Family Guy (season 5) article? You seem to be good at finding reviews and reception pieces to add to the article. Gage (talk) 20:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC) WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll CallFamily Guy FLCI would, but I'm not really familiar with that sort of list. I commented on the other one because I'm a fan of Family Guy and noticed it had some issues that needed resolving. Ωphois 23:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: Family GuySorry, but between my current WikiProjects and real-life stuff, I don't think I have the time to help out with a Family Guy FA. I don't really know much about the show anyway. Best of luck though! — Hunter Kahn (c) 00:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Family Guy FLCThe Rambling Man hasn't struck his oppose yet. The FL Directors won't promote a list if a regular reviewer has a standing oppose. Geraldk (talk) 12:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC) FIFA WikiprojectHi there. the Wikiproject for FIFA hs been approved. Feel free to sign up and/or help me fix the Wikiproject page. Secret Saturdays (talk) 23:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC) It's not uncommon for it to happen. If the director/delegate feels that there is no way the article can pass within 10 days they will close it. I'm assuming my statement had something to do with it as well. -- Scorpion0422 00:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Well, I think it was more because I was the leading contributor and I felt it wasn't quite ready. A couple quick comments, I think the "Character" section could use some expanding, same with the "reception" section. It would also be nice to see a "cultural influence" similar to the one in Bart and Homer's pages. -- Scorpion0422 00:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC) It's a start, but I'd like to see more added. I noticed a number of spelling errors in there as well. -- Scorpion0422 01:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC) I don't really have a lot of time at the moment. Could I take a look at it on the weekend? In the meantime, try asking Theleftorium or Gran2 for help. Also, might I suggest that you start spell checking your edits, as I've noticed that you do tend to make a number of spelling errors. For example, the "cultural influences" section in your sandbox contains a number of spelling and grammatical errors (ie. "reconiced", "enviornmentaly", "wher") -- Scorpion0422 02:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC) She has appeared in a few specials, I believe she was in the American Idol special with the rest of the family a while back. -- Scorpion0422 01:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC) Like I said, I don't have a lot of time to look up stuff for you right now. Just do google searches and such. Try looking up Yeardley Smith's credits on IMDB, and it might give you some ideas for stuff that Lisa appeared in. Then, try to find a reliable reference for it. -- Scorpion0422 02:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC) Family Guy copyeditI don't know for the life of me how I was able to miss your request for so long. Sure, I'll take a look a the Family Guy article. Sorry again for the delayed response. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Pedro; can you please check out the FAC on the article and weigh in on the ongoing comments on sourcing? SandyGeorgia has requested the supported reviewers comment on the discussion. Thanks, The Flash {talk} 21:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
family guy listIt makes more sense to have the episode list connected to the season pages. That way all the info remains the same. More and more tv shows are getting season pages and linking the pages is an expanding practice. There is nothing that says a featured list can't be in this format, and it would make more sense for a feature list to have that format as it will keep all the information the same and easily fixable in one place as opposed to having to fix one thing multiple times because the same info appears on multiple pages. Anyways when i have some time i'll change it back or you can do it yourself...It also elps reduce vandalism as less pages would have to be watched since there is only one central location to change all the info. Grande13 (talk) 20:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Bottom line: if you want to make the family guy pages the most accurate and functional pages possible this is the option. no reason to use inferior method which causes double work of entering the same info twice. its as simple as thatGrande13 (talk) 20:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
there isnt much different between this
Season Test: 1
and this Season Test: 2
and if we use the version with the directors in it then the pages can be connected and have the benefit of always being the same as each other which is what we want Grande13 (talk) 20:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Wii-fit-plus2.jpg) Thanks for uploading File:Wii-fit-plus2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:46, 18 November 2009 (UTC) Re:LisaI realise it's frustrating, but I only have a bit of time each night, and I use that time to check through my watch list and update articles. I wish I ahd more time as there are a bunch of projects I'd like to work on. I'll try to take a look through your sandbox in a bit. -- Scorpion0422 00:25, 26 November 2009 (UTC) I took a quick look through, and you've added some good stuff. I noticed that the influence section tends to repeat a lot of stuff from other sections. I would like there to be such a section, but it should if there isn't enough content for it to work as a stand-alone section, then I don't know if there is a need for it. -- Scorpion0422 00:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC) It's essential that you get a good copyeditor to look over the article. Cirt and Dabomb87 are both great reviewers. Scartol is an excellent copyeditor who has worked on Simpsons articles in the past for us, though he may not have time for it. -- Scorpion0422 00:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC) In two weeks the semester will be over and I'll be on Christmas vacation. I don't know if you want to wait that long, but at that point I can help you a lot more than I can now. -- Scorpion0422 00:46, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Talkback Message added 03:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Peter GriffinHi again, I happen to watch the Peter Griffin article and noticed your edits, I'm sorry but they're not very good. You need to cite each sentence, use italics for tv shows, films and books and use quotation marks for song titles and episode titles. You expanded the reception section with things mostly from IGN, which only pass-on mention the character; my advice is to stick to direct criticisms or positive responses. Personality should be a seperate section. I have to go now, I'll finish this later. (I don't meen to be mean).--Music26/11 15:52, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Re:Check itWell, it could definitely use a copyedit, first off. The reception section (which I believe is the most controversial one from the complaints) does stray from Peter himself, but for the most part it's fine. Might want to remove the stuff about awards the series got that have actually nothing to do with him. Also might be good to mention the (I think) three or so awards Seth has been nominated for for voicing Peter. You also need to italicize movies and books, and put quotes around episodes. That's all. Oh, and yes, I have access to one of the Phineas and Ferb DVDs, why? Cheers, The Flash {talk} 04:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Pedro. Yesterday, I removed the GAN Template in its Talk Page and removed it from Wikipedia:Good article nominations. Why, you ask? In case you haven't seen the page lately, it is now merged into Family Guy. Just wanna let you know that. GamerPro64 (talk) 07:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Re: Road to GermanyUm, I haven't looked at the article, looks like it was reviewed by someone else. Wizardman 22:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC) FAC review notePlease see this (I've noticed this twice now, also at Dan Povenmire. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC) I reviewed Blue Harvest (Family Guy)Just as an FYI. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Road to GermanyThe article Road to Germany you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold TalkbackMessage added 01:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Re:fAVORI'll try getting to it whenever I can. :) The Flash {talk} 02:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Regarding Untitled Griffin Family HistoryYou are the nominator of the above stated article, so I am informing you that there is currently a {{citation needed}} tag which needs to be addressed. Cleanup tags are not part of the good article criteria and can even warrant quick-fail on a good article review. I would hate to see a great amount of work gone waste, just because of one tag. As well, you should address the issue as soon as possible as the article is now on the Good Article Backlog and will be reviewed very shortly. warrior4321 06:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC) Talk archiveshey Pedro .. I am really sorry it took so long to get back to you on your question about archiving talk pages. It would take so long to explain it all .. so I just archived your talk and put a link at the top of the page. Basically, all you have to do is put a slash after your url when you're at your talk page, and call it "Archive 1" ... or 2 or 4 depending on where you are. I archived everything up until November for you .. but you can just revert if you want. you can read about how to do this at WP:ARCHIVE and it will explain it all. There is a way to set things up to do it automatically, but I don't do that myself. Personally I prefer to archive things manually - but if you want to set things up automatically - you can do that. One guy I know that's familiar with how to do that (and he's a really great guy) is User:Huntster. I hope I didn't make you mad by just archiving your talk page, and I will gladly put it all back if you want - but it was easier to just do it than to try to explain it all. Read up on the WP:ARCHIVE page, and if you have any questions, I'll try to help. Let me know what you want me to do here. All my best .. — Ched : ? 05:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC) 2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup. It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:
If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges, iMatthew talk at 03:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC) Hi. I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. Kaguya-chan (talk) 18:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Peter Shin.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Peter Shin.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 19:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Wal uigi.jpgThanks for uploading File:Wal uigi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Dreamcast at Valued PicturesThe picture of the Dreamcast is currently a Valued Picture nominee so can you please review it as a favor? Please respond ASAP Secret Saturdays (talk to me) 03:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Swinter.pngThanks for uploading File:Swinter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Click23 (talk) 13:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Perfect Castaway
Family Guy GANsHi Pedro. I don't mean to be rude, but you really need to work more on your articles before you nominate them for GA. Peter's Got Woods and Perfect Castaway, for example, are far away from GA quality. I suggest you read through the Good article criteria more closely. Regards, Theleftorium 14:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 00:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Brian Griffin Pilot .jpgThanks for uploading File:Brian Griffin Pilot .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Theleftorium 09:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC) Re: do you knowI've never really done "copy editing", but I sometimes clean things up. Why do you ask? --HELLØ ŦHERE 16:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC) ?I don't understand what you mean. The article was wrtten so it was well sourced and comprehensive and had good prose. It was nominated and then it passed. That's it. Gran2 16:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:FGuyPeterRush.jpgThanks for uploading File:FGuyPeterRush.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGatalk 15:06, 14 December 2009 (UTC) Re:LisaYes, I am now on vacation. I'll try to start work on the article within the next few days. -- Scorpion0422 00:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Family GuyTwo reviews is not "constantly"... anyways, I've taken an interest in the Family Guy nominations because lately you've been nominating the articles WAY too early. I would recommend peer review and/or copy-editing before nominating. Ωphois 01:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for not helping out more. I'm more a fan of Venture Bros. and Beavis and Butthead. Have you seen previews for that private detective cartoon with the voice from the soccer coach on that other cartoons the name of which I can't remember. Happy Holidays. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC) From Bed to WorseCould you please voice your support on From Bed to Worse. Gage (talk) 03:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC) ResponceThanks, I have added my feedback. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyxaus (talk • contribs) 16:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Family Guy season 5 FLCI'll try to find time for reviewing it either later today or tomorrow. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 20:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC) Family Guy season 7I've improved Peter's Progress, Baby Not on Board and Three Kings. Tell me what you think and if they deserve B-class in WikiProject Family Guy. Pancake (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
The 2010 WikiCup begins tomorrow! Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC) Twilight PrincessSure. But contact Gary King as well, he edited that article as much as me. (and maybe TJ Spyke) igordebraga ≠ 21:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Check the previous FAC. Also, leave posts in the Talk pages of people who usually post in VG FACs and Peer Reviews to get some suggestions. And since you asked, no, I haven't played (though I've played 8 Zeldas, including the other one in the GameCube), because money doesn't grow on trees (you're Venezuelan, so I come from the neighbourhood where games are too damn expensive). igordebraga ≠ 00:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated List of non-English versions of Family Guy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-English versions of Family Guy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC) TBYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Family Guy controversy section inappropiate referenceHi theres a reference being misused in the controversy section of the family guy article. Please see the talk page, i'm not a registered user so can't make the changes needed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Family_Guy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.31.197 (talk) 10:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC) TalkbackMessage added 14:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC) I'm afraid I've failed the article. I have left a description of the issues on the review page, and I am contactable on my talk page with any questions. If, once you've dealt with the issues and have renominated, you want a quick review, feel free to message me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 23:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC) Simpsons GAWould you like to work on Homer Defined with me to complete season 3 drive? CTJF83 chat 03:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I've offered a review and some pointers to improvements I'm going to need to see before I can promote the article. I will be watching the page, but feel free to contact me on my talk page if I can be of any help/if you feel you have dealt with the issues raised. J Milburn (talk) 01:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Content WikiCup 2010 January newsletterWe are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC) Non Free Images in your User Space
Copying InformationHey there. Just so you know, when you're adding information to an article, you don't want to copy the source verbatim like you have done on The Legend of Zelda (2010 video game). Not only is it a form of plagiarism, it affects the flow of the article by stating points that are redundant, opinionated, or just plain un-encyclopedic. And be sure to cite your sources. Just wanted to let you know. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 20:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Pedro, I've started a GAN review for Peter Griffin. Please look over my comments and start to address the concerns I've raised, and I'll finish the review soon. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 05:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey Pedro. I've started a GAN review of I Dream of Jesus. There is still quite a bit that has to be done, so please take a look at the review page as soon as you can. — Hunter Kahn 01:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Pedro. I've been working on Rich Appel's page recently. It's basically done, but I was wondering if you knew of any more sources which talk about the work he did on Family Guy and American Dad. Especially a source saying he wrote "Family Gay" and The Cleveland Show pilot, and also saying which seasons he worked on FG and AD. Thanks, Gran2 14:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC) StrikingHey Pedro. I see you started striking my objections yourself at the I Dream of Jesus GAN. Please do not do that. Just respond to each line with two bullets underneath each comment, and I'll strike them when I'm satisfied the concern has been addressed. Some editors get really annoyed by that kind of thing. It should be up to the reviewer to strike the objections, not the person responding to the comments. I've checked and everything you struck is fine, so I'm OK with it, but just keep this in mind for the future. (Also, please note my response to you about some quote-cutting you did...) — Hunter Kahn 22:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC) Re: Ga helpSorry, but I don't have time these days. Try asking at WT:VG. Gary King (talk) 04:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC) GAN reviewsHey Pedro. It's been more than a week since I've reviewed I Dream of Jesus, Road to Rhode Island, and Not All Dogs Go to Heaven over at WP:GAN. I know you started to address items on the first one, but there are still a lot of outstanding issues that haven't been addressed, and the other two haven't been touched at all. Usually I only leave an article on hold for about a week. Are you planning to follow through on those improvements? Let me know right away. If I don't hear anything after a few days, I'll probably fail them, and encourage you to nominate them again after you've addressed those concerns down the road. Let me know either way! — Hunter Kahn 03:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
){kind=link}
