User talk:Pbritti/Archive 8

Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10→Archive 15


FYI

Hi Pbritti. FYI, I mentioned you here at WP:ARC. Cheers, gnu57 12:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

@Genericusername57: Huh. I was hoping I would be able to actually get that interaction discussed, especially after TNT tried to intimidate me in response to calling out one of the "cabal" editors a bit ago. Not sure how you stumbled on this, but glad I could get it down in writing somewhere. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Interested in helping to refresh WikiProject Christianity?

I'm new to serious editing, but I've been poking around WikiProject Christianity and wishing there were a slightly more active community over there. I'm pinging you because you seem to be one of the few who seems to be regularly checking in. Would you have any interest in working with me to refresh that project—clean up some of the old pages, revisit categories and subprojects, etc.? Is it even worth the time? Brian (talk) 13:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

@Bdhamilton: You're more than welcome to invite me to any discussion or article you like! I'm glad you're taking an active step in searching for a livening of those articles; keep me in the loop and I'll help as I can! ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Will do, thank you! I'm timid about making any changes on project pages because I don't yet know enough of the etiquette to be sure I'm not screwing things up. But I'll keep reading through WikiProject docs and making some piecemeal edits, and I'll ping you if there's something that needs a more experienced eye. Brian (talk) 16:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Editing to Mobil 1 The Grid

Hi, I work for this television show and have updated this page in accordance to our up to date information. Can I please ask that you stop retracting the information? Ashhart06 (talk) 18:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Mystery of Crowning

On 22 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mystery of Crowning, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Assyrian Christian couples drink dust from the tombs of martyrs and are crowned during their weddings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mystery of Crowning. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mystery of Crowning), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Hanānā

On 22 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hanānā, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Assyrian Christian couples drink dust from the tombs of martyrs and are crowned during their weddings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mystery of Crowning. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hanānā), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Colorado online meeting 11/15/2022

WikiProject
Colorado

WikiProject Colorado will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 15, 2022, at meet.google.com/yoe-aphc-wey. Anyone interested in Colorado articles, history, or photographs is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/Colorado/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Sthathicon

On 2 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sthathicon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the heads of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church and Jacobite Syrian Christian Church certify their bishops by giving them a sthathicon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sthathicon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sthathicon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Evans Memorial Chapel

On 4 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evans Memorial Chapel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Denver's oldest building continuously used for Protestant worship, the Evans Memorial Chapel, is now also used by Catholics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evans Memorial Chapel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Evans Memorial Chapel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

ordinary means more than diocesan bishop

CIC c. 134 says that the title ordinary applies to diocesan bishops as well as Vicars General, Episcopal Vicars, and major superiors. Saying he was the youngest ordinary would mean checking his age against all diocesan bishops, vicars general, and episcopal vicars, major superiors in the United States. If there's a possible way to do that then I would like to know, otherwise removing the info about Fr. Christopher Stanish is fine as long as it's clarified he was youngest Latin diocesan bishop in the united states upon his episcopal ordination not the youngest ordinary.

17:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC) 50.227.7.98 (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@50.227.7.98: While vicar-generals can be ordinaries (as can simple monsignors in certain circumstances), they are not always the ordinary (or, more specifically, the "local ordinary") of a territory. Fr. Stanish is subordinate to a living bishop who is still the ordinary of that diocese. Additionally, that article fails to identify 1.) Fr. Stanish as an ordinary, 2.) that he is/was the youngest ordinary in the US, and 3.) any association of fact between +Fernandes and Fr. Stanish. As such, I removed it from the article on all these grounds. If Fr. Stanish ends up meriting his own Wikipedia article, we can revisit issues 1 and 2. Issue 3 alone, as a WP:SYNTH matter, is enough to warrant the deletion of that information from the Fernandes article. Thanks for reaching out on my talk page and if you have lingering questions or disagreements, you are wholly welcome to continue putting them here! ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:32, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the info I appreciate! As I mentioned I have no way of proving #2 as that would entail checking a whole lot of positions in the US. #3 was perhaps to show how fleeting such a title can be. As for #1 what I was trying to point out previously is that the title of "local ordinary" can apply to any episcopal vicars and vicars general within a diocese as well as the diocesan bishop of that territory since they have de iure ordinary authority (cf. CIC (1983) cc. 134 & 475, 479). The cited article of his appointment as VG would thus prove this. But in any case, the phrasing you have now of ordinary bishop (or equally diocesan bishop) clarifies this. Sorry to be such a bother, thanks again :)
50.227.7.98 (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
@50.227.7.98: Yes! I had hoped that revision would be more agreeable to you! Glad we reached something of a consensus on that. Considering your apparent deftness in editing and courtesy in discussion, I would encourage you to consider making an account and joining Wikipedia:Wikiproject Catholicism. We always want more editor with a familiarity of canon law and knowledge of what sources to use! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
I don't know if I would have the time available to be a useful contributor but I'll consider it, thanks
50.227.7.98 (talk) 22:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

More socks

Hi Pbritti, what do you think of Varghese T Mathew and Jebimathew, who are active around the MOSC topic? They seem like meatpuppets in a parallel way to the Syro-Malabar ones. Perhaps great minds think alike? Elizium23 (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Sorry but I'll have to look tomorrow US time. I'll weigh in! ~ Pbritti (talk) 06:45, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
@Elizium23: I lean towards these being meatpuppets in a loose fashion; they make the same sorts of updates on episcopal consecrations and the like with a similar degree of latency from when those consecrations actually occur. Nothing to me speaks to them being socks or coordinated by the editors but there may be something spurring them to action. I've been checking the usual channels that editors in this topic get filtered in through but no obvious catalyst yet. I think there's enough to pass it forward to an admin, though. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Ascension lead request

Hi Pbritti, I wanted to reach out and see if you had any interest in the request I made on the Ascension article. It's a pretty simple request to update the article lead based on the changes that have been made over the last few months. Please let me know! ~~~~ CH at Ascension (talk) 14:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Customary (liturgy)

Hello! Your submission of Customary (liturgy) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew🐉(talk) 23:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Customary (liturgy)

On 5 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Customary (liturgy), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the precise details in medieval customaries have allowed historians to reconstruct since-lost buildings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Customary (liturgy). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Customary (liturgy)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evans Memorial Chapel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evans Memorial Chapel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 18:23, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

@Ganesha811: Swell! Thanks. I'll be available regularly for the next week, but do please ping for the fastest response! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Heinrich Reuss

LCI is a very weak video source! Never read about "Russian financing" or "three Russian individuals" in German press. For this extraordinary/strange claim we need a better source. 91.54.4.197 (talk) 20:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

@91.54.4.197: You need to give evidence to explain why LCI is an inferior source. As best I can tell, it is accepted under our reliable source standards and is itself sufficient for extraordinary claims. Information not appearing in other sources does not preclude it being true. Additionally, that source was restored for the purpose of restoring a broken citation left over when you initially deleted the Russian connection from the article. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback, LCI and TF1 are reliable sources. But in that video something is asserted ("Russian financing" or "three Russian individuals") that I have not read/heard anywhere else. I was flabbergasted and tried to verify it - I couldn't. Not in the German nor the French media (I am French living in Germany). Let's keep an eye on it. --91.54.4.197 (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I am glad someone has taken up the issue.--91.54.2.1 (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Eastern Catholic liturgy

Hello! Your submission of Eastern Catholic liturgy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 15:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Question re Reuss English/German

What's "the tag for that" you refer to? Rutsq (talk) 02:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@Rutsq: In Template:Cite web, there are two options to select a language (|language= and |lang=). Use those rather than a postscript, even though the language tag won't be visible. Also, since you reverted my warnings without appearing to actually reflect on them, I am again warning you to remember WP:SHOUTING and to avoid attempt even subtle WP:UNCIVIL. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
If the language tag isn't visible it doesn't help the reader (or editor) who is otherwise easily mislead by the German title, no? Rutsq (talk) 02:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
@Rutsq: That video is likely a violation of WP:PRIMARY in the manner it's being used so this whole discussion is moot but explanatory notes are often frowned upon. If you would like, a good place for that context-enhancing video would to be linking it in an "External links" section with a brief description of its contents. In this description you can add "in English". ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evans Memorial Chapel

The article Evans Memorial Chapel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Evans Memorial Chapel for comments about the article, and Talk:Evans Memorial Chapel/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 17:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

@Ganesha811: Wait wow! Thank you so much! This is my first GA and I'm over the moon about it. Thank you so much! Wow! ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)